.
.
US Envoy Writes of Israeli Threats
32 minutes ago
Wednesday, 21 December 2011
The Utter Insanity of Attacking Iran's Nuclear Sites
.
Sometimes the obvious needs stating.
If or, rather (it appears), when Iran's nuclear sites are attacked we know that the consequences will be dreadful for Iranians and probably everyone else on the planet. The consequences might easily also provide a horrible surprise for those who expect to profit from the global cataclysm that will almost certainly ensue.
But what of the initial attack itself?
There are three Iranian power-station reactors and six smaller research reactors
There are approximately 80 nuclear 'facilities' of one kind or another in Iran. Presumably, if one wants to destroy the Iranian capacity to create a nuclear bomb, not knowing where key technology is located, one would have to strike every single one of these sites.
This issue was explored in some depth in an article by Floyd Rudmin in 2008.
The utter insanity of carrying out such attacks should be immediately apparent. We have seen consequences of (supposedly) mere fires and a tsunami flood in Fukushima's reactors. A significant portion of Japan is unfit for human habitation. The Pacific ocean continues to be poisoned by leaks. A frightening increase in mutated births are being reported in the area around the plant.
Bunker-busting bombs, possibly with nuclear warheads hitting multiple Iranian reactors would send massive amounts of radiation into the upper atmosphere to fall God-knows-where, possibly anywhere in the northern hemisphere. Hundreds of farms in North Wales and Cumbria, areas that suffered some of the Chernobyl fallout in 1984, are still not allowed to sell their lamb for consumption. How much more serious might an all-out attack on Iranian nuclear facilities be?
An expectation is being created that this event will occur. Perhaps there is the hope that with the crippling sanctions now being organised by the delightful people at the UK Foreign Ministry (amongst others) and the various other trade restrictions being imposed on Iran, that the country will become so economically strangled that its government will become desperate and this combined with the thunder of western war drums will freak Iran, believing an attack to be inevitable, into making a first strike.
This is almost exactly the game played against Japan prior to WW2.
We are led by devils.......fiends.......degenerate Satanists........who care nothing for the well-being of the British, nor the American nor, most certainly, the Israeli people. If Iran is destroyed it is highly likely that Israel will be also. The citizens of all three countries have be misinformed, lied to, abused and, when needs be, murdered (see here and here) by the criminal gangsters that we call our governments.
We must get very noisy about this issue.
Also, as Floyd Rubin suggests, we would do well to pray.
.
Sometimes the obvious needs stating.
If or, rather (it appears), when Iran's nuclear sites are attacked we know that the consequences will be dreadful for Iranians and probably everyone else on the planet. The consequences might easily also provide a horrible surprise for those who expect to profit from the global cataclysm that will almost certainly ensue.
But what of the initial attack itself?
There are three Iranian power-station reactors and six smaller research reactors
There are approximately 80 nuclear 'facilities' of one kind or another in Iran. Presumably, if one wants to destroy the Iranian capacity to create a nuclear bomb, not knowing where key technology is located, one would have to strike every single one of these sites.
This issue was explored in some depth in an article by Floyd Rudmin in 2008.
The utter insanity of carrying out such attacks should be immediately apparent. We have seen consequences of (supposedly) mere fires and a tsunami flood in Fukushima's reactors. A significant portion of Japan is unfit for human habitation. The Pacific ocean continues to be poisoned by leaks. A frightening increase in mutated births are being reported in the area around the plant.
Bunker-busting bombs, possibly with nuclear warheads hitting multiple Iranian reactors would send massive amounts of radiation into the upper atmosphere to fall God-knows-where, possibly anywhere in the northern hemisphere. Hundreds of farms in North Wales and Cumbria, areas that suffered some of the Chernobyl fallout in 1984, are still not allowed to sell their lamb for consumption. How much more serious might an all-out attack on Iranian nuclear facilities be?
An expectation is being created that this event will occur. Perhaps there is the hope that with the crippling sanctions now being organised by the delightful people at the UK Foreign Ministry (amongst others) and the various other trade restrictions being imposed on Iran, that the country will become so economically strangled that its government will become desperate and this combined with the thunder of western war drums will freak Iran, believing an attack to be inevitable, into making a first strike.
This is almost exactly the game played against Japan prior to WW2.
We are led by devils.......fiends.......degenerate Satanists........who care nothing for the well-being of the British, nor the American nor, most certainly, the Israeli people. If Iran is destroyed it is highly likely that Israel will be also. The citizens of all three countries have be misinformed, lied to, abused and, when needs be, murdered (see here and here) by the criminal gangsters that we call our governments.
We must get very noisy about this issue.
Also, as Floyd Rubin suggests, we would do well to pray.
.
Saturday, 17 December 2011
Worried Cameron Demands Support From God
It is not often a news story raises a laugh but here's one that will surely contend for a comedy award.
Elsewhere Mr Cameron was quoted as saying the following:
Quite so, Mr. Cameron.........
........but how can an upsurge in moral indignation possibly benefit you?
Could it be that the touchy-feely think-tankers who are paid to zombify the masses and infect our collective mind with fraudulent double-think Frankfurt School rubbish are detecting a problem?...........just such an upsurge in moral outrage as Mr Cameron describes? Could it be that this sense of outrage is directed primarily against people like himself? Are the masses beginning to realise (as Robert Fisk powerfully stated yesterday) that the financiers, the bankers, are our real government and that the likes of Mr Cameron serve their interests and not ours? ........that we are represented by a fraudsters.........bankers' whores..........agents of international finance. People who have been bought and paid for........more often than not with created-out-of-nothing Jewish money. Could it be that Mr Cameron, in the usual cunning establishment manner of controlling opposition, is trying to co-opt this resentment against his government and the banks as though he too is an outraged critic.......as though none of this has anything to do with him?
It won't work Mr Cameron. Even if the established churches, who have already betrayed every principle they are supposed to stand for, rally to your cause it will not revive your moral standing. These churches have had nothing to say about the great lies that have so befouled our new century. The Christian churches have been Judaised. The few churchmen that speak out have been persecuted, denounced, silenced.....even by their own. Mr Cameron, if you want a great moral regeneration, do not demand that Christ's followers support you, but rather follow Christ yourself. Announce an end to usury (giggle). Drive the moneychangers from our temple. For once and for all (guffaw). In the meantime tax speculative trading in derivatives, currencies and bonds (you started the comedy Mr C). Tell the truth about international terrorism. .......that 9/11 and 7/7 were carried out by our side so that people like you could implement your masters' wishes under the pretext of self-defence in order to attack and occupy resource-rich countries (helpless laughter). ......that the only principle at work in all your initiatives (including, in this case the appeal to Christianity) is 'divide and rule' (a tear now, is this still funny?). ......surely anyone seeing gangster Leon Panetta arrive in Libya today will also recognise the truth that is staring them in the face. Libyan 'assets' are being released into the hands of the 'National Transitional Council'. Everyone knows these people as the same people we used to call "Al Qaeda". We have handed the country over to religious extremists. We no longer call these particular members of Al Qaeda 'terrorists'. The deal is this. We give you Libya. You give our corporations Libyan oil money in the form of reconstruction contracts to rebuild the cities we have recently bombed to smithereens. All that matters is the money. 'Divide and Rule'. Control of the resources. Will Christians support you in your schemes Mr Cameron......? ........not real ones...... .........if they understand anything at all about this world.......or, for that matter, about God's will as revealed through the teachings of Jesus Christ.
Elsewhere Mr Cameron was quoted as saying the following:
"Whether you look at the riots last summer, the financial crash and the expenses scandal, or the ongoing terrorist threat from Islamist extremists around the world, one thing is clear: moral neutrality or passive tolerance just isn't going to cut it anymore."
Quite so, Mr. Cameron.........
........but how can an upsurge in moral indignation possibly benefit you?
Could it be that the touchy-feely think-tankers who are paid to zombify the masses and infect our collective mind with fraudulent double-think Frankfurt School rubbish are detecting a problem?...........just such an upsurge in moral outrage as Mr Cameron describes? Could it be that this sense of outrage is directed primarily against people like himself? Are the masses beginning to realise (as Robert Fisk powerfully stated yesterday) that the financiers, the bankers, are our real government and that the likes of Mr Cameron serve their interests and not ours? ........that we are represented by a fraudsters.........bankers' whores..........agents of international finance. People who have been bought and paid for........more often than not with created-out-of-nothing Jewish money. Could it be that Mr Cameron, in the usual cunning establishment manner of controlling opposition, is trying to co-opt this resentment against his government and the banks as though he too is an outraged critic.......as though none of this has anything to do with him?
It won't work Mr Cameron. Even if the established churches, who have already betrayed every principle they are supposed to stand for, rally to your cause it will not revive your moral standing. These churches have had nothing to say about the great lies that have so befouled our new century. The Christian churches have been Judaised. The few churchmen that speak out have been persecuted, denounced, silenced.....even by their own. Mr Cameron, if you want a great moral regeneration, do not demand that Christ's followers support you, but rather follow Christ yourself. Announce an end to usury (giggle). Drive the moneychangers from our temple. For once and for all (guffaw). In the meantime tax speculative trading in derivatives, currencies and bonds (you started the comedy Mr C). Tell the truth about international terrorism. .......that 9/11 and 7/7 were carried out by our side so that people like you could implement your masters' wishes under the pretext of self-defence in order to attack and occupy resource-rich countries (helpless laughter). ......that the only principle at work in all your initiatives (including, in this case the appeal to Christianity) is 'divide and rule' (a tear now, is this still funny?). ......surely anyone seeing gangster Leon Panetta arrive in Libya today will also recognise the truth that is staring them in the face. Libyan 'assets' are being released into the hands of the 'National Transitional Council'. Everyone knows these people as the same people we used to call "Al Qaeda". We have handed the country over to religious extremists. We no longer call these particular members of Al Qaeda 'terrorists'. The deal is this. We give you Libya. You give our corporations Libyan oil money in the form of reconstruction contracts to rebuild the cities we have recently bombed to smithereens. All that matters is the money. 'Divide and Rule'. Control of the resources. Will Christians support you in your schemes Mr Cameron......? ........not real ones...... .........if they understand anything at all about this world.......or, for that matter, about God's will as revealed through the teachings of Jesus Christ.
Monday, 31 October 2011
Wall St. and other "Occupy" Protests Should Re-Brand as "Anti-Oligarchy"
.
Some of the biggest men in the United States are afraid of something. They know there is a power somewhere, so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it. – President Woodrow Wilson
The "Occupy" protests and other demonstrations across the US and Europe are reported as being "anti-capitalist", "anti-banker", "anti-EU" or simply "anti-government".
But these labels will just not do.
The oligarchs who bring us our successive financial crises and wars will be getting rid of capitalism pretty soon.
Unfortunately they have no intention of disappearing with it.
We know that the entire financial system is going to collapse in fairly short order.
It must.
The 'more-debt' solution to irresolvable debt problems is a stalling strategy and everybody knows it.
A real solution to the nightmare that the financial oligarchs have created for us would end their system, so that ain't going to happen.......just yet.
First we are going to endure crises like we have never seen before.
Currencies will collapse.
There will be a major and very terrible war, a primary purpose of which will be to make survivors so desperate that they will be glad to accept anything on offer that delivers peace.
When it is over capitalism will go.......but the same people will remain in charge.
Therefore there is little point in branding oneself an 'anti-capitalist' (because Messrs. Rothschild and Rockefeller will soon be making common cause with you)
When the time comes we will be expected not to notice that the new, much better, much fairer system on offer will continue to be run by the same banking oligarchy that caused all the problems and nearly destroyed planet earth in the first place.
This trajectory is well laid out by Richard North in a recent article here.
We can expect a new Godless tyranny. A 'humanitarian' tyranny.
So let us be clear:
The system we call 'democracy' is really government by agents representing the interests of a financial oligarchy.
'Capitalism' is government by oligarchy.
(Wall-Street funded) Soviet 'Communism' was government by a tyrannical oligarchy.
All these disastrous systems were disasters because they were structurally designed to represented the interests of a ruling elite rather than the genuine interests of ordinary people.
So,
WHEN THE NEXT OLIGARCHICAL SYSTEM IS OFFERED TO US, ALL HUMANITY MUST RECOGNISE IT FOR WHAT IT IS AND REJECT IT.
TOTALLY.
What protesters need to set their minds and hearts against is the continuing dominating influence of a financial juggernaut that is, at its core, led by a small elite of extraordinarily powerful, corrupt and self-serving oligarchs.
Think it through, be clear about this and explain to everybody you meet.
Our system is not democratic, it is oligarchical and.....
WE ARE, FIRST AND FOREMOST, ANTI-OLIGARCHY.
Film on Oligarchy:
Part Two of this video here.
.
Some of the biggest men in the United States are afraid of something. They know there is a power somewhere, so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it. – President Woodrow Wilson
The "Occupy" protests and other demonstrations across the US and Europe are reported as being "anti-capitalist", "anti-banker", "anti-EU" or simply "anti-government".
But these labels will just not do.
The oligarchs who bring us our successive financial crises and wars will be getting rid of capitalism pretty soon.
Unfortunately they have no intention of disappearing with it.
We know that the entire financial system is going to collapse in fairly short order.
It must.
The 'more-debt' solution to irresolvable debt problems is a stalling strategy and everybody knows it.
A real solution to the nightmare that the financial oligarchs have created for us would end their system, so that ain't going to happen.......just yet.
First we are going to endure crises like we have never seen before.
Currencies will collapse.
There will be a major and very terrible war, a primary purpose of which will be to make survivors so desperate that they will be glad to accept anything on offer that delivers peace.
When it is over capitalism will go.......but the same people will remain in charge.
Therefore there is little point in branding oneself an 'anti-capitalist' (because Messrs. Rothschild and Rockefeller will soon be making common cause with you)
When the time comes we will be expected not to notice that the new, much better, much fairer system on offer will continue to be run by the same banking oligarchy that caused all the problems and nearly destroyed planet earth in the first place.
This trajectory is well laid out by Richard North in a recent article here.
We can expect a new Godless tyranny. A 'humanitarian' tyranny.
So let us be clear:
The system we call 'democracy' is really government by agents representing the interests of a financial oligarchy.
'Capitalism' is government by oligarchy.
(Wall-Street funded) Soviet 'Communism' was government by a tyrannical oligarchy.
All these disastrous systems were disasters because they were structurally designed to represented the interests of a ruling elite rather than the genuine interests of ordinary people.
So,
WHEN THE NEXT OLIGARCHICAL SYSTEM IS OFFERED TO US, ALL HUMANITY MUST RECOGNISE IT FOR WHAT IT IS AND REJECT IT.
TOTALLY.
What protesters need to set their minds and hearts against is the continuing dominating influence of a financial juggernaut that is, at its core, led by a small elite of extraordinarily powerful, corrupt and self-serving oligarchs.
Think it through, be clear about this and explain to everybody you meet.
Our system is not democratic, it is oligarchical and.....
WE ARE, FIRST AND FOREMOST, ANTI-OLIGARCHY.
Film on Oligarchy:
Part Two of this video here.
.
Sunday, 23 October 2011
Alex Jones, Demos and Controlled Demolition
.
Yesterday Alex Jones interviewed Demos operative Jamie Bartlett on his nightly show. Bartlett's job description on the Demos website goes as follows:
Jamie is Head of the Violence and Extremism Programme. His primary research interests lie in terrorism, radicalisation and extremism, conspiracy theories and integration policy.
He is a familiar figure to UK 9/11 activists. He came, along with Demos buddy Carl Miller, to speak to us at Goldsmith College last year. The same pair addressed the Conway Hall 'Conspiracy Theory Conference' a couple of months ago.
At the Goldsmith's event, during a heated exchange, Miller asked the assembled 'conspiracy theorists' this question:
"If the US government wanted a war wouldn't it have been enough to fly two aeroplanes into the buildings? Why would they choose to demolish them as well? It is completely unneccesary........
...........Why?......(pleading look)......Why?"
As I was present in the room and about 4 feet in front of them I tried to offer an explanation but was ignored by Mr Bartlett who was acting as chair if the meeting.
At the Conway Hall conference (which did not go very well for the establishment side in my view) Carl M raised the same question.
Last night, for a third time, at 2:35 during the interview below Jamie Bartlett asked Jones their favourite question yet again.
"Why do you think the American government felt the need to enact a controlled demolition on the two towers to actually bring them down? Would it not have been more rational to just allow two planes to fly into the buildings? That is surely enough of a cause for war if that's what they were planning. Why multiply the chances that you are going to get caught exponentially by actually bringing them down in a controlled demolition in front of the entire world?"
Now, Alex Jones has done more than any living human being to expose the actions of the globalist financial elite, including the hidden truths of false flag terror. This is simply a fact. Much as one can respect him for that, his response to Jamie Bartlett's question was weak. It went:
"No guts, no glory."
"Fortune goes to the bold."
"Bottom line, those buildings already had asbestos and structural problems."
"Psychologically you do it on a weekday morning....etc.....etc"
Poor response Alex.
There is one primary reason for the controlled demolitions of WTC1&2 and all the other reasons are much less essential.
It was necessary to produce profound and lasting shock in the general population.
The scenes of hundreds of thousands of Americans running for their lives were necessary to induce this shock. A few dozen dead bodies on the upper floors was not enough dead bodies.
A B-25 bomber flew into the Empire State Building in July 1945. Hardly anyone remembers this now.
Planes into buildings is just not shocking enough.
When Bartlett says, "....that is surely enough of a cause for war if that's what they were planning"........he needs to be told that these people were not just planning a war.
They were planning multiple wars (as the PNAC document confirms) and multiple wars are what we have been given.......and there are more wars to come.
The demolitions were to create a collective post-traumatic stress disorder in the population at large. A mega-event from which to launch an assault aimed at gaining control of the major resources of planet earth.
The numbing, disabling shock was the necessary element of the operation. Everything else was secondary.
Building 7 was also obviously and provably demolished, so it can be sensibly deduced that the purpose of this demolition was the destruction of evidence connecting the perpetrators to the crime.
The Bartlett Method
Jamie Bartlett is a very charming fellow. He is impeccably polite. He is very intelligent. For this reason I find it impossible to accept that he is honest in his exchanges with 'conspiracy' activists. He is well aware of the detail of the hard questions but he never addresses that detail. If he could win the argument by addressing detail he would certainly do so.
He has watched '9/11 Mysteries' and the detailed analysis of the physics of the WTC7 collapse. The laws of physics prove beyond ANY doubt that these collapses were demolitions. However Bartlett chooses to accept the laughable science promoted by paid government 'debunkers'. It is probable that he genuinely believes he is with the 'good guys' in 'uniting' society and moving it towards participation in a global system of centralised control.....because this would be a good a sensible thing and would create a fairer world for everybody.
Everybody has their alibis.
However Mr Bartlett is a professional liar.
And a good one.
If you present good evidence he will concede any point in argument....
.....except when it really matters.
Yes, Tony Blair lied. Yes, governments sometimes do terrible things. Yes, they sometimes lie.
No, 9/11 and 7/7 were Al Qaeda attacks on the west by Islamic fundamentalists. No, Zionist-Occupied-Government is a lunatic fantasy.
When dealing with Building 7, say, activists will go deep into the issue, show detailed point-mapping of the building collapse, draw graphs, calculate acceleration compare with 'g'. Bartlett refers to 'the majority of engineers' who are not in A&E911Truth (well, of course they are not), refers to official government reports but never faces the detail himself.
Regarding 7/7 here is a question for Bartlett and his pals at Demos:
Evidence presented at the 2010/11 Inquiry and the London Assembly Inquiry in 2006 makes it clear from multiple witnesses that there were a MINIMUM of 3 holes (2 separate ones by the first set of double doors and 1 in front of the first set of single doors) in the bombed Edgware Road carriage.
How is it conceivably possible for a suicide bomber holding a single rucksack containing hydrogen peroxide and black pepper to create 3 separate well-spaced holes in the floor of the train?
Indeed, how can a single rucksack containing ANYTHING YOU CARE TO THINK OF produce such damage?
However, we know that while we will go on producing detailed analyses that destroy government lies, paid think-takers will go on propagating and defending those lies.
Until the system falls.
IT'S ALL A BIT LIKE........
Jamie Bartlett reminds me of someone.......and I couldn't think who.....and then it struck me.
I went to school with Gus O'Donnell.
It's Gus.
We all held Gus in the highest regard. He broke school academic and sporting records. He captained football teams (and went on to captain Oxford University first XI). In spite of this he was universally popular. A very modest, well-mannered and respectful fellow. Nobody resented him for his gifts.
Yet.......as the country's most senior civil servant.....I've seen him on TV defending the Afghan war and resorting to quoting statistics about the increased number of young girls that are now being schooled there.........How must it feel to be in charge of a machine responsible for seeing that the illegal Iraq/Libyan wars were well managed......or that the funding was in place to adequately support the humanitarian carpet-bombing of Libya.
Gus.
What happened to you?
How on earth can you buy into these murderous games?
You read the gospels of Christ first period every single morning for years.
I just don't get it.
.......likewise Jamie, a very 'nice' man.......do you understand that you are making common cause with the very worst kind of criminals?
IT'S ALL A BIT LIKE (2)........
I know how Demos types would see what I'm about to say as an opportunity (or perhaps a reason) to trash everything else a 911 activist might say out of hand but I will say it nonetheless, for this situation will not persist.
The only mass mental trauma-inducing reality that can be compared to the 9/11 collapses is the 'human gas chambers' element of 'The Holocaust'.
Without this ultimate horror, this unspeakable evil, this terrible shock to the western mass mind, Jewish suffering during WW2 would have had, in historical terms, no special status.
More Ukrainians died in 'The Holdomor' (at the hands of Soviet Jews mostly). More Soviets were murdered by Stalin. Far more Chinese killed by Mao.
Two planes into skyscrapers, a few tens of thousands dead in concentration camps, from Typhus mostly.
Get over it.
But the 'human gas chambers'* have created a unique reality. 'The Jews' have displaced Christ.
They are, in mainstream thinking (as Christ once was), beyond criticism.
Such is the power of victim status (ask any shareholder in Manchester United FC).
There are people out there, think-tankers also, who understand (as Bertrand Russell put it) "the science of mass mind control....... the knowledge of which will be confined to the elite...."
Well, the mass mind has been well controlled for a very time but thankfully the public at large appear to be waking from their slumber.
The genie is out of the bottle and will never go back in, however hard Demos operatives work at containing it.
* It needs to be said that, based on the physical evidence, the 'human gas chambers' story like the official narrative of 9/11 is a wicked lie.
.....and like the 9/11 government apologists, the one manner in which no spokesman will respond to a denier of the existence of the 'human gas chambers' is by debating the detail of the contradictory physical evidence with him/her.
That is because it just can't be done.
Videos, confessions, blah, blah, blah....these things are easily falsified.
Chemistry and physics present a very much tougher challenge.... but, hey, why bother when you control the media anyway.
We are all part-victim and part-perpetrator of the evils that result from great lies.
Some of us want no revenge, nor blame.
Leave these things to God.
We want truth.
And a viable, decent future for our children.
...but the truth, at least, will come.
It is just a matter of time.
.
Yesterday Alex Jones interviewed Demos operative Jamie Bartlett on his nightly show. Bartlett's job description on the Demos website goes as follows:
Jamie is Head of the Violence and Extremism Programme. His primary research interests lie in terrorism, radicalisation and extremism, conspiracy theories and integration policy.
He is a familiar figure to UK 9/11 activists. He came, along with Demos buddy Carl Miller, to speak to us at Goldsmith College last year. The same pair addressed the Conway Hall 'Conspiracy Theory Conference' a couple of months ago.
At the Goldsmith's event, during a heated exchange, Miller asked the assembled 'conspiracy theorists' this question:
"If the US government wanted a war wouldn't it have been enough to fly two aeroplanes into the buildings? Why would they choose to demolish them as well? It is completely unneccesary........
...........Why?......(pleading look)......Why?"
As I was present in the room and about 4 feet in front of them I tried to offer an explanation but was ignored by Mr Bartlett who was acting as chair if the meeting.
At the Conway Hall conference (which did not go very well for the establishment side in my view) Carl M raised the same question.
Last night, for a third time, at 2:35 during the interview below Jamie Bartlett asked Jones their favourite question yet again.
"Why do you think the American government felt the need to enact a controlled demolition on the two towers to actually bring them down? Would it not have been more rational to just allow two planes to fly into the buildings? That is surely enough of a cause for war if that's what they were planning. Why multiply the chances that you are going to get caught exponentially by actually bringing them down in a controlled demolition in front of the entire world?"
Now, Alex Jones has done more than any living human being to expose the actions of the globalist financial elite, including the hidden truths of false flag terror. This is simply a fact. Much as one can respect him for that, his response to Jamie Bartlett's question was weak. It went:
"No guts, no glory."
"Fortune goes to the bold."
"Bottom line, those buildings already had asbestos and structural problems."
"Psychologically you do it on a weekday morning....etc.....etc"
Poor response Alex.
There is one primary reason for the controlled demolitions of WTC1&2 and all the other reasons are much less essential.
It was necessary to produce profound and lasting shock in the general population.
The scenes of hundreds of thousands of Americans running for their lives were necessary to induce this shock. A few dozen dead bodies on the upper floors was not enough dead bodies.
A B-25 bomber flew into the Empire State Building in July 1945. Hardly anyone remembers this now.
Planes into buildings is just not shocking enough.
When Bartlett says, "....that is surely enough of a cause for war if that's what they were planning"........he needs to be told that these people were not just planning a war.
They were planning multiple wars (as the PNAC document confirms) and multiple wars are what we have been given.......and there are more wars to come.
The demolitions were to create a collective post-traumatic stress disorder in the population at large. A mega-event from which to launch an assault aimed at gaining control of the major resources of planet earth.
The numbing, disabling shock was the necessary element of the operation. Everything else was secondary.
Building 7 was also obviously and provably demolished, so it can be sensibly deduced that the purpose of this demolition was the destruction of evidence connecting the perpetrators to the crime.
The Bartlett Method
Jamie Bartlett is a very charming fellow. He is impeccably polite. He is very intelligent. For this reason I find it impossible to accept that he is honest in his exchanges with 'conspiracy' activists. He is well aware of the detail of the hard questions but he never addresses that detail. If he could win the argument by addressing detail he would certainly do so.
He has watched '9/11 Mysteries' and the detailed analysis of the physics of the WTC7 collapse. The laws of physics prove beyond ANY doubt that these collapses were demolitions. However Bartlett chooses to accept the laughable science promoted by paid government 'debunkers'. It is probable that he genuinely believes he is with the 'good guys' in 'uniting' society and moving it towards participation in a global system of centralised control.....because this would be a good a sensible thing and would create a fairer world for everybody.
Everybody has their alibis.
However Mr Bartlett is a professional liar.
And a good one.
If you present good evidence he will concede any point in argument....
.....except when it really matters.
Yes, Tony Blair lied. Yes, governments sometimes do terrible things. Yes, they sometimes lie.
No, 9/11 and 7/7 were Al Qaeda attacks on the west by Islamic fundamentalists. No, Zionist-Occupied-Government is a lunatic fantasy.
When dealing with Building 7, say, activists will go deep into the issue, show detailed point-mapping of the building collapse, draw graphs, calculate acceleration compare with 'g'. Bartlett refers to 'the majority of engineers' who are not in A&E911Truth (well, of course they are not), refers to official government reports but never faces the detail himself.
Regarding 7/7 here is a question for Bartlett and his pals at Demos:
Evidence presented at the 2010/11 Inquiry and the London Assembly Inquiry in 2006 makes it clear from multiple witnesses that there were a MINIMUM of 3 holes (2 separate ones by the first set of double doors and 1 in front of the first set of single doors) in the bombed Edgware Road carriage.
How is it conceivably possible for a suicide bomber holding a single rucksack containing hydrogen peroxide and black pepper to create 3 separate well-spaced holes in the floor of the train?
Indeed, how can a single rucksack containing ANYTHING YOU CARE TO THINK OF produce such damage?
However, we know that while we will go on producing detailed analyses that destroy government lies, paid think-takers will go on propagating and defending those lies.
Until the system falls.
IT'S ALL A BIT LIKE........
Jamie Bartlett reminds me of someone.......and I couldn't think who.....and then it struck me.
I went to school with Gus O'Donnell.
It's Gus.
We all held Gus in the highest regard. He broke school academic and sporting records. He captained football teams (and went on to captain Oxford University first XI). In spite of this he was universally popular. A very modest, well-mannered and respectful fellow. Nobody resented him for his gifts.
Yet.......as the country's most senior civil servant.....I've seen him on TV defending the Afghan war and resorting to quoting statistics about the increased number of young girls that are now being schooled there.........How must it feel to be in charge of a machine responsible for seeing that the illegal Iraq/Libyan wars were well managed......or that the funding was in place to adequately support the humanitarian carpet-bombing of Libya.
Gus.
What happened to you?
How on earth can you buy into these murderous games?
You read the gospels of Christ first period every single morning for years.
I just don't get it.
.......likewise Jamie, a very 'nice' man.......do you understand that you are making common cause with the very worst kind of criminals?
IT'S ALL A BIT LIKE (2)........
I know how Demos types would see what I'm about to say as an opportunity (or perhaps a reason) to trash everything else a 911 activist might say out of hand but I will say it nonetheless, for this situation will not persist.
The only mass mental trauma-inducing reality that can be compared to the 9/11 collapses is the 'human gas chambers' element of 'The Holocaust'.
Without this ultimate horror, this unspeakable evil, this terrible shock to the western mass mind, Jewish suffering during WW2 would have had, in historical terms, no special status.
More Ukrainians died in 'The Holdomor' (at the hands of Soviet Jews mostly). More Soviets were murdered by Stalin. Far more Chinese killed by Mao.
Two planes into skyscrapers, a few tens of thousands dead in concentration camps, from Typhus mostly.
Get over it.
But the 'human gas chambers'* have created a unique reality. 'The Jews' have displaced Christ.
They are, in mainstream thinking (as Christ once was), beyond criticism.
Such is the power of victim status (ask any shareholder in Manchester United FC).
There are people out there, think-tankers also, who understand (as Bertrand Russell put it) "the science of mass mind control....... the knowledge of which will be confined to the elite...."
Well, the mass mind has been well controlled for a very time but thankfully the public at large appear to be waking from their slumber.
The genie is out of the bottle and will never go back in, however hard Demos operatives work at containing it.
* It needs to be said that, based on the physical evidence, the 'human gas chambers' story like the official narrative of 9/11 is a wicked lie.
.....and like the 9/11 government apologists, the one manner in which no spokesman will respond to a denier of the existence of the 'human gas chambers' is by debating the detail of the contradictory physical evidence with him/her.
That is because it just can't be done.
Videos, confessions, blah, blah, blah....these things are easily falsified.
Chemistry and physics present a very much tougher challenge.... but, hey, why bother when you control the media anyway.
We are all part-victim and part-perpetrator of the evils that result from great lies.
Some of us want no revenge, nor blame.
Leave these things to God.
We want truth.
And a viable, decent future for our children.
...but the truth, at least, will come.
It is just a matter of time.
.
Friday, 21 October 2011
We Are All Jews Now
.
The issue of 'Deicide', the killing of Christ by "the Jews", has (astonishingly in this Talmud-dominated* age) been recently raised in the mainstream media.
Bishop Williamson of the traditionalist Catholic SSPX order has accused Jews of killing Jesus in a (privately circulated) blog posting entitled "How can Pope Benedict let go of ancient truths?" (his article can be read on Michael Hoffman's website here)
BW is correct to state that his position was the mainstream Catholic view for nearly 2000 years until 1962 and the publishing of Nostra Aetate (“In Our Time”), a document contradicting the New Testament and agreeing with the Rabbis that the ancient Jews were not responsible for the execution of Christ.
Williamson states the case thus...."Originally raised by God to cradle the Messiah, alas, when he came they refused, collectively to recognize him. Collectively also, meaning there are always noble exceptions, they have remained faithful to that rejection, so that they changed their religion from that of Abraham and Moses and the Old Testament to that of Anas, Caiphas and the Talmud. Tragically, their very messianic training by God drives them to go on rejecting the one whom they hold to be a false messiah. Until they convert at the end of the world, as the Church has always taught they will do (cf. Rom. XI, 26-27), they seem bound to choose to go on acting, collectively, as enemies of the true Messiah."
Jewish convert to Christianity, Roy Tov, presents some detail about how the Pharisees altered 'the religion of Abraham and Moses' to serve their purposes.
Michael Hoffman surely nails the essence of this issue here and here when he says that those modern Jews who accept The Talmud can rightly be accused of 'Deicide' by Christians because the 'holy book' they follow openly celebrates Christ's murder. It says, amongst other horrible things, that Christ is in hell drowning in boiling excrement and that his mother is a whore.
The Talmud promotes a moral code that is to be practiced amongst Jews only. It promotes hatred (indeed murder and sexual exploitation) of gentiles (we're only 'cattle' you know) and the idea of Jewish supremacism over all other races. A Jew can say a prayer once a year (the Kol Nidre) that undoes all promises and contracts with gentiles for that year.
Let Christians be clear.
And be unafraid to say it.
THE TALMUD IS AN UTTERLY SATANIC DOCUMENT.
As a child attending Mass before 1962 I remember that we always used to says prayers at the end of the service 'for the conversion of Russia' (i.e. the Jews)
This was surely a work of spiritual mercy that the prodigal sons and daughters of 'Israel' return to God.
Catholicism's (and Christianity's at large) abandonment of this aspect of our spiritual and religious focus has proved a greater disaster than we could have imagined.
International banking interests have taken over our governments. Western societies allow their owned leadership to exercise an ideology that is, in practice, Talmudic supremacism on a global stage. The Christian churches have no effective or even mildly useful criticism to make of this diabolical situation.
Our children in Europe are flown (aided by government subsidy) to Auschwitz to witness the scene of ultimate human sacrifice. Auschwitz has displaced Golgotha. Work-shy predators and parasites have thus been protected by a victim-status while they have soared above and gained control of society at large.
It needs to be emphasised that there are legions of gentiles happy to collaborate in the supremacist mission......and that many, many Jews reject the Talmudic ideology. It is unfortunate that some of these buy into that ideology second-hand by accepting precepts of Zionism.
And yet in spite of current Jewish hegemony (this is not too strong a word) over western countries, Rabbis respond to Williamson's statements with something approaching panic.
Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt of the European Council of Rabbis said: "Comments like these take us back decades to the dark days before there was a meaningful and mutually respectful dialogue between Jews and Roman Catholics. There must be no rapprochement within the Catholic church for those of its flock who seek to preach words of hate."
Meaningful?
Mutually respectful?
There has been no sincerity whatsoever in this dialogue on the part of the Talmudists.
None.
Their 'Holy Book' still curses Christ and His mother.
The Christian churches (and the Catholic Church in particular) are in ruins as a result of their abandonment of tradional principle and their willingness to submit to the secular-humanistic Frankfurt-School-created agenda, so heavily funded and promoted by financier-funded think-tanks and Foundations.
Money rules. Global supremacism is our governments' policy of choice. We have abandoned God and are helpless because of it.
For the moment we have no power to stop the Leviathan.
Our choice today is the same as it was for Jews 2000 years ago.
Christ warned us against the Pharisees, those supremacist Jews who abandoned the traditions of Abraham and Moses and put themselves on an equal (or superior when it suited their purpose) footing with God.
He did not even argue with the money-changers. Christ's first act in Holy Week was to drive them from the temple.
We have collectively stopped listening to Christ, upon whom our civilisation was once founded.
We have embraced the enemies of God and the results are there for all to see.
We are all Jews now.
* Our parliamentary system in England began as a talking shop between the king and land-owning barons to create mechanisms that would keep the peace between these thugs and settle disputes with a minimum of risk to life. It has developed in the modern world on the Talmudic model. An almost infinitely flexible and continually developing system of law created for lesser brethren by an elite that (primarily) serve the interests of that elite. The financiers' control over the global political system is now almost complete. Red-team-blue-team-one-party-state-democracies are the primary instruments via which they imprint their lies and Godlessness upon us all.
.
The issue of 'Deicide', the killing of Christ by "the Jews", has (astonishingly in this Talmud-dominated* age) been recently raised in the mainstream media.
Bishop Williamson of the traditionalist Catholic SSPX order has accused Jews of killing Jesus in a (privately circulated) blog posting entitled "How can Pope Benedict let go of ancient truths?" (his article can be read on Michael Hoffman's website here)
BW is correct to state that his position was the mainstream Catholic view for nearly 2000 years until 1962 and the publishing of Nostra Aetate (“In Our Time”), a document contradicting the New Testament and agreeing with the Rabbis that the ancient Jews were not responsible for the execution of Christ.
Williamson states the case thus...."Originally raised by God to cradle the Messiah, alas, when he came they refused, collectively to recognize him. Collectively also, meaning there are always noble exceptions, they have remained faithful to that rejection, so that they changed their religion from that of Abraham and Moses and the Old Testament to that of Anas, Caiphas and the Talmud. Tragically, their very messianic training by God drives them to go on rejecting the one whom they hold to be a false messiah. Until they convert at the end of the world, as the Church has always taught they will do (cf. Rom. XI, 26-27), they seem bound to choose to go on acting, collectively, as enemies of the true Messiah."
Jewish convert to Christianity, Roy Tov, presents some detail about how the Pharisees altered 'the religion of Abraham and Moses' to serve their purposes.
Michael Hoffman surely nails the essence of this issue here and here when he says that those modern Jews who accept The Talmud can rightly be accused of 'Deicide' by Christians because the 'holy book' they follow openly celebrates Christ's murder. It says, amongst other horrible things, that Christ is in hell drowning in boiling excrement and that his mother is a whore.
The Talmud promotes a moral code that is to be practiced amongst Jews only. It promotes hatred (indeed murder and sexual exploitation) of gentiles (we're only 'cattle' you know) and the idea of Jewish supremacism over all other races. A Jew can say a prayer once a year (the Kol Nidre) that undoes all promises and contracts with gentiles for that year.
Let Christians be clear.
And be unafraid to say it.
THE TALMUD IS AN UTTERLY SATANIC DOCUMENT.
As a child attending Mass before 1962 I remember that we always used to says prayers at the end of the service 'for the conversion of Russia' (i.e. the Jews)
This was surely a work of spiritual mercy that the prodigal sons and daughters of 'Israel' return to God.
Catholicism's (and Christianity's at large) abandonment of this aspect of our spiritual and religious focus has proved a greater disaster than we could have imagined.
International banking interests have taken over our governments. Western societies allow their owned leadership to exercise an ideology that is, in practice, Talmudic supremacism on a global stage. The Christian churches have no effective or even mildly useful criticism to make of this diabolical situation.
Our children in Europe are flown (aided by government subsidy) to Auschwitz to witness the scene of ultimate human sacrifice. Auschwitz has displaced Golgotha. Work-shy predators and parasites have thus been protected by a victim-status while they have soared above and gained control of society at large.
It needs to be emphasised that there are legions of gentiles happy to collaborate in the supremacist mission......and that many, many Jews reject the Talmudic ideology. It is unfortunate that some of these buy into that ideology second-hand by accepting precepts of Zionism.
And yet in spite of current Jewish hegemony (this is not too strong a word) over western countries, Rabbis respond to Williamson's statements with something approaching panic.
Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt of the European Council of Rabbis said: "Comments like these take us back decades to the dark days before there was a meaningful and mutually respectful dialogue between Jews and Roman Catholics. There must be no rapprochement within the Catholic church for those of its flock who seek to preach words of hate."
Meaningful?
Mutually respectful?
There has been no sincerity whatsoever in this dialogue on the part of the Talmudists.
None.
Their 'Holy Book' still curses Christ and His mother.
The Christian churches (and the Catholic Church in particular) are in ruins as a result of their abandonment of tradional principle and their willingness to submit to the secular-humanistic Frankfurt-School-created agenda, so heavily funded and promoted by financier-funded think-tanks and Foundations.
Money rules. Global supremacism is our governments' policy of choice. We have abandoned God and are helpless because of it.
For the moment we have no power to stop the Leviathan.
Our choice today is the same as it was for Jews 2000 years ago.
Christ warned us against the Pharisees, those supremacist Jews who abandoned the traditions of Abraham and Moses and put themselves on an equal (or superior when it suited their purpose) footing with God.
He did not even argue with the money-changers. Christ's first act in Holy Week was to drive them from the temple.
We have collectively stopped listening to Christ, upon whom our civilisation was once founded.
We have embraced the enemies of God and the results are there for all to see.
We are all Jews now.
* Our parliamentary system in England began as a talking shop between the king and land-owning barons to create mechanisms that would keep the peace between these thugs and settle disputes with a minimum of risk to life. It has developed in the modern world on the Talmudic model. An almost infinitely flexible and continually developing system of law created for lesser brethren by an elite that (primarily) serve the interests of that elite. The financiers' control over the global political system is now almost complete. Red-team-blue-team-one-party-state-democracies are the primary instruments via which they imprint their lies and Godlessness upon us all.
.
Sunday, 16 October 2011
Letwin A Third Party To Himself And The Actions Of His Own Arms
.
Oliver Letwin, who has been dumping government documents in a bin in St. James Park, states in the video interview shown below:
" .....and constituents may feel that I shouldn't have allowed their papers to be in that bin......"
You have to hand it to these people. When it comes to nuance and spin the Letwins of this world are seriously talented.
Here is a trick that was missed by the defending barristers of the Yorkshire Ripper, for instance,
"Mr Sutcliffe, would you like to make a statement to the court?"
" Yes sir, I must humbly admit that I shouldn't have allowed my arm to hit the good lady's head with a ball-pein hammer."
You never know, it might have made a difference.
.
Oliver Letwin, who has been dumping government documents in a bin in St. James Park, states in the video interview shown below:
" .....and constituents may feel that I shouldn't have allowed their papers to be in that bin......"
You have to hand it to these people. When it comes to nuance and spin the Letwins of this world are seriously talented.
Here is a trick that was missed by the defending barristers of the Yorkshire Ripper, for instance,
"Mr Sutcliffe, would you like to make a statement to the court?"
" Yes sir, I must humbly admit that I shouldn't have allowed my arm to hit the good lady's head with a ball-pein hammer."
You never know, it might have made a difference.
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
