NO ONE TO VOTE FOR

Astonishing: Most Senior Orthodox Rabbi, Now Dead, Revealed Name of Messiah "JESUS"

2011-12-21T17:17:00.001Z

.

.

The Utter Insanity of Attacking Iran's Nuclear Sites

2011-12-21T11:06:00.000Z

.

Sometimes the obvious needs stating.

If or, rather (it appears), when Iran's nuclear sites are attacked we know that the consequences will be dreadful for Iranians and probably everyone else on the planet. The consequences might easily also provide a horrible surprise for those who expect to profit from the global cataclysm that will almost certainly ensue.

But what of the initial attack itself?

There are three Iranian power-station reactors and six smaller research reactors

There are approximately 80 nuclear 'facilities' of one kind or another in Iran. Presumably, if one wants to destroy the Iranian capacity to create a nuclear bomb, not knowing where key technology is located, one would have to strike every single one of these sites.

This issue was explored in some depth in an article by Floyd Rudmin in 2008.

The utter insanity of carrying out such attacks should be immediately apparent. We have seen consequences of (supposedly) mere fires and a tsunami flood in Fukushima's reactors. A significant portion of Japan is unfit for human habitation. The Pacific ocean continues to be poisoned by leaks. A frightening increase in mutated births are being reported in the area around the plant.

Bunker-busting bombs, possibly with nuclear warheads hitting multiple Iranian reactors would send massive amounts of radiation into the upper atmosphere to fall God-knows-where, possibly anywhere in the northern hemisphere. Hundreds of farms in North Wales and Cumbria, areas that suffered some of the Chernobyl fallout in 1984, are still not allowed to sell their lamb for consumption. How much more serious might an all-out attack on Iranian nuclear facilities be?

An expectation is being created that this event will occur. Perhaps there is the hope that with the crippling sanctions now being organised by the delightful people at the UK Foreign Ministry (amongst others) and the various other trade restrictions being imposed on Iran, that the country will become so economically strangled that its government will become desperate and this combined with the thunder of western war drums will freak Iran, believing an attack to be inevitable, into making a first strike.

This is almost exactly the game played against Japan prior to WW2.

We are led by devils.......fiends.......degenerate Satanists........who care nothing for the well-being of the British, nor the American nor, most certainly, the Israeli people. If Iran is destroyed it is highly likely that Israel will be also. The citizens of all three countries have be misinformed, lied to, abused and, when needs be, murdered (see here and here) by the criminal gangsters that we call our governments.

We must get very noisy about this issue.

Also, as Floyd Rubin suggests, we would do well to pray.

.

Worried Cameron Demands Support From God

2011-12-17T13:43:00.001Z

It is not often a news story raises a laugh but here's one that will surely contend for a comedy award.

Elsewhere Mr Cameron was quoted as saying the following:

"Whether you look at the riots last summer, the financial crash and the expenses scandal, or the ongoing terrorist threat from Islamist extremists around the world, one thing is clear: moral neutrality or passive tolerance just isn't going to cut it anymore."

Quite so, Mr. Cameron.........

........but how can an upsurge in moral indignation possibly benefit you?

Could it be that the touchy-feely think-tankers who are paid to zombify the masses and infect our collective mind with fraudulent double-think Frankfurt School rubbish are detecting a problem?...........just such an upsurge in moral outrage as Mr Cameron describes? Could it be that this sense of outrage is directed primarily against people like himself?Are the masses beginning to realise (as Robert Fisk powerfully stated yesterday) that the financiers, the bankers, are our real government and that the likes of Mr Cameron serve their interests and not ours? ........that we are represented by a fraudsters.........bankers' whores..........agents of international finance. People who have been bought and paid for........more often than not with created-out-of-nothing Jewish money.Could it be that Mr Cameron, in the usual cunning establishment manner of controlling opposition, is trying to co-opt this resentment against his government and the banks as though he too is an outraged critic.......as though none of this has anything to do with him?
It won't work Mr Cameron.Even if the established churches, who have already betrayed every principle they are supposed to stand for, rally to your cause it will not revive your moral standing. These churches have had nothing to say about the great lies that have so befouled our new century. The Christian churches have been Judaised. The few churchmen that speak out have been persecuted, denounced, silenced.....even by their own.Mr Cameron, if you want a great moral regeneration, do not demand that Christ's followers support you, but rather follow Christ yourself.Announce an end to usury (giggle).Drive the moneychangers from our temple. For once and for all (guffaw).In the meantime tax speculative trading in derivatives, currencies and bonds (you started the comedy Mr C).Tell the truth about international terrorism........that 9/11 and 7/7 were carried out by our side so that people like you could implement your masters' wishes under the pretext of self-defence in order to attack and occupy resource-rich countries (helpless laughter).......that the only principle at work in all your initiatives (including, in this case the appeal to Christianity) is 'divide and rule' (a tear now, is this still funny?).......surely anyone seeing gangster Leon Panetta arrive in Libya today will also recognise the truth that is staring them in the face.Libyan 'assets' are being released into the hands of the 'National Transitional Council'. Everyone knows these people as the same people we used to call "Al Qaeda".We have handed the country over to religious extremists. We no longer call these particular members of Al Qaeda 'terrorists'.The deal is this. We give you Libya. You give our corporations Libyan oil money in the form of reconstruction contracts to rebuild the cities we have recently bombed to smithereens.All that matters is the money.'Divide and Rule'.Control of the resources.Will Christians support you in your schemes Mr Cameron......?........not real ones...............if they understand anything at all about this world.......or, for that matter, about God's will as revealed through the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Wall St. and other "Occupy" Protests Should Re-Brand as "Anti-Oligarchy"

2011-10-31T00:07:00.006Z

.

Some of the biggest men in the United States are afraid of something. They know there is a power somewhere, so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it. – President Woodrow Wilson

The "Occupy" protests and other demonstrations across the US and Europe are reported as being "anti-capitalist", "anti-banker", "anti-EU" or simply "anti-government".

But these labels will just not do.

The oligarchs who bring us our successive financial crises and wars will be getting rid of capitalism pretty soon.

Unfortunately they have no intention of disappearing with it.

We know that the entire financial system is going to collapse in fairly short order.

It must.

The 'more-debt' solution to irresolvable debt problems is a stalling strategy and everybody knows it.

A real solution to the nightmare that the financial oligarchs have created for us would end their system, so that ain't going to happen.......just yet.

First we are going to endure crises like we have never seen before.

Currencies will collapse.

There will be a major and very terrible war, a primary purpose of which will be to make survivors so desperate that they will be glad to accept anything on offer that delivers peace.

When it is over capitalism will go.......but the same people will remain in charge.

Therefore there is little point in branding oneself an 'anti-capitalist' (because Messrs. Rothschild and Rockefeller will soon be making common cause with you)

When the time comes we will be expected not to notice that the new, much better, much fairer system on offer will continue to be run by the same banking oligarchy that caused all the problems and nearly destroyed planet earth in the first place.

This trajectory is well laid out by Richard North in a recent article here.

We can expect a new Godless tyranny. A 'humanitarian' tyranny.

So let us be clear:

The system we call 'democracy' is really government by agents representing the interests of a financial oligarchy.

'Capitalism' is government by oligarchy.

(Wall-Street funded) Soviet 'Communism' was government by a tyrannical oligarchy.

All these disastrous systems were disasters because they were structurally designed to represented the interests of a ruling elite rather than the genuine interests of ordinary people.

So,

WHEN THE NEXT OLIGARCHICAL SYSTEM IS OFFERED TO US, ALL HUMANITY MUST RECOGNISE IT FOR WHAT IT IS AND REJECT IT.

TOTALLY.

What protesters need to set their minds and hearts against is the continuing dominating influence of a financial juggernaut that is, at its core, led by a small elite of extraordinarily powerful, corrupt and self-serving oligarchs.

Think it through, be clear about this and explain to everybody you meet.

Our system is not democratic, it is oligarchical and.....

WE ARE, FIRST AND FOREMOST, ANTI-OLIGARCHY.

Film on Oligarchy:

Part Two of this video here.

.

Alex Jones, Demos and Controlled Demolition

2011-10-23T02:41:00.003+01:00

.

Yesterday Alex Jones interviewed Demos operative Jamie Bartlett on his nightly show. Bartlett's job description on the Demos website goes as follows:

Jamie is Head of the Violence and Extremism Programme. His primary research interests lie in terrorism, radicalisation and extremism, conspiracy theories and integration policy.

He is a familiar figure to UK 9/11 activists. He came, along with Demos buddy Carl Miller, to speak to us at Goldsmith College last year. The same pair addressed the Conway Hall 'Conspiracy Theory Conference' a couple of months ago.

At the Goldsmith's event, during a heated exchange, Miller asked the assembled 'conspiracy theorists' this question:

"If the US government wanted a war wouldn't it have been enough to fly two aeroplanes into the buildings? Why would they choose to demolish them as well? It is completely unneccesary........

...........Why?......(pleading look)......Why?"

As I was present in the room and about 4 feet in front of them I tried to offer an explanation but was ignored by Mr Bartlett who was acting as chair if the meeting.

At the Conway Hall conference (which did not go very well for the establishment side in my view) Carl M raised the same question.

Last night, for a third time, at 2:35 during the interview below Jamie Bartlett asked Jones their favourite question yet again.

"Why do you think the American government felt the need to enact a controlled demolition on the two towers to actually bring them down? Would it not have been more rational to just allow two planes to fly into the buildings? That is surely enough of a cause for war if that's what they were planning. Why multiply the chances that you are going to get caught exponentially by actually bringing them down in a controlled demolition in front of the entire world?"

Now, Alex Jones has done more than any living human being to expose the actions of the globalist financial elite, including the hidden truths of false flag terror. This is simply a fact. Much as one can respect him for that, his response to Jamie Bartlett's question was weak. It went:

"No guts, no glory."

"Fortune goes to the bold."

"Bottom line, those buildings already had asbestos and structural problems."

"Psychologically you do it on a weekday morning....etc.....etc"

Poor response Alex.

There is one primary reason for the controlled demolitions of WTC1&2 and all the other reasons are much less essential.

It was necessary to produce profound and lasting shock in the general population.

The scenes of hundreds of thousands of Americans running for their lives were necessary to induce this shock. A few dozen dead bodies on the upper floors was not enough dead bodies.

A B-25 bomber flew into the Empire State Building in July 1945. Hardly anyone remembers this now.

Planes into buildings is just not shocking enough.

When Bartlett says, "....that is surely enough of a cause for war if that's what they were planning"........he needs to be told that these people were not just planning a war.

They were planning multiple wars (as the PNAC document confirms) and multiple wars are what we have been given.......and there are more wars to come.

The demolitions were to create a collective post-traumatic stress disorder in the population at large. A mega-event from which to launch an assault aimed at gaining control of the major resources of planet earth.

The numbing, disabling shock was the necessary element of the operation. Everything else was secondary.

Building 7 was also obviously and provably demolished, so it can be sensibly deduced that the purpose of this demolition was the destruction of evidence connecting the perpetrators to the crime.

The Bartlett Method

Jamie Bartlett is a very charming fellow. He is impeccably polite. He is very intelligent. For this reason I find it impossible to accept that he is honest in his exchanges with 'conspiracy' activists. He is well aware of the detail of the hard questions but he never addresses that detail. If he could win the argument by addressing detail he would certainly do so.

He has watched '9/11 Mysteries' and the detailed analysis of the physics of the WTC7 collapse. The laws of physics prove beyond ANY doubt that these collapses were demolitions. However Bartlett chooses to accept the laughable science promoted by paid government 'debunkers'. It is probable that he genuinely believes he is with the 'good guys' in 'uniting' society and moving it towards participation in a global system of centralised control.....because this would be a good a sensible thing and would create a fairer world for everybody.

Everybody has their alibis.

However Mr Bartlett is a professional liar.

And a good one.

If you present good evidence he will concede any point in argument....

.....except when it really matters.

Yes, Tony Blair lied. Yes, governments sometimes do terrible things. Yes, they sometimes lie.

No, 9/11 and 7/7 were Al Qaeda attacks on the west by Islamic fundamentalists. No, Zionist-Occupied-Government is a lunatic fantasy.

When dealing with Building 7, say, activists will go deep into the issue, show detailed point-mapping of the building collapse, draw graphs, calculate acceleration compare with 'g'. Bartlett refers to 'the majority of engineers' who are not in A&E911Truth (well, of course they are not), refers to official government reports but never faces the detail himself.

Regarding 7/7 here is a question for Bartlett and his pals at Demos:
Evidence presented at the 2010/11 Inquiry and the London Assembly Inquiry in 2006 makes it clear from multiple witnesses that there were a MINIMUM of 3 holes (2 separate ones by the first set of double doors and 1 in front of the first set of single doors) in the bombed Edgware Road carriage.

How is it conceivably possible for a suicide bomber holding a single rucksack containing hydrogen peroxide and black pepper to create 3 separate well-spaced holes in the floor of the train?

Indeed, how can a single rucksack containing ANYTHING YOU CARE TO THINK OF produce such damage?

However, we know that while we will go on producing detailed analyses that destroy government lies, paid think-takers will go on propagating and defending those lies.

Until the system falls.

IT'S ALL A BIT LIKE........

Jamie Bartlett reminds me of someone.......and I couldn't think who.....and then it struck me.

I went to school with Gus O'Donnell.

It's Gus.

We all held Gus in the highest regard. He broke school academic and sporting records. He captained football teams (and went on to captain Oxford University first XI). In spite of this he was universally popular. A very modest, well-mannered and respectful fellow. Nobody resented him for his gifts.

Yet.......as the country's most senior civil servant.....I've seen him on TV defending the Afghan war and resorting to quoting statistics about the increased number of young girls that are now being schooled there.........How must it feel to be in charge of a machine responsible for seeing that the illegal Iraq/Libyan wars were well managed......or that the funding was in place to adequately support the humanitarian carpet-bombing of Libya.

Gus.

What happened to you?

How on earth can you buy into these murderous games?

You read the gospels of Christ first period every single morning for years.

I just don't get it.

.......likewise Jamie, a very 'nice' man.......do you understand that you are making common cause with the very worst kind of criminals?

IT'S ALL A BIT LIKE (2)........

I know how Demos types would see what I'm about to say as an opportunity (or perhaps a reason) to trash everything else a 911 activist might say out of hand but I will say it nonetheless, for this situation will not persist.

The only mass mental trauma-inducing reality that can be compared to the 9/11 collapses is the 'human gas chambers' element of 'The Holocaust'.

Without this ultimate horror, this unspeakable evil, this terrible shock to the western mass mind, Jewish suffering during WW2 would have had, in historical terms, no special status.

More Ukrainians died in 'The Holdomor' (at the hands of Soviet Jews mostly). More Soviets were murdered by Stalin. Far more Chinese killed by Mao.

Two planes into skyscrapers, a few tens of thousands dead in concentration camps, from Typhus mostly.

Get over it.

But the 'human gas chambers'* have created a unique reality. 'The Jews' have displaced Christ.

They are, in mainstream thinking (as Christ once was), beyond criticism.

Such is the power of victim status (ask any shareholder in Manchester United FC).

There are people out there, think-tankers also, who understand (as Bertrand Russell put it) "the science of mass mind control....... the knowledge of which will be confined to the elite...."

Well, the mass mind has been well controlled for a very time but thankfully the public at large appear to be waking from their slumber.

The genie is out of the bottle and will never go back in, however hard Demos operatives work at containing it.

* It needs to be said that, based on the physical evidence, the 'human gas chambers' story like the official narrative of 9/11 is a wicked lie.

.....and like the 9/11 government apologists, the one manner in which no spokesman will respond to a denier of the existence of the 'human gas chambers' is by debating the detail of the contradictory physical evidence with him/her.

That is because it just can't be done.

Videos, confessions, blah, blah, blah....these things are easily falsified.

Chemistry and physics present a very much tougher challenge.... but, hey, why bother when you control the media anyway.

We are all part-victim and part-perpetrator of the evils that result from great lies.

Some of us want no revenge, nor blame.

Leave these things to God.

We want truth.

And a viable, decent future for our children.

...but the truth, at least, will come.

It is just a matter of time.

.

We Are All Jews Now

2011-10-21T10:46:00.004+01:00

.

The issue of 'Deicide', the killing of Christ by "the Jews", has (astonishingly in this Talmud-dominated* age) been recently raised in the mainstream media.

Bishop Williamson of the traditionalist Catholic SSPX order has accused Jews of killing Jesus in a (privately circulated) blog posting entitled "How can Pope Benedict let go of ancient truths?" (his article can be read on Michael Hoffman's website here)

BW is correct to state that his position was the mainstream Catholic view for nearly 2000 years until 1962 and the publishing of Nostra Aetate (“In Our Time”), a document contradicting the New Testament and agreeing with the Rabbis that the ancient Jews were not responsible for the execution of Christ.

Williamson states the case thus...."Originally raised by God to cradle the Messiah, alas, when he came they refused, collectively to recognize him. Collectively also, meaning there are always noble exceptions, they have remained faithful to that rejection, so that they changed their religion from that of Abraham and Moses and the Old Testament to that of Anas, Caiphas and the Talmud. Tragically, their very messianic training by God drives them to go on rejecting the one whom they hold to be a false messiah. Until they convert at the end of the world, as the Church has always taught they will do (cf. Rom. XI, 26-27), they seem bound to choose to go on acting, collectively, as enemies of the true Messiah."

Jewish convert to Christianity, Roy Tov, presents some detail about how the Pharisees altered 'the religion of Abraham and Moses' to serve their purposes.

Michael Hoffman surely nails the essence of this issue here and here when he says that those modern Jews who accept The Talmud can rightly be accused of 'Deicide' by Christians because the 'holy book' they follow openly celebrates Christ's murder. It says, amongst other horrible things, that Christ is in hell drowning in boiling excrement and that his mother is a whore.

The Talmud promotes a moral code that is to be practiced amongst Jews only. It promotes hatred (indeed murder and sexual exploitation) of gentiles (we're only 'cattle' you know) and the idea of Jewish supremacism over all other races. A Jew can say a prayer once a year (the Kol Nidre) that undoes all promises and contracts with gentiles for that year.

Let Christians be clear.

And be unafraid to say it.

THE TALMUD IS AN UTTERLY SATANIC DOCUMENT.

As a child attending Mass before 1962 I remember that we always used to says prayers at the end of the service 'for the conversion of Russia' (i.e. the Jews)

This was surely a work of spiritual mercy that the prodigal sons and daughters of 'Israel' return to God.

Catholicism's (and Christianity's at large) abandonment of this aspect of our spiritual and religious focus has proved a greater disaster than we could have imagined.

International banking interests have taken over our governments. Western societies allow their owned leadership to exercise an ideology that is, in practice, Talmudic supremacism on a global stage. The Christian churches have no effective or even mildly useful criticism to make of this diabolical situation.

Our children in Europe are flown (aided by government subsidy) to Auschwitz to witness the scene of ultimate human sacrifice. Auschwitz has displaced Golgotha. Work-shy predators and parasites have thus been protected by a victim-status while they have soared above and gained control of society at large.

It needs to be emphasised that there are legions of gentiles happy to collaborate in the supremacist mission......and that many, many Jews reject the Talmudic ideology. It is unfortunate that some of these buy into that ideology second-hand by accepting precepts of Zionism.

And yet in spite of current Jewish hegemony (this is not too strong a word) over western countries, Rabbis respond to Williamson's statements with something approaching panic.

Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt of the European Council of Rabbis said: "Comments like these take us back decades to the dark days before there was a meaningful and mutually respectful dialogue between Jews and Roman Catholics. There must be no rapprochement within the Catholic church for those of its flock who seek to preach words of hate."

Meaningful?

Mutually respectful?

There has been no sincerity whatsoever in this dialogue on the part of the Talmudists.

None.

Their 'Holy Book' still curses Christ and His mother.

The Christian churches (and the Catholic Church in particular) are in ruins as a result of their abandonment of tradional principle and their willingness to submit to the secular-humanistic Frankfurt-School-created agenda, so heavily funded and promoted by financier-funded think-tanks and Foundations.

Money rules. Global supremacism is our governments' policy of choice. We have abandoned God and are helpless because of it.

For the moment we have no power to stop the Leviathan.

Our choice today is the same as it was for Jews 2000 years ago.

Christ warned us against the Pharisees, those supremacist Jews who abandoned the traditions of Abraham and Moses and put themselves on an equal (or superior when it suited their purpose) footing with God.

He did not even argue with the money-changers. Christ's first act in Holy Week was to drive them from the temple.

We have collectively stopped listening to Christ, upon whom our civilisation was once founded.

We have embraced the enemies of God and the results are there for all to see.

We are all Jews now.

* Our parliamentary system in England began as a talking shop between the king and land-owning barons to create mechanisms that would keep the peace between these thugs and settle disputes with a minimum of risk to life. It has developed in the modern world on the Talmudic model. An almost infinitely flexible and continually developing system of law created for lesser brethren by an elite that (primarily) serve the interests of that elite. The financiers' control over the global political system is now almost complete. Red-team-blue-team-one-party-state-democracies are the primary instruments via which they imprint their lies and Godlessness upon us all.

.

Letwin A Third Party To Himself And The Actions Of His Own Arms

2011-10-16T11:40:00.004+01:00

.

Oliver Letwin, who has been dumping government documents in a bin in St. James Park, states in the video interview shown below:

" .....and constituents may feel that I shouldn't have allowed their papers to be in that bin......"

You have to hand it to these people. When it comes to nuance and spin the Letwins of this world are seriously talented.

Here is a trick that was missed by the defending barristers of the Yorkshire Ripper, for instance,

"Mr Sutcliffe, would you like to make a statement to the court?"

" Yes sir, I must humbly admit that I shouldn't have allowed my arm to hit the good lady's head with a ball-pein hammer."

You never know, it might have made a difference.

.

"Highly Successful" Obscenities

2011-10-10T21:42:00.003+01:00

.

This evening I caught the following on the BBC News Channel. A Conservative supporter (missed his name) of Liam Fox was holding forth strongly in defense of his beleaguered minister.

".......Mr. Fox has been an excellent Secretary of Defense. We have nearly completed a highly successful operation in Libya without the loss of a single British life....."

Successful?

Highly unlikely in the long run.

But yes.

.....tens of thousands of Libyan dead with

NOT THE LOSS OF A SINGLE BRITISH LIFE.

Are we supposed to feel proud of the fact that our leaders now order the military to yet again embark on a campaign of action that can, this time, only be described as

the risk-free slaughter of brown-skinned people.

Surely most British people recoil in horror at this obscenity....

....the fact it is carried out in the name of 'humanitarianism' is truly beyond words.

Must we not now admit that, however much we oppose this illegal war, that the RAF's bombing of Libyan cities is a horror for which WE must admit some reponsibility?

To be honest, realising what is taking place in our name, I feel very guilty that I do so little to oppose this war.

I've seen my MP about it. He knows large numbers loathe the Libyan campaign. He didn't defend it but his demeanor was one of helplessness.

What kind of a monstrous world are Cameron and the rest of these internationalists building for us?

....but there's always worse......

......from an article: Remote control murder: Afghan drones operated from Nevada and Virginia, recognising drones as the weapon of choice of US military and the RAF in Afghanistan, we read the following:

"Regarding the use of drones against civilians in Pakistan and Yemen US author and journalist James Bamford said,

“Death warrants for targets are signed by mid-level bureaucrats, and soccer moms and dads double as joystick killers. They operate in comfort and safety, half the Earth away from their targets and close enough for many to run home for lunch between kills."

The time is coming when will be forced to confront the elite that creates these monstrosities.

Here is a template for enforcement up with which we must not put.

.

Lucifer Rising

2011-09-27T23:49:00.004+01:00

.

There is no surer sign that we live in the age of Judeo-Masonic Luciferianism than the dropping of BC (before Christ)and AD (Anno Domini, i.e. Year of the Lord) for BCE(Before Common Era) and CE(Common Era) by many major organisations including the BBC.

The pretext is the usual 'humanitarian' one, the avoidance of 'causing offence'. Christmas is under attack for the same (stated) reason. However, it is obvious that the powerful want Christ deleted from history.

A rather silly lady, Marie Clair of the Plain English Campaign, said: "As with most politically correct innovations, I am sure this was done with the best of intentions......It sounds like change just for the sake of change......"

No, Marie, not 'change for change sake', it is change for the sake of making Christ disappear from public consciousness.

So, we observe ourselves collectively turning yet another page of the document that is the template of our living history, 'The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion'.

While massive 'Christmas' menorahs are lit on the White House lawn, we step, eyes closed, into a world prepared for us as if it were on the other side of a C.S. Lewis-style wardrobe.

But the Kingdom we are sleep-walking into has no place for an all-loving creator, nor any creature who would wish to serve Him. Here the Love, Truth, Justice and Peace of Christ are not on offer. In this Kingdom the hated Christ will be remembered only to be reviled.

The Protocols make it quite clear what to expect in this Kingdom and what kind of road will lead us there (just read the document.......

.......it is written by a genius, forgery my arse).

So does the writer of Freemasons' oaths, Albert Pike:

"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."

Many 'alternative' commentators have long been predicting a global financial collapse. Such prophets are now starting to appear on the BBC.

Such an event can only lead to unprecedented turmoil and war.

We approach a particular end-game, it would appear.

For international finance imperialists it is the whole world or no world......

......SH*T OR BUST.

.......but whatever happens we will get a new beginning, one perhaps that none of us can forsee.

Let us be wise.

If these people all hate Christ.

As they clearly do.

Let us be for Christ.

With our whole hearts and our whole minds and our whole strength.

The spirit of God, the One they desire so desperately to displace, is what they most fear. We have been seduced and corrupted into shedding the armour of His light and these people think they can now conquer a faithless world.

It is a terrible thing that we must learn every lesson the hard way....but we will learn it.

Ultimately, there can only be one winner.

.

Our Brave Boys At Work. The 'Humanitarian' Reality.

2011-09-26T16:03:00.004+01:00

.

Terrifying NATO Cluster Bomb in Libya - Raw Footage

Even with absolute freedom to bomb as it likes, it seems that there are many places in Libya where NATO still cannot gain the upper hand.

.

Conspiracy Theory Conference

2011-09-26T08:21:00.012+01:00

.

A 'Conspiracy Theory Conference' was held at Conway Hall in central London yesterday (Sunday 25th Sept.). Here are a few, admittedly biased, comments about the day.

In its original formation this 'conference' was set up as a very one-sided affair indeed, with all contributors firmly in the establishment camp. David Aaronovitch, he of "Voodoo histories" (and foremost media tub-thumper for bombing Iraq) was to give a presentation in the afternoon. Many were looking forward to confronting this fellow but discovered that he had 'pulled out' a few days earlier.

Here is a media favourite, a columnist for the Times, whose every conscious utterance is broadly promoted by our mainstream media.

Yet.

When the opportunity arises for him to present his ideas before people who are ready, willing and able to challenge them (albeit in the very constricted form of short questions) he chickens out.

That's how I saw the situation anyway, whatever excuses he came up with.

The point is that this serial liar is always free to make his preposterous and dishonest statements unchallenged.

For instance in a recent article he wrote the following sentence:

".....the conspiracy theories over Israel's mistaken bombing of the USS Liberty in 1967......"

Giving the massive amount of evidence presented by those sailors on the USS Liberty who survived this attack and the astonishing political aftermath of the outrage, this statement can only be perceived as an obscene and deliberate lie. Informed by this and every other deliberately twisted and misdirecting analysis Aaronovitch has produced it is fair to ask whose interests his lies are meant to serve.

However, Aaronovitch was replaced by Ian R Crane, first chair of 9/11 Truth UK, full-time speaker and well-known activist. Many had expected that this change would give the day a little necessary 'balance'. However, 'balance' is hardly the word because by 5pm Ian's end of the see-saw was firmly planted on terra firma while the rest appeared to be uncomfortably suspended at the other end trying to decide whether to gain leverage by bravely edging backwards towards their extremity or leaping to safety in case things got worse.

I will explain, but first a few words about the day itself.

During the morning Professor Chris French and Robert Brotherton of Goldsmith's College and Karen Douglas of Kent University addressed (one way or another) the 'psychology' of conspiracy theorists. French and Brotherton peppered their limp and vacuous ideas with ridicule that they mistook for wit (You'll know that I'm a Bilderberger because I say these things....and the like).

They defined what is meant by a 'conspiracy theory'........O.K......

We heard that a person who believes in one conspiracy theory is more likely to believe in another.......um,..........(searching for some nuance of meaning in this statement of the obvious that I might have missed [but hadn't])........um........Yes.........(thought) Is French being paid to do this?

......back to the august professor....

We were told that these theories were universally contradicted by the evidence of real experts and were, therefore, unworthy of consideration and NO, Professor French would not engage in argument over the substance of any issue whatsoever.

We were, apparently, there to learn what was wrong with us as far as French was concerned. He was the one 'establishment' speaker I actively disliked. Arrogant, bombastic, sneering. A man who dismissed the truthfulness of conspiracy theorists claims while refusing to engage with these issues himself. One felt he is the kind of man who, if he felt he had a winning hand, would delight in wiping the floor with anyone who tried to argue with him.

There is a horrible cowardice to the individual who is prepared to build a career by trashing the truthfulness of persons with whose statements of truth he fails to personally counter or even engage. This is a pathetic (and, again, cowardly) way to make one's own position invulnerable.

Karen Douglas spoke along the same lines with one or two small variations. Again, the presumption of error was entirely with the conspiracy theorists. There were a couple of memorable elements though, the first being a response to a question (on a questionnaire completed by people, some of whom could be categorised CTists):

"If you were a member of the security services would you participate in false flag events?"

The responses (apparently) demonstrated the psychological mechanism (of CTists) of "projection". Apparently 'people like me' answered "yes" more so that those who disbelieve CTs.

This sort of took my breath away.

Isn't this question a bit like asking, "If you were a bird would you eat worms?"....or...." If you were Hitler would you invade Poland?"

I found it flabbergasting that such a question should have been posed by someone who called herself an academic.

We also found out that conspiracy theorists, given 3 questions on the issue, were prepared to believe that Bin Laden was alive and dead. This demonstrated that distrust of authority can be the overriding factor in a person's judgement. Fair enough (almost) but again, Douglas' ability to ask sensible questions must be seriously questioned.

When challenged about these issues during questions from the audience she looked angry and accused her interrogators of not understanding 'the scientific method'.

Every conference is better for a comedy moment or two. Thanks Karen.

Messrs. Bartlett and Miller of Demos said little that was memorable except that that they mentioned Cass Sunstein and that they would, like Mr. Sunstein, be recommending infiltration of 9/11 groups and the like. They promised 'new ideas' in a forthcoming Demos publication. We were also told that our theories are wrong, of course.

Finally Ian R Crane came on and made a presentation hammering a few issues, most notably one that is truly impossible to 'debunk'....the collapse of Building 7. His presentation was clear and powerful and punctuated by regular applause.

He also handed the stage over to Tony Farrell for 5 minutes.....and here was the whole confrontation of the day personified in one man.

Here is why no one will engage with the issues. Here is why 'conspiracy theorists' are confronted only by ridicule and name calling.

The PRIMARY reason is because EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS that in most jobs if you stand up and suggest state criminality or even demand the answers to reasonable questions

YOUR CAREER IS OVER.

YOU WILL ALMOST CERTAINLY BE FINANCIALLY DESTROYED.

Just like Tony Farrell, the principal intelligence officer for the South Yorkshire Police whose conscience would not allow him to lie, no matter what the personal consequences*.

So, Professor French et al. The TRUTH OF THESE ISSUES CANNOT BE SIDESTEPPED.

False Flag terror and the rest can never be 'somebody else's business'.

These issues will define your children and your grandchildrens' future and there might be more serious aspects to the outcome of your current moral indolence than the quality of their careers.

If you reject our allegations, outrageous though they might appear, it is your DUTY to prove us wrong.

As fully responsible human beings.

At the end of the conference all speakers faced the audience for questions together. Ian's success with the crowd obviously stung Jamie Bartlett into challenging him on the issue of Building 7. The exchanges were memorable for a couple of reasons. Firstly, Carl Miller (Jamie's Demos co-worker) became visibly angry and invigorated at one point. Bartlett's intervention on the matter was more a debating tactic, in my view. His motive was to score what points he could with the crowd. Miller was more interesting and more genuine. He holds to the official story with real passion and was obviously distressed that he could not prove his point with the audience.

He soared into an angry diatribe, " Why on earth would the government collapse the towers. Would flying planes into them not be enough for God's sake! It's ridiculous. Why would they collapse Building Seven at a time when the whole world was watching. It is just MAD to believe that! (and re Jane Stanley's premature report of the building's collapse)Why on earth would the BBC be involved in a conspiracy! etc....

He exuded real distress and exasperation.

Actually all his reactions and comments are eminently understandable and reasonable UNTIL you realise that these were indeed controlled demolitions.

The evidence of this is final, definitive, totally proven. The 9/11 Commission ignored this issue and only years later when the WRC7 had become a dangerous public embarrassment did the US government come up with a 'theory' of this unique collapse.

An absolutely laughable theory.

Only when you realise this and accept that Building 7 was a controlled demolition (as any intelligent and honest person finally must) and therefore that the whole event must have been an event carried out by some network within government can a person begin to understand that there must be and ARE answers to the questions asked by Mr. Miller. Very reasonable answers (see below).

The second 'event' right at the end of the conference that brought loud cheers from the floor occurred when Jamie Bartlett accepted an invitation from Ian to debate the issue in public. Carl agreed but quickly started to backtrack, "I'm not a professional debunker" (this was the previously mentioned 'leaping off the seesaw').

This is one event for which I cannot wait. It will be a 'first'.

Fingers crossed.

Will it happen?

We will see.

*1) Building 7 was headquarters to all kinds of security service people. The 23rd floor had received 15 million dollars' worth of renovations to create an emergency command center for then-Mayor Rudolf Giuliani. This was probably involved in managing the crime. What is always a criminal's first priority? Destroy the evidence (just like all the WTC 1 & 2 steel was immediately shipped to China rather investigated as part of a crime scene).

2) The essential element of this operation was that it induce massive shock in the American public. A few dozen dead, killed by planes hitting the building would not have served purpose. A plane had hit The Empire State Building in 2003. Not nearly big enough a deal. Apocalyptic terror. Thousands dead. Citizens running for their lives. This is what was required and what America got.

3) Ian R Crane told you. Stanley's report was not BBC involvement in the plot. it was a 'scripted event' gone slightly wrong.

Carl Miller
Jamie Bartlett
Karen Douglas
Chris French
Ian R Crane

.

False Flag Day of Danger 20/09/2011

2011-09-16T23:32:00.006+01:00

.

Webster Tarpley wrote on 9th September that the probability of a large-scale False Flag attack is increasing as a European banking panic looms.

Well, European leaders met today (16th Sept.), Timothy Geithner turned up to apply some friendly encouragement, numerous participants were reported as saying "time is short", yet it looks like there is no 'solution' in sight. The can has been kicked down the road and the meeting will reassemble in October.

We all know that European leaders have a serious political problem as well as a financial one. The obvious and usual solution is for them to arrange for us to hand out more money (guaranteeing the repayment of impossible debt to the bond-holding banks who own the Greek national debt).....followed, presumably, by a bail-out of all the other impossibly debt-ridden economies, which includes (as far as I can make out) just about every country in the western world, bar Germany.

Their problem is that they know that the public will stand for no more of this.

If they try to pull that stroke again now there is a dangerously high probability that most European governments will be driven from office by Christmas.

The financial masters like to stay in control.

Their system is designed to collapse but it must collapse in a manner that brings these people ever more power. The string-pulling, degenerate, murdering oligarchs who control our national governments want it all......

.....and, there is some evidence to suggest that they intend to do away with a very large number of us in the process of getting it.

World wide uprisings and the consequent extinction of current banking institutions is definitely not their plan.

The next step MUST be a crisis that overshadows the current financial problems and ultimately affords the globalist elite the opportunity to enforce their centralising agenda.

It is impossible that anything can perform such a purpose other than a massive false-flag attack or some demented military initiative that will inevitably kick off the long-dreaded world war.

Many people who pay attention and have some understanding of the templates that the globalist psychopaths work to are now expecting a major event on the scale of 9/11 or bigger that will, once again, 'change everything'.

Millions of people increasingly understand these criminals.

In the coming weeks we will be holding our collective breath.

Can we second guess them?

Watch the drills. Watch the magic numbers. Watch out for extraordinary news items like the bomb that "went missing" during a DHS live drill at Sky Harbor Airport in Phoenix a couple of weeks ago. Might it even be possible, as the man who led the US moon landings project, Werner Von Braun, predicted.....that our 'final enemy', the Aliens, will make an appearance? (Von Braun listed the sequence of 'enemies'....."after the Soviets there will be 'terrorism' then 'aliens' and it will all be lies.")

We know that the networks that carry out these crimes are very keen on leaving a signature to their handiwork. Much has been written of the occult numerology that is always connected to state-sponsored outrages.

The first day of danger to watch out for is next Tuesday 20/09/2011 (20+9+2+1+1=33)
or writing it as 20/09/11 (2+9+1+1=13)

Silly though it feels writing about such things, this aspect of False-Flag criminality should not be ignored.

These people are Satanists after all.

.

Video Rebel: The Modern Revolutionary’s Manifesto

2011-09-15T10:36:00.002+01:00

.

Video Rebel's post today:

In the first essay in this two part series I said:

The Fundamental Fact of Your Existence as a modern man or woman is that the bankers of New York and London want to reduce you to debt slavery.

Accept that fact and move on to the solution.

To solve the problems of inflation, Depressions, mass bankruptcies, unemployment, debt slavery, infinite taxation and Banker Bailouts and unending wars we first need to undo the stranglehold the banks have over our government, the press, the Foundations, the schools and Hollywood.

So many radical changes are required that I feel the need to give this a second title:

The Modern Revolutionary’s Manifesto

It has been often noted that we will never recover from our current 23% unemployment and 11% inflation rates until the bankers are arrested, tried, convicted and ordered to make restitution for their crimes against humanity and not just America. The US has a Rico (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Act which will allow us to seize all the assets of the criminals who conspired against America and the world to steal tens of trillions of dollars.

Listen: I think I hear chants of “Jail To The Thief” breaking out at rallies all across America.

The bankers and their allies in the government, the Foundations, the media, Hollywood and major corporations have conspired together to kill Americans and citizens of foreign nations to benefit themselves and their principal allies like Israel.

A case in point is 911. It was taken down by a controlled demolition through an alliance of the banks, the Neocons and Israel. 440,000 cubic yards (336,404 cubic meters) of reinforced concrete were not turned into dust by jet fuel in two seconds. Nanothermite which burns at 5,300 degrees and is available only from above top secret US and Israeli military labs was found in the dust of the World Trade Center.

The Department of Justice has done nothing. The House and Senate have many committees with oversight but they have done nothing. After USAF General Ben Partin who was in charge of Air Force bomb ordnance gave every member of the House and Senate conclusive proof that the bombing of the Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City on 19 April 1995, the House and Senate did nothing. Under RICO, we can indict the administration and the House and the Senate and seize them as criminal run enterprises. We can seize all of their personal assets and cancel their pensions. We will do so as soon as the economic implosion the New York and London banks created gives us enough momentum.

We do need to arrest and try and convict the bankers and their allies. But we will also need their corporate and personal assets to be seized so we can make restitution for the money they have stolen from pensions and savings. There are tens of millions of people around the world who think the 31 trillion dollars in pensions funds are there and were not invested in toxic assets from the New York banks. They will be retiring with a private pension that in reality is no longer all there. The US is also moving to follow the lead of the European criminal governments which are literally taking private pension money and giving the plans worthless IOUs denominated in currencies that will soon be devalued leaving retiring workers out in the cold.

We will cancel all government debts. In cases where we find the buyers of Treasury bonds were innocent of any criminality, we will have the corporate and personal assets of the bankers and their known criminal associates to use as a compensation fund.

We will also cancel all government debts everywhere in the world. Henceforth, money will be issued debt free as Presidents Kennedy and Lincoln had done before they were assassinated by the bankers and their allies. In America that would mean the Treasury should seize control of the Federal Reserve bank.

Since prices are a ratio of the money supply to the total amount of goods and services for sale (i.e. GNP), we can safely increase both the supply of money and the GNP at the same ratio. In America this means we could easily spend 450 billion dollars a year into circulation on badly needed infrastructure repairs. America and Europe both have a whole generation of young people who have never had a real job. If we allow this to continue, our civilization will soon collapse.

We will forever end fractional reserve banking. There is a New York bank with no assets and 92 trillion dollars in liabilities. Banks will only be allowed to loan out depositor’s money. If there is a need for for liquidity, the US Treasury will create it without interest. In 1348 the gold banks of Venice crashed because of fractional reserve banking. They loaned out their customers’ money several times over. The London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) and the COMEX in New York today are engaging in the same fractional reserve gold banking as did their banking forbears did in Venice. They will in months face the same end.

Jeff Christian, a former Goldman Sachs VP, testified before the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) that there are 50 to 100 ounces of paper gold and silver issued for every ounce of physical silver and gold. The Chinese have opened a Pan Asian Metals Exchange and a Pan Asian Gold Exchange. Their futures contracts are required to be redeemable in gold if the buyer so chooses. No such luck in New York and London. I wrote previously that the Chinese declared war on the banks and will take down the COMEX, the LBMA and major banks as soon as their new exchanges are fully operational.

I was the one who originated the saying that SEC now stands for Shredding in Exchange for Cash. The SEC has been shredding all of the prosecutor’s evidence in thousands of court cases. The CFTC has done nothing to stop the wild abuses of the COMEX. And bank regulators have done nothing to stop abuses by the banks. All of these agencies need to be included in RICO indictments with their corporate and personal assets together with pensions to be seized. We also must not forget the credit rating agencies like S&P, Moodys and Fitch that gave fraudulent AAA ratings to mortgage backed securities so they could illegally be sold. They all participated in multi-trillion dollar frauds.

There are varying estimates of the total number of Credit Default Swaps (CDS) in existence. A CDS is a hybrid between insurance and a derivative which is a bet on the future value of a bond or a commodity. The problem is that CDS are neither regulated nor are they real insurance with actual reserves set aside to pay for the losses. You as a taxpayer are supposed to pay for their losses.

Some say there are 1.5 quadrillion dollars in CDS of which 600 billion American banks and financial institutions have guaranteed. That means taxpayers in America are theoretically liable for the 600 billion or 40 times total GDP. I do not know what individual countries in Europe and elsewhere are exposed to. I do know of a law case brought in a regional French court by a New York bank attempting to collect an astronomical sum from a small local town. The court said the French people owe you nothing. The New York bankers went home empty handed. Nothing was said in the American press lest voters and potential jury members learn the truth. We owe them nothing. The bankers engaged in fraud. They bankrupted Birmingham Alabama’s Jefferson county.

CDS should all be terminated. Nor should anyone be allowed to sell a futures contract they cannot make delivery on. If you do not own a wheat farm or a silver mine, you have no business selling wheat or silver.

There is another source of assets to be seized. Walter Burien of www.CAFR1.com has documented the tens of trillions of dollars held by tens of thousands of government agencies in the US and their current income which is far greater than enough to balance the budget, pay off all state and local government bonds, fund their pensions and to serve as a source of money for restitution.

We also need to create an entirely new manufacturing base for America and the world. We must release the scientific advances our Secret Government has made. They are at least 20 to 30 years in advance of us in medicine, computers, materials sciences, communications, superconductors and free energy. I find it reasonable to believe that they have some measure of anti-gravity and also have been making regular interplanetary trips to Mars. If all of these advances were patented and stock companies were organized to hold those patents, we could fund a large part of Social Security by giving those shares to Americans in trust accounts. This will create more than ten million high paying jobs.

There is more than enough cash floating around the various governmental agencies and in the personal possession of known banking to solve all of our problems. David DeGraw told us that the wealthy in America have net assets of 46 trillion dollars if you count the money they have in tax havens like the Cayman Islands. A lot of those trillions are held by the criminals we have been speaking of. Now is not the time to despair.

America is currently engaged in six active wars we know of. The latest news is that Walter Fauntroy who used to be the Washington D.C. Delegate to the US House, was in Libya. He was in fear for his life for good reason as he is black. The Al Qaeda rebels have been routinely killing black Libyans including women and children. He saw NATO Special Forces enter a town and kill both rebels and Loyalists. The NATO soldiers even beheaded civilians to show they were the new colonial power in charge of Libya. NATO has been bombing civilians to force the old regime to withdraw so they could steal their oil, gold and money. We need to stop the war against the Libyan people, all five of the other wars America admits it is currently waging plus any others we have not been told of. We also need to withdraw US troops from at least 100 nations.

We need to immediately stop the usage of all Depleted Uranium ammunition. It is killing our troops. It is also killing our allies overseas. And DU is killing Americans at home from firing practice sites not just in Puerto Rico but also inside the continental US. We need to use those seized assets from the bankers to clean up the battle fields overseas and the training ranges in the US. We have had enough cancer induced by DU.

We can clearly see the influence of the major tax exempt Foundations in implementing the Globalist banker agenda. We need to include where applicable the Foundations in those RICO lawsuits. Their assets need to be seized. We could allow them to continue under new management but a new purpose which should be to restore our culture. We also need to take a look at most members of the Bilderberg Society, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission for RICO investigation arresting and seizing assets.

We also must investigate all members of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the ADL and AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) as illegal agents of a foreign power. These charges are serious as it is patently obvious that Israel did 911 with the help of Zionist criminals inside the US. A man whose name was redacted went from the SPLC to Elohim City where two Jewish men were running an operation to entrap Americans who resisted the criminal Zionist banker conspiracy. Elohim City was thought to be involved in the Oklahoma City bombing which killed 168 people including 19 children in the daycare center.

The police and the courts have been co-operating with the ADL and the SPLC to arrest and convict innocent people. All these charges need to be dismissed. All prosecutors, judges, police officials and people from outside pressure groups like the SPLC and the ADL need to be arrested, tried and convicted for the applicable crimes they committed. All of their assets need to be seized to pay for the court costs and damages done to innocent men and women.

Major banks, corporations and crime families traffick 250,000 human slaves every year. Many of these young children are killed for sexual sport. DynCorp and Blackwater have been caught engaging in human trafficking. Yet DynCorp amazingly is allowed to contract their employees to US states to run state Children’s Protective Services (CPS) agencies. These children are often sexually abused. They are often killed. And some are even sent overseas to become sex slaves. Children in state care are also abused by the administration of unwarranted medications with many states giving them an average of 6 to 7 dangerous drugs.

This will stop immediately. All DynCorp contracts with CPS will be abrogated. DynCorp and Blackwater will have their corporate charters removed. We will begin investigations into the abuse of tens of thousands of children. We will seek criminals from foreign countries. That includes Israel which is the center of human slavery trafficking. We will also co-operate with foreign nations that want to investigate illegal organ harvesting.

Many privately owned companies and state and local governments have participated in the war against humanity. It is illegal to poison drinking water with fluoride in Japan, France and many other nations. This practice has to stop in America. Stalin discovered he need fewer guards to control the millions of inmates in his Gulags if he fluoridated them. Hitler copied him. And the Allies loved fluoridating prisoners so much that they did it to the general public here.

Vaccine makers have included aborted human fetuses in their vaccines which generate autoimmune responses. They also included peanut oil in many vaccines which gave rise to widespread peanut allergies.

Our food has been poisoned with Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) from Monsanto. GMO crops grow pesticides inside them which poison us. Mexico has recently banned GMO crops. Canada has banned BisPhenol-A, a plastic that produces estrogen mimickers and causes cancer. America needs to outlaw both and to stop exporting these poisons. We also need to stop the release of unrestricted gene splicing experiments into nature. We have allowed some insane people to genetically engineer a new hybrid fish by splicing together genes from a salmon and a spider.

What is the point of all this mindless destruction of humanity?

This Manifesto is firmly grounded in reality. I can see what others must deny, because they are gripped by fear. The banks are collapsing. Bank of America absorbed Countrywide and is choking on their toxic assets. Now Americans are to believe that JP Morgan which has 92 trillion dollars in derivative liabilities and zero assets can absorb Bank of America? Europeans are supposed to believe that because Soc Gen (Societe General) is bankrupt that BNP Paribas can absorb them and continue in business? Wait a second. Isn’t BNP Paribas the bank that just announced American money markets refuse to lend them money? Paribas is owned by the Rothschilds so you know things are getting bad in Europe.

There is about zero chance for Obama to get another Bailout through the divided Congress. The Democrats just lost a special election in a district in New York where Republican voters are an endangered species. Obama has zero political capital. In fact any banker Bailout bill he introduces will give Democrats in the House and the Senate a golden opportunity to separate themselves from the Teleprompter Reader occupying the White House. There has been talk of Obama declaring martial law and issuing an Executive Order to create a new Bailout for the banking criminals. There is an explanation for the martial law exercises. The bankers know the dollar will not last long.

I have previously said that I would expect Ben Bernanke to create trillions of dollars in new money so he can swap it with Jean Claude Trichet, his counterpart at the ECB (European Central Bank). All this new money will be inflationary. It will be used to bail out banks.

The vote later this month in the Bundestag on Merkel’s disastrous Bailouts should cause her government either to collapse or at least change their policies. Germans will not be bailing out Europe much longer. Merkel should lose her 7th straight local election this weekend.

I have written of the 2 trillion dollars in M0 or Monetary base money in deposit at the Federal Reserve. Bernanke created 2 trillion dollars in new money which he gave to the banks so they could buy US Treasury bonds. This is called sanitizing debt and is not too inflationary. But there are indications that the FED is allowing the big banks to deposit this money in their banks so under fractional reserve banking rules 500 billion dollars can become 5 trillion dollars, a trillion dollars can become ten trillion dollars and 2 trillion can become 20 trillion dollars. They might loan all or part of that money to themselves so the bankers can buy all remaining real assets not under their control.

We are in the end stages of this illegal occupation of America by the New York banks and their co-conspirators. The banks, the COMEX, the LBMA, the dollar, the pound, the euro and the stock markets will all soon crash. When they do, a worldwide network of people who received their news from the Internet and not the mainstream news will be able to diagnose the problems facing us and have the ability to solve them.

I need to emphasize this point: The US military in my opinion will not allow Israel to launch WW III by attacking Iran. I would also hope the US military will tell the bankers that they will not be allowed to kill a few billion people with a series of plagues.

The future belongs to us. The bankers at best can expect to live the rest of their lives in jail sharing cells with war criminals.

Author’s Note: This is the second in this series. The first article was:

The Mathematics Of Austerity: Proving Austerity Never Was Even Intended To Work

http://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2011/09/12/the-mathematics-of-austerity-proving-austerity-never-was-even-intended-to-work/

I made a reference to the works of David DeGraw. He has some important information to share. I have a quick guide to his latest book here:

David DeGraw In 2 Minutes

http://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2011/08/13/david-degraw-in-2-minutes/

.

Someone Else's Business

2011-09-08T12:27:00.012+01:00

.

Tony Farrell, 'Principal Intelligence Analyst' For South Yorkshire Police (the UK's 18th largest force), was sacked in July 2010 for submitting in his annual review that the major threat of terrorism against British people came from within the UK state apparatus rather than from Islamic fundamentalists. Mr Farrell had worked in this position for twelve years and his previous work record was, his employers admitted, 'impeccable'.

However, in this 2010 report he asserted that both 7/7 and 9/11 were 'inside jobs'.

One can understand the dilemma this posed for South Yorkshire Police.

One can understand his being sacked. Tony himself well understood that this would almost certainly be the outcome of his actions.

Earlier this year an Employment Tribunal upheld SYP's decision when they rejected TF's claim against them for 'unfair dismissal'.

I attended the first day of Tony Farrell's appeal against this decision in Sheffield Employment Tribunal yesterday. Tony cannot afford legal representation but this probably matters little. He is being assisted/represented by well-known public speaker and polymath Ian R Crane.

I had attended a 'Friends of Tony' gathering the previous evening and it was clear that the substance of the appeal would be to pursue the 'procedural' argument, i.e. that procedures were violated by the SYP resorting to summary dismissal without reviewing or investigating any of his analysis that had caused the dismissal.

However, in court, while listening to the interrogation of the SYP witnesses I found it difficult not to sink into a sort of gloom. Nitpicking exchanges over nuances of procedure somehow missed the point.

The Director of Finance who sacked TF was a transparently decent man. One could easily understand the 'impossible' position in which he found himself. Any normal person would naturally ask themselves, "What else was he supposed to do?" This man even said that Tony Farrell's allegations "could be right.".....but it turns out that the UK police policy on 'terrorism' is the responsibility of the Metropolitan Police.

Someone else's business.

The same goes for the Tribunal, three men who bent over backwards to cover every detail of the actions of SYP and offered Tony Farrell every courtesy, full respect and sometimes necessary patience as he required time to respond to various thrusts in the evidence.

For this Tribunal too, the content of Tony Farrell's analysis is 'somebody else's business'. It is their job only to address evidential matters relating points of law previously overlooked or misapplied.

One might ask what would have happened if TF had worked for the Metropolitan Police. There is little doubt he would have been sacked by them also. They would have said that they take their directions on anti-terrorism' policy from the 'security services'.

But it is the 'security services' who are being accused by Tony Farrell (and many, many others) of carrying out the 7/7 terror attacks.

For parliament and the mass media too the truth about 7/7 is "somebody else's business". The narrative emanating from the 'security services' is treated as gospel in spite of the extraordinary anomalies, contradictions and pure lies that are promoted as truth in the public domain.

The truth about this appeal is that the outcome of the case depends entirely on the panel's interpretation of the word "reasonable".

They could easily find that South Yorkshire Police were being 'reasonable' in every way when they sacked Tony Farrell because the issues he raised were "someone else's business".

But such extraordinary and serious allegations are surely everybody's business! If the Tribunal were to admit this to themselves then the reaction of South Yorkshire Police to TF's 'annual review' take on an entirely different complexion. From this perspective the SYP were entirely UNreasonable in their actions.

.....and if the same South Yorkshire Police had carried out a little investigation into TF's allegations, here are just a few of the facts (emerging from published and submitted 7/7 evidence) they would have discovered:

1) That there were THREE holes in the Edgware Road carriage, one large hole by the first set of single doors and two holes, one large and one smaller in front of the first set of double doors. Individuals fell into all three holes. two emerged. One died. In what way is this scenario possibly compatible with a suicide-bomber carrying one rucksack of home-made liquid explosive?
2) A Dr Morgan Costello was sent by police on to two of the trains to count the dead bodies. He counted Six on the Aldgate coach and Seven at Edgware Road. These numbers exactly match the numbers of civilian dead but where are the bombers? The numbers should have been seven and eight. Here is the clearest possible evidence that the so-called suicide bombers were not on the trains. The narrative has adjusted to this anomaly by claiming that Tanweer's body (Aldgate) was splattered into 52 different pieces. But this violates common sense. The evidence places many people all around Tanweer on the train, yet nearly all the other serious injuries were to feet and lower limbs.
3) There were 4 different drills around 7/7, one at the very time of the attacks, that mimicked what actually occurred with more-than-uncanny accuracy. For those who study such matters here is an ever-present and defining fingerprint of the false-flag attack template.
4) Regarding the explosives used, the first analysis came from a genuine expert. Superintendent Christophe Chaboud, chief of French anti-terrorism Coordination Unit who was in London assisting Scotland Yard with its investigation, confirmed to The Times that,‘The nature of the explosives appears to be military, which is very worrying.....the material used were not homemade but sophisticated military explosives …’ This is surely the most reliable commentary on the nature of the bombs that went off that morning. The problem is that it would have been all-but-impossible for four young men from Leeds to get their hands on such materials.
Between 2005 and today the official story developed onwards from explosives 'C4' to 'TAPT' to, finally, a mixture of black pepper and boiled-down hydrogen peroxide bought from a local warehouse.

There are literally hundreds of other anomalies that SYP could have discovered for themselves through EASILY ACCESSIBLE AND OPEN OFFICIAL SOURCES.

No one, it seems, excepting people like Mr Farrell, are prepared to do this important work. The consensus appears to be that this is

'SOMEONE ELSE'S BUSINESS'.

When we are being mired in wars that no sensible person wants, when the media today are signalling new possible wars with Syria, Iran and Venezuela, when we see the beginnings of our children being mired in debt slavery before they even begin their working lives, when they are told they will never own their own homes, when the prospect of a lifetime of central finance-controlled Soviet-style subjugation looms for our yet-unborn grandchildren,

WHOSE BUSINESS IS IT?

WHOSE?

Once men and women swallow mainstream fictions, however widely accepted, and abandon principle we are doomed and we have no one to blame but our individual selves.

The fact is that South Yorkshire Police should have honestly investigated Tony Farrell's allegations. Normal procedures demand it and although THE SYP's behaviour was emotionally and culturally reasonable, in principle it was NOT reasonable.

Everybody in the courtroom understands the extraordinary nature of this case and the possible alarming and dangerous consequences (for individuals involved) of anything other than the obvious verdict.

But this case transcends matters of established employment procedures or even broader matters of law.

It should be clear to everyone that this is a matter of visceral and vital importance and that the arena of battle is not firstly a tribunal premises but the individual human soul.

The battleground is our own hearts and minds.

Deep down everybody in this court understands the issues. It is just that some are afraid (perhaps understandably) to face them and some are not.

An easy path for avoiding them has been laid down for, not just the tribunal, but for everyone else....by an owned mainstream media and a supine and invisible parliament.

We must appeal to the Tribunal not to take this path.

If charges against the state are made, however seemingly outrageous, let us at least demand that relevant evidence be investigated.

If the Police will not do it, who will protect us?

If the Law will not demand it, where is Justice?

THESE MATTERS ARE EVERYBODY'S BUSINESS.

I appeal to the members of this Tribunal to look deeply within themselves.

Let the system that is put in place to serve us AT LAST do so.

Let the message go out that we, whoever we are, demand to be told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth of these matters.

Let us also not forget that our culture was founded on Christ's teachings and such words as these:

"YOUR JUSTICE MUST EXCEED THAT OF THE SCRIBES AND PHARISEES WHO STRAIN AT THE GNAT BUT SWALLOW THE CAMEL."

P.S. The hearing continues at Sheffield Employment Tribunal (beside the Cathedral). Its last day will be on Friday 9th September.

.

Cameron Gloats Too Soon

2011-09-06T11:46:00.009+01:00

.

The Independent's parliamentary commentator Simon Carr, reporting on David Cameron's demeanor in the House of Commons yesterday, said that;

".....No wonder David Cameron was so cheerful, his first war has ended jolly well...."

Carr continues,

".......In a strangely lifeless Parliament, Cameron told us why we'd gone to the trouble and expense of helping Libya overthrow a murdering, torturing enemy of Britain....."

Strangely lifeless?

Nothing strange about that.

Even members of the British parliament remain human beings. With 50,000 estimated dead, continuation of the 'humanitarian' justification for this war of aggression must cause a little vomit to rise in the hardiest throat.

M.P.'s will also surely be aware that the country has been handed over to a coalition of groups, mostly Islamic fundamentalists (who hated Gaddafi because he suppressed their activities).

We used to call these people 'Al Qaeda'.

On the eve of the 10th anniversary of 9/11 realisation of this fact must cut deep with 'Honourable Members' who retain any pretensions regarding their own integrity.

Thinking Parliamentarians must sit on their benches and feel like whores lining up to service the next paying client.

Lifeless?

DEPRESSED, more like.

Those of even a little intelligence will also know how short-lived Cameron's 'moment of glory' is likely to be.

Next we will see the battle for dominance between the rebel groupings, then the creation of a Benghazi 'green zone' occupied by NATO 'peacekeepers' (this already exists, informally). Next a descent into complete chaos and horror as Gaddafi's people and Libyan nationalists get their act together and launch a guerrilla war against oil installations, western occupiers and Libyans working in alliance to the new Libyan (i.e.Rothschild-integrated) bank.

It will almost certainly start to look like Iraq all over again.

LIBYA WILL BECOME FOR CAMERON WHAT IRAQ IS FOR BLAIR.

A cause for MP's to squirm, decent citizens to spit and the creep involved to disappear from the streets and pontificate on global issues from a safe distance (somewhere east of the Mediterranian).

So,

MP's are listless, lifeless and depressed.

That is because they know all this instinctively.

It is just that most of them haven't yet allowed such thoughts into their conscious minds.

Cameron.

YOU GLOAT TOO SOON.

.

The Education System is Creating a 'Fair' Society (and a 'New Science' For Schools?)

2011-09-05T11:43:00.012+01:00

.

Nick Clegg gave a speech this morning about his coalition government's new creation, 'Free Schools'. Let us recall that his party voted against creating Free Schools less than a year ago.....

.....Oh, and that Mr Clegg has made his party an object of almost universal contempt by promising not to raise University tuition fees in the LibDem election manifesto and then promptly tripling them immediately after being elected.

.....but then policy never really was Mr Clegg's thing.

He's more a pretty face, a Blair-style 'nice guy', a media-friendly, hand-picked instrument of betrayal.

In his speech Mr Clegg said that Free Schools "must not be the preserve of the privileged few - creaming off the best pupils while leaving the rest to fend for themselves, causing problems for and draining resources from other nearby schools".

"So let me give you my reassurance - I would never tolerate that," he said.

Mr Clegg also called on free schools to admit at least the same proportion of free school meal pupils as the local average and open up facilities to the local community.

So here we have our society's ongoing model of 'fairness' exposed yet again.

The government WILL DO NOTHING ITSELF to address the accelerating transfer of wealth (but one example in this link) from the poor to the rich.

What it will do is task schools with identifying more talented or ambitious elements from the lower orders who can enjoy the educational benefits that might allow them to join the lower ranks of the well-heeled predators and parasites (like Clegg himself) who enforce this disgusting system on the ever more impoverished and powerless masses.

Here is the western liberal democratic version of what 'fairness' is.

A NEW PHYSICS, A NEW CHEMISTRY?

Just to make sure that our educational system remains 'free' and fair' Education Secretary Michael Gove announced yesterday that his government will be using "ex-Spies to root out fanatics in the classroom."

I suppose Mr Gove means people like me who spread mistrust of government by asking uncomfortable questions and making unacceptable allegations.

Mr Gove said, “......More than that, we are reviewing the science curriculum......"

We can surely expect the Law of Conservation of Momentum and the Law of Conservation of Energy to be consigned, like 'Social Credit', the history of the battles between governments and bankers for control of money-creation, the identity of the paymasters of Lenin and Trotsky....etc., etc......to the dustbin of history.

After 9/11 we can expect the laws of physics to become in some nebulous way, a subjective matter......perhaps the whole thing will be incorporated under 'relativity' and reformatted by the brilliant metaphysicians who have got so much useful practice 'debunking' 9/11 Truthers and the like.

Mr Gove, Mr Clegg and their friends will decide how we understand the words 'fairness' and 'truth'.

The fact is that their 'fairness' is GROSS INJUSTICE and their 'truths' are OBSCENE LIES.

Look upon these smooth liars and weep.

Neils Harrit (whose research might necessitate the creation of a new chemistry) said in BBC2's '9/11 Ten Years on Conspiracy Files' last week something like this:

"There is no way our civilisation can survive the kind of lies to which we are being subjected."

Quite so.

IAN CRANE TALK

2011-09-05T11:32:00.003+01:00

.

London Talk - 7.00pm - Friday 9th Sept 2011

Ian R Crane, a former oilfield executive and founding Chairman of the UK 9/11 Truth Movement, who now lectures and writes on the deep geo-political webs that are being spun – with particular focus on US Hegemony and the NWO (Corporatist) agenda for control of global resources.

Indian Y.M.C.A
41 Fitzroy Square
London W1T 6AQ

(4 mins from Warren Street Tube Station)

7.00pm - 10.00pm

Advance Tickets £8 + 80p Admin Charge

Tickets On The Door £10

.

"Moral Slurry" and The Culture Of Looting

2011-08-15T17:22:00.005+01:00

.

Quote from Peter Hitchens article in yesterday's 'Mail On Sunday':

".....The real danger from some of the defendants is emphasised by the floor-to-ceiling armoured glass which now surrounds the dock. Our courts never used to have such cages (though they are common in Third World tribunals).

In these ambiguous surroundings, a hard core of professionals are wearily processing the flow of moral slurry that passes constantly through the building...."

Hitchens is a commentator who, because of his determined promotion of Christianity and very effective opposition to abortion, I generally like.

However Peter, sometimes when reading such pieces as this, words of Christ spring to mind:

"Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye." (Matthew 7:5)

"Let He Who Is Without Sin Cast The First Stone."(John 8:7)

Better for you, Peter, that you try and feel some identification, or at least empathy, with this "moral slurry".

God made them too and firstly,

WHERE DO YOU THINK THE CULTURE OF LOOTING COMES FROM?

(cartoon here)

and secondly,

THEIR CRIMES OF THE STREET LOOTERS ARE SO MUCH LESS SERIOUS THAN NOT ONLY THE LOOTING OF THE BANKERS BUT ALSO THE SINS OF OMISSION COMMITTED BY YOURSELF

and the rest of your profession.

If it was the duty of the underclass to investigate, report on and demand the prosecution of criminal oligarchs, bankers, politicians, security services and the like, my guess is that they would do so. These are people who, for all their inadequacies, would surely see that dealing with the crooks at the top of society as severely as those at the bottom is an important matter of principle.....

.....a point clearly lost on your good self.

You can be forgiven for not stating the obvious and pointing an accusing finger....but

YOU DO NOT EVEN ASK THE OBVIOUS AND VITALLY IMPORTANT QUESTIONS.

YOU DO NOT EVEN REPORT STARTLING AND VERY IMPORTANT ANOMALIES OF EVIDENCE AVAILABLE TO ALL IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.

THE ONLY REASONS CAN BE THAT SUCH REPORTING MIGHT GET IMPORTANT PEOPLE INTO SERIOUS TROUBLE.

(O.K. Such right and honest reporting might get you unemployed or worse but you will surely understand why some of us might feel justified in sneering out loud at such a person who mounts a 'moral high horse').

I will outline a few details of just one issue on which you have failed (7/7) below.....but there are many others. Failure on this will one day cause the public to consider all media as accessories to the most serious crime ever committed in this country.

For myself, I cannot condone or applaud any of the rioters' actions. But I can feel some sympathy for them. They are bottom of the heap. Angry losers who know that if things stay as they are that is all they will ever be. I can also admit to being grateful that this society has begun to manifest openly the truly appalling sickness that infects its body from top to bottom. Such transformative developments always seems to involve the heart-breaking suffering of innocents but you, as a Christian, will understand the unfortunate inevitability of this.

And anyone who has studied the issues knows that this sickness is much, oh so much, greater at the top of this society than at the bottom. The sickness must surely reveal itself in full before this society has any chance of healing itself.

However, we should try to empathise with people at the top also. We all know what it is to want more than we need and to do wrong to get it.

We all require some measure of God's mercy.

The evil of the controllers is worse of course, but history shows that the two ends of society have colluded in immeasurable wickedness over the past millenia. The British Empire had its Luciferian bankers, but there were plenty of willing murderers snatched from the gutters to help them.

Let us forgive them all.

But let us tell the truth and demand truth.

Then we can demand a change of heart from all parties, perhaps ourselves included.

THE TRUTH WILL SET US FREE.

Oh, Peter.....yes......I'd forgotten the point.

Print some of this stuff, will you?

SERIOUSLY DISTURBING YET UNREPORTED FACTS ABOUT 7/7

Three Holes in the Floor of the Edgeware Road Carriage

Evidence was given by different witnesses, including the train driver (Ray Whitehead), that clearly describe three separate holes in the Edgeware Road carriage, two in front of the second set of (double) doors in the second carriage and another large hole in front of the first set of single doors in the same carriage. People fell into all three holes. Two emerged from the holes . One died in the third hole. The original report on the Edgeware Road explosion (from Mark Honigsbaum of the Guardian who was on the train) had the train lifting off the tracks and being derailed (i.e. bomb(s) underneath the train). The driver described all the access panels in the floor of the first coach (the bomb(s) killed people in the second carriage) being 'flipped open' from underneath.
In what way is any of this compatible with a single 'suicide bomber' with a rucksack full of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide?

The Explosives

Here is a timeline for the 7/7 explosives narrative as it developed:

The first analysis came from a genuine expert. This is surely the most reliable commentary on the nature of the bombs that went off that morning. The problem is that it would have been all-but-impossible for four young men from Leeds to get their hands on such materials.

On 12 July 2005, Superintendent Christophe Chaboud, chief of French anti-terrorism Coordination Unit who was in London assisting Scotland Yard with its investigation, confirmed to The Times that,‘The nature of the explosives appears to be military, which is very worrying….the material used were not homemade but sophisticated military explosives …’ (Nafeez Ahmed The London Bombs, p.24)

On 13th July it was stated that these were of ‘C4’ explosive....London explosives have military origin – [Science Daily. LONDON, July 13 (UPI)]: Forensic scientists told the newspaper the construction of the four devices detonated in London was very technically advanced, and unlike any instructions that can be found on the Internet.’

From The Independent on July 14th: ‘A bath filled with explosives has been found at a house in Leeds that was the “operational base” for the London suicide bombers
17th July 2005 The Observer: ‘22 lbs TATP in the bath.’

The TATP story survived but faded away in 2007 then, when the 7/7 Kingston trial came along in the summer of 2008 all trace of the TATP story had gone.

Now the explosives were made of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide. The idea of the four heating up Hydrogen Peroxide in their kitchen to the point where it would make an explosive mix with black pepper is simply laughable. How could they test that their ‘bombs’ were going to go off. Were they going to go lurching across the country with this kind of bomb sloshing about in their rucksacks. Has anybody ever made a bomb out of this mixture? If such a bomb did explode could it possibly have caused the devastation created on 7/7?

There is much written online that mocks these materials as potential tools of mass destruction. Do we not require a Public Inquiry on this issue alone. The changing storyline above surely makes no sense at all.

Why Suicide?

Moving on to another very obvious question: why would terrorists who wished to wreak havoc and punish British people for the UK’s involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan choose to blow themselves up along with their victims?

There is no history of suicide bombings in the west.

This is because there is no need for bombers to commit suicide to achieve their objective.

These were very crowded trains. They could have set a timed detonator and quietly slipped off the trains a stop or two early, leaving their bags on the floor amongst the feet of dozens of incurious passengers. Where would have been the risk in that? Surely such activists would better serve their cause by continuing and not terminating their mission?

Drills

There were four uncannily accurate drills carried out before the 7/7 bombings:
1) The BBC Panorama ‘management exercise’ programme of May 2004 during which a panel of ‘managers’, including Peter Power (see below) and Michael Portillo, discussed how they would deal with a terror attack on London that revealed itself to them through mock news reports as the show progressed. The scenario they had to deal with turned out to be one overground and 3 underground explosions taking place over a short space of time during the morning rush hour.

2) The contemporaneous 7/7 drill: on 7/7 itself Peter Power conducted a terror drill that shadowed the cataclysm as it happened – over the same three tube stations at more or less the same time. On the afternoon of 7/7 he was interviewed on Radio 5’s ‘Drivetime’ programme:
POWER: …at half-past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for, er, over, a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing upright!

3) Atlantic Blue: held over 5-8 April, 2005. All echelons of government participated in this large terror-drill. The Independent reported after July 7th that “By an extraordinary coincidence, all the experts who formulate such plans are together in a meeting at the headquarters of the London Ambulance Service – and they are discussing an exercise they ran three months ago that involved simulating four terrorist bombs going off at once across London.”

4) Operation Hanover: London’s police hold a little-known yearly terror-drill. On 2005 it just happened to be held on 1-2 July. Its game-plan was threefold: three ‘simultaneous’ bomb attacks on three underground stations. The police have been reticent about discussing this astounding precursor event, mere days before 7/7. They only revealed it in 2009.

Question: How did the authorities manage to be so extraordinarily prescient re the 7/7 bombings? They got it almost exactly right every time. How, in the name of God, is such a thing possible?

Why No Post-Mortems?

Another astonishing fact that emerged during the 2010-11 7/7 Inquest was that no post mortems were carried out on the bodies of the victims. A very great deal about the nature of and distance from the explosions could have been discovered from such examinations. The effects of different explosives on flesh are well-known. Such post-mortems would have provided some definitive information that would have at least ruled out some possible explosives from consideration as the source material of the blasts. What could possibly explain such an oversight other than the desire to avoid creating conflicts with a fabricated narrative.

Body Count reveals no Bombers

The First Official Body Count on Two of the Trains was One Body Short

At the 7/7/ Inquest in November 2010 Dr. Morgan Costello gave evidence that he was asked to attend two scenes, Edgware Road and Aldgate, for the 'purposes of certifying the extinction of life'. He counted six bodies at Edgware Road and seven bodies at Aldgate and declared these as 'life extinct'. The enormous anomaly, that passed completely unreported in the press, was that the numbers should have been seven and eight if we count the bodies of the bombers. Here is surely the clearest possible evidence that the alleged bombers were never on the trains.
To some extent the authorities got round this issue with Tanweer by saying that his body was blown into 52 different pieces........but this makes no sense whatsoever given his alleged extreme proximity to others who died and the fact that the dead and the injured on this train (and on the other two) mostly suffered massive injuries to their feet and legs.

No similar count seems to have been carried out on the other (Russell Square ) train but we do know a little about the behaviour of the Russell Square bomber, Germaine Lindsay, before his demise.

Germaine Lindsay, cool and then confused

Germaine Lindsay drove from Aylesbury to meet the other (let’s call them) bombers in Luton railway station. He arrived an hour before them and decided to take a little nap. He received a parking ticket while asleep in his car. Were he a terrorist he obviously would have known that he would have had only four hours left to live.

Germaine Lindsay was one extraordinarily relaxed suicide-bomber.

A station attendant called Mr. Patel gave testimony to the Inquest that a man he identified as Germaine Lindsay arrived on the concourse of King’s Cross station and asked to talk to “The Duty Manager”. He said it was, “Very important.” Mr Patel remarked that it was very unusual for a member of the public to know the exact name for the person in charge of the station. Normally people asked for ‘the supervisor’ or ‘the manager’. At this time there was chaos on the concourse. The metal grills had been pulled down and shut at the front of the station. Passengers were not being allowed through the barriers. A crowd had built up and people were starting to abuse staff. Numbers of ‘Community Support Officers’ who looked like police were milling around the area trying to manage the situation. No wonder Lindsay was confused. He must have decided to try to speak to someone who ‘was in on the game’ to explain to him what was going on. The most obvious explanation of his behaviour is that it would have puzzled and alarmed him that the drill had started before he, ‘the bomber’, had caught their trains. Perhaps a chilling possibility occurred to him. When Mr. Patel returned with the duty manager Lindsay had gone.

And More

There are many, many other serious anomalies in the official narrative besides those mentioned above (and below).

The train times presented huge problems for the official narrative causing the Home Secretary to change the story after it was realised that the 7.40 they were said to have caught had been cancelled. Then the next train arrived 23 minutes late at King’s Cross giving the bombers only three minutes to buy four RETURN tickets (think about that one), cross the track by bridge and board the last possible train that makes it just feasible they could have reached the bombed trains in time.

On the 5th July 2005, Mohammed Siddique Khan took his pregnant wife to Dewsbury Hospital in West Yorkshire. She was bleeding and there was obviously something wrong. Doctors examined Hasina Patel and said that there was a ‘threatened miscarriage’. They sent her home and booked her in for a scan on the 7th. Mrs Patel has never told the time they got home but afterwards Mohammed Khan said that he was ‘going to see his friends’. Hasina Patel never saw or heard from her husband ever again. She miscarried on July 6th . At the 7/7 Inquest there was ‘evidence’ (peculiar and surely untrustworthy) presented of a mobile phone text-message exchange between Khan and Germaine Lindsay at 4.35am on the morning of the 6th July. Would Khan really have abandoned his desperate wife for a whole day while she was in that condition? Khan was a highly respected in his community and by the headmistress of the special school in which he worked as a classroom assistant. The police had used him to mediate between rival gangs in local disputes. He was trusted by all sides. Hilary Benn had taken Khan on a tour of the House of Commons. He was not known to be politically radical. Quite the opposite. He was protective of the good name of his community and was eager to maintain good relations with the local white community. Bearing this in mind it is likely that the reason the police have film of Khan is that he was helping them ‘keep an eye on’ any worrisome Muslim elements in his locality. He was not a troublemaker, he was a healer and a fixer.
The most likely explanation for Khan’s disappearance on the 6th is that he told his minder for the 7/7 exercise that he was not going to be able to make it. . He would have been told to see that the others could make it without him. The bombings were not going to be called off but……now he had presented his minders with a problem that had only one possible solution. His goose was cooked.

This would also explain why the attendant at the filling station where Tanweer filled his car (and argued about the change he was given) said he only saw one other person in Tanweer’s car. Hasib Hussain alone (the bus-bomber) was in the car and, unknown to the pair of them, Khan was by now already dead. This would also explain why the now-suppressed BBC radio 5 news reports from the late morning of the seventh said that two men had been shot in Canary Wharf (rather than three, the supposed train bombers. Hussain had been separated from the others).

Those who have travelled to Beeston and spoken to locals report that, like Khan, Hussain and Tanweer had shown no inclination in their communities towards political or religious radicalism.

The Evidence against ‘The Four’

Looking at the detail of latest narrative laid out before the 7/7 Inquest, it must be admitted that it is now just physically possible that the four caught the last possible train at Luton and rushed from King’s Cross Thameslink to the various subway platforms before detonating their deadly cargos. However, their relaxed demeanour in the very few still photos presented as evidence militates against the probability that they were rushing about madly that morning (especially with all that liquid explosive slopping about on their backs).

Why too in the most CCTV-rich environment on earth are there only a couple of very poor pictures of the four, one at Luton, one at Thameslink, the date and time stamps on which could have easily been photoshopped. Could the photos of Khan have been used from the ‘practice run’ the four carried out on 29th June 2005, just eight days earlier?

The mobile phone evidence places them all on the correct train at the right time. Three things about this though. Firstly, this is new evidence that was not released in the previous 2006 hearing. Why? Second, is it likely that these men would have been texting each other on train they had all boarded together. Finally, this is the kind of evidence easily faked. It is letters and numbers on a piece of paper.

Khan and Tanweer could easily have been talked into making the Jihadi videos that have played such a large part in aiding the public to accept their guilt. They were employees, well-paid for two days work, the practice on June 29th and for the day itself. They were told that the exercise has to be made as realistic as possible. The film would be in the hands of the station staff and other authorities giving them a possible means of intercepting the four. The on-camera ‘threats’ from Khan and Tanweer are vague and unspecific. When Hasina Patel first saw these videos it was reported that she said, “That’s not my husband.” Her brother thought it was Khan. It is most likely that she meant, “ I know him. He would never say such things.”
The ‘bombers’ all had four or more mobile phones each; one of their own private phones and at least three other (so-called) ‘operational’ phones that they are supposed to have used to confound anyone who might attempt to track their communications and obstruct their diabolical plan. It is most likely that these phones were supplied by their minder and that their holding them allowed their ‘handlers’ to track Tanweer and Lindsay down in Canary Wharf after they had panicked and gone on the run, presumably (and naively) hoping to tell their story to the British press who are mostly based there.

P.S. Muad’Dib

The first person to present an alternative and more credible narrative for 7/7 was Yorkshireman Anthony John Hill, in his documentary ‘7/7 The Ripple Effect’ (this is a must-see. Please watch if you don't know the film). Hill is a very unusual character in many ways. He has renamed himself Muad’Dib after a character in Frank Herbert’s sci-fi epic ‘Dune’. It is basically his interpretation of events that have been presented above, excepting that ‘Dib did not know of the pregnancy problems of Khan’s wife, nor about the 4.35 text-messages, nor Khan’s failure to contact his wife after leaving her on the evening of the 5th of July at the time of making his film.
When a group of ‘Islamic terrorists’, allegedly associates of Khan, went on trial for offences in 2008 at Kingston Crown Court, Hill posted two copies of his DVD to the court. One envelope was addressed to the judge, the other to the foreman of the jury. Neither DVD reached its target but shortly afterwards a request for Hill to be extradited from Ireland (he lived in Kells, County Meath at the time) was sent to the Irish Ministry of Justice. The request was successful and Hill was collected by a British policeman, accompanied across the water and incarcerated in Wandsworth prison shortly before the start of the 7/7 Inquest.
Hill relates, amusingly, that he asked the policeman in whose charge he was placed, “Have you watched my film.” The constable replied, “Yes.” “What did you think of it?” asked Hill. The PC offered a look that was wide-eyed and grim. Hill asked him, “Shouldn’t you be arresting Tony Blair and not me?” and the policeman sheepishly went back to reading his newspaper.
Hill made immediate applications for bail but was only released once the Inquest was finished.
His documentary has been copied and handed out at mosques to thousands of Muslims in the UK. Most Muslims now believe ‘The Four’ to be innocent, largely because of ‘Dib’s work. The authorities were obviously determined he would not upset the 7/7 Inquest operation by getting his film into the hands of family members, press and God knows who else. This man scares them and has suffered accordingly. His case was being heard in Southwark Crown Court on Monday 9th May 2011. A jury of his peers found him, in contradiction to strong advice given to them by the judge, innocent on all charges.

All the above information can be found here:

http://7julyinquests.independent.gov.uk/
http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/
http://terroronthetube.co.uk/

.

More Than Taboo

2011-08-14T20:49:00.006+01:00

.

Very strong new video from Ryan Dawson adding his own commentary to excerpts from a previous documentary, "One Third of The Holocaust" and other rare footage.

His closing statement says the following:

TO BE CLEAR

I AM NOT A HOLOCAUST DENIER

I JUST THINK IT IS MORE ACCURATE TO SAY 'HOLOCAUSTS' RATHER THAN 'THE HOLOCAUST'

AND THAT MANY OF THE CLAIMS OF 'THE HOLOCAUST' ARE FALSE OR GREATLY EXAGGERATED.

SOME MOTIVES FOR THIS WERE TO COVER UP THE CRIMES OF THE ALLIED POWERS WHICH WERE OF EQUAL OR GREATER MAGNITUDE.

IT IS AN EMOTIONAL CLUB TO SWING TO DEFEND THE CASE FOR TOTAL WAR OR TO JUSTIFY THE CRIMES OF THE ISRAELI STATE.

NO MATTER HOW NAZI-LIKE THEY ARE THEMSELVES.

THIS IDEA THAT EVIL IS OK BECAUSE THERE COULD BE SOMETHING EVEN MORE EVIL IS A ROUTINE EXCUSE FOR WARMONGERS AND IT IS A FALSE PROPAGANDA.

THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS MYTH IS JUST A CLEVER JUSTIFICATION FOR EVIL.

THIS SIMPLISTIC NARRATIVE OF GOOD GUYS VERSUS EVIL DOERS PERSISTS TODAY.

WITHOUT THE HOLOCAUST WW2 WOULD BE TREATED MUCH LIKE WW1, AN INSANE RESOURCE WAR BETWEEN COLONIAL POWERS SUBJECT TO CENTRAL BANKS AND STATE-RUN MEDIA PROPAGANDA.

A PISSING CONTEST FOR NATIONALISM.

IT IS THE ONE WAR TO EVOKE, TO JUSTIFY ALL OF THE WARS AFTER IT.

THE REVISIONIST'S JOB IS TO DEFLATE THE CRIME OF "THE HISTORY BOOKS WRITTEN BY THE WINNERS".

THERE IS NO GLORIFICATION OF NAZISM.

MURDERING A MILLION PEOPLE BE IT FOR RACE, SPREADING DEMOCRACY, LIBERATION, "HUMANITARIANISM" OR WHATEVER LABEL THEY WANT TO VEIL IT WITH IS STILL MURDERING A MILLION PEOPLE.

NAZISM UNDER NEW BANNERS CONTINUES TO FLOURISH.

IT HAS TO STOP.

BREAK THIS TABOO.

Dawson is quite right.

Here is the greatest lie.

More destructive than even 9/11 and 7/7.

A place he doesn't go in this film is to demonstate the way that this great lie has embedded a guilt complex in Europeans and massively facilitated the rise of Jewish power throughout America, the UK and Europe.

Well, my perception of Great Britain is that it is now almost completely dominated by Zionist politics and by Jews themselves. So much so that hardly a single person has the nerve to mention this very obvious reality.

Can anyone possibly disagree with this assessment?

.

Collective Punishment of 'Rioters' Families and the Geneva Convention

2011-08-13T13:16:00.002+01:00

.

An interesting exchange on Facebook is reproduced below regarding some Councils' determination to evict persons convicted of involvement in the recent UK riots. Wandsworth Council want to evict an entire family whose son was found guilty of involvement in the Clapham Junction looting.

One wonders what long-term good such a local authority imagines will come from this. Will they make an underclass intimidated into passivity and obedience, however grudging?

Is satisfying the understandable cries for punitive action from shopkeepers and a rattled middle class wise if this action strays into the realms of collective punishment, a point Jim Murphy fairly raises below?

For myself, even if a convicted person is the only one evicted, this strategy makes no sense. Deprive the underclass of even a place to live? I can think of no better way of creating genuinely terrifying psychopaths.

Anyone paying attention to the crimes of the elite (and the cover-up of these crimes by parliament and the media) knows very well that the sickness at the bottom of society is a manifestation of a much greater sickness at the top.

Bearing in mind the unwillingness of our entire parliament, even the old icons of the left like Diane Abbott, who rose to prominence on the back of the Hackney riots, to see itself as part of (never mind the source of) the problem, might we not expect with absolute certainty that a similar sickness will manifest itself later....more than likely on a much larger scale. The middle classes, whose children cannot afford to get a mortgage on a place to live and who are being inducted into massive debt before they even start their working lives will become heavily involved.

When this time comes, and it will, more than sports and mobile phone shops will have cause to worry.

Here is the Facebook extract referred to:

Jim Murphy

Collective punishment is classified as a war crime under Geneva Convention. Wandsworth Council is trending on Twitter because they have served an eviction notice on the family of a young guy who was involved in the riots (1st offence). Politicians are idiots. When they were sitting around discussing their facist tactics, the people were out on the streets cleaning up after the riots. Politicians serve Bankers not citizens and we no longer need them. #DirectDemocracy now
11 hours ago · ·

Philip S******

The Geneva Conventions though only apply in times of war, including civil war. What happened at the weekend was neither despite some of the participants believing so apparently. Tenancy agreements however, were almost certainly broken.

Jim Murphy

It is less about the applicability of the legislation and more about the moral imperative. The ban on collective punishment in the Geneva Convention is designed to combat the once widely accepted concept of reprisal or revenge to look at it in its proper context. An eye for an eye is not part of the Christian tradition which has been the bedrock of our laws and culture for centuries. In short, this is anti-Christian and should be recognised as such.

Watch this black man point the finger and put his case very well during Boris Johnson's visit to Clapham Junction:

.

The Enemies of NATO

2011-08-10T22:42:00.008+01:00

.

Will the enemies of NATO soon recognise the UK's 'hoody' army as our lawful government?

Will they arm these anti-Cameron insurgents and carry out bombing raids on the UK on their behalf?

Can we expect slouching teenage layabouts in balaclavas to shortly displace our diplomats in certain foreign embassies?

Perhaps the enemies of NATO will target UK water supplies and power stations in the same manner as we have destroyed vital water and electricity supplies in Libya?

Perhaps they will target David Cameron himself?

Or his wife and children?

In the same manner that we have at last formalised our long-running alliance with Al Queda by recognising the Libyan 'rebels', can we expect China (manufacturers for JD Sports,Vodaphone, Blackberry etc.) and Iran (whose Ayatollahs exhibit such a fondness for execution-by-stoning) to now give an official thumbs-up to the brick-wielding arsonists of Wolverhampton and Croydon?

Nothing should surprise us.

Our subhuman enemies are capable of anything.

P.S. As a Catholic, I've just phoned to ask my parish priest where the Vatican stands on these issues of such extraordinary moral import.

His reply was,

"Somewhere in Jerusalem, as usual".

Is it just me or are these dark days indeed?

.
PS Have only just realised a similar article has been put up by Paul Joseph Watson on Prison Planet. It's a (non)parallel reality worth imagining, however.

London Performance at Beijing Olympics Decoded

2011-08-10T14:53:00.006+01:00

.

The following video was found here.

I watched this part of the Beijing Olympics closing ceremony on TV and wondered at the shocking chutzpah of having a 7/7-style London bus with its roof 'blown off' as part of the act. I also wondered at the choice of famous Satanist Jimmy Page to front the music.

Page is a devout follower of Alistair Crowley's and would prefer to be known as a 'Thelemist'......

....but we get the idea, Jimmy.

In the following video we can can see the entire act/ritual decoded.

There are some very sick people in some very high places out there.

Disclose.tv - London 2012 7/7 Olympics Sacrifice Ritual Video

Just in case you do not know about 7/7, see the following.......(full article here)

There are two competing narratives to explain this great crime:

1) The official story of four suicide bombers murdering 52 people and injuring hundreds by exploding four bombs on three tube trains and one bus on the morning of 7/7.

2) Forces embedded within the establishment carried out a false-flag attack against the British people. As with nearly all false-flag events, patsies were set up to take the blame for the crime. The four Muslims were completely innocent actors paid to participate in a concurrent anti-terror 'drill'.

As you will have guessed, I am one of the many who subscribe to conspiracy theory number two.

HERE'S WHY

After 9/11 the murderous confabulation that is modern history soared and raged all around us under guise of a ‘War on Terror’, providing the necessary pretext for just about anything the western military-industrial complex felt like doing. However, in the UK we (or should I say the Labour government) had a serious problem. Although Blair and his army of stooges signed up to every invasion and participated loyally in every occupation, the one thing our ‘War on Terror’ was short on was…..the terror. It appeared that British Muslims, peeved though they undoubtedly were at watching their co-religionists being slaughtered by the million in Iraq, just wouldn’t turn their energies toward blowing up their fellow Englishmen. The ‘War on Terror’ was happening somewhere else.

The fact that on 7/7/05 four (or more) explosions killed fifty-two innocent people making their way to work on a Thursday morning changed all that.

Nonetheless the story, universally accepted by the British media (if not across the country), that four Islamic-terrorist suicide-bombers murdered them remains an unproven and (as I will attempt to explain) highly unlikely conspiracy theory.

Firstly it needs to be noted that the refusal of both the Labour and the new Tory/Liberal alliance to hold a public Inquiry into the events of 7/7 should ring a very loud alarm bell for every British citizen. This was the largest mass-murder ever on British soil. One might have expected the promoters of the 'War on Terror' to use a Public Inquiry to cash in on an incident that would make and massively boost their case.

In a court of law physical evidence always trumps excuses, allegations, observations or any other kind of verbal contribution to a case, so one should perhaps begin here.

Three Holes in the Floor of the Edgeware Road Carriage

Evidence was given by different witnesses, including the train driver (a Mr Whitehead), that clearly describe three separate holes in the Edgeware Road carriage. People fell into all three holes. Two emerged from the holes . One died in the third hole. The original report on the Edgeware Road explosion (from mark Honigsbaum of the Guardian who was on the train) had the train lifting off the tracks and being derailed (i.e. bomb(s) underneath the train). The driver described all the access panels in the floor of the first coach (the bomb(s) killed people in the second carriage) being 'flipped open' from underneath.
In what way is any of this compatible with a single suicide 'suicide bomber' with a rucksack full of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide?

The Explosives

Here is a timeline for the 7/7 explosives narrative as it developed:

The first analysis came from a genuine expert. This is surely the most reliable commentary on the nature of the bombs that went off that morning. The problem is that it would have been all-but-impossible for four young men from Leeds to get their hands on such materials.

On 12 July 2005, Superintendent Christophe Chaboud, chief of French anti-terrorism Coordination Unit who was in London assisting Scotland Yard with its investigation, confirmed to The Times that,‘The nature of the explosives appears to be military, which is very worrying….the material used were not homemade but sophisticated military explosives …’ (Nafeez Ahmed The London Bombs, p.24)

On 13th July it was stated that these were of ‘C4’ explosive....London explosives have military origin – [Science Daily. LONDON, July 13 (UPI)]: Forensic scientists told the newspaper the construction of the four devices detonated in London was very technically advanced, and unlike any instructions that can be found on the Internet.’

From The Independent on July 14th: ‘A bath filled with explosives has been found at a house in Leeds that was the “operational base” for the London suicide bombers
17th July 2005 The Observer: ‘22 lbs TATP in the bath.’

The TATP story survived but faded away in 2007 then, when the 7/7 Kingston trial came along in the summer of 2008 all trace of the TATP story had gone.

Now the explosives were made of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide. The idea of the four heating up Hydrogen Peroxide in their kitchen to the point where it would make an explosive mix with black pepper is simply laughable. How could they test that their ‘bombs’ were going to go off. Were they going to go lurching across the country with this kind of bomb sloshing about in their rucksacks. Has anybody ever made a bomb out of this mixture? If such a bomb did explode could it possibly have caused the devastation created on 7/7?

There is much written online that mocks these materials as potential tools of mass destruction. Do we not require a Public Inquiry on this issue alone. The changing storyline above surely makes no sense at all.

Why Suicide?

Moving on to another very obvious question: why would terrorists who wished to wreak havoc and punish British people for the UK’s involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan choose to blow themselves up along with their victims? These were very crowded trains. They could have set a timed detonator and quietly slipped off the trains a stop or two early, leaving their bags on the floor amongst the feet of dozens of incurious passengers. Where would have been the risk in that? Surely such activists would better serve their cause by continuing and not terminating their mission?

Drills

There were four uncannily accurate drills carried out before the 7/7 bombings:
1) The BBC Panorama ‘management exercise’ programme of May 2004 during which a panel of ‘managers’, including Peter Power (see below) and Michael Portillo, discussed how they would deal with a terror attack on London that revealed itself to them through mock news reports as the show progressed. The scenario they had to deal with turned out to be one overground and 3 underground explosions taking place over a short space of time during the morning rush hour.

2) The contemporaneous 7/7 drill: on 7/7 itself Peter Power conducted a terror drill that shadowed the cataclysm as it happened – over the same three tube stations at more or less the same time. On the afternoon of 7/7 he was interviewed on Radio 5’s ‘Drivetime’ programme:
POWER: …at half-past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for, er, over, a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing upright!

3) Atlantic Blue: held over 5-8 April, 2005. All echelons of government participated in this large terror-drill. The Independent reported after July 7th that “By an extraordinary coincidence, all the experts who formulate such plans are together in a meeting at the headquarters of the London Ambulance Service – and they are discussing an exercise they ran three months ago that involved simulating four terrorist bombs going off at once across London.”

4) Operation Hanover: London’s police hold a little-known yearly terror-drill. On 2005 it just happened to be held on 1-2 July. Its game-plan was threefold: three ‘simultaneous’ bomb attacks on three underground stations. The police have been reticent about discussing this astounding precursor event, mere days before 7/7. They only revealed it in 2009.

Why No Post-Mortems?

Another astonishing fact that emerged during the 2010-11 7/7 Inquest was that no post mortems were carried out on the bodies of the victims. A very great deal about the nature of and distance from the explosions could have been discovered from such examinations. The effects of different explosives on flesh are well-known. Such post-mortems would have provided some definitive information that would have at least ruled out some possible explosives from consideration as the source material of the blasts. What could possibly explain such an oversight other than the desire to avoid creating conflicts with a fabricated narrative.

Body Count reveals no Bombers

The First Official Body Count on Two of the Trains was One Body Short

At the 7/7/ Inquest in November 2010 Dr. Morgan Costello gave evidence that he was asked to attend two scenes, Edgware Road and Aldgate, for the 'purposes of certifying the extinction of life'. He counted six bodies at Edgware Road and seven bodies at Aldgate and declared these as 'life extinct'. The enormous anomaly, that passed completely unreported in the press, was that the numbers should have been seven and eight if we count the bodies of the bombers. Here is surely the clearest possible evidence that the alleged bombers were never on the trains. No similar count seems to have been carried out on the other (Russell Square ) train but we do know a little about the behaviour of the Russell Square bomber, Germaine Lindsay, before his demise.

Germaine Lindsay, cool and then confused

Germaine Lindsay drove from Aylesbury to meet the other (let’s call them) bombers in Luton railway station. He arrived an hour before them and decided to take a little nap. He received a parking ticket while asleep in his car. Were he a terrorist he obviously would have known that he would have had only four hours left to live.

Germaine Lindsay was one extraordinarily relaxed suicide-bomber.

A station attendant called Mr. Patel gave testimony to the Inquest that a man he identified as Germaine Lindsay arrived on the concourse of King’s Cross station and asked to talk to “The Duty Manager”. He said it was, “Very important.” Mr Patel remarked that it was very unusual for a member of the public to know the exact name for the person in charge of the station. Normally people asked for ‘the supervisor’ or ‘the manager’. At this time there was chaos on the concourse. The metal grills had been pulled down and shut at the front of the station. Passengers were not being allowed through the barriers. A crowd had built up and people were starting to abuse staff. Numbers of ‘Community Support Officers’ who looked like police were milling around the area trying to manage the situation. No wonder Lindsay was confused. He must have decided to try to speak to someone who ‘was in on the game’ to explain to him what was going on. The most obvious explanation of his behaviour is that it would have puzzled and alarmed him that the drill had started before he, ‘the bomber’, had caught their trains. Perhaps a chilling possibility occurred to him. When Mr. Patel returned with the duty manager Lindsay had gone.

And More

There are many, many other serious anomalies in the official narrative.

The train times presented huge problems for the official narrative causing the Home Secretary to change the story after it was realised that the 7.40 they were said to have caught had been cancelled. Then the next train arrived 23 minutes late at King’s Cross giving the bombers only three minutes to buy four RETURN tickets (think about that one), cross the track by bridge and board the last possible train that makes it just feasible they could have reached the bombed trains in time.

On the 5th July 2005, Mohammed Siddique Khan took his pregnant wife to Dewsbury Hospital in West Yorkshire. She was bleeding and there was obviously something wrong. Doctors examined Hasina Patel and said that there was a ‘threatened miscarriage’. They sent her home and booked her in for a scan on the 7th. Mrs Patel has never told the time they got home but afterwards Mohammed Khan said that he was ‘going to see his friends’. Hasina Patel never saw or heard from her husband ever again. She miscarried on July 6th . At the 7/7 Inquest there was ‘evidence’ (peculiar and surely untrustworthy) presented of a mobile phone text-message exchange between Khan and Germaine Lindsay at 4.35am on the morning of the 6th July. Would Khan really have abandoned his desperate wife for a whole day while she was in that condition? Khan was a highly respected in his community and by the headmistress of the special school in which he worked as a classroom assistant. The police had used him to mediate between rival gangs in local disputes. He was trusted by all sides. Hilary Benn had taken Khan on a tour of the House of Commons. He was not known to be politically radical. Quite the opposite. He was protective of the good name of his community and was eager to maintain good relations with the local white community. Bearing this in mind it is likely that the reason the police have film of Khan is that he was helping them ‘keep an eye on’ any worrisome Muslim elements in his locality. He was not a troublemaker, he was a healer and a fixer.
The most likely explanation for Khan’s disappearance on the 6th is that he told his minder for the 7/7 exercise that he was not going to be able to make it. . He would have been told to see that the others could make it without him. The bombings were not going to be called off but……now he had presented his minders with a problem that had only one possible solution. His goose was cooked.

This would also explain why the attendant at the filling station where Tanweer filled his car (and argued about the change he was given) said he only saw one other person in Tanweer’s car. Hasib Hussain alone (the bus-bomber) was in the car and, unknown to the pair of them, Khan was by now already dead. This would also explain why the now-suppressed BBC radio 5 news reports from the late morning of the seventh said that two men had been shot in Canary Wharf (rather than three, the supposed train bombers. Hussain had been separated from the others).

Those who have travelled to Beeston and spoken to locals report that, like Khan, Hussain and Tanweer had shown no inclination in their communities towards political or religious radicalism.

The Evidence against ‘The Four’

Looking at the detail of latest narrative laid out before the 7/7 Inquest, it must be admitted that it is now just physically possible that the four caught the last possible train at Luton and rushed from King’s Cross Thameslink to the various subway platforms before detonating their deadly cargos. However, their relaxed demeanour in the very few still photos presented as evidence militates against the probability that they were rushing about madly that morning (especially with all that liquid explosive slopping about on their backs).

Why too in the most CCTV-rich environment on earth are there only a couple of very poor pictures of the four, one at Luton, one at Thameslink, the date and time stamps on which could have easily been photoshopped. Could the photos of Khan have been used from the ‘practice run’ the four carried out on 29th June 2005, just eight days earlier?

The mobile phone evidence places them all on the correct train at the right time. Three things about this though. Firstly, this is new evidence that was not released in the previous 2006 hearing. Why? Second, is it likely that these men would have been texting each other on train they had all boarded together. Finally, this is the kind of evidence easily faked. It is letters and numbers on a piece of paper.

Khan and Tanweer could easily have been talked into making the Jihadi videos that have played such a large part in aiding the public to accept their guilt. They were employees, well-paid for two days work, the practice on June 29th and for the day itself. They were told that the exercise has to be made as realistic as possible. The film would be in the hands of the station staff and other authorities giving them a possible means of intercepting the four. The on-camera ‘threats’ from Khan and Tanweer are vague and unspecific. When Hasina Patel first saw these videos it was reported that she said, “That’s not my husband.” Her brother thought it was Khan. It is most likely that she meant, “ I know him. He would never say such things.”
The ‘bombers’ all had four or more mobile phones each; one of their own private phones and at least three other (so-called) ‘operational’ phones that they are supposed to have used to confound anyone who might attempt to track their communications and obstruct their diabolical plan. It is most likely that these phones were supplied by their minder and that their holding them allowed their ‘handlers’ to track Tanweer and Lindsay down in Canary Wharf after they had panicked and gone on the run, presumably (and naively) hoping to tell their story to the British press who are mostly based there.

P.S. Muad’Dib

The first person to present an alternative and more credible narrative for 7/7 was Yorkshireman Anthony John Hill, in his documentary ‘7/7 The Ripple Effect’ (this is a must-see. Please watch if you don't know the film). Hill, a very unusual character in many ways, has renamed himself Muad’Dib, after a character in Frank Herbert’s sci-fi epic ‘Dune’. It is his basically his interpretation of events that have been presented above, excepting that ‘Dib did not know of the pregnancy problems of Khan’s wife, nor about the 4.35 text-messages, nor Khan’s failure to contact his wife after leaving her on the evening of the 5th of July at the time of making his film.
When a group of ‘Islamic terrorists’, allegedly associates of Khan, went on trial for offences in 2008 at Kingston Crown Court, Hill posted two copies of his DVD to the court. One envelope was addressed to the judge, the other to the foreman of the jury. Neither DVD reached its target but shortly afterwards a request for Hill to be extradited from Ireland (he lived in Kells, County Meath at the time) was sent to the Irish Ministry of Justice. The request was successful and Hill was collected by a British policeman, accompanied across the water and incarcerated in Wandsworth prison shortly before the start of the 7/7 Inquest.
Hill relates, amusingly, that he asked the policeman in whose charge he was placed, “Have you watched my film.” The constable replied, “Yes.” “What did you think of it?” asked Hill. The PC offered a look that was wide-eyed and grim. Hill asked him, “Shouldn’t you be arresting Tony Blair and not me?” and the policeman sheepishly went back to reading his newspaper.
Hill made immediate applications for bail but was only released once the Inquest was finished.
His documentary has been copied and handed out at mosques to thousands of Muslims in the UK. Most Muslims now believe ‘The Four’ to be innocent, largely because of ‘Dib’s work. The authorities were obviously determined he would not upset the 7/7 Inquest operation by getting his film into the hands of family members, press and God knows who else. This man scares them and has suffered accordingly. His case was heard in Southwark Crown Court on next Monday Morning 9th May 2011.

The jury watched his film in its entirety and, ignoring the instructions of the judge, found him innocent of all charges.

Well Said Brother

2011-08-09T12:22:00.003+01:00

.

Jew-turned-orthodox-Christian, Brother Nathaniel, hits the nail on the head.....with a big hammer....time and time again in the following 3-minute video presentation.

You should try posting such ideas on any mainstream media (BBC, Guardian, Telegraph, you name it) 'comments' pages. Suggest that mass immigration is a policy developed by globalist Frankfurt School Jews in order to aid financial power in implementing its divide-and-rule strategy upon western societies in order to advance its one-world-government agenda.

Not a word of such thinking will ever be printed.

The plan laid out in The Protocols of Zion is entering its final stages......

......very heavily protected by all the nice secular, humanitarian anti-racists who man the offices of the mass media and smile into its cameras.

.

Ellen Brown: Web Of Debt

2011-08-01T14:12:00.001+01:00

.

Five-part talk. Why we are all fast becoming absolute slaves to bankers.

Worth 45 minutes of anybody's time.

ONE

TWO

FOUR
THREE

FIVE

.

Satanic UK's Libya Policy Could Mean Thousands More Libyans Will Die

2011-07-27T13:34:00.003+01:00

.

So William Hague recognises the Libyan Rebel Council as the "sole governmental authority". Furthermore the foreign secretary said that the UK will "unfreeze" Libyan assets in the UK, including stocks of currency and other assets of the Libyan central bank.

Unless a political solution is found quickly (and Gaddafi shows no signs of caving in) this money will most likely find its way back into the hands of western arms manufacturers and the Libyan Civil War will take on a new and even more horrific dimension.

"Our policy is to protect the lives of the Libyan people"....? (Cameron, Haigh, Sarkozy et al)

What a bunch of filthy, murdering, Satanic swine.

.

22nd July 92 dead. 'Magic Numbers' Yet Again?

2011-07-25T20:35:00.006+01:00

.

More signals for Cabbalaistic pals?

More magic numbers?

Look here:

22nd July 1946. The bombing (that helped to drive the British from Palestine) of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, the headquarters of British rule.

92 people killed.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article690085.ece

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/King_David.html

On 22nd July 2011. Although the number of dead has now officially changed, stories about the Norway attacks have been reporting 92 dead for the last two days.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/23/norway-attacks

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Article/201107116036135

9/11, 7/7 and now 22/7 (or 7/22 for American friends).......false flag terrorism and magic numbers go hand in hand.

.

ANONYMOUS. Just Another Element Of Controlled Opposition

2011-07-17T12:17:00.009+01:00

.

Vladamir Ulyanov/Lenin, the bisexual syphilitic Satanist, mass murderer and multi-millionaire customer of Swiss Banking establishments, famously said that "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."

The forces of globalism, led by Judeo-Masonic international bankers, have all the resources necessary to do exactly this and do so quite effectively.

Anyone who has been involved in the '9/11 Truth' movement will be have become aware of leading presences within this 'resistance' that have no interest whatsoever in creating effective (or even embarrassing) difficulties for the powers-that-be.

'Stop The War' will not speak a word about 9/11. This tells you all you need to know. As Paul Craig Roberts says, "Trying to oppose the consequences of an event whose explanation you accept is an impossible task."

'Stop The War' are government shills and their silence over Libya is deafening.

Likewise for '7/7 Truth'.

J7, while exposing all the anomalies in available evidence, shy away from stating the obvious. They will not accuse. This organisation's anger is reserved for and directed towards other 7/7 activists (who might be forgiven for imagining they were 'on the same side' as J7....but find they are not).

Genuine opposition (and J7 target) Muad'Dib, maker of "7/7 The Ripple Effect", was put in prison for the entire duration of the recent 7/7 Inquest.

This is what you find. Individuals who offer genuine and effective opposition like Nick Kollerstrom (sacked from his university post) and Christopher Bollyn (attacked in his own home) are made to suffer.

So what are we to make of 'Anonymous', who have just released a video 'declaring war on the system' (use link or see video below).

They look like Wikileaks to me. A 'limited hangout' security services operation designed to deceive the masses (of angry youth, particularly) into thinking this operation can change the corrupt system and that you too can join in by tapping your keyboards (.......OK, I know).

There is one fundamental reason for mistrusting 'Anonymous' plus a couple of give-aways in their branding of themselves, in my opinion.

Firstly, in the video there is an abundance of style and an almost total absence of meaningful or useful content. Any 'opposition' that meant business would pick up on the public's anger with the banking system and not only promise to put an end to the money-as-debt system but also explain to people how, throughout history, this has often been done before and is, in principle if not in practice (because of the stranglehold these people have on our politicians), a simple change to implement.

Secondly, the use of the masked man from 'V'. Part of this major Hollywood production was filmed on the London Underground mere days before it was bombed and 52 British citizens were murdered in a false-flag attack by agents of the Satanic state. As uplifting emotionally as this film might have been it was coming from within the power nexus.

Finally, 'Anonymous' brands itself using the catchphrase "We are Legion".

To put it kindly, this is peculiarly poorly chosen. In the New Testament "Legion" refers to the demons cast out by Christ from the possessed man and into the Gadarene swine that then hurled themselves over a nearby cliff.

Why would an organisation determined to oppose criminal banksters and politicians brand themselves as Legion, i.e. 'demons' or 'Servants of Satan'?

Is this an organisation aimed at the under-25's whose education has been such that they are not expected to notice.

Perhaps if we really want to oppose the Satanists that govern us, we should find Christ.

The Christ that the Christian Churches have abandoned.

The Christ that drove the moneychangers from the temple and warned the Jews against following the supremacist satanist Pharisees whose only God is power for their collective self. These people have renamed their religion as 'Orthodox Judaism'. They have created a parallel Gentile religion called Freemasonry and these are the religions of the enemy that controls just about everything we see around us.....through its control of the issuance of money and its ownership of nearly all that organs of information that influence our thinking.

These enemies of Christ are the opposition. 'Anonymous' look like just another bunch of their employees.

.

General Government Debt as Percentage of GDP (Europe)

2011-07-12T17:31:00.004+01:00

.

See here for more detailed chart than below.

The graphs show that the majority of countries (including Ireland) were pretty healthy before the banking rip-off of 2008 when private (and 'odious') banking debts were transferred to the taxpayers of Europe. Greece and Italy significantly worse than the rest. One wonders how Italy has escaped a massive default (shouldn't speak too soon though).

'Principal Intelligence Officer' For South Yorkshire Police Says 9/11 and 7/7 'Inside Jobs'.

2011-07-10T13:48:00.004+01:00

.

J Edgar Hoover (Founder and long-term head of the FBI) said it well:

"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."

Tony Farrell is an unlikely 'Conspiraloon'.

As 'Principal Intelligence Officer' for the South Yorkshire Police he had to produce a yearly ‘Strategic Threat Assessment Matrix’ to determine how the police force should prioritise its activities.

Part of this exercise involved analysis and predictive numerical weightings related to various aspects of the 'terror threat' presented by Islamic extremists in South Yorkshire.

Shortly before presenting his annual report in July 2010, Mr Farrell became convinced (over the course of about 8 days) that the major source of the 'terror threat' was neither external nor Islamic but came from within the UK government. Like many millions before him, having come across unreported evidence relating to 9/11 and 7/7, Tony Farrell quite quickly realised (with certainty) that both these attacks were classic false-flag events.

Mr Farrell is a Christian. He understood how unacceptable his views would be to the police hierarchy. He knew that delivering his rather alternative analysis and recommendations could only get him in deep trouble.

Nevertheless, if anything is an issue of conscience, this was just such an issue.

He presented his ‘Strategic Threat Assessment Matrix’ report to a roomful of stunned superiors. They listened respectfully.

(One can only imagine the scene. Who wouldn't swap a ticket to the World Cup Final for one minute in that room. Mr Farrell should auction his PowerPoint show for the event on eBay.)

A more detailed version of this story can be found here and here.

Tony Farrell was sacked, of course, and is now awaiting an appeal against his dismissal and will charge his employers with 'unfair dismissal' at an Employment Tribunal in September. His grounds are that it is unlawful to dismiss anyone because of their belief.

He says he is now a crusader against the Satanic cabal of international oligarchs bent on imposing a single world government on humanity.

I agree with Mr Farrell. That these people are 'Satanic' is a fact that needs to be recognised by all.

Why did Christ call the Pharisees "of Satan"?

Why did He solemnly warn the Jewish people against the supremacist Godless ideology and teachings of the Pharisees? These people negated the Laws of Moses. The heirs to the Pharisees are Orthodox Talmudic Rabbis. They and their followers have succeeded in creating a parallel gentile supremacist religion called 'Freemasonry'. This is the religion of the murderous criminal elite that pulls the strings, through their control of the money system, of our political and media classes.

By such chains are we all bound. Sometimes, it appears, helplessly bound.

Satanists/Luciferians are in charge AT THE VERY TOP. AND IT IS THE WILL OF THOSE AT THE VERY TOP THAT MATTERS (while the rest of us at every level down the pyramid sheepishly obey and pass their orders on down the line).

The power they have usurped from government, to create money out of nothing and lend it at interest, is the source of their dreadful power.

Christ entered Jerusalem and drove these people from the temple.

We badly need to recognise Christ, recognise His enemy and repeat this procedure.

Times are changing fast. As more people like Tony Farrell step forward the displacement of these agents of Satan will become, increasingly, a real possibility.

God Bless you Tony....

....and thanks.

.

'AUSTERITY MEASURES' ATTACK THE WRONG KIND OF DEBT

2011-06-24T20:36:00.011+01:00

.

I can not claim to fully understand the banking system and all the devious ways it finds to make a profit without itself producing any material thing that is of use to anybody.

What it does create is fiat money (an abstraction, a medium of exchange that is recognised by governments and therefore by the governed).

One of the most basic and obvious things we all realise about this banking system is that it makes its owners extremely, incredibly, monstrously rich. It makes those who run the system merely 'rich'....and leaves the great mass of humanity in a position somewhere between 'comfortably enslaved' and 'absolute destitution'.

Another small (or maybe large) breakthrough in my understanding of this racket occurred when I watched Australian Professor of Economics, Steve Keen, being interviewed by Max Keiser here.

His analysis bears repeating.

It is not 'rocket science' but he exposes yet another fundamental and concealed aspect of the fraud that has been perpetrated against the honest citizens of the world since the introduction of this satanic system.

TWO KINDS OF DEBT

There is PRIVATE DEBT and PUBLIC DEBT.

PRIVATE DEBT

This is the kind of debt created by the private banks with no government involvement, i.e. mortgages, personal loans and (much more significantly) debts resulting from the gambling activities of these banks on the international markets. Webster Tarpley and others called these debts, the result of the creation of a massive 'derivatives' bubble, the cause of the 2008 banking crash. The banks have created about $ 1.5 Quadrillion dollars worth of these 'assets'. $1.5 Quadrillion is $1500 Trillion or $1,500,000 billion (about 10 times the value of everything on earth). When dealers collectively realised that the 'goods' they were buying and selling were fraudulent the system collapsed and the banks were 'skint'.

This PRIVATE DEBT, not public debt or any action taken by our governments nor any actions of our own, created the crisis. We sort of know this.

PUBLIC DEBT

We also know that the banks were saved by the creation of PUBLIC DEBT. That's US putting money into the system that (don't laugh) WE BORROWED FROM THE SAME PENNILESS BANKING SYSTEM. And herein is the heart of the scam against humanity, but we'll let that pass for the moment.

Every victim country of this scam has been told that their problem is TOO MUCH DEBT so we have to 'cut back' to reduce that debt.

As Keen brilliantly points out, this is like a psychopath coming along with an axe and chopping your arm off. Next a doctor rushes in and applies a tourniquet to your wound to stop the bleeding.

The axeman then accuses the doctor of causing your arm to fall off.

NO.

Public debt (the doctor) is not the problem. Private debt (the psychopathic axeman) is the problem.

Our focus should be on dealing with the Private Debt (debts incurred via bank lending and trading).

We should not be attacking ourselves because of public debt. We should be dealing with the private debt.

.....The best solution is to let the banks fall and begin creating our own money debt-free.....

But even if this is not going to happen any time soon, we should realise that are not "living beyond our means."

The money system does not operate like a household budget.

REPEAT. THE MONEY SYSTEM DOES NOT OPERATE LIKE A HOUSEHOLD BUDGET.

WE KNOW THAT THE CONSEQUENCE OF THIS MINDSET (DELIBERATELY CREATED FOR US BY THOSE WHO PROFIT IT) IS THE TRANSFER OF REAL WEALTH FROM OURSELVES TO THE CRIMINALS WHO HAVE ALREADY ROBBED US ONCE.

Look at Greece. As Keiser reports it is crawling with parasite international financiers expecting to buy Greece's assets, its water, its airports, its docks etc for 'cents on the dollar' because Greece 'cannot pay its debts'.

In this crooked game the point will always be reached where nobody can pay their debts.

The 2008 engineered destruction of the banking system was a prelude to the greatest theft in history. The Protocols of Zion describes this method of destroying and occupying nations very clearly. The Press will support the banking criminals and the end-game is war.

A MAJOR MECHANISM OF WEALTH TRANSFER

Bankers are paid according to their ability to inflate the money supply, i.e. create debt.
While increasing debt rewards them proportionately* we must accept 'austerity', i.e. cuts in wages.

So....as the people lose money the bankers gain again. They profit both from debts created and from the inability of people to repay their debts as an economy shrinks.

The thing is if we really want to deal with the main problem, private banker-created debt, surely we should be reducing that debt as a fraction of the total money supply.

We could do this by INCREASING WAGES.

This would cause inflation and would probably not make anyone directly richer but it could be managed in such a way as to reduce the relative size of the private debt burden that so threatens the people.

A strategy of job creation and high rates of pay linked to the increase in money supply would push back the significance of debt and the bloated incomes of bankers compared to the size of the overall economy.

i.e. a fairer share of the wealth would go to the people who create it.

OK, we know this won't happen, but we need to be armed with an awareness of these issues in order to challenge the bullsh*t that is destroying us.

WE MUST NOT LET THESE LYING LIARS CONTINUE TO ROB AND ENSLAVE US BY THEIR LIES AND BY THEIR CONTROL OVER THE LYING POLITICIANS WHO PUT A WILLING FACE ON THEIR LIES FOR THE SAKE OF NARROW PERSONAL ADVANTAGE. AN ADVANTAGE THAT THEY WILL ONE DAY, PROBABLY QUITE SOON, REALISE WAS NO ADVANTAGE AT ALL.

In the end PUBLIC DEBT will be eliminated by governments taking back the power of money-creation to themselves from private banks.

PRIVATE DEBT will be eliminated by turning the clock back a few hundred years and MAKING USURY ILLEGAL or, better still, a hanging offense.

* Is it not also mad that debt is written into a banks books as an 'asset'. What, therefore, is the borrower paying interest on exactly....when the full sum, instantaneously and magically, is realised by the bank the millisecond the 'loan' is created for a customer?

.

The Military Must 'Stop Complaining'

2011-06-21T14:33:00.007+01:00

.

We bomb the capital city of a sovereign state, murdering women and children in their own homes. International law clearly forbids such actions.

Most people know that we have no right whatsoever to attack anyone in Libya.

But International Law....hey, who cares about that any more?

However, let us not be surprised that British military chiefs are complaining.

They cannot stomach being a part of this unjustified, satanic, slaughter. It offends their dignity. They can feel it corrupting their very souls.

Such 'service' can only generate self-loathing in all concerned.

A humanitarian mission!?

Just grow up.

The first cause of the deaths of innocents is always LIES uttered by venal politicians, almost always in service of the interest of supremacist international financiers who own them and for whose pleasure and profit all such deaths occur.

Do you know anyone who wants these wars?

Nor me.

But we keep getting them and there are more to come. We are watching the build-up to the big one. The one that will destroy most of what is and leave survivors in desperate need of the loans these oligarchs have used, over the centuries, to enslave us ever more deeply.

The cycle has been played out many times before. This is how power was transferred, for instance, from 'The British Empire' directly into the hands of the moneylenders. As the money system collapses war is always there to breathe life, via real corpses, into the economic corpse.

We will never have true peace until we deal with these people and their money-as-debt all-enslaving banking system.

Cameron, Blair, Obama, Bush....these people are irrelevant. Whoever we 'elect' is THEIR government ....

....NOT OURS.

.

God Bless Paul Craig Roberts

2011-06-20T23:09:00.003+01:00

What a brilliant and powerful article! I have not read Roberts on 9/11 before. Is this a 'coming out'? If so, how wonderful it is to read his words.......

........and how sad that there are so very few of his stature prepared to stand up and state obvious truth.

Paul Craig Roberts
Prisonplanet.com
June 20, 2011

While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone Orwellian redefinition.

A “conspiracy theory” no longer means an event explained by a conspiracy. Instead, it now means any explanation, or even a fact, that is out of step with the government’s explanation and that of its media pimps.

For example, online news broadcasts of RT have been equated with conspiracy theories by the New York Times simply because RT reports news and opinions that the New York Times does not report and the US government does not endorse.

In other words, as truth becomes uncomfortable for government and its Ministry of Propaganda, truth is redefined as conspiracy theory, by which is meant an absurd and laughable explanation that we should ignore.

When piles of carefully researched books, released government documents, and testimony of eye witnesses made it clear that Oswald was not President John F. Kennedy’s assassin, the voluminous research, government documents, and verified testimony was dismissed as “conspiracy theory.”

In other words, the truth of the event was unacceptable to the authorities and to the Ministry of Propaganda that represents the interests of authorities.

The purest example of how Americans are shielded from truth is the media’s (including many Internet sites’) response to the large number of professionals who find the official explanation of September 11, 2001, inconsistent with everything they, as experts, know about physics, chemistry, structural engineering, architecture, fires, structural damage, the piloting of airplanes, the security procedures of the United States, NORAD’s capabilities, air traffic control, airport security, and other matters. These experts, numbering in the thousands, have been shouted down by know-nothings in the media who brand the experts as “conspiracy theorists.”

This despite the fact that the official explanation endorsed by the official media is the most extravagant conspiracy theory in human history.

9/11 AND THE ORWELLIAN REDEFINITION OF CONSPIRACY THEORY

Let’s take a minute to re-acquaint ourselves with the official explanation, which is not regarded as a conspiracy theory despite the fact that it comprises an amazing conspiracy. The official truth is that a handful of young Muslim Arabs who could not fly airplanes, mainly Saudi Arabians who came neither from Iraq nor from Afghanistan, outwitted not only the CIA and the FBI, but also all 16 US intelligence agencies and all intelligence agencies of US allies including Israel’s Mossad, which is believed to have penetrated every terrorist organization and which carries out assassinations of those whom Mossad marks as terrorists.

In addition to outwitting every intelligence agency of the United States and its allies, the handful of young Saudi Arabians outwitted the National Security Council, the State Department, NORAD, airport security four times in the same hour on the same morning, air traffic control, caused the US Air Force to be unable to launch interceptor aircraft, and caused three well-built steel-structured buildings, including one not hit by an airplane, to fail suddenly in a few seconds as a result of limited structural damage and small, short-lived, low-temperature fires that burned on a few floors.

The Saudi terrorists were even able to confound the laws of physics and cause WTC building seven to collapse at free fall speed for several seconds, a physical impossibility in the absence of explosives used in controlled demolition.

The story that the government and the media have told us amounts to a gigantic conspiracy, really a script for a James Bond film. Yet, anyone who doubts this improbable conspiracy theory is defined into irrelevance by the obedient media.

Anyone who believes an architect, structural engineer, or demolition expert who says that the videos show that the buildings are blowing up, not falling down, anyone who believes a Ph.D. physicist who says that the official explanation is inconsistent with known laws of physics, anyone who believes expert pilots who testify that non-pilots or poorly-qualified pilots cannot fly airplanes in such maneuvers, anyone who believes the 100 or more first responders who testify that they not only heard explosions in the towers but personally experienced explosions, anyone who believes University of Copenhagen nano-chemist Niels Harrit who reports finding unreacted nano-thermite in dust samples from the WTC towers, anyone who is convinced by experts instead of by propaganda is dismissed as a kook.

In America today, and increasingly throughout the Western world, actual facts and true explanations have been relegated to the realm of kookiness.

ONLY PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE LIES ARE SOCIALLY APPROVED AND ACCEPTED AS PATRIOTIC CITIZENS.

Indeed, a writer or newscaster is not even permitted to report the findings of 9/11 skeptics. In other words, simply to report Professor Harrit’s findings now means that you endorse them or agree with them. Everyone in the US print and TV media knows that he/she will be instantly fired if they report Harrit’s findings, even with a laugh. Thus, although Harrit has reported his findings on European television and has lectured widely on his findings in Canadian universities, the fact that he and the international scientific research team that he led found unreacted nano-thermite in the WTC dust and have offered samples to other scientists to examine has to my knowledge never been reported in the American media.

Even Internet sites on which I am among the readers’ favorites will not allow me to report on Harrit’s findings.

As I reported earlier, I myself had experience with a Huffington Post reporter who was keen to interview a Reagan presidential appointee who was in disagreement with the Republican wars in the Middle East. After he published the interview that I provided at his request, he was terrified to learn that I had reported findings of 9/11 investigators. To protect his career, he quickly inserted on the online interview that my views on the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions could be dismissed as I had reported unacceptable findings about 9/11.

The unwillingness or inability to entertain any view of 9/11 different from the official view DOOMS TO IMPOTENCE many Internet sites that are opposed to the wars and to the rise of the domestic US police state. These sites, for whatever the reasons, accept the government’s explanation of 9/11; yet, they try to oppose the “war on terror” and the police state which are the consequences of accepting the government’s explanation.

Trying to oppose the consequences of an event whose explanation you accept is an impossible task.

If you believe that America was attacked by Muslim terrorists and is susceptible to future attacks, then a “war on terror” and a domestic police state to root out terrorists become necessary to make Americans safe. The idea that a domestic police state and open-ended war might be more dangerous threats to Americans than terrorists is an impermissible thought.

A country whose population has been trained to accept the government’s word and to shun those who question it is a country without liberty in its future.

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts is the father of Reaganomics and the former head of policy at the Department of Treasury.

Spiritual War: Where Are The Christians?

2011-06-15T18:49:00.011+01:00

.

So Jewish convert to Christianity Roy Tov writes an article demonstrating exactly how the Pharisees changed the teaching of Moses and suffers an assassination attempt for his trouble. Here is an excerpt:

Acts 15:16-18 After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up: That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things. Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world.

Amos 9:11-12 In that day will I raise up the tabernacle of David that is fallen, and close up the breaches thereof; and I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old: That they may possess the remnant of Edom, and of all the heathen, which are called by my name, saith the LORD that doeth this.

The two cited texts are very different. The one in Acts talks about the redemption of all people, regardless their ethnicity; all would be reached by God. However, the text in Amos tells a very different story, claiming the tabernacle (i.e. the Jewish holiest place, and by association the Jewish people) would be risen and would possess - i.e. enslave - all Edom and other surviving people.(that's us folks)

Tov cites evidence that the Amos text was changed by the Pharisees to serve their Supremacist purposes.

In an article about that another Jewish convert to Christianity, Israel Shamir, Shamir emphasises the point:

Their (Christians' and Muslims' ) enemy is not "the Jew," for Jews can live peacefully with Spaniards and Palestinians, but the spirit of Judaic supremacy, which has to be defeated, and will be defeated.

Shamir's unabashed and historically accurate assessment of what happens to a society condemned to live under what he refers to as the "Judaic paradigm," i.e., "a dwindling middle class, vast security apparatus, growing social gaps, and impoverishment of spirit," is precisely what is happening in what he rightly describes as the "neo-Jewish US" today.
In spite of Jewish dominance being repeatedly shoved in our faces as when, for instance, Netanyahu's recent speech to Congress was interrupted 28 times by rapturous applause and standing ovations, why do we seem to need Israeli Christians to point out to us the bald truth.

Where are our own Christians?

The only Christian I know who has spoken of the Pharasaical spiritual occupation of our societies, Bishop Williamson of the Catholic order SSPX, has been ordered to silence by the leader of his own order and by the Pope himself.

The Bishop believes that the endless repetition through the media of the 'Holocaust gas chambers' story has mesmerised and intimidated the entire Christian community into a kind of witless helplessness to the point where we have, effectively, abandoned something at the very core of Christ's message. (Williamson also believes, not without evidence, that the vision of horror that is the industrialised extermination of a people by 'gas chambers' is a lie.)

The mission of Christ, the Jew, was to save the Jews from the satanic wickedness of those who had taken over leadership of His people. His mission was to fulfil the true law of Moses and the prophets, to bring Jews and, through them, the whole world, into right relationship with the ecstacy that is the pure love of God.

The Pharisees wanted to invert this message, which they did. Their drive was to, amazingly, bring the Jewish people to absolute power and ownership over the entire world and its peoples. 'Monstrous'? 'grandiose'? Is there a word out there to adequately describe such an ambition.

When Christ called them 'Of Satan' to their faces, this was for our ears as well as the Jews.

The Talmud, the collected writings of the Pharisees has promoted the same exact message since those early times.Orthodox Rabbis study and teach this same creed to this very day. It is very strange, as Roy Tov says in this very powerful article, that quoting the Talmud is considered by Jews to be 'anti-Semitic'.

That really is having it every way.

Christians need to be confident that bringing such truth to Jews is not 'anti-Semitic'.

On the contrary, to imitate Christ in this manner is to carry blessings and grace to the deceived Jewish people.

We must also work to counteract the same deceptions now embedded in the collective psyche of our own people.

We are led by a supremacist Satanic leadership. All races are represented amongst this leadership but it clear that Jews and the crypto-Jewish Freemasons dominate at the top.

This leadership is supported by an army of willing acolytes in every area of public life who systematically strive to maintain the systemic poison that threatens to destroy us.

The brainwashing is subtle and incessant, emanating from folks like David Aaronovitch (whose mission is to convince us that life is an unplanned disordered theatre proceeding from human error and the various forms of chaos that error precipitates).......or climate-change mugwump George Monbiot (who writes of the importance of respecting ALL victims). We know what you mean George

Surely we must confront the spiritual nature of the evil that dominates us. It is hard to see how this can be done if Christians do not start taking the teaching of Christ more seriously.

Christians please actually READ some of the material below.

Jews please read it too.

Is this really what you stand for?

Do you realise that if you reject and openly challenge this ideology and your supremacist leaders you might well save us all?

TALMUDIC QUOTATIONS

1. "We beg Thee, 0 Lord, inflict Thy wrath on the nations not believing in Thee. Take away, 0 Lord, all hope from them. Destroy all foes of Thy nation." -Synagaga Judaica, p. 212. Minhagen, p. 23. Crach Chain, 480 Magah.

2. "The teachings of the Talmud stand above all other laws. They are more important than the laws of Moses." -Rabbi Issael, Rabbi Chasbar, et. al.

3. "The decisions of the Talmud are words of the living God. Jehovah Himself asks the opinion of the earthly rabbis when there are difficult affairs in heaven." -Rabbi Menechen Commentary on Fifth Book

4. "Jehovah Himself studies the Talmud standing, he has such respect for that book." -Tract Mechillo

5. "It is more wicked to question the words of the rabbis than those of the Torah." -Michna Sanhedryn 11:3

6. "It is forbidden to disclose the secrets of the law. He who would do it would be as guilty as though he destroyed the whole world." - Jektat Chadasz, 171, 3

7. "Every goy who studies the Talmud and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die." -Sanhedryn, 59a, aboda Zora 8-6, Szagiga 13

8. "To communicate anything to a goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the goyim knew what we teach about them they would kill us openly." -Libbre David 37

9. "If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he ought to give only a false explanation. Who ever will violate this order shall be put to death." -Libbre David 37

10. "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the goyim asks if our books contain anything against them." -Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Via 17

11. "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts..." -Saba Mecia 114, 6

12. "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves." -Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D

13. "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night." - Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L

14. "As soon as the King Messiah will declare himself, He will destroy Rome and make a wilderness of it. Thorns and weeds will grow in the Pope's palace. Then He will start a merciless war on non-Jews and will overpower them. He will slay them in masses, kill their kings and lay waste the whole Roman land. He will say to the Jews: 'I am the King Messiah for whom you have been waiting. Take the silver and gold from the goyim.' " -Josiah 60, 6. Rabbi Abarbanel to Daniel 7, 13

15. "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated." -9boda Sarah 37

16. "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl." -&ad. Shas. 2:2

17. "A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat." -Hadarine, 20, B; Schulchan 9ruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348

18. "A Jew may misuse the non-Jewess in her state of unbelief." - Maimonides, Jak. Chasaka 2:2

19. "IF a goy kills a goy or a Jew he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy he is NOT responsible." -Tosefta. 9boda Za,-a 8, 5

20. "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces." -Schuichan Qruch, Choszen Hajpiszpat jog

21. "Thou shalt not do injury to thy neighbor (Bible), but it is not said, 'Thou shalt not do injury to a Goy.' " -Mishna Sanhedryn 57

22. "When you go to war do not go as the First, but as the last, so that you may return as the first. Five things has Kanaan recommended to his sons: 'Love each other, love the robbery, hate your masters and never tell the truth.' " -Pesachis F. 113B

23. "A Jew is permitted to rape, cheat and perjure himself; but he must take care that he is not found out, so that Israel may not suffer." -Schulchan Aruch, Jore Dia

24. "A Jew may rob a goy - that is,.he may cheat him in a bill, if unlikely to be perceived by him." -Schalchan Arach, Choszen Hamiszpat 348

25. "If a goy wants a Jew to stand witness against a Jew in a Court of Law, and if the Jew could give fair evidence, he is forbidden to do it; but if a Jew wants a Jew to be a witness in a similar case against a goy, he may do it." -Schalchan .9ruch, Choszen Hasiszpat 28, Art. 3 and 4

26. "Those who do not confess the Torah and the Prophets must be killed. Who has the power to kill them, let them kill them openly with the sword. if not, let them use artifices, till they are done away with." -Schulchan Qruch. Choszon Haviszpat 425.5

27. "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general' " - Schalchan arach. Choszen Hasisxpat 348

28. "Should a Jew inform the goyish authorities that another Jew has much money, and the other will suffer a loss through it, he must give him emuneration." -Schalchan Oruch, Choszen Maipiszpat 388

29. "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy." -Tosefta, Qbda Zara VIRZ, 5

30. "On the house of the goy one looks as on the fold of cattle." - Tosefta, Erabin VZZ, 1

31. "All vows, oaths, promises, engagements, and swearing, which, beginning this very day or reconciliation till the next day of reconciliation, we intend to vow, promise, wear, and bind ourselves to fulfill, we repent of beforehand; let them be illegalized, acquitted, annihilated, abolished, valueless, unimportant. Our vows shall be no vows, and our oaths no oaths at all." -Schulchan 9ruch,

Edit. 1, 136. The Jewish Kol Nidre "All Vows" Oath has been set to a

morbid Jewish music, and is often heard on the radio. It is sung as a

chant at each Yom Kippur [Jewish New Year service September 17]

32. "Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no goy is permitted to manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human beings." -Schulchan Oruch, Orach Chaiw 14, 20, 32, 33, 39. TaIDud Jebamoth 61

33. "A Jewish mid-wife is not only permitted but she is compelled to help a Jewish mother on Saturday (Jewish Sabbath) and when so doing to do anything which otherwise would desecrate the Saturday. But it is forbidden to help a non-Jewish woman even if it should be possible to help her without desecrating the Saturday, because she is to be considered only as an animal." -Schulchan gruch, Orach Chaim 330

34. "At the time of the Cholhamoed the transaction of any kind of business is forbidden. But it is permitted to cheat a goy, because cheating of goyim at any time pleases the Lord." -Chuichan Qruch, Orach ChaiD 539

35. "The Jews are strictly Forbidden to cheat their brothers and it is considered cheating already if onesixth of the value has been taken away from him. Whoever has cheated his brother has to return it to him. Naturally all that only holds towards the Jew, to cheat a goy he is permitted and he is not permitted to return to him what he cheated him out of. Because the Bible says: 'Thou shalt not cheat thy next brother,' but the non-Jews are not our brethren, but as mentioned above, worse than dogs." -aruch hoszen Haniszpat 227

And from another source comes the following

In New York City, Jewish Menorahs are a part of city displays during Hanukkah, as are the Islamic star and crescent during Ramadan. Nativity scenes during Christmas are banned, however. Same thing in Palm Beach, Florida (yes, that Palm Beach...the one of hanging chad fame). Both are hotbeds of Jewish activism. Precursors of what is in store for the rest of America.

The Talmud fairly bulges with expressions of animosity for the goyim (that's you and me) and, especially, Christianity, which itself simply turns the other cheek, of course. Normally, I would give just a couple of examples, but I am going to let this list to go on at some length, just so you get a flavor of the depth of hostility for us that exists in Jewish teachings - the hostility that has led to so many things that now are wrong with America, including the destruction of Christmas, of course:

"A Jew must not associate himself with gentiles." - Hilkoth Maakhaloth, Ch. IX.

"The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts." - Saba Mecia, 114, 6.

"Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night." - Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L.

"It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces." -Schuichan Qruch, Choszen Hajpiszpat jog

"Thou shalt not do injury to thy neighbor (Bible), but it is not said, 'Thou shalt not do injury to a Goy.' " - Mishna Sanhedryn 57.

"All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general." - Schalchan arach. Choszen Hasisxpat 348.

"The Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human beings." - Schulchan Oruch, Orach Chaiw 14, 20, 32, 33, 39. TaIDud Jebamoth 61.

"To communicate anything to a goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the goyim knew what we teach about them they would kill us openly." - Libbre David 37.

"Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human." - Schene luchoth haberith, p. 250 b

"If you eat with a Gentile, it is the same as eating with a dog." - Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b

"It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah." - Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5

(Jesus Christ was) illegitimate and conceived during menstruation. Mother a Prostitute. - Kallah 1b. (18b)

Christian birth rate must be diminished materially. - Zohar (II 64b):

Jews must always try to deceive Christians. - Zohar (1 160a)

Jews are not to prevent the death of a Christian. - Choschen Ham (425 5):

Do not save Christians in danger of death, instructed to let die. - Hilkkoth Akum (x,1):

Even the best of the Goim [Christians] should be killed. - Abhodah Zarah (25b)T

If Jew kills a Christian he commits no sin. - Sepher Or Israel 177b

Extermination of Christians necessary. - Zohar (11 43a):

Make no agreements and show no mercy to Christians. - Hilkhoth Akum (x,1):

Christians are idolaters. - Hilkhoth Maakhaloth

Christians have intercourse with animals. - Abhodah Zarah (22a):

Female Jews contaminated when meeting Christians. - Iore Dea (198, 48):

Innocent of murder if intent was to kill a Christian. - Makkoth (7b)

Christians likened to cows and asses. - Zohar II (64b):

Psalmist compares Christians to beasts. - Kethuboth (110b):

Sexual intercourse with Christian same as intercourse with beast. - Sanhedrin (74b)

The seed [children] of Christians valued same as the seed of a beast. - Kethuboth (3b):

Those Jews who do good to Christians never rise when dead. - Zohar (1, 25b)

Jews are to hide their hatred for Christians. - Iore Dea (148, 12H):

Christian property belongs to the first Jew claiming it. - Babha Bathra (54b):

Keep any overpayment Christians make in error. - Choschen Ham (193, 7):

It is permitted for a Jew to deceive Christians. - Babha Kama (113b):

Jew may deceive Christians. - Iore Dea (157, 2) H:

Jew may lie and perjure himself to condemn a Christian. - Babha Kama (113a):

The name of God is not profaned when a Jew lies to Christians. - Babha Kama (113b):

Jew may perjure himself when lying about Christians. - Kallah (1b, p. 18):

Jews may swear falsely by the use of subterfuge wording. - Schabbouth Hag (6d):

Jews must always try to deceive Christians. - Zohar (1, 160a):

Christians who are not Jews' enemies must also die. - Iore Dea (158, 1):

Global media serves 'The Synagogue of Satan'

2011-06-06T12:45:00.015+01:00

.

On the BBC lunchtime News today it was reported that "20 Palestinian protesters have died" at the Syrian border of the Golan Heights (BBC website article here).

Notice that the report did not say that the protesters had been shot by Israeli soldiers.

Israelis get shot, murdered, persecuted, exterminated.

Other peoples are much more fortunate. They die by their own actions. They alone are responsible for their dying.

The newsreader then interviewed an IDF spokeswoman who claimed that the protesters had died "as a direct result of their own actions. They were throwing petrol bombs. We shot over their heads.......then we used teargas......then we shot at their feet......we took every measure to resolve the situation without casualties but by their own actions protesters unfortunately died."

The only surprise or deviation from the usual Israeli response to such incidents is that the IDF woman did not call the dead people 'terrorists'.

These outrageous lies were contradicted by the BBC's own news bulletin last night (Sunday 5th June).

Reporter Kevin Connolly had also used 'died' rather than 'were shot' phraseology and, watching, I considered his report similarly biased to today's. However, his pictures showed the shootings followed by a barrage of teargas from the Israeli troops and Connolly finished with the comment, "Some might wish to ask the uncomfortable question as to why it was that Israeli military used lethal force before moving on to the use of non-lethal force."

Thank you Kevin.

It is not reasonable to suppose that today's BBC news teams do not know the facts of the Golan murders. It is not reasonable to suppose that their presentation of a new 'corrected' Israeli narrative for the slaughter could have been a mere 'accident'.

The IDF spokeswoman could easily have been challenged as the murdering liar she provably is.

No such challenge was made in spite of the BBC's possession of the facts of the incident.

The UK is, spiritually and mentally speaking, an occupied country.

Israel can do as it pleases and the media hoors (who enjoy lavish lifestyles funded by our taxation) will continue to serve the interests of the international bankers who use Israel to project their divide-and-rule strategies across a suffering world.

The BBC covers up every Israeli crime.

When the time comes that the great crimes of 9/11 and 7/7 (and others) are exposed people will discover that Israeli fingerprints are all over these too.

This day will come.

Too many people know the truth.

Too many people have had enough of the lies and crimes of the gangsters that dominate our lives.

When Christ drove the moneychangers from the Temple and warned the Jews against the leadership (Pharisees) that had risen to dominance over the Jewish people, He was warning us all.

BUT WE DID NOT LISTEN.

OVER THE PAST TWO MILLENIA THESE FORCES HAVE, THROUGH THEIR MONEY-LENDING PRACTICES AND BY THEIR TALMUDIC/MASONIC IDEOLOGY, TAKEN CONTROL OF OUR VERY SYSTEMS OF GOVERNMENT.

International bankers who dominate and lead the corporate world and who work hand-in-hand alongside those Jews and gentiles who hold to the self-serving, power-crazed Talmudic ideology are the enemy.

They are an enemy within.

Not without.

They are paving the way for their 'Jewish King'.

These are the 'The Synagogue of Satan'.

.....and their agents are, knowingly or unknowingly, in controlling positions at the top of just about every organisation out there, including 'the opposition', which is clearly also under control.......

.......for now.

.

Truth Behind The Phony Wars

2011-05-31T22:34:00.000+01:00

.

.

IT IS ALL ABOUT THE JEWS

2011-05-26T18:36:00.012+01:00

.

I have nothing original to say on the subject of our seemingly hopeless oppression.......but how dire the situation sometimes appears?

There is no lie so great that the mainstream media will not propagate it as truth.

Entrapped within this matrix of simply enormous lies, it is difficult to imagine a way out for ourselves.

But there is more at work in heaven and earth than the mere minds of men.

One can understand why the powers-that-be allow revolutionary background noise on the internet. They have been fighting their war for a long time and they obviously believe that they have already won it.

Either that or they are afraid that if they stop people writing their articles, large numbers will take to the streets and become much more dangerous to their project.

JOHN KAMINSKY

There is a writer called John Kaminsky who has been focusing his attention on organised Jewry or, as he is more inclined to call them, 'The Jews' for many years. A person (a friend) I know in the 'alternative' media has called him a Zionist agent because his verbal accusations and attacks against Jews have been so intense and because Kaminsky often fails to distinguish between 'Zionists' and 'ordinary Jews'.

It is well-known that 'anti-Semitism' is the Rabbis' greatest ally. They teach their people that this 'anti-semitism' is an irrational hatred that goyim have for all Jews. By such lies, and by the corrupting power exercised by their moneyed Zionist allies, they control their flock and induct them deeper into their unholy project.

I believe that Kaminsky is not only genuine but that he is right (the friend is genuine too, but we all make mistakes....here's hoping I'm right this time....I do think so).

'ORGANISED JEWRY' AT WAR WITH THE WORLD

The Jews (or, as one should perhaps put it) 'organised Jewry' are the primary entity at war with the mass of decent humanity.

Jews are at they very core of the FINANCIAL OLIGARCHY. There are Jewish names on all the banks.

The BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT has interbred with Jewish bankers over the generations. The Royal family is Jewish. Maybe the British Empire was, at its heart, a Jewish project?

Though there are all races involved, near to and supporting the top of the power pyramid, the dominant group within this power matrix is surely Jewish. Jews similarly dominated SOVIET COMMUNISM. Although only 50% of the leadership, their greater coherence and co-operation made them the dominant Soviet faction for most of the life of the Soviet state.

LOOK AROUND YOU

Jews dominate every observable area of public life.

They dominate POLITICS to the point where one might say that they OWN our governments. 80% of Conservative MP's are Friends of Israel. British Prime Ministers' seem to move around shadowed by some Jewish money-bags or other. The current Prime Minister's personal fortune is founded on the drug-running activities of his Jewish great grandfather, who was such a nice man he founded his own bank.

In the USA the situation appears to be, if anything, worse.

'Nuff said.

Jews dominate BUSINESS. The big banks are Jewish. The big food stores, Tesco, Sainsbury's, Marks and Spencer's are Jewish. Billionaire Philip Green dominates the clothing industry and more.

In SPORT there's Formula One motor racing (Bernie Ecclestone), Premier League football (Roman Abramovich, the Glazers etc., etc..)

The MEDIA and PUBLISHING are dominated by Jews.

The MUSIC INDUSTRY is run by Jews.

HOLLYWOOD is entirely dominated by Jews.

The EDUCATION SYSTEM is controlled by government policies generated within think-tanks funded by banking/corporate finance. So who controls that?

Kaminsky is right. There is a 'destabilisation template' at work. It's principles have been written down by various groups over the centuries from the so-called Illuminati (and before), The Protocols of Zion to the subtle developments now being implement along the lines recommended in the writings of the 'Frankfurt School' psychologists.

The influence of the Jews is UNIVERSAL and OVERWHELMINGLY DOMINEERING.

Even the CATHOLIC CHURCH is now a department of Jewry.

I was raised a Catholic and although I might now reject its authority, the Church did spend a great deal of time educating me in the sayings, teachings and about the example of Jesus Christ. Today, it seems to me, the Catholic Church has ditched Jesus in favour of Orthodox Rabbis. (i.e. the inheritors and current practitioners of the religion of Pharisees).

The Pharisees, in case you didn't know, convinced the Romans that they had to crucify Christ.

The Pharisees have been absolved of guilt for this crime by the current Pope. So Orthodox Jews continue in their foul faith while so-called Christians abandon theirs.

Enough is enough.

We must call a spade a spade.

IT IS ALL ABOUT THE JEWS.

The Frankfurt School psychologists promoted the ideas of anti-racist offenses and mass immigration in order to destroy racial cohesion in our societies. How successful these Jewish social engineers have been. And while we were abandoning and making an unforgivable crime of racism, the Jews have been been practicing it intensively, relentlessly, most determinedly.....as no other race ever has...to the point where they either own or control almost everything.

They have destroyed our ability to defend ourselves in order to achieve their own racist ends.

For us anti-racism has become a moral imperative.

For them it is a way of destroying the opposition.

A quote from the Koran comes to mind here: " God judges a man not by his actions but by his intention."

The wickedness and nerve of these people takes ones breath away.

We must go to the Jews in a spirit of love, as Christ did, and tell them that they are being misled.

WE TOO, OF COURSE, ARE BEING MISLED....BUT JEWS AT THE TOP ARE THE VANGUARD OF THE DECEIVERS.

We must tell them that their leadership (who they have made ours) are, as Christ said, "of Satan".

We must do no violence against them, though I believe their leaders would happily murder us all( Well, that's what they say anyway).

WE MUST EXPOSE THE GREAT LIES THAT EMPOWER THEM.

LIE/FRAUD NUMBER ONE:

The root of their power over us is the guilt we have been conditioned to feel over 'The Holocaust'.

This story is a huge over-inflated LIE.

There were no homicidal gas-chambers. NONE. There were hygenic gas chambers for delousing clothes of the workers (i.e. to keep them healthy). Anyone who spends the time to research this issue will discover for themselves that there is no end to the lies behind this great hoax (that was not launched in earnest until about 1970)

LIE/FRAUD NUMBER TWO:

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB .

Completely provably.

It is also clear that 9/11 was primarily as Israeli project.

LIE/FRAUD NUMBER THREE:

7/7 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.

Less obviously than 9/11, but an inside job nonetheless.

LIE/FRAUD NUMBER FOUR:

The MONEY-CREATION SCAM.

This is the engine that underpins all their power. It has got to be swept away.

BY US.

NOT BY THEM, AS THEY INSTALL SOME NEW SEEMINGLY ATTRACTIVE SYSTEM THAT WILL BIND US EVER-MORE-TIGHTLY UNDER THEIR HEARTLESS YOKE.

There are many more big lie/scams but that will do for a start.

ALSO PRAY

Christ IS the spirit of God in man.

Christ loves all men and women. HE loves those that reject HIM as truly as those that love HIM. HIS spirit is the Father's and God can only love.

Christ came to save the Jews and all men through them. Those Jews that accepted him founded Christianity and gave us the basis of western culture.

Those that rejected him remain lost and damage not only themselves but all who fall under their influence.

GOD made us free. It is we who must choose to change as God cannot make us.

Those who reject HIM would do well to remember that in the eternal world and in this (for Christ is alive today), Lucifer is crushed.

and GOD WINS.

So we must take care and be very slow to think ourselves wise.

However, we have heard the word of the prophets.

The Jews WILL accept Christ.

(.....and better sooner than later)

.

Forensic Evidence About the "Holocaust"

2011-05-24T22:22:00.004+01:00

.

Title of film: The Forensic Evidence About the "Holocaust" That Almost Every Jew is Too Afraid to Look At

Why do Jews need us all to believe the very worst about Hitler and the Germans?

Is this great lie the rock upon which Jewish economic and political global hegemony is founded?

If the truth of this matter is neither here nor there to our political representatives, then whose interests do Members of Parliament really represent?

Our 'democratic' system can ONLY be a total farce.

.

Jose Arguelles -The Mayan Calendar and The Thelepatic Field in 2013

2011-05-24T22:12:00.001+01:00

.

This is interesting. I've never seen anything like it:

.

Ireland Royal Visit: Peace or Reoccupation?

2011-05-17T19:55:00.007+01:00

.

Superficially the visit of Queen Elizabeth to Ireland is a cause for celebration an all sides. It seems that irreversible peace has broken out between Ireland and its ancient enemy across the water.

This can only be good.

We can all celebrate the fact that IRA bombs no longer blow up English city centres.

However, if this is marking the breakout of peace why has this visit taken so long. The Good Friday Agreement was signed in 1998, after all.

The last Royal visit, by George V, was in 1911 when Ireland was just another possession of 'The Crown'. Owners do, after all, like to take a look at their goods every now and again and, in the case of colonies, remind them who's in charge.

We should, perhaps, remember that Her Majesty is a figurehead for a rather nebulous organisation that is called 'The Crown'.

But who are 'The Crown'?

Some say that 'The Crown' is the allegorical symbol and name for the familiar international financial oligarchy whose base is in the City of London. If this is the case, then the IMF is a mere instrument of this 'Crown'.

The same IMF that now have taken control of the Irish economy.

Is Elizabeth's visit a marking of a new occupation of Ireland by 'The Crown'? This time not by force of arms but by the instrument of debt?

The old slavery was enforced at the point of a gun.

Techniques have become more sophisticated. The very same entity can now extract the same servitude and more, without using a single bullet.

But make no mistake.

DEBT IS SLAVERY.

The parasite is back in full control.

There is another interesting aspect to this that is worth a mention.

Henry Makow, a Jewish writer, says that "The Jewish Conspiracy" is British Imperialism.

We might wonder why all the Royal Males get circumcised, as openly acknowledged by this Rabbi (and Mohel) and does this not support the claim we do not read about in the papers, that The Royals regard themselves as Merovingian Jews?.

.

Veterans Today False Flag Warning

2011-05-17T13:50:00.002+01:00

.

BREAKING! Netanyahu Now in USA for False Flag ASAP!

We expect another False Flag incident sometime soon.

After Bin Laden's execution what else can we expect.

Here's hoping as many as possible are paying close attention. A visit from the 9/11/7/7 angel of death is something to take seriously.

READ HERE.

Towards the end of the article there is a discussion about the possibility of a f-flag attack being an eco-attack such as an earthquake. It is easy to imagine that such a possibility is fictional but listen to this Russian politician threaten Georgia:

"We have new weapons that nobody knows anything about yet....with these weapons we will destroy any part of the planet within 15 minutes...no explosions, no rays, no laser, not lightening, it's a calm and quiet weapon with which whole continents will be put to sleep forever...."....and the threats get heavier....

Just the kind of guy we want running the planet. We know the Americans have HAARP. Does Russia have something similar or is this fellow just trying to pretend so?

THE BBC's WAR ON TRUTH

2011-05-15T15:35:00.020+01:00

.

This morning 'The Big Questions' went out on BBC1, as usual, but addressed a single question (rather than the usual three). This was:

'Does Britain Have A Problem With Muslims?'

The studio was filled with perhaps two-thirds Muslims.

A survey, The Pew Global Attitudes Report, carried out in 2006, found that more than half of the British Muslims, 56%, believed Arabs were not responsible for the 9/11 terror strikes. In some parts of the UK that majority is much higher. Try home of 'the 7/7 bombers' Beeston, in Leeds, for example.

Anyone who mixes with ordinary Muslims knows that a majority of them believe that the 'War on Terror' is a hoax, that 9/11 was an 'inside job' and that 7/7 was not carried out by four suicide bombers but by forces acting on behalf of the secret state in order to provide yet a further pretext for foreign aggression and domestic suppression.

However, in this debate not a single Muslim voice represented the opinions of this VERY LARGE part of their community.

On the contrary, the only mention of 9/11 and 7/7 was made by a Jewish contributor, one Davis Lewin of 'The Henry Jackson Society' (his special subject seems to be 'Homeland Security').

Lewin (at about 50 minutes) accused a Muslim panelist of 'working with' someone "who said (shock, horror) that 7/7 and 9/11 might not have been done by Muslims." The absence of any challenge to this man's short speech communicated to the BBC audience that such an idea really is beyond the pale......utterly outrageous. (Lewin went on, at the end of the show, to condemn a panel member "during Israel's war with Hamas" for suggesting it might inflame Muslims....."war with Hamas?!!")

Job done.

The woman accused busied herself in a mode of defensive apology. The next Muslim speaker, Saleem Chagtai, another funded-by-God-knows-who think-tanker, was asked directly and forcefully by Nicky Campbell, regarding 7/7.... ."Why did they do it?"

Chagtai did not raise the possibility that these men might be innocent. Their guilt was accepted as a statement of fact. He wittered on about Iraq and Al Queda. He might as well have been Lady Justice Hallett.

In fact 9/11, absolutely provably by simple physics, and 7/7 were both false flag events.

Last week a London jury almost unanimously delivered a verdict in favour of a man who asserts exactly this version of events in the excellent film that got him arrested and charged.

So here, in the most civilised and well-mannered arena imaginable, we witness two great betrayals.

Firstly, hand-picked Muslims failing to defend the lives of their own people by failing to present any of the copious evidence that would prove Muslim innocence regarding these foul crimes.

Secondly by the perfidious BBC, executing exactly the same betrayal against the British people.

In the decade to come these people will stand condemned not by the fact that they propagated the lies that were fed to them by their superiors, but by the fact that THEY FAILED TO EVEN RAISE (NEVER MIND DEMAND ANSWERS TO) QUESTIONS ABOUT EVIDENCE, FREELY AVAILABLE TO ALL, THAT BLOWS BOTH OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORIES RIGHT OUT OF THE WATER

So, another Sunday, another job well done by our satanic engineers of consciousness.

There are now millions across the world that know the truth. In the USA, and the UK too, millions have seen the evidence.

The real architects of terror might imagine they can manage some kind of coming dollar collapse/terrorist crisis in a way that will ensure a final victory for the financial oligarchy that presently pulls our strings.

If I worked for the BBC I wouldn't count on it, I'd start thinking about how my participation in the BBC's War on Truth is going to play out for me personally and for everyone I love.

Keeping my job (and my fingers crossed), while failing in my primary duty, just would not do.

"Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don’t mean to do harm – but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves."

T.S. Eliot

.

PROOF That Bin Laden Was Buried At Sea

2011-05-10T13:06:00.003+01:00

.

.

(Mistaken...See comments) Apology to Bridget Dunne of J7

2011-05-06T22:54:00.005+01:00

I put put up a post some months ago calling 'J7' "controlled opposition".

I apologise to Bridget (whom I have never met) for this comment, my own angry judgement mostly based on J7's extreme hostility to 7/7 activists Nick Kollerstrom and Muad'Dib, both individuals I still respect and admire..

J7's commentary on Justice Hallet's Inquest Report is spot on.

Let me also acknowledge that Bridget Dunne has done more than anybody in collecting, archiving and analysing evidence, other records and anomalies emerging from the massive volume of material generated by the events of 7/7.

Sorry again.
KB

Britain's 9-11 Cover Up: WHAT WILL BECOME OF US?

2011-05-06T10:42:00.025+01:00

.

What will become of a people too mentally lazy and stupidly trusting to take an interest in their own survival?

Yesterday Mike Adams published an excellent article titled 'The Gullible Mind Explained'. It could have been describing the wall of uncritical and lazy reporting now hitting the airwaves regarding Lady Justice Hallett's report on the recent 7/7 Inquest.

The content of this report was easily predictable. Simply inevitable.

There are two competing narratives to explain this crime:

1) The official story of four suicide bombers murdering 52 people and injuring hundreds by exploding four bombs on three tube trains and one bus on the morning of 7/7.

2) Forces embedded within the establishment carried out a false-flag attack against the British people. As with nearly all false-flag events, patsies were set up to take the blame for the crime. The four Muslims were completely innocent actors paid to participate in a concurrent anti-terror 'drill'.

As you will have guessed, I am one of the many who subscribe to conspiracy theory number two.

HERE'S WHY

After 9/11 the murderous confabulation that is modern history soared and raged all around us under guise of a ‘War on Terror’, providing the necessary pretext for just about anything the western military-industrial complex felt like doing. However, in the UK we (or should I say the Labour government) had a serious problem. Although Blair and his army of stooges signed up to every invasion and participated loyally in every occupation, the one thing our ‘War on Terror’ was short on was…..the terror. It appeared that British Muslims, peeved though they undoubtedly were at watching their co-religionists being slaughtered by the million in Iraq, just wouldn’t turn their energies toward blowing up their fellow Englishmen. The ‘War on Terror’ was happening somewhere else.

The fact that on 7/7/05 four (or more) explosions killed fifty-two innocent people making their way to work on a Thursday morning changed all that.

Nonetheless the story, universally accepted by the British media (if not across the country), that four Islamic-terrorist suicide-bombers murdered them remains an unproven and (as I will attempt to explain) highly unlikely conspiracy theory.

Firstly it needs to be noted that the refusal of both the Labour and the new Tory/Liberal alliance to hold a public Inquiry into the events of 7/7 should ring a very loud alarm bell for every British citizen. This was the largest mass-murder ever on British soil. One might have expected the promoters of the 'War on Terror' to use a Public Inquiry to cash in on an incident that would make and massively boost their case.

In a court of law physical evidence always trumps excuses, allegations, observations or any other kind of verbal contribution to a case, so one should perhaps begin here.

Three Holes in the Floor of the Edgeware Road Carriage

Evidence was given by different witnesses, including the train driver (a Mr Whitehead), that clearly describe three separate holes in the Edgeware Road carriage. People fell into all three holes. Two emerged from the holes . One died in the third hole. The original report on the Edgeware Road explosion (from mark Honigsbaum of the Guardian who was on the train) had the train lifting off the tracks and being derailed (i.e. bomb(s) underneath the train). The driver described all the access panels in the floor of the first coach (the bomb(s) killed people in the second carriage) being 'flipped open' from underneath.
In what way is any of this compatible with a single suicide 'suicide bomber' with a rucksack full of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide?

The Explosives

Here is a timeline for the 7/7 explosives narrative as it developed:

The first analysis came from a genuine expert. This is surely the most reliable commentary on the nature of the bombs that went off that morning. The problem is that it would have been all-but-impossible for four young men from Leeds to get their hands on such materials.

On 12 July 2005, Superintendent Christophe Chaboud, chief of French anti-terrorism Coordination Unit who was in London assisting Scotland Yard with its investigation, confirmed to The Times that,‘The nature of the explosives appears to be military, which is very worrying….the material used were not homemade but sophisticated military explosives …’ (Nafeez Ahmed The London Bombs, p.24)

On 13th July it was stated that these were of ‘C4’ explosive....London explosives have military origin – [Science Daily. LONDON, July 13 (UPI)]: Forensic scientists told the newspaper the construction of the four devices detonated in London was very technically advanced, and unlike any instructions that can be found on the Internet.’

From The Independent on July 14th: ‘A bath filled with explosives has been found at a house in Leeds that was the “operational base” for the London suicide bombers
17th July 2005 The Observer: ‘22 lbs TATP in the bath.’

The TATP story survived but faded away in 2007 then, when the 7/7 Kingston trial came along in the summer of 2008 all trace of the TATP story had gone.

Now the explosives were made of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide. The idea of the four heating up Hydrogen Peroxide in their kitchen to the point where it would make an explosive mix with black pepper is simply laughable. How could they test that their ‘bombs’ were going to go off. Were they going to go lurching across the country with this kind of bomb sloshing about in their rucksacks. Has anybody ever made a bomb out of this mixture? If such a bomb did explode could it possibly have caused the devastation created on 7/7?

There is much written online that mocks these materials as potential tools of mass destruction. Do we not require a Public Inquiry on this issue alone. The changing storyline above surely makes no sense at all.

Why Suicide?

Moving on to another very obvious question: why would terrorists who wished to wreak havoc and punish British people for the UK’s involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan choose to blow themselves up along with their victims? These were very crowded trains. They could have set a timed detonator and quietly slipped off the trains a stop or two early, leaving their bags on the floor amongst the feet of dozens of incurious passengers. Where would have been the risk in that? Surely such activists would better serve their cause by continuing and not terminating their mission?

Drills

There were four uncannily accurate drills carried out before the 7/7 bombings:
1) The BBC Panorama ‘management exercise’ programme of May 2004 during which a panel of ‘managers’, including Peter Power (see below) and Michael Portillo, discussed how they would deal with a terror attack on London that revealed itself to them through mock news reports as the show progressed. The scenario they had to deal with turned out to be one overground and 3 underground explosions taking place over a short space of time during the morning rush hour.

2) The contemporaneous 7/7 drill: on 7/7 itself Peter Power conducted a terror drill that shadowed the cataclysm as it happened – over the same three tube stations at more or less the same time. On the afternoon of 7/7 he was interviewed on Radio 5’s ‘Drivetime’ programme:
POWER: …at half-past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for, er, over, a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing upright!

3) Atlantic Blue: held over 5-8 April, 2005. All echelons of government participated in this large terror-drill. The Independent reported after July 7th that “By an extraordinary coincidence, all the experts who formulate such plans are together in a meeting at the headquarters of the London Ambulance Service – and they are discussing an exercise they ran three months ago that involved simulating four terrorist bombs going off at once across London.”

4) Operation Hanover: London’s police hold a little-known yearly terror-drill. On 2005 it just happened to be held on 1-2 July. Its game-plan was threefold: three ‘simultaneous’ bomb attacks on three underground stations. The police have been reticent about discussing this astounding precursor event, mere days before 7/7. They only revealed it in 2009.

Why No Post-Mortems?

Another astonishing fact that emerged during the 2010-11 7/7 Inquest was that no post mortems were carried out on the bodies of the victims. A very great deal about the nature of and distance from the explosions could have been discovered from such examinations. The effects of different explosives on flesh are well-known. Such post-mortems would have provided some definitive information that would have at least ruled out some possible explosives from consideration as the source material of the blasts. What could possibly explain such an oversight other than the desire to avoid creating conflicts with a fabricated narrative.

Body Count reveals no Bombers

The First Official Body Count on Two of the Trains was One Body Short

At the 7/7/ Inquest in November 2010 Dr. Morgan Costello gave evidence that he was asked to attend two scenes, Edgware Road and Aldgate, for the 'purposes of certifying the extinction of life'. He counted six bodies at Edgware Road and seven bodies at Aldgate and declared these as 'life extinct'. The enormous anomaly, that passed completely unreported in the press, was that the numbers should have been seven and eight if we count the bodies of the bombers. Here is surely the clearest possible evidence that the alleged bombers were never on the trains. No similar count seems to have been carried out on the other (Russell Square ) train but we do know a little about the behaviour of the Russell Square bomber, Germaine Lindsay, before his demise.

Germaine Lindsay, cool and then confused

Germaine Lindsay drove from Aylesbury to meet the other (let’s call them) bombers in Luton railway station. He arrived an hour before them and decided to take a little nap. He received a parking ticket while asleep in his car. Were he a terrorist he obviously would have known that he would have had only four hours left to live.

Germaine Lindsay was one extraordinarily relaxed suicide-bomber.

A station attendant called Mr. Patel gave testimony to the Inquest that a man he identified as Germaine Lindsay arrived on the concourse of King’s Cross station and asked to talk to “The Duty Manager”. He said it was, “Very important.” Mr Patel remarked that it was very unusual for a member of the public to know the exact name for the person in charge of the station. Normally people asked for ‘the supervisor’ or ‘the manager’. At this time there was chaos on the concourse. The metal grills had been pulled down and shut at the front of the station. Passengers were not being allowed through the barriers. A crowd had built up and people were starting to abuse staff. Numbers of ‘Community Support Officers’ who looked like police were milling around the area trying to manage the situation. No wonder Lindsay was confused. He must have decided to try to speak to someone who ‘was in on the game’ to explain to him what was going on. The most obvious explanation of his behaviour is that it would have puzzled and alarmed him that the drill had started before he, ‘the bomber’, had caught their trains. Perhaps a chilling possibility occurred to him. When Mr. Patel returned with the duty manager Lindsay had gone.

And More

There are many, many other serious anomalies in the official narrative.

The train times presented huge problems for the official narrative causing the Home Secretary to change the story after it was realised that the 7.40 they were said to have caught had been cancelled. Then the next train arrived 23 minutes late at King’s Cross giving the bombers only three minutes to buy four RETURN tickets (think about that one), cross the track by bridge and board the last possible train that makes it just feasible they could have reached the bombed trains in time.

On the 5th July 2005, Mohammed Siddique Khan took his pregnant wife to Dewsbury Hospital in West Yorkshire. She was bleeding and there was obviously something wrong. Doctors examined Hasina Patel and said that there was a ‘threatened miscarriage’. They sent her home and booked her in for a scan on the 7th. Mrs Patel has never told the time they got home but afterwards Mohammed Khan said that he was ‘going to see his friends’. Hasina Patel never saw or heard from her husband ever again. She miscarried on July 6th . At the 7/7 Inquest there was ‘evidence’ (peculiar and surely untrustworthy) presented of a mobile phone text-message exchange between Khan and Germaine Lindsay at 4.35am on the morning of the 6th July. Would Khan really have abandoned his desperate wife for a whole day while she was in that condition? Khan was a highly respected in his community and by the headmistress of the special school in which he worked as a classroom assistant. The police had used him to mediate between rival gangs in local disputes. He was trusted by all sides. Hilary Benn had taken Khan on a tour of the House of Commons. He was not known to be politically radical. Quite the opposite. He was protective of the good name of his community and was eager to maintain good relations with the local white community. Bearing this in mind it is likely that the reason the police have film of Khan is that he was helping them ‘keep an eye on’ any worrisome Muslim elements in his locality. He was not a troublemaker, he was a healer and a fixer.
The most likely explanation for Khan’s disappearance on the 6th is that he told his minder for the 7/7 exercise that he was not going to be able to make it. . He would have been told to see that the others could make it without him. The bombings were not going to be called off but……now he had presented his minders with a problem that had only one possible solution. His goose was cooked.

This would also explain why the attendant at the filling station where Tanweer filled his car (and argued about the change he was given) said he only saw one other person in Tanweer’s car. Hasib Hussain alone (the bus-bomber) was in the car and, unknown to the pair of them, Khan was by now already dead. This would also explain why the now-suppressed BBC radio 5 news reports from the late morning of the seventh said that two men had been shot in Canary Wharf (rather than three, the supposed train bombers. Hussain had been separated from the others).

Those who have travelled to Beeston and spoken to locals report that, like Khan, Hussain and Tanweer had shown no inclination in their communities towards political or religious radicalism.

The Evidence against ‘The Four’

Looking at the detail of latest narrative laid out before the 7/7 Inquest, it must be admitted that it is now just physically possible that the four caught the last possible train at Luton and rushed from King’s Cross Thameslink to the various subway platforms before detonating their deadly cargos. However, their relaxed demeanour in the very few still photos presented as evidence militates against the probability that they were rushing about madly that morning (especially with all that liquid explosive slopping about on their backs).

Why too in the most CCTV-rich environment on earth are there only a couple of very poor pictures of the four, one at Luton, one at Thameslink, the date and time stamps on which could have easily been photoshopped. Could the photos of Khan have been used from the ‘practice run’ the four carried out on 29th June 2005, just eight days earlier?

The mobile phone evidence places them all on the correct train at the right time. Three things about this though. Firstly, this is new evidence that was not released in the previous 2006 hearing. Why? Second, is it likely that these men would have been texting each other on train they had all boarded together. Finally, this is the kind of evidence easily faked. It is letters and numbers on a piece of paper.

Khan and Tanweer could easily have been talked into making the Jihadi videos that have played such a large part in aiding the public to accept their guilt. They were employees, well-paid for two days work, the practice on June 29th and for the day itself. They were told that the exercise has to be made as realistic as possible. The film would be in the hands of the station staff and other authorities giving them a possible means of intercepting the four. The on-camera ‘threats’ from Khan and Tanweer are vague and unspecific. When Hasina Patel first saw these videos it was reported that she said, “That’s not my husband.” Her brother thought it was Khan. It is most likely that she meant, “ I know him. He would never say such things.”
The ‘bombers’ all had four or more mobile phones each; one of their own private phones and at least three other (so-called) ‘operational’ phones that they are supposed to have used to confound anyone who might attempt to track their communications and obstruct their diabolical plan. It is most likely that these phones were supplied by their minder and that their holding them allowed their ‘handlers’ to track Tanweer and Lindsay down in Canary Wharf after they had panicked and gone on the run, presumably (and naively) hoping to tell their story to the British press who are mostly based there.

P.S. Muad’Dib

The first person to present an alternative and more credible narrative for 7/7 was Yorkshireman Anthony John Hill, in his documentary ‘7/7 The Ripple Effect’ (this is a must-see. Please watch if you don't know the film). Hill, a very unusual character in many ways, has renamed himself Muad’Dib, after a character in Frank Herbert’s sci-fi epic ‘Dune’. It is his basically his interpretation of events that have been presented above, excepting that ‘Dib did not know of the pregnancy problems of Khan’s wife, nor about the 4.35 text-messages, nor Khan’s failure to contact his wife after leaving her on the evening of the 5th of July at the time of making his film.
When a group of ‘Islamic terrorists’, allegedly associates of Khan, went on trial for offences in 2008 at Kingston Crown Court, Hill posted two copies of his DVD to the court. One envelope was addressed to the judge, the other to the foreman of the jury. Neither DVD reached its target but shortly afterwards a request for Hill to be extradited from Ireland (he lived in Kells, County Meath at the time) was sent to the Irish Ministry of Justice. The request was successful and Hill was collected by a British policeman, accompanied across the water and incarcerated in Wandsworth prison shortly before the start of the 7/7 Inquest.
Hill relates, amusingly, that he asked the policeman in whose charge he was placed, “Have you watched my film.” The constable replied, “Yes.” “What did you think of it?” asked Hill. The PC offered a look that was wide-eyed and grim. Hill asked him, “Shouldn’t you be arresting Tony Blair and not me?” and the policeman sheepishly went back to reading his newspaper.
Hill made immediate applications for bail but was only released once the Inquest was finished.
His documentary has been copied and handed out at mosques to thousands of Muslims in the UK. Most Muslims now believe ‘The Four’ to be innocent, largely because of ‘Dib’s work. The authorities were obviously determined he would not upset the 7/7 Inquest operation by getting his film into the hands of family members, press and God knows who else. This man scares them and has suffered accordingly. His case is being heard in Southwark Crown Court on next Monday Morning 9th May 2011.

WHAT WILL BECOME OF US?

For me, there is only one sensible explanation to explain the facts of 7/7/05. Unfortunately this is a very unpleasant explanation.

Let us ask the hard questions of all our leaders, MP's, journalists, teachers, police, military and the rest.....

.......What will become of us if we continue to allow ourselves to be led by such criminals, people who are prepared to commit acts of false flag terrorism against their own people?

Think about it Constable, Sargeant, Brigadier, Headmaster, News editor, everyone.......

There is no such thing as an innocent bystander. To stand and watch is to be complicit. Standing and watching is passive approval.

.

Nick Clegg is an Idiot (repost)

2011-05-06T09:47:00.003+01:00

.

Politicians are often baffling but few more so than Liberal leader Nick Clegg. Before last year's General Election he went on TV and made some astonishing statements (see below). He also, now famously, promised not to raise University fees. This gained him lots and lots of votes. To the young he came across as one of the 'good guys' in politics.

How he did not realise that reneging on this promise, in the spectacular way he did by legislating for the tripling of fees, would not destroy his party, is nothing short of amazing.

Last night's losses were predictable (and pleasing).

When trust is broken, it is gone. There is a whole generation of young people who will never dream of voting Liberal again.

Unfortunately for them there is no one else in the field worth voting for either.

People are looking for a real alternative to the banker-owned, phony (left/right) divided, phony democratic, one-party state we now endure.

Many are working on creating a real alternative. Something will emerge. Let's hope it will arrive sooner rather than later.

Previous post on Clegg is below:

On the Andrew Marr Show this morning Nick Clegg says that Britain should make itself a safe haven for persecuted homosexuals around the world.
Marr said, "That's a lot of people. What about those who say that we are already an overcrowded island and we don't have the room?"

"This is true in London and the South East but not elsewhere. There is a shortage of fruit pickers in Lincolnshire, for example...."

Is it Liberal policy to flood Lincolnshire with African homosexuals, one might fairly ask.

This great idea would surely work wonders for Liberals standing for parliament in Spalding and Grantham, say.

Good luck with that one Nick! Sounds like a winner.

He then said that "We need policies like this to make Britain the integrated diverse society I want it to be."

If Clegg thinks that the politics of 'Diversity' produces 'integrity he is either a fool or a fiend.

'Diversity' (as is obvious to anyone with their eyes and mind wide open) is about 'divide and rule', artificially created alienation and conditioned helplessness for society at large. Its purpose is to make us compliant to the diktats of an increasingly tyrannical (and globalist)government.

.

Bin Laden's 9/11 Confession (not)

2011-05-04T11:20:00.006+01:00

.

Below we see an interview given by Osama Bin Laden to the Ummat newspaper of Pakistan, published on 28th September 2001. This piece, somehow, never made its way into the pages of western newspapers nor was it ever mentioned on major TV news channels. Bin Laden blames Israel for the attacks much like Christopher Bollyn and former director of studies at the US Army War College,Dr. Alan Sabrosky (see YouTube interview below).

OSAMA BIN LADEN SAYS ISRAELI REGIME BEHIND THE 9/11 ATTACKS

KABUL, Afghanistan (Ummat): Prominent Arab mojahed (freedom fighter) Usama bin Laden or the Al-Qaida group has nothing to do with the 11 September attacks on the Bush Administration, according to an Osama bin Laden interview with Ummat, the Karachi-based Pakistani daily newspaper. In his interview, Osama bin Laden pointed out that the Israeli regime is behind the 9-11 attacks. He expressed gratitude and support for Pakistan, urging the Pakistani people to continue their Jihad against dictators, tyrants, traitors, crooks, criminals, dictatorships and tyrannies. Following is the text of Osama Bin Laden's interview conducted by a "special correspondent" and published in the daily Ummat on Friday, 28 September 2001. [The place and date of the interview was not given by Ummat.]

Daily UMMAT: You have been accused of involvement in the attacks in New York and Washington. What do you want to say about this? If you are not involved, who might be?

OSAMA BIN LADEN: In the name of Allah (God), the most beneficent, the most merciful. Praise be to Allah, Who is the creator of the whole universe and Who made the Earth as an abode for peace, for the whole humankind. Allah is the Sustainer, who sent Prophet Muhammad (saw) for our guidance. I am thankful to The Ummat Group of Publications, which gave me the opportunity to convey my viewpoint to the people, particularly the valiant and momin (true Muslim) people of Pakistan who refused to believe the lies of the demon (Pakistani military dictator General Pervez Musharraf).

I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. It is the United States, which is perpetrating every maltreatment on women, children and common people of other faiths, particularly the followers of Islam. All that is going on in Palestine for the last 11 months is sufficient to call the wrath of God upon the United States and Israel. There is also a warning for those Muslim countries, which witnessed all these as a silent spectator. What had earlier been done to the innocent people of Iraq, Chechnya and Bosnia? Only one conclusion could be derived from the indifference of the United States and the West to these acts of terror and the patronage of the tyrants by these powers that America is an anti Islamic power and it is patronizing the anti-Islamic forces. Its friendship with the Muslim countries is just a show, rather deceit. By enticing or intimidating these countries, the United States is forcing them to play a role of its choice. Put a glance all around and you will see that the slaves of the United States are either rulers or enemies of Muslims.

The U.S. has no friends, nor does it want to keep any because the prerequisite of friendship is to come to the level of the friend or consider him at par with you. America does not want to see anyone equal to it. It expects slavery from others. Therefore, other countries are either its slaves or subordinates. However, our case is different. We have pledged slavery to God Almighty alone and after this pledge there is no possibility to become the slave of someone else. If we do that it will be disregardful to both our Sustainer and his fellow beings. Most of the world nations upholding their freedom are the religious ones, which are the enemies of the United States, or the U.S. itself considers them as its enemies.

The countries which do not agree to become the U.S. slaves are China, Iran, Libya, Cuba, Syria [Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iraq, Sudan, Indonesia, Malaysia] and Russia. Whoever committed the act of 11 September are not the friends of the American people. I have already said that we are against the American system, not against its people, whereas in these attacks, the common American people have been killed. According to my information, the death toll is much higher than what the U.S. Government has stated. But the Bush Administration does not want the panic to spread. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the U.S. system, but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology could survive. They can be anyone, from Russia to Israel and from India to Serbia. In the U.S. itself, there are dozens of well-organized and well-equipped groups, which are capable of causing a large-scale destruction. Then you cannot forget the American Jews, who are annoyed with President Bush ever since the elections in Florida and want to avenge him.

Then there are intelligence agencies in the U.S., which require billions of dollars worth of funds from the Congress and the government every year. This [funding issue] was not a big problem till the existence of the former Soviet Union but after that the budget of these agencies has been in danger. They needed an enemy. So, they first started propaganda against Osama and Taleban and then this incident happened. You see, the Bush Administration approved a budget of 40 billion dollars. Where will this huge amount go? It will be provided to the same agencies, which need huge funds and want to exert their importance. Now they will spend the money for their expansion and for increasing their importance. I will give you an example. Drug smugglers from all over the world are in contact with the U.S. secret agencies. These agencies do not want to eradicate narcotics cultivation and trafficking because their importance will be diminished. The people in the U.S. Drug Enforcement Department are encouraging drug trade so that they could show performance and get millions of dollars worth of budget. General Noriega was made a drug baron by the CIA and, in need, he was made a scapegoat. In the same way, whether it is President Bush or any other U.S. President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks.

Daily UMMAT: A number of world countries have joined the call of the United States for launching attacks on Afghanistan. These also include a number of Muslim countries. Will Al-Qaida declare a Jihad against these Islamic countries as well?

OSAMA BIN LADEN: I must say that my duty is just to awaken the Muslims; to tell them as to what is good for them and what is not. What does Islam says and what the enemies of Islam want? Al-Qaida was set up to wage a Jihad against infidelity, particularly to counter the onslaught of the infidel countries against the Islamic states. Jihad is the sixth undeclared pillar of Islam. [The first five being the basic holy words of Islam (There is only one God in the entire universe and Muhammad is the last Prophet of God), prayers, fast, pilgrimage to Mecca and giving alms (zakat).] Every anti-Islamic person is afraid of Jihad. Al-Qaida wants to keep Jihad alive and active and make it a part of the daily life of the Muslims. It wants to give it the status of worship. We are not against any Islamic country. We do not consider a war against an Islamic country as Jihad. We are in favour of armed Jihad only against those infidel governments, which are killing innocent Muslim men, women and children just because they are Muslims. Supporting the U.S. act is the need of some Muslim countries and the compulsion of others. However, they should think as to what will remain of their religious and moral position if they support the attack of the Christians and the Jews on a Muslim country like Afghanistan. The orders of Islamic Shariah [jurisprudence] for such individuals, organizations and countries are clear and all the scholars of the Muslim brotherhood are unanimous on them. We will do the same, which is being ordered by the Ameer-ul-Momeneen [the commander of the faithful Afghans] Muhammad Omar and the Islamic scholars. The hearts of the people of Muslim countries are beating with the call of Jihad. We are grateful to them.

Daily UMMAT: The losses caused in the attacks in New York and Washington have proved that giving an economic blow to the U.S.is not too difficult. U.S. experts admit that a few more such attacks can bring down the American economy. Why is Al-Qaida not targeting their economic pillars?

OSAMA BIN LADEN: I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We are against the [U.S. Government] system, which makes other nations slaves of the United States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic freedom. This system is totally in control of the American-Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is clear that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the U.S. is not uttering a single word.

Daily UMMAT: Why is harm not caused to the enemies of Islam through other means, apart from the armed struggle? For instance, urging the Muslims to boycott Western products, banks, shipping lines and TV channels.

OSAMA BIN LADEN: The first thing is that Western products could only be boycotted when the Muslim fraternity is fully awakened and organized. Secondly, the Muslim companies should become self-sufficient in producing goods equal to the products of Western companies. Economic boycott of the West is not possible unless economic self-sufficiency is attained and substitute products are brought out. You see that wealth is scattered all across the Muslim World but not a single TV channel has been acquired which can preach Islamic injunctions according to modern requirements and attain an international influence. Muslim traders and philanthropists should make it a point that if the weapon of public opinion is to be used, it is to be kept in the hand. Today's world is of public opinion and the fates of nations are determined through its pressure. Once the tools for building public opinion are obtained, everything that you asked for can be done.

Daily UMMAT: The entire propaganda about your struggle has so far been made by the Western media. But no information is being received from your sources about the network of Al-Qaida and its Jihadi successes. Would you comment?

OSAMA BIN LADEN: In fact, the Western media is left with nothing else. It has no other theme to survive for a long time. Then we have many other things to do. The struggle for Jihad and the successes are for the sake of Allah and not to annoy His bondsmen. Our silence is our real propaganda. Rejections, explanations, or corrigendum only waste your time and through them, the enemy wants you to engage in things which are not of use to you. These things are pulling you away from your cause. The Western media is unleashing such a baseless propaganda, which makes us surprise but it reflects on what is in their hearts and gradually they themselves become captive of this propaganda. They become afraid of it and begin to cause harm to themselves. Terror is the most dreaded weapon in modern age and the Western media is mercilessly using it against its own people. It can add fear and helplessness in the psyche of the people of Europe and the United States. It means that what the enemies of the United States cannot do, its media is doing that. You can understand as to what will be the performance of the nation in a war, which suffers from fear and helplessness.

Daily UMMAT: What will be the impact of the freeze of Al-Qaida accounts by the U.S.?

OSAMA BIN LADEN: God opens up ways for those who work for Him. Freezing of accounts will not make any difference for Al-Qaida or other Jihad groups. With the grace of Allah, Al-Qaida has more than three alternative financial systems, which are all separate and totally independent from each other. This system is operating under the patronage of those who love Jihad. What to say of the United States, even the combined world cannot budge these people from their path. These people are not in hundreds but in thousands and millions. Al-Qaida comprises of such modern educated youths who are aware of the cracks inside the Western financial system as they are aware of the lines in their hands. These are the very flaws of the Western fiscal system, which are becoming a noose for it and this system could not recuperate in spite of the passage of so many days.

Daily UMMAT: Are there other safe areas other than Afghanistan, where you can continue Jihad?

OSAMA BIN LADEN: There are areas in all parts of the world where strong Jihadi forces are present, from Indonesia to Algeria, from Kabul to Chechnya, from Bosnia to Sudan, and from Burma to Kashmir. Then it is not the problem of my person. I am a helpless fellowman of God, constantly in the fear of my accountability before God. It is not the question of Usama but of Islam and, in Islam too, of Jihad. Thanks to God, those waging a Jihad can walk today with their heads raised. Jihad was still present when there was no Osama and it will remain as such even when Osama is no longer there. Allah opens up ways and creates loves in the hearts of people for those who walk on the path of Allah with their lives, property and children. Believe it, through Jihad, a man gets everything he desires. And the biggest desire of a Muslim is the life after death. Martyrdom is the shortest way of attaining an eternal life.

Daily UMMAT: What do you say about the Pakistan Government policy on Afghanistan attack?

OSAMA BIN LADEN: We are thankful to the valiant people of Pakistan who erected a blockade in front of the evil forces and stood in the first file of battle. Pakistan is a great hope for the Islamic brotherhood. Its people are awakened, organized and rich in the spirit of faith. They backed Afghanistan in its war against the Soviet Union and extended every help to the Mojahedeen (freedom fighters) and the Afghan people. Then these are very Pakistanis who are standing shoulder by shoulder with the Taleban. If such people emerge in just two countries, the domination of the West will diminish in a matter of days. Our hearts beat with Pakistan and, God forbid, if a difficult time comes we will protect it with our blood. Pakistan is sacred for us like a place of worship. We are the people of Jihad and fighting for the defense of Pakistan is the best of all Jihads to us. It does not matter for us as to who reforms Pakistan. The important thing is that the spirit of Jihad is alive and stronger in the hearts of the Pakistani people.

- Source: Ummat, Urdu-language daily newspaper based in Karachi, Pakistan - Friday, 28 September 2001 - pages 1, 7. - Source: BBC Monitoring Service. - Source: http://www.khilafah.comhttp://www.khilafah.com/1421/category.php?DocumentID=2392&TagID=2

Carol A. Valentine President, Public Action, Inc. Copyright, October, 2001. May be reproduced for non-commercial purposes.

Quote from interview below:

......"I have had long conversations over the last two weeks with contacts at the Army War College and the headquarters, Marine Corps and I've made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation." Period.

......"There are some really, really unhappy people up there.......astonishment was the first thing.....they didn't know, they truly didn't know......and the next statement is rage...real rage"

......" The Zionists are playing this as an all-or-nothing exercise. If they lose this one, they're done....."

.

The Death of Bin Laden Means Terrorism Will Go Nuclear

2011-05-02T10:24:00.023+01:00

.

People, as our 'protectors' in the CIA know, will believe just about anything.

Osama Bin Laden was introduced to us all as a central player in the narrative that brought us 'The War On Terror'. It is important to understand that history is carefully scripted in advance by the agencies of international finance capital. It doesn't matter if the narrative is true or false (actually 'The War On Terror' is, in all important aspects, false). What is important is that we, the dumb masses, are given a good story in which to believe.

It's all about the narrative.

Well, now that the central baddie no longer has a role to play in our narrative, we can surely expect that the globalist story-tellers are ready with a new script.

What seasoned CIA watchers will sensibly ask and what everyone else would be wise to start asking is this:

"Does the 'death' of Bin Laden today signal a summer of nuclear terrorism in the United States?"

The chaos is mounting. International Law is now a joke, a dead duck. The Middle East has been turned, more than ever before, into a seething cauldron.

China is sitting back for now, while it watches its investments in Eastern Libya turn to dust. It understands that the west is determined to drive it out of Africa.

Russia watches while Syria, and its deal with the Syrians to establish a naval base in the Mediterranean, falls apart.

China is beginning to refuse to buy American debt so the dollar will shortly collapse.

What better event to coincide with financial collapse than an act of nuclear terrorism at home.

An immediate war footing would guarantee immediate recovery of the currency albeit, possibly, a new one.

This 'Bin Laden Is Dead' bullsh*t should scare the pants of every intelligent human being who has been paying serious attention over the last few years. Nearly every news bulletin and current affairs programme will be endlessly asking the question:

"Will Al Queda take revenge for the killing of Bin Laden?"

When they (the CIA/Mossad/MI6 as usual) strike, the familiar traitors will be wheeled on to our screens to say, "We told you so."

Pray to God this is wrong, but it is hard to see any other consequence of today's news, nor any other reason for the CIA to go to all the trouble to carry out this operation and concoct this lying story to go with it when everybody knows (outside of the idiot-zone) that Bin Laden is already a long time dead.

The extent to which the theatre of the coming conflict is co-ordinated between western powers, China and Russia is unknown. However, it is looking increasingly like we are watching a full-on world war in the making. The fact that nobody wants this yet it seems to be coming tells us, yet again (if we still need telling), that our elected governments act in the interests of parties other than ourselves. Therefore 'our' government is the primary enemy of 'we the people'.

It seems unbelievable but there you are.

Henry Makow appears to deliver the only commentary that makes any sense of such a breathtaking reality.

Humanity has been hijacked.

Henry......

.....you're right.

....by a Luciferian cult, as you assert?

More than likely. See here, here, here, here.

Let men gather before their God. We know that the media will continue to lie, even though those lies spell the same disaster for the journalists who tell them as for the rest of us.

Prayers are recommended. We are soon to endure a great trauma. The sooner we find faith and recognise that we are all one, a single powerful (rather than passive) consciousness created by God, the sooner we will overcome the manipulative fiends that have blinded the eyes and misled the minds of humanity and bought the souls of so many of our (tragically weak) leaders.

Oh, By the way...

.....and see here (article from India's Daily Bahskar.com "WikiLeaks: Nuke hellstorm if Osama is caught or killed, says al-Qaeda", first posted April 27th. Is Wikileaks a branch of the CIA, one might fairly wonder.)

3rd May.......and here's Wayne Madsen (speaking to Alex Jones) saying the same as above:

Part One:

Part Two:(Hear about new Al Queda number 2, one Adam Perlman, a "Jewish kid from Los Angeles" who "used to attack Muslims outside Mosques and whose grandfather ran the ADL".......you'd think somebody was just making this stuff up, but it's all been out there for a couple of years at least(with no one denying it).)

.

Jewish Influence. Racism In Action.

2011-05-01T10:54:00.010+01:00

.

How proud one must feel to be a NATO pilot this morning.

One Gaddafi son and three grandchildren murdered in their 'villa'. Here was an attempted targeted assassination if ever there was one.

How comforting to hear David Cameron speaking to Andrew Marr this morning repeating that

" 'Command and Control Centres' are 'legitimate targets' under UN Resolution 1973. Ours is a humanitarian action in order to prevent any further suffering of the Libyan people."

There's that magic word again...'humanitarian'.... doesn't it just sit so well alongside everything and anything.

Private residence, dead children.....'humanitarian'.

Slips out like a glossy turd.

As well as discussing the Libyan issue with Mr. Cameron, a man whose great personal fortune derives from the banking and drug-running activities of his Jewish great-grandfather, Mr Marr also discussed it with his 'newspaper reviewers', one Simon Schama (the BBC's historian in residence) and comedienne, Maureen Lipman, both also Jewish.

Lipman, to her credit, said she found the Gaddafi story 'horrifying'.

Given the fact that every poll taken in the UK so far has clearly demonstrated the unpopularity of the Libyan adventure, is it fair to remark on the fact that 0.5% of the British population can (often) contribute 100% of the news commentary on such a serious political event?

Schama's take on the killing of Gaddafi's son and grandchildren was "Should anyone complain that there was a plot in 1944 to kill Hitler?"

......another fair comment from the great 'history' guru, no doubt in between filming episodes of his next smooth reality-defining history series that will be shoved into our stupid trusting faces.

The Andrew Marr Show went out on BBC1 from 9 to 10 am.

From 10 to 11 am 'The Big Questions' discussed three issues in front of a studio audience with comments on each issue from three 'special guests', one of whom was the Jewish Chaplain at the University of Surrey. One of the three debates centred on a film opposing 'anti-semitism' at football grounds. Only one third of the main speakers and the focus of one third of the debate....yet Jewish interests are still here over-represented by a factor 66 times greater than what might be considered fair.

From 10 to 11am BBC1 showed 'Country Tracks' which is probably, or perhaps relatively, a non-political programme.

From 12 noon to 1 pm there was the weekly 'Politics Show' on which Jon Sopel (Jewish) interviewed leader of the Labour Party, Ed Milliband (Jewish). Bloody Hell! Back to 100% again.

This was followed by two solid hours of the soap 'Eastenders' during which we can watch wall-to-wall anti-racist and anti-homophobia propaganda. After decades of this stuff there surely cannot be a grain of racism still running through the veins of the British public.....and yet.....and yet.....

Is 'racial discrimination' not discriminating in favour of one's own race and against others? Surely the ridiculous predominance of Jews in the media (not to mention every other centre of power, wealth and influence) is evidence that the engineers of anti-racism are racism's greatest practitioners?

It is interesting (and surely no accident) that the category 'racial discrimination' has disappeared from Wikipedia pages.

Why do I expect to be accused of 'racism' for pointing out these obvious facts of life.

Am I being racist for pointing these things out?

Is anyone who says such things a 'racist'.......or are they fighting a very real and dangerous racism?....a practiced racism that has, in truth, defined every important and regrettable aspect of our reality.

Our slavery to bankers.

The fact that corporate finance owns our very government.

The onward march of imperialism and all the horrors that entails.

Our manufactured insecurity.

The poverty of the masses.....and so on?

If it was the Frankfurt School Psychologists (also nearly all Jewish) intention to "make society stink" in preparation for a 'New World Order', they are clearly making excellent progress.

Ordinary Jewish people really do need to wake up to the perils that 'organised Jewry' present to us all and to their own selves (traditionally, its greatest victims) in particular.

.

There Are No Anomalies. One Principle Directs All.

2011-04-17T20:45:00.006+01:00

.

Stop Press: Children who are considering having a sex-change operation will be given drugs by the state to delay the onset of puberty.

No doubt many will think that people we might otherwise consider 'faceless bureaucrats' truly have hearts of gold.

But how many children are not confused, particularly about sex.....and what child could entertain such thoughts were he/she not encouraged to do so?

The plight of such rare individuals might be a serious and some might indeed need special help, but the effect of such a norm-disrupting article (for the zillionth time) in the public domain is to promote the anything-goes mentality, to promote the subjugation of principle to personal 'feelings' and, yet again, to undermine what might broadly be called 'traditional family values'.

But, what's new?

In truth, This article (see below) represents Frankfurt School social engineering at it's most odious.

The Frankfurt School recommended (in the interests of implementing the preferred communist globalist system of the international banking oligarchy), that sexual politics could be utilised to undermine society.

Under the guise of caring deeply about the well-being of individuals, the real intention of this (satanic) method is to destroy all norms that bind society and make us ever more compliant to the unholy will of our invisible masters.

This method is very subtle but it is really old-fashioned divide-and-rule in (almost imperceptible) action....and the sexual revolution is already far advanced, as are other elements listed on the Frankfurt School agenda such as the undermining of racial and national cohesion by mass immigration and the destruction of religions....for instance.

You might notice a similar agenda at work in our Health and Safety legislation.

If you are a schoolteacher you will be obliged to fill out copious forms every time you take children off your premises to cross a road.

That's how much our government care about the safety of our children.

In Iraq, of course, the same government happily murdered thousands of children in their beds (on our behalf) during that thrilling little TV newscast called 'Shock and Awe'.

On TV debates we, the public, endlessly (and with great futility) point out this and that inconsistency in government policy.....but this game is a debilitating fraud (as Bank of England chairman, Montagu Norman, helpfully explained).

Wonder about 'consistency' no longer.

There is but one consistency and one principle to apply wherein you will find that consistency.

Government policy is WHATEVER SERVES THE INTERESTS OF THE CORPORATE/BANKING OLIGARCHS WHO ARE OUR TRUE GOVERNMENT.

i.e. policies to CONTROL society at home....and to ROB, PLUNDER, OPPRESS and DOMINATE abroad.

Let us stop being confused about moral anomalies within our system.

THERE ARE NO EFFING ANOMALIES.

Our representatives use moral arguments as pretexts for doing whatever the money power wants.

.....AND REALISE NOW THAT THIS SOCIETY IS BEING EVERY BIT AS EFFECTIVELY DESTROYED BY OUR GOVERNMENTS 'LOVE' AT HOME AS THAT OF BROWN-SKINNED MUSLIMS IS BEING DESTROYED BY OUR GUNS AND BOMBS ABROAD.

Article:

PUBERTY BLOCKER FOR CHILDREN CONSIDERING SEX CHANGE

Children as young as 12 are to be allowed drugs to block puberty while they decide whether to have a sex change, it has been revealed.

By Richard Alleyne, Science Correspondent, Daily Telegraph (17/04/2011)

The monthly injection suspends the onset of adulthood so that young people confused about their gender can be sure of any decision before they take on too many masculine or feminine features.

Supporters say that the "window" prevents a great deal of mental and physical anguish caused by the maturing of sex organs, facial hair growth and changes in the voice.

But critics argue it only prolongs the agony and can prevent people "growing out" of any feelings of confusion.

The treatment can be prescribed for people diagnosed with Gender Identity Disorder (GID) – a rare psychiatric condition where a person is born one sex, but feels they are the other.

One of the main effects of the drugs is to stunt the development of sexual organs so less surgery will be required if someone chooses to permanently change their gender at a later date.

However, bodily and hormonal changes will continue as normal if the medication is stopped.

Until this month, British doctors were prevented from offering youngsters diagnosed with gender issues any medical intervention before the late stages of puberty usually at 16.

But now the National Research Ethics Service has given approval to the UK's only specialist clinic for GID – the Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust in London – to prescribe the drugs to youngsters from 12 years old.

Dr Polly Carmichael, the clinic director, said the reduction in the age limit will be welcomed by families who would have otherwise had to travel abroad to the US for the treatment.

"The majority of our referrals are 15-plus and we get fewer from a younger age group," she said.

"Certainly, of the children between 12 and 14, there's a number who are keen to take part.

"I know what's been very hard for their families is knowing that there's something available but it's not available here.

"This delay gives us a window to explore together that they are definitely making the right decision But as professionals we need to be looking at the long term and making sure this treatment is safe."

The hormone blockers, which are already used for early onset puberty, will only be given to around a dozen children and teenagers selected for an NHS research project jointly run by the clinic and University College London Hospital.

To take part, they will have to meet strict eligibility criteria including having full support from their parents, the existence of long-standing gender identity issues, an ability by the child to give formal consent and an absence of other mental health problems.

Those chosen will go through a series of psychological and medical assessments before receiving the blockers.

As a result, they will stop producing the hormones which tell the sex glands to make oestrogen or testosterone.

Boys will be prevented from developing male traits such as facial hair, deeper voices and Adam's apples and girls will not develop breasts or menstruate.

But Dr Carmichael said that only around 10 to 20 per cent of prepubescent children with GID went onto have a sex change.

Around 80 per cent in late puberty were likely to have the operation.

The Tavistock and Portman clinic is currently the only place in Britain where under-18s with GID and their relatives can access specialist psychotherapy.

The 22-year-old service, which received 127 GID referrals this year, helps families avoid common traps such the temptation to keep their child's condition secret.

.

Governor BOE: The Democratic System is a Fraud Created to Disable Opposition to Bankers' Rule

2011-04-13T10:56:00.012+01:00

.
Quote:

"Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world.

BY DIVIDING THE VOTERS THROUGH THE POLITICAL PARTY SYSTEM, WE CAN GET THEM TO EXPEND THEIR ENERGIES IN FIGHTING FOR QUESTIONS OF NO IMPORTANCE.

It is thus, by discrete action, we can secure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished."

Montagu Norman, Governor of The Bank Of England, addressing the United States Bankers' Association, New York, 1924.

No additional comment is necessary. This, from a bankster-oligarch's own mouth, says it all. We should be grateful for the candid Mr. Norman, a very nice man who financed Hitler up to the outbreak of WWII.

Here he is speaking openly (in 1924) about what we now call 'The New World Order'. This is real evidence that supports the claims of many researchers that this conspiracy goes back centuries.

The above Montagu Norman quote should be broadcast far and wide.

People might continue to mock your 'conspiracy theories' but let no one call those theories 'ridiculous'. Surely only fools and the criminally careless can deride or ignore the obvious implications of such statements when these statements come from the mouths of people with the power to direct our countries, our cultures and our very thinking through the power of finance over the mass media.

Here is another important banker's quote, this time from Montagu Norman's predecessor at the BOE (perhaps, having made their great fortunes such men, on retirement , begin to worry for their souls......who knows). However, here it is:

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin.
The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them,
but leave them the power to create deposits,
and with the flick of the pen they will
create enough deposits to buy it back again.
However, take it away from them, and
all the great fortunes like mine
will disappear and they ought to disappear, for
this would be a happier and better world to live in.
But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers
and pay the cost of your own slavery,
let them continue to create deposits."

Sir Josiah Stamp
(1880-1941) President of the Bank of England in the 1920's, the second richest man in Britain, speaking at the Commencement Address of the University of Texas in 1927.

These quotes both highlight the extreme importance of the greatest questions that never gets asked by, or put to, our political leaders (nor the media) today......here are those questions:

WHY DOES THE ISSUANCE OF MONEY NOT REST WITH 'WE THE PEOPLE' TO WHOM IT PROPERLY BELONGS?

WHY DOES THIS ENORMOUS POWER REST IN THE HANDS OF PRIVATELY OWNED CORPORATIONS, THE INTERNATIONAL BANKS?

WHY IS 97% OF OUR MONEY CREATED AS DEBT BY BANKERS (TO WHOM WE 'PAY BACK' MANY TIMES THE SUM 'BORROWED') AND NOT CREATED DEBT-FREE BY OUR OWN ELECTED GOVERNMENT?

IS THIS MECHANISM NOT A FRAUD AGAINST THE PEOPLE AND DOES NOT THIS MASSIVELY ENRICHING FRAUD ENSURE THAT, IN PRACTICE, THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS ARE OUR REAL GOVERNMENT?

See the history (that you won't be told in school) of the long struggle between society's elected leaders and bankers for control of our societies. The bankers have won.

For now.

Watch 'The MoneyMasters' below. No intelligent person should be allowed to be ignorant of the information revealed in this great film:

PS GCSE Economics exam question Summer 2011 Preview (not): Why did our recently acquired friends, the 'rebel' Libyan 'government-in-waiting', set up a new 'Libyan Central Bank' last week?

.

Henry Makow Says It All

2011-04-10T09:57:00.004+01:00

.

Henry Makow's strongest post ever, in my opinion. Rings absolutely clear and true. "Useful idiots".....Is that, or was that ever, you and me? I plead guilty, m'Lord.

April 9, 2011

THE RESPONSIBILITY OF "USEFUL IDIOTS"

(left, traitors Julius & Ethel Rosenberg, were executed despite the wailing and gnashing of teeth from fellow "Liberals.")

To what extent is someone who is deceived, responsible for his actions, and his fate?

by Henry Makow, Ph.D.

As I have said before, true world history is the story of the overthrow of Christian civilization by Cabalist Jewish bankers, using organized Jewry and Freemasonry as their instruments.

Their goal is a total control of humanity (Communism), using social engineering, mass media and technology. Essentially, humanity is being reshaped to serve these bankers in a world government, dedicated to their God Lucifer. This is the real meaning of all the major revolutions. This is the real reason for anti-Semitism.

Revolutionary Jews "are today nothing else but the world's seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners..." Jewish scholar Oscar Levy wrote in 1920. "I look at this world, and I shudder at its ghastliness; I shudder all the more as I know the spiritual authors of all this ghastliness. . ."

You and I have entered this drama at a very late stage. The overthrow is largely complete. We already live under a satanic Illuminati dispensation, one which denies the existence of God, i.e. the inherent Moral and natural design of human life.

The world is redefined and run by the god-usurping agents of these bankers. The modern "alienation" we feel is their alienation, due to their rebellion against God. We have all become Masonic Jews ("humanists") worshiping their pagan gods.

In "The Antichrist," Nietzsche wrote, "Out of their own consciousness, [the Illuminati Jews] have evolved a set of ideas in opposition to all natural conditions of living -- one by one they have taken religion, culture, morality, history and psychology, and converted them irreparably into a contradiction of their natural meaning."

When you deny God, you deny the existence of spiritual absolutes like Truth, as well as Good and Evil. Thus, the world is becoming increasingly bizarre. But at least we know who is turning it upside down and why.

ACCOMPLICES

As a Jew, I do not feel that I am damned, nor are my fellow Jews. We are God's children like everyone else. But the agenda of organized Jewry is damned, and everyone who becomes its unwitting agent is compromised.

Most Jews know little about Judaism. Based on the Talmud and Cabala, which openly reject the validity of the Old Testament, it is not a religion but a satanic secret society.

This means that the rank-and-file is not privy to the real agenda. Instead, they are manipulated by spurious idealistic platitudes like "equality." They are dupes or "useful idiots."

The secret society model was applied to Freemasonry and through Freemasonry to intelligence agencies and eventually all important social organizations. The model now applies to humanity as a whole. The lower ranks are manipulated according to a secret plan. Leaders are chosen from deviants willing to execute it.

For example, women have been manipulated into abandoning their femininity in the name of "equality." They were not told the true agenda is to undermine gender and family and make everyone dependent on the state.

To what extent is someone who is deceived, responsible for his actions, and his fate?

"USEFUL IDIOTS"

Communist leaders used this term privately to describe the people who actually believed Communism was about brotherhood, social justice, and equality. Communism is monopoly capitalism with the State fronting for the Cabalist bankers. Communism, like Zionism, is a Masonic (i.e. Luciferian) order.

Communism, like Zionism, duped idealistic Jews to advance the banker agenda. David Horowitz describes how his Communist Jewish parents, along with millions of other American Jews, were traitors.

Outwardly they were respectable law-abiding middle class high school teachers, liberal and democratic. But like all their friends..they were secretly Communists and this is what "gave meaning to their otherwise modest and unassuming lives."

They served the USSR and even had secret code names for the time when they would abandon the facade of progressive politics and go underground to lead the revolutionary struggle. (Stephen Powell, Covert Cadre, p.vviii)

They were willing to destroy the nation's freedom, which they had enjoyed.
The fact that the CPUSA wasn't banned proves it was already too late.

Bella Dodd was not Jewish. A member of the National Executive of the CPUSA, she quit when she discovered that the USSR was run by Jewish millionaires who lived in the Waldorf Astoria and operated out of the Jewish Community Headquarters at 35 E. 12th St. She also concluded Communism was a satanic secret society.

Communist Jews and Zionists are idealistic dupes. I was one myself until 12 years ago (not a Communist but deluded about its true nature.) Norman Bethune, a Canadian physician,not a Jew, is considered a great hero because he served the Communist Chinese. Did he know they murdered 40 million of their own people?

Oscar Levy asked if revolutionary "Jews are conscious or unconscious malefactors."

He answered: "I myself am firmly convinced that they are unconscious ones, but please do not think that I wish to exonerate them on that account.
A conscious evildoer has my respect, for he knows at least what is good: an unconscious one -- well, he needs the charity of Christ -- a charity which is not mine -- to be forgiven for not knowing what he is doing."

CONCLUSION

Revolutionary Jews have never been called to task for their role in creating the New World Order. This is because when treason is successful, none dare call it treason.

The Illuminati bankers own the government, education and the media. They are able to spin treason as "free speech" and "political freedom." They spin patriotism as "isolationism" and "witch hunts."

The nature of the New World Order, and Communism, is that ultimately everyone works for the Illuminati bankers, directly or indirectly. For example, the US is being taken down by debt. But hardly anyone in government or the media, not even Ron Paul, suggests that half of the debt can be eliminated simply by abolishing the Federal Reserve.

Naturally, everyone adopts the belief-system that ensures their job security. They deny they are useful idiots. They don't know what they are doing, and most don't wish to know. They are willing accomplices.

The Illuminati bankers are waging a relentless covert war on humanity.

What sort of fate do the useful idiots, or their children deserve?

Holocaust, Hate Speech. Were the Germans so Stupid

2011-04-09T12:18:00.003+01:00

.

Important New Film by Anthony Lawson.

Part One

Part Two

Part Three (contains warning by two Nurenberg Judges regarding excessive Jewish influence on the trial)

.

Excellent News: Cynicism At All-Time High. Elected Politicians Almost Universally Loathed...

2011-04-07T14:02:00.012+01:00

.

There was an encouraging article in today's Independent from Steve Richards, 'This loathing of politicians must end'.

......and there was me waiting for it to properly begin.

A newly elected MP tells him that "the hardest part of the job is coping with disdain of the public". Other M.P.'s seem to agree.

Well Steve, thanks for that. It is encouraging to know that there are so many that hold a positive reason for no longer voting. They despise the bl**dy lot of 'em.

The more cynicism and loathing the better, I say.

Maybe one day the penny will drop. Maybe one day the horrible so-and-so's that covet a soaring parliamentary career will understand why they are hated, see the light and start doing the right thing (for once).

These people drag us into a 'War On Terror' without demanding answers to (or even asking) the most obvious and crucial questions. The 'War On Terror' is an obvious hoax. There is definitive scientific evidence that proves it. There are even respected insider 'whistle-blowers' (listen to all this brilliant interview) that openly declare it.

Failure of our representatives to question 9/11 and 'The War on Terror' is nothing less than treason. It is an ultimate betrayal, the sacrifice of the lives of ones country's citizens to serve the interests of a banking oligarchy that increasing numbers of people understand to be our real government.

We notice that no MP has raised a squeak about the fact that there has been no Public Inquiry into the 7/7 London bombings, the biggest act of mass murder ever committed on British soil. What MP has raised a question or said a single word about the following:
1) A doctor who was sent onto two of the trains to 'count the dead' was one body short in both cases. If all the victims bodies are accounted for, where are the bodies of the alleged suicide bombers.?
2) The first expert on the scene said the explosions were timer-detonated and used high-grade military explosives. Now we have the ludicrous narrative of four mates in a Yorkshire gym buying tubs of hydrogen peroxide, boiling it down to the required concentration, mixing it with black pepper, filling containers with this stuff and traversing the country with this stuff sloshing around in their rucksacks, before making their bags explode to devastating effect on the morning of 7/7.
Do me a favour, guv. Apart from the fact that the explosives story is in its fourth incarnation since 7/7, to believe that you have to really NEED to believe it.......which, of course MP's do. Nonetheless they are not doing their jobs.
3) There have been three different train-times narratives before HMG settled on the latest version.
4) In spite of London being the most CCTV-rich environment on earth there are only a couple of very poor images to place the bombers in the right place at the right times and these could easily have been photoshopped. What was up with those thousands of CCTV cameras?
5) There were four drills carried out by authorities that almost perfectly mirrored the event itself. How spectacularly unlikely is it that this conflation of real and virtual 'terrorism' was random happenstance?
6)There were no post mortems carried out on any of the bodies. A shocking truth that can only be explained by somebody's desire not to create evidence that would possibly (or, more correctly, certainly) contradict other evidence that was, at that early time, yet to be fully concocted.
7) Lots and lots of other things. The reported lack of political or religious fervor of at least three of the four. Khan's role in his job (working in a special school) and with the police (as a negotiator and peacemaker between rival gangs). This man's previous habitual behaviour was as a healer and not a destroyer. He was even taken on a tour of parliament by his local MP. The fact they bought return tickets and Tanweer (who was playing cricket until 10pm the night before) argued about the change in the M1 Services on the way down to Luton. The fact Germaine Lindsay arrived early in Luton, fell asleep and got a parking ticket in Luton Station car park before the others arrived.

How relaxed is that for a guy who knows he will die in four hours time?

The fact that when he arrived (surely late) in King's Cross station he asked an attendant, a Mr Patel, if he could see the "Duty Manager" saying "It is very important" (Mr Patel reported that it was already chaotic on the concourse at this time with grills to the street having been pulled down, barriers closed, uniformed personnel moving around and passengers shouting at staff for being prevented from getting to work). Lindsay did not wait for the man to be brought to him. He disappeared.

This, and much else besides, sounds much more like the behaviour of a hired actor in a drill rather than a determined killer. As well-paid patsies, hired for the 'exercise', it is easy to imagine Khan and Tanweer being sweet-talked into making the 'threatening' videos that so effectively convinced most people of their guilt.

The Muslim community are not so dumb, however, nor many of the rest of us.

So, Mr Richards, if these anomalies had been noticed and raised by a single MP or media outlet we might still have a little respect for their and your collective integrity.

But NO.

It hasn't happened and it won't happen.

Because THERE IS NO INTEGRITY.

And this what everybody increasingly notices.

Morality is compartmentalised. It is applied sometimes and not others.

COMPARTMENTALISED MORALITY IS NO MORALITY AT ALL.

As a schoolteacher I had to get Health and Safety forms filled in every time children were taken across a road and every form had to be taken home by every child and parents' emergency mobile phone numbers filled in, 'in case something happens'. The same politicians who voted in this rubbish (because they care so much about children) were also responsible for giving the green light to the 'Shock and Awe' that murdered thousands of women and children in their beds at the start of the Iraq War.

So what is the unifying principle here?

It has certainly nothing to do with the well-being of children.

The unifying principle is discovered by asking this question, "What is in the interests of the international corporate finance?"

Answer: CONTROL AT HOME AND DESPOTISM ABROAD.

HERE IS THE SINGLE RULING PRINCIPLE OF GOVERNMENT.

EVERY POLICY, ALMOST WITHOUT FAIL, SERVES THE INTEREST OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCE. (show me one that doesn't). The financiers fund the think-tanks who create the policies for what we call government, of the left or right, it makes no difference.

At home, for western peoples, amongst whom these oligarchs lurk, we must get used to their governments installing endless systems designed to condition our subconscious minds into automatic and unthinking obedience.

Abroad, anything goes.

But hey, Steve, you and your mates were right about one thing.

We really are in Libya because we care about the safety of Libyans.

Repeat after me: We love Libyans soo, so much. We love Libyans soo, so much.We love Libyans soo, so much. We......

etc., etc.

So Steve, here we have it. For many of us the situation is now way beyond repair. The system itself is clearly at the very heart of our problems. Within it, even those who long for righteousness can do nothing.....or can I phrase this more correctly.....

THEY ARE NOT PREPARED TO SPEAK OUT BECAUSE THERE MIGHT BE PAINFUL CONSEQUENCES.

IF LARGE NUMBERS WITHIN THE SYSTEM (POLITICIANS, MEDIA, CHURCHES ans EDUCATORS) DEMANDED ANSWERS TO OBVIOUS QUESTIONS IT WOULD THE CRIMINALS WHO HAVE A PROBLEM, NOT THE REST OF US.

But, hey, we bear some guilt too for putting up with the situation and the system.

A system whereby infinitely flexible law-making institutions are controlled by and for an elite (under the pretext of serving the interests of the people).

This is a system that follows the Talmudic model. This self-serving, morally cracked machinery and leadership was exactly what Christ condemned when he called its masters, the Pharisees (as they were then known) "of Satan".

Less than nothing has changed in this age of a new war per week.

More and more decent people, thankfully, perceive the political and media class as those who busy themselves weaving gold cloth from dense and poisonous turds. In the old days when our bodies willingly supported those garments, when we trusted the BBC and the 'better' newspapers, we could sometimes get a whiff of the stink but now the fabulous gossamer you weave before our eyes is, and will remain, nothing but, only, and definitively.....that turd.

We will never willingly don such clothes again.

.

THE TRUTH ABOUT LOCKERBIE

2011-03-30T09:38:00.003+01:00

.

Documentaries and articles have laid out most of this information about the Lockerbie bombing before, not that you'd know it from reading the mainstream media. Here it is explained by an ex-CIA asset that the current attack on Libya has everything to do with Lockerbie, its aftermath and Gaddafi's demands for compensation from US big oil for previous services to the USA, i.e. the face-saving acceptance of blame for the crime and the leveraged extortion (compensation for victims) that went with it.

LIBYA'S BLOOD FOR OIL: THE VAMPIRE WAR
March 28th, 2011

By Susan Lindauer, former U.S. Asset who covered Libya at the United Nations from 1995 to 2003

Who are we kidding? The United States, Britain and NATO don't care about bombing civilians to contain rebellion. Their militaries bomb civilians every day without mercy. They have destroyed most of the community infrastructure of Iraq and Afghanistan before turning their sights on Libya. So what's really going on here?

According to the CIA, the following never happened…

Last October, US oil giants— Chevron and Occidental Petroleum— made a surprising decision to pull out of Libya, while China, Germany and Italy stayed on, signing major contracts with Gadhaffi's government. As the U.S. Asset who started negotiations for the Lockerbie Trial with Libyan diplomats, I had close ties to Libya's U.N. Mission from 1995 to 2003. Given my long involvement in the Lockerbie saga, I have continued to enjoy special access to high level intelligence gossip on Libya.

Last summer that gossip got juicy!

About July, I started hearing that Gadhaffi was exerting heavy pressure on U.S. and British oil companies to cough up special fees and kick backs to cover the costs of Libya's reimbursement to the families of Pan Am 103. Payment of damages for the Lockerbie bombing had been one of the chief conditions for ending U.N. sanctions on Libya that ran from 1992 until 2003. And of course the United Nations forced Gadhaffi to hand over two Libyan men for a special trial at The Hague, though everybody credible was fully conscious of Libya's innocence in the Lockerbie affair. (Only ignorant politicians trying to score publicity points say otherwise.)

Knowing Gadhaffi as well as I do, I was convinced that he'd done it. He'd bided his time until he could extort compensation from U.S. oil companies. He's a crafty bastard, extremely intelligent and canny. That's exactly how he operates. And now he was taking his revenge. As expected, the U.S. was hopping mad about it. Gadhaffi wasn't playing the game the way the Oil Bloodsuckers wanted. The Vampire of our age—the Oil Industry—roams the earth, sucking the life out of every nation to feed its thirst for profits. Only when they got to Libya, Gadhaffi took on the role of a modern-day Robin Hood, who insisted on replenishing his people for the costs they'd suffered under U.N. sanctions.

Backing up a year earlier, in August 2009 the lone Libyan convicted of the Lockerbie bombing that killed 270 people, Abdelbasset Megrahi, won a compassionate release from Scottish prison. Ostensibly, the British government and Scottish Courts granted Megrahi's request to die at home with dignity from advance stage cancer—in exchange for dropping a legal appeal packed with embarrassments for the European Courts. The decision to free Megrahi followed shocking revelations of corruption at the special Court of The Hague that handled the Lockerbie Trial. Prosecution witnesses confessed to receiving payments of $4 million each from the United States, in exchange for testimony against Megrahi, a mind-blowing allegation of judicial corruption.

The Lockerbie conviction was full of holes to begin with. Anybody who knows anything about terrorism in the 1980s knows the CIA got mixed up in heroin trafficking out of the Bekaa Valley during the hostage crisis in Lebanon. The Lockerbie conspiracy had been a false flag operation to kill off a joint CIA and Defense Intelligence investigation into kick backs from Islamic Jihad, in exchange for protecting the heroin transit network.

According to my own CIA handler, Dr. Richard Fuisz, who'd been stationed in Lebanon and Syria at the time, the CIA had established a protected drug route from Lebanon to Europe and on to the United States. His statements support other sources that "Operation Corea" allowed Syrian drug dealers led by Monzer al-Kassar (also linked to Oliver North in the Iran-Contra scandal) to ship heroin to the U.S. ON Pan Am flights, in exchange for intelligence on the hostages' whereabouts in Lebanon. The CIA allegedly made sure that suitcases carrying heroin were not searched at customs. Nicknamed the "Godfather of Terror," Al Kassar is now serving a prison sentence for conspiring with Colombian drug cartels to assassinate U.S. nationals.

Building up to Lockerbie, the Defense Intelligence team in Beirut, led by Maj. Charles Dennis McKee and Matthew Gannon, suspected that CIA infiltration of the heroin network might be prolonging the hostage crisis. If so, the consequence was severe. AP Reporter Terry Anderson got chained in a basement for 7 years, while 96 other high profile western hostages suffered beatings, mock executions and overall trauma. McKee's team raised the alarms in Washington that a CIA double agent profiting from the narco-dollars might be warning the hostage takers whenever their dragnet closed in. Washington sent a fact-finding team to Lebanon to gather evidence.

On the day it was blown out of the sky, Pan Am 103 was carrying that team of CIA and FBI investigators, the CIA's Deputy Chief assigned to Beirut, and three Defense Intelligence officers, including McKee and Gannon, on their way to Washington to deliver a report on the CIA's role in heroin trafficking, and the impact on terrorist financing and the hostage crisis. In short, everyone with direct knowledge of CIA kickbacks from heroin trafficking died on Pan Am 103. A suitcase packed with $500,000 worth of heroin was found in the wreckage. It belonged to investigators, as proof of the corruption.

The punch line was that the U.S. State Department issued an internal travel advisory, warning that government officials should get off that specific flight on that specific day, because Pan Am 103 was expected to get bombed. That's right, folks! The U.S. had prior knowledge of the attack.

Unforgivably, nobody told Charles McKee or Matthew Gannon. But other military officials and diplomats got pulled off the flight—making room for a group of students from Syracuse University traveling stand by for the Christmas holidays.

It was a monstrous act! But condemning Megrahi to cover up the CIA's role in heroin trafficking has struck many Lockerbie afficiandos as grossly unjust. Add the corruption of purchased testimony-- $4 million a pop— and Megrahi's life sentence struck a nerve of obscenity.

It struck Gadhaffi as grievously offensive, as well—The United Nations had forced Libya to fork over $2.7 billion in damages to the Lockerbie families, a rate of $10 million for every death. Once it became clear the U.S. paid two key witnesses $4 million each to commit perjury, spook gossip throughout the summer was rife that Gadhaffi had taken bold action to demand compensation from U.S. (and probably British) oil corporations operating in Libya. More than likely, Libya's demands for kick backs and compensation extended to other European oil conglomerates as well—particularly France and Italy—who are now spearheading attacks on Libya.

I knew last summer there would be trouble. Payback would be a b—tch on both sides. You don't lock an innocent man in prison for 10 years on bogus charges of terrorism, and expect forgiveness. The United States and Britain had behaved with remarkable selfishness. You've got to admit that Gadhaffi's attempt to balance the scales of justice demonstrated a flair of righteous nationalism.

Alas, Gadhaffi was playing with fire, no matter how justified his complaint. You don't strike a tyrant without expecting a tyrant to strike back.

And that's exactly what's happening today.

Don't kid yourself. This is an oil war, and it smacks of imperialist double standards. Two articles by Prof. Chossudovsky at the Global Research Centre are must reading: "Operation Libya and the Battle for Oil: Redrawing the Map of Africa" and "Insurrection and Military Intervention: The US-NATO Attempted Coup d'Etat in Libya?"

There is simply no justification for U.S. or NATO action against Libya. The U.N. charter acknowledges the rights of sovereign nations to put down rebellions against their own governments. Moreover, many observers have commented that plans for military intervention appear to have been much more advanced than U.S. and European leaders want to admit.

For myself, I know in my gut that war planning started months before the democratization movement kicked off throughout the Arab world—a lucky cover for U.S. and European oil policy. Perhaps too lucky.

As Chossudovsky writes, "Hundreds of US, British and French military advisers arrived in Cyrenaica, Libya's eastern breakaway province" on February 23 and 24— seven (7) days after the start of Gadhaffi's domestic rebellion. "The advisers, including intelligence officers, were dropped from warships and missile boats at the coastal towns of Benghazi and Tobruk." (DEBKAfile, US military advisers in Cyrenaica, Feb. 25, 2011) Special forces on the ground in Eastern Libya provided covert support to the rebels." Eight British Special Forces commandos were arrested in the Benghazi region, while acting as military advisers to opposition forces, according to the Times of London.

We're supposed to believe the United States, Britain and Europe planned, coordinated and executed a full military intervention in 7 short days— from the start of the Libyan rebellion in mid-February until military advisers appeared on the ground in Libya on February 23-24!

That's strategically impossible.

Nothing can persuade me that Gadhaffi's fate wasn't decided months ago, when Chevron and Occidental Petroleum took their whining to Capitol Hill, complaining that Gadhaffi's nationalism interfered with their oil profiteering. From that moment, military intervention was on the drawing board as surely as the Patriot Act got stuck in a drawer waiting for 9/11.

The message is simple: Challenge the oil corporations and your government and your people will pay the ultimate price: Give us your oil as cheaply as possible. Or die.

Don't kid yourself. Nobody gives a damn about suffering in Libya or Iraq. You don't bomb a village to save it. The U.S., Britain and NATO are the bullies of the neighborhood. The enforcers for Big Oil.

Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan have something in common. They have vast and extraordinary oil and mineral riches. As such, they are all victims of what I call the Vampire Wars. The Arab Princes get paid off, while the bloodsuckers pull the life blood out of the people. They're scarcely able to survive in their own wealthy societies. The people and the domestic economy are kept alive to uphold the social order, but they are depleted of the nourishment of their own national wealth.

The democratization movements are sending a warning that I don't think Big Oil, or their protectors in the U.S. and British governments understand or have figured out how to control. The Arab people are finished with this cycle of victimization. They've got their stakes out, and they're starting to figure out how to strike into the heart of these Vampires, sucking the life blood out of their nations.

And woe to the wicked when they do!

-###-

This article may be reprinted in full or part with attribution to the author.

Former U.S. Intelligence Asset, Susan Lindauer covered Iraq, Libya, Yemen and Syria/Hezbollah from 1993 to 2003. She is the author of Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover Ups of 9/11 and Iraq.

.

LIBYA: HAS A PEOPLE EVER BEEN MORE LOVED?

2011-03-29T14:30:00.006+01:00

.

The London Conference on Libya has just started. We are a few speeches in but it was very difficult to continue watching.

So, so moving.

David Cameron,Ban Ki-moon, Hilary Clinton and a representative of the Arab League competed as to who could most intensely confirm their heartfelt and total support, their sincere, tender and overwhelming concern for 'The Libyan People', their determination to 'protect their lives' and their utter abhorrence of the violence committed against them.

These giants of the world stage confirmed their greatness before our very eyes.

How fortunate the Libyan people must feel.

Such was the intensity of love noisily clattering around the walls of the conference hall that it would have created little surprise if Christ Himself favoured the assembly with a short visitation.

The spectacle made me weep.

Truly.

The suffering is surely over for the Libyan people.

There will be no more deaths. It's over.

Time now to move on.

.....Now, where were we?

Umm, Aah....Oh, that's right.....Damascus, wasn't it Mr. Soros?

.

Beautiful Burnout

2011-03-28T09:53:00.007+01:00

.

The following was found and forwarded from 'The Guardian' website as a comment on a thread (about 15 comments down) from a contributor called 'Beautiful Burnout'. Excellent and quite moving.

The cuts will have little or no direct effect on me, personally.

I have benefited from the reduced interest rates on my mortgage subsequent to the banking rip-off. I am in a profession where work will never run out. OK, my work-related overheads have gone up by an average of about 25% over the last year and I have to work harder to stand still, as it were, but I am not on the breadline.

Yet yesterday I walked more than 3 miles with half a million others because every benefit I have had from the welfare state - free schooling, virtually free higher education, health-care free at the point of delivery (and instantly available no matter whether I have the right insurance or not), a fire-brigade or ambulance service that will turn up to my house in reasonable time should I require it, a police service that will protect me, etc. etc.- is going to be denied to the next generation for....well, what reason exactly?

So that:
1) Right-wing ideologues can open up all those markets that the US have been whining to the WTO about for decades.
2) Some ideological principle can be applied that says people should contribute less tax and pay privately for their services (screwing the collective community if they cannot afford to pay their insurance)
3) Further rewards can be showered on the very richest in society, while the very poorest will be expected to step up or die out
4) Any public provision will not be on the basis of the most needy, but on the basis of who those in control consider to be the most deserving.

In short, we will be regressing to a Victorian model society of the über-rich and undeserving poor.

The reason why the welfare state was created after WW2 - and may I remind people that this was a time when our national debt was somewhere in the region of 150% of our GDP - was because the war was a remarkable leveller of class. Suddenly all those rich officer types became aware that the working class ranks were good people, brave people, people just like them, prepared to put their lives on the line for them, and that these people deserved being treated with respect. They deserved a share in the country's wealth to the extent that they would no longer have to worry about what would happen to them if they fell ill or lost their jobs - after all, they had fought just as hard to protect the country they loved.

The reason why the current lot of right-wing assholes are managing to dismantle all this to their own benefit is because the have succeeded in dehumanising working class people again - portraying them as spongers, scroungers and profligate spendthrifts. Aided and abetted by mega-rich newspaper moguls and other allies, they deflect attention from the fact that their buddies in the City have royally shafted us all. Privatising their profits, nationalising their losses, they blame the very people who had replenished the Treasury coffers year-in year-out with their hard-earned cash. We are not supposed to consider the fact that those same coffers have been emptied into the pockets of the Fat Cat City spivs and crooks a relevant issue.

Yesterday was just the beginning of the backlash. My middle-aged feet are killing me, but I will march again and again until they are bruised and bleeding - not for me, but for everyone else.

Stick that in your corporatist crack pipes and smoke it.

....and along the same lines.... "Andrew Lansley. TOSSER!" from MC NxtGen.

Hurrah for youth. Well done young man.

.

UK 'ANARCHISTS' ARE PART OF MI5

2011-03-27T12:12:00.022+01:00

.

The TUC-led protest march in London yesterday was the biggest I've seen. The attendance was significantly larger than the massive pre-Iraq war London protest (that was duplicated in cities across the UK leading to an estimated 2 million participants).

As the newspapers report, the march was good-humored and almost entirely peaceful.

This morning however, as usual, front pages are filled with images of young men slamming poles through shop windows and fires blazing on the streets. This is the image of 'protest' that is intended to settle into the minds of the complacent, the merely curious and those that might be considering doing something to challenge power in society.

The violence is blamed, again as usual, on 'Anarchists'.

The presence of this group is easily identifiable at any large protest. They dress mostly in black and often carry red-and-black pennants on poles. Most cover their faces below (and normally but not always above) the eyes with black scarves. They move as one and stick together.

Yesterday I was in Trafalgar Square when this group (of maybe 150) skewed away, as one, from the main body of the march and strode as a troupe round the other side of the square past St Martin-In The Fields and up Charing Cross Road towards Cambridge Circus. I heard one old fellow say, "Where are they off to?" The reply, "Oxford Street to smash a few windows".

Of course they were. The game is well and broadly understood.

But why were they not stopped? Nor even followed. The police showed no interest in these people whatsoever.

They could easily have been stopped. If a few of us had put some thought into this predictable event we could have stopped them ourselves. They were small in number and mostly kids. I would guess that there was hardly a person over 25 among them. The young men leading the group were lean and fit. Many of those behind were slight. No fat, middle-aged or grizzled faces at all.

Who are these people? For a political movement they seem strangely reluctant to reveal themselves in public and state their case.

In fact Anarchism as a political philosophy seems to be a 19th century idea that more or less disappeared during the first three decades of the 20th century. In the mid-to-late 1800's this movement was led by people like Emma Goldman. The Goldman-directed agent Leon Czolgosz assassinated US president William McKinley in 1901. McKinley had been supported by the financiers against William Jennings Bryant and had won the 1896 election. However, it appears that he outlived his usefulness and was killed. At that time Anarchists were major political change-agents. Their actions allowed them to be presented to the public as enemies of the state but their 'orgy of destabilisation' (to use Webster Tarpley's words) created a chaos that those who really wield power find extremely useful. Violence, division and chaos makes for a political situation where the only people who are NOT confused, disorientated and misdirecting their energies are those who directed the chaos in the first place.

Is it possible that the ridiculous, silent and anonymous rump that is UK 'Anarchism' today is nothing more than an instrument of MI5 that is only triggered into action when there is an active political opposition to discredit?

Are 'Anarchists' a bunch of silly kids signed up to a website (on which there is not a single name, nor a forum nor an other evidence of serious political discourse)?

Has anyone ever heard of a UK anarchist being prosecuted for violence during a public protest?

Do we know the name of a single UK Anarchist?

What kind of political organisation does not have a visible leader, nor leadership group.

What kind of political group does absolutely nothing to promote its political philosophy in the public domain (please don't say that smashing windows [remember to wait until the cameras arrive] is any kind of meaningful statement)?

Are the 'Anarchists' such a group? Almost-adults led by a very small group of police agent-provocateurs?

Highly likely in my opinion.

Actually, here is film of some of the worst scenes from yesterdays protest. If you watch carefully (it will take a few viewings) from about 5:45 you will see one of the 'Anarchists' move towards police lines while some fighting is still taking place. He must say something or show a card (it was suggested to me that he looks like he is removing a wire at one point) because he is ushered gently to the other side of the line by the same police (he has presumably just been attacking) while the chaos continues. I suppose this explains why juvenile Anarchists are never arrested and charged.....because it would inevitably lead to the naming of more senior individuals within the group who are police or MI5.....and the whole charabang of deceptive (but useful) bullsh*t would fall over a cliff and disappear under the waves.

I've convinced myself.

UK ANARCHISTS ARE PART OF MI5

And there is evidence that this type of police action goes on everywhere (watch the boots).

It also seems that internationally 'anarchists' serve a similar purpose.

Here they are back in November 2010 at the 'student' protest.

No long-haired scruffy jumper-and-trainers-clad student he.

Note the strong and sturdy copper's boots. Notice the banks of cameramen awaiting their money shot that will (and did) adorn our front pages the following morning. Notice PC plod behind the cameramen, looking on with mere curiosity.

Neither the BBC, nor ITV, nor the corporate press will EVER ask simple and obvious questions, nor raise obvious concerns nor make obvious allegations about these people.

It is about time the rest of us did. If you are beginning to understand the game, inform your friends and associates. Speak it out loud and clear.

PS

For those who are new to realising the obvious but 'unthinkable', MI5 are the internal UK Intelligence service. They are senior to the police while working independently but often in co-ordination with them. They can turn up at a crime scene, flash an identity card and tell police to clear off. Even our most senior elected politicians are only told of their activities on a need-to-know basis. They are subject to an authority that is entirely separate from our visible political system. They are governed by individuals representing the interests of a ruling oligarchy, an elite who have access to almost unlimited funds owing to their ownership and control of the various vehicles of international finance.

One imagines that MI5 agents think they carry out their dirty work in service of UK PLC but international financiers are only interested in the UK as a safe haven from which to project, with their allies, imperialist control over the earth's resources i.e. globalism. They are engaged in a 'project', sometimes called 'the great game'. Though 'a game' to them, it has nothing in common with a game for the rest of us.

This is a game in which the rest of us all lose.

It is no accident that inside the UK (as elsewhere) the rich are getting massively richer , the poor get increasingly desperate while we submit (complaining-in-an-ever-so-civilised-manner) to the coming debt-enslavement of our children. This IS what yesterday's march was about, wasn't it?

Neither our real government(the oligarchy), nor MI5 care a damn for us. Their sole project is to condition us for submission and eventual total enslavement.

The pretend-government of venal careerists that we elect will strain at any number of gnats having swallowed every camel as dictated by their political bosses.

MP's DO NOT ASK THE IMPORTANT, NECESSARY AND OBVIOUS QUESTIONS. NOT ABOUT THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM, NOT ABOUT 9/11, NOR 7/7, NOR ANYTHING ELSE THAT REALLY MATTERS.

To be fair, most involved in imposing this nightmare agenda are quite unaware of the bigger picture.

MI5 employees!

WAKE UP!

You have got children too.

Schoolteachers, police, Council employees, military personnel!

WAKE UP!

Notice that the edicts you (and your bosses) obey come from you-know-not-where. Start challenging them. Do nothing (or as little as possible) that invokes the slightest qualm or reservation in your God-given conscience.

.

THE CAT IS OUT OF THE BAG

2011-03-25T09:29:00.004Z

.

This is brilliant and worth reading carefully (see fuller exposition of your legal registration as a PERSON [a form of corporation] in John Harris' talk after article).

THE CAT IS OUT OF THE BAG

Roger Hayes (article for The UK Column)

This article is a continuation of the non-payment of council tax saga... now in its 3rd year.

The story so far:

The council have demanded council tax from me, which I have refused to pay for 3 years - on the grounds that there is no lawfully enforceable contract between me (Roger Hayes) and the council. The council is refusing to provide me with a lawful contract because they think they have the right to demand that I pay council tax... which they do not. I am happy to pay my council tax – but only when the Council has agreed to provide me with a lawful contract... this is my right. The benefit of a contract is that it makes the council agree terms and conditions with me and prevents them acting in an arbitrary fashion i.e. it brings power back to the people.

The fact is that the council has no right to demand council tax from me (Roger Hayes) - but they DO have the right to demand it from the legal fiction MR ROGER HAYES... but that isn’t me. If readers are not familiar with the legal fiction – please refer to previous articles or the UK Column web site www.ukcolumn.org.

On the 11th January 2011 in the county court of Birkenhead, in front of witnesses, the court conceded to the right of Roger Hayes to act as ‘third party representative’ for MR ROGER HAYES. In essence the court agreed that they they were two entirely separate entities. This is an extraordinary development to put it very mildly.

The court did not however concede without putting up a very vigorous fight... this is how events unfolded in the court room.

Judge: Can we first find out who is in the court... is MR ROGER HAYES in the court?

Me: Sir, I am third party representative for MR ROGER HAYES.

Judge: Are you MR ROGER HAYES?

Me: No sir, I am the third party representative for MR ROGER HAYES... you may address me as Roger.

Judge: I will not address you as Roger, I will call you MR HAYES

Me: Sir, I am not MR HAYES, the court is required to address me as I request and I request that you address me as Roger. (NOTE – court protocol dictates that a defendant or respondent can be addressed the way they choose – the Judge then referred to me as ‘the gentleman’ but avoided referring to meas MR HAYES).

Judge: If you are not MR ROGER HAYES then I will take note that MR ROGER HAYES is not represented in court.

Me: In that case sir, you will have to also note that the council is not represented in court.

(NOTE. This would mean that the case would have to be dismissed, finding for the defendant, because the plaintiff had not appeared)

Judge: I can see that that the council has representation in the court.

Me: Then you will have to acknowledge that MR ROGER HAYES has representation in the court. We are all equal in the eyes of the law... if council has third party representation then so does MR ROGER HAYES. The council is a corporation and so is MR ROGER HAYES.

Judge: MR ROGER HAYES is not a corporation.

Me: Yes it is.

Judge: No it isn’t, it is a PERSON.

Me: A PERSON is a corporation.

Judge No it isn’t.

Me: Define person.

Judge: I don’t have to.

Me: Then let me do it for you sir. A PERSON is a corporation (NOTE: This is defined in a law dictionary) Sir, are you familiar with the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666?

Judge: I am familiar with many laws.

Me: Sir, I asked if you were familiar with the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666, if you are not Sir, then with respect you are not competent to judge in this matter and that gives rise to a claim of denial of due process.

Judge: Let’s hear from the council.

Me: Sir we can only move on to the council’s presentation when the court has confirmed that MR ROGER HAYES is represented in court.

Judge: Fine.

And the case continued.... with me (Roger Hayes) acting as third party representative for the legal fiction MR ROGER HAYES and with the judge eventually telling the council to go away and prove its case. The Judge was obviously very keen to avoid a charge of denial of due process i.e. a challenge to his competence. It was much easier for him to side with me and pass the buck back to the council.

Smart judge.

So what does this all mean? Well In very simple terms, it is SEISMIC i.e. extremely significant. It means that the court has accepted that the council’s claim is against the legal fiction MR ROGER HAYES and not me the flesh and blood man Roger Hayes. The court has also accepted that I (Roger Hayes) can act as a third party representative to defend the claim against MR ROGER HAYES.
The legal fiction cat is now truly out of the bag (although for me this is the second time I have achieved this in court). If the council goes on to win its case, then the court will find against the legal fiction MR ROGER HAYES, but significantly, they will not have found against me Roger Hayes... because as the court agrees... MR ROGER HAYES is a corporation... which isn’t me. One important thing is now clearly established - I, Roger Hayes, am not liable for council tax. AND NEITHER ARE YOU.

One of many films on this subject:
John James Harris - Freeman of England

.

35% of British public, 98% of British parliament support attack on Libya

2011-03-21T23:14:00.008Z

.

The latest Opinion Poll, published in the Financial Times, that examines the British public's attitude to western attacks on Libya, demonstrates the ever-growing and unbridgeable chasm that exists between ordinary people and those that represent us.

Quote: ".....According to an ITV/ComRes poll, 35 per cent of people agreed it was right for the UK to take military action against Muammer Gaddafi’s forces in Libya."

This same night British M.P.'s voted 557 to 13 in favour of the attacks. That is 557 out of 570 or 98% support for Cameron's new war.

Ordinary people, by and large, clearly understand two things that our elected representatives seem to have missed.

One, Gaddafi represents no threat to western countries whatsoever, and...

Two, that bombing the sh*t out of people is a very peculiar kind of 'humanitarianism'.

So here is a loud message from the British public to Cameron, Clegg and the entire political/media class.

65% of the people believe you are wrong. Almost all of them surely also believe you are lying (if we can exclude the unlikely possibility that they imagine the lawyers and Oxbridge types that predominate on the green leather benches to be stupid) about the motivation behind this war.

Here, at least, is one encouraging fact to emerge from what Webster Tarpley calls "the engineered orgy of destabilisation" now taking place across the Muslim world.

.....and if the lives of many of Gaddafi's opponents have been saved (as is quite possible, or even likely) by recent military actions, these 'rebels' would never have taken up armed insurrection in the first place without CIA encouragement and financial backing.

NOR IS IT LIKELY, IN THE LONG RUN, THAT THE NUMBER OF LIVES POSSIBLY SAVED WILL IN ANY WAY BALANCE THE MASSIVE LOSSES THAT WILL ACCRUE IN WHAT IS VERY LIKELY TO DEVELOP INTO A HORRIBLE AND INTERMINABLE CIVIL WAR.

The US Congress has allocated hundreds of millions of dollars to support such insurrections. For the moment, destabilisation and the destruction of nation states that might (from a position of security) defect into the Chinese orbit, seems to be the name of the game.

PEOPLE, INCLUDING THE 'REBELS', NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT AT THE END OF WHATEVER IS COMING LIBYA WILL REMAIN A VASSAL STATE. IT WILL CONTINUE TO BE DOMINATED BY WESTERN (INCLUDING ISRAELI) INTERESTS. LIBYAN REBELS WILL ENJOY A BETTER LIBYA IF, EVEN AT THIS LATE STAGE, THEY CAN (HOWEVER IMPOSSIBLE IT MIGHT SEEM)OVERCOME THEIR HATRED, COME TO SOME KIND OF POWER-SHARING ARRANGEMENT WITH GADDAFI AND FACE THE PREDATORY IMPERIALIST WESTERN GLOBALISTS TOGETHER.

Louis Farrakhan analyses the Libyan situation with great accuracy and emphasis below.

.

Don't Trust The Libyan Horror Stories

2011-03-20T12:59:00.003Z

.

On LBC (London Broadcasting) radio this morning there was a live poll of Londoners, the results of which were intermittently broadcast. At the end of the first hour the balance was 72% against military action, 28% in favour.

By the end of the show this balance had changed to 52% against, 48% for.

In the meantime there were also a stream of callers claiming to be Libyans who plied their way through a long list of absolutely horrific crimes of the Gaddafi regime including (for a taste of the horror recited):

A young boy was overheard making a phone call. The authorities went to his house, took him away, beheaded him and brought his head back to his mother saying she should give it to his brother to play with.

This kind of thing reminds one of the Kuwaiti Princess who went on world TV in 1991 alleging that Iraqi soldiers in a Kuwaiti hospital were taking premature babies from their incubators and killing them. This story was later proved (and admitted) to be a complete lie.

I called LBC to contribute to their phone-in to say this but they would not let me on air.

if such horrors were routinely occurring (as the callers allege) you can be quite sure we would all have heard about such incidents long before this crucial moment arrived.

Garnering support for military attacks matters. The British public (in London at least), it appears, are against this action and a media blitz of such propaganda is almost certainly on its way into your living rooms.

Don't trust a word these war-mongers say. Someone is trying to make your heart shed virtual blood in order that you will applaud the reality of real Libyans will shedding real blood.

.

Cosmic Evil and 'The Great Game'

2011-03-19T20:14:00.012Z

.

It is difficult to make much sense of our latest war against Gaddafi.

The one thing we can know with absolute confidence is that 'our' motivation for embarking on this latest adventure is NOT humanitarian.

Listening to Cameron, Sarkozy and the deafening international chorus that has supported this action, one can well imagine Gaddafi and his supporters visualising Nato firepower and trembling in their bunkers. But if we are not too concerned for the well-being of a military dictator, let us spare a thought for the rest of the Islamic world. Let us pray they will not all die from laughing at the spectacle of Clinton/Sarkozy/Cameronian hearts theatrically bleeding for the suffering of the oppressed.

This is a humanitarian mission?

The peoples of Palestine and all points east must shake their heads in bewilderment that western politicians can continue to sell this kind of nonsense to their supposedly well-educated citizens.

One obvious question arises. What makes the eastern Libyans worthy of such special consideration? We don't seem too concerned about the human rights of the protesters in Bahrain, never mind the poor persecuted people of Gaza, nor the millions of relatives of the Iraqi dead.

It also seems that this action was only possible by getting 'The Arab League' on board and that this was achieved by promising to protect the Gulf State oligarchs from their own impoverished and tyrannised internal opposition.

How's that for humanitarianism and impartially applied principle?

It was reported that a US drone killed 80 people in Pakistan a couple of days ago. There is and will be no end to this kind of humanitarianism until we deal with the poison at the heart of our own governmental system.

Furthermore, we must surely know that any armed rebellion in our own countries would be met with all necessary force and it is not as though there are not millions of us who would happily wave our current international-bankster-controlled mock-democracies goodbye tomorrow morning.

Therefore the justifications for this action represent purest hypocrisy and fabricated pretext.

There is the oil, of course.

.......but were we not already buying this oil from Lybia? Were Blair and Mandelson getting all cuddly with Gaddafi because they were genuinely attracted to his personality? It would appear that Gaddafi is already one of our assets so what's really going on?

We do know that simply having access to resources is not enough for the powers that govern us. 'We' have always had a problem with Gaddafi. The US tried to kill him during the Reagan presidency by bombing some of his residences. According to MI5 whistle-blower, David Shayler, the UK tried to do the same during the 1990's in a bungled bomb plot that only succeeded in killing a few innocent Libyan citizens. 'We' are obviously tired of playing games with this awkward fellow and want our own boy in charge of Libyan oil.

But who are we supporting in Libya?

The most committedly-Islamic anti-Americans in Libya, by the sound of it.

And are we really supporting them considering the fact that Gaddafi has been given plenty of time to take full control of Libya's oilfields (there has been quite a delay in imposing the no-fly zone, hasn't there)?

Perhaps we were quite determined that the oil would not fall into the hands of Islamic fundamentalist anti-Americans?......so what lies in store for these rebels about whose well-being we care so much?

My guess is that things will not work out very well for our new friends in Benghazi.

When Gaddafi said that 'Al Qaeda' was behind the Libyan rebellion in the east, he sounded like a raving lunatic to most western ears. However, for the many that know that 'Al Qaeda' was originally a CIA database of arab revolutionaries, buyable criminals and other assorted (often mentally ill) misfits, Gaddafi's assertion sounds more like a recognisable or even a likely possibility (bearing in mind that 'Al Qaeda' is code for a method rather than an arab organisation that controls itself centrally. British Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, understood this. Might have been a mistake to say so though).

We know the west is funding anti-government movements across the world, from Belarus to Iran, from North Africa to Pakistan, from Ukraine to Taiwan.

It's the simple 'divide and rule' game that is as old as the hills.

As it is difficult (or perhaps impossible) to see a clear and coherent rationale behind the west's assault on Gaddafi, perhaps it is just a matter of creating the division, throwing in a large measure of murderous chaos (great for corporate profits of course) and letting the chips fall where they may......in the confident expectation that whatever fall-out occurs it can be managed to 'our' advantage.

Webster Tarpley offers many insights into the way 'our side' (If only they were) are playing the global 'great game' (see 'behind the 2011 orgy of destabilisations' here). He says that the destabilisations and interventions are all about preventing coherent nation states creating new alliances with global competitors like China and Russia.........."The current goal of London and Washington is to stop a jailbreak by their former clients,"

At least that makes some kind of sense.

Cosmically evil though, isn't it?

This 'great game' will surely one day, and quite soon, threaten the lives of every last one of us.

At some point we will have to stand up and oppose these people that claim to represent us.

.

Old Terrorism New Terrorism

2011-01-03T09:17:00.004Z

.

Do you remember the days when the people who terrorised England were IRA bombers.....along with, perhaps, the occasional serial killer?

Do you remember how the police could never catch the bastards?

.....and when they did it turned out that the 'terrorists' jailed were usually innocent men (or even whole families, including children) who had been tortured into confessions or damned by falsified forensic evidence?

Do you remember the days when the Yorkshire police pulled in everyone in the North of England with a dick and a ball pein hammer for questioning as a suspect in the 'Yorkshire Ripper' case? They interviewed the Ripper himself but in spite of the fact that he was a 'dead ringer' for the killer (as described by various witnesses) and the fact his good friend Trevor Birdsall had named him as the Ripper to police (this letter was read but placed into the wrong filing tray and quickly forgotten), Sutcliffe carried on with his killing for 5 full years before being caught.

My, how things have changed.

Has Mr. Plod got his act together or what?

The majority of terrorists are now uncovered and charged while they are still only thinking about committing their murderous acts.

The security services are surely doing an absolutely brilliant job. It seems they have their own agents out there infiltrating all the terrorist groups and preventing catastrophe on a daily (or at least a weekly) basis.

Did you know it turns out that many of those charged have a history of psychiatric disorder.

No surprise there, the sick scum.

Of course there is always one member of the gang that doesn't get charged with anything. He is obviously our boy.

My friend Gabriel says that it turns out that this guy is always the leader of the group.....but Gabe's an idiot. He just makes up stuff like this?

Occasionally, of course, our people are oblivious to a threat, slip up and an attack gets past them.

As in London on 7/7/05.

In spite of the fact we had brilliantly practiced for that very attack at least four times, in spite of the fact that one of our brave parking attendants missed one of the bombers by a whisker, in spite of the fact that hardly a single one of the tens of thousands of CCTV cameras were working on that terrible morning, our brave boys named the culprits in short order.

It is case closed as far as knowing who are the guilty men.

Gabe says that the people who hate our government know that the government want 'terror' (to justify their 'War on Terror') so these people won't give them any.

Fool.

A man who used to be President Reagan's Assistant Secretary to the US Treasury says the same thing is going on in the USA.

....but there are the occasional lunatics, like Roberts, everywhere.

We are so much safer now.

Don't you agree?

.....and things are so much better now.

Aren't they?

(Home for a day, so put this up. Away until second week in February.)
.

Happy Christmas

2010-12-24T22:48:00.002Z

.

Wishing a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to any visitor to this blog. There will be no postings in the coming weeks as I will be away from all technology until the second week in February or so...

Best wishes and God Bless to all.

Iraq Vets KNOW 911 Was an Inside Job

2010-12-17T11:41:00.002Z

.
The two biggest obstacles to people recognising the obvious.....that 9/11 was an 'inside job'.....are:

1) the immediate realisation that if this 'outrageous' allegation is true then everybody we have spent our lives (probably) respecting, the BBC, the rest of the media, major politicians, the Christian Churches and many more besides are signed up to this lie......

.......this is just too shocking an idea for many to contemplate seriously.

2) the 'what does this mean for me' factor. Most people, even if they understand that the whole story is a lie, are not prepared to stand against the crowd and put themselves at risk.

It is quite something to hear the young US 'refusnik' (in the video below) say that US grunts on the ground in Iraq knew that "9/11 is a lie" back in 2004.

9/11 Truth will never stop being an issue until all those in positions of power and influence have paid a price for their betrayal, a betrayal that has caused the most terrible suffering.

A betrayal of man and a betrayal of God.

Because of the success of this great lie the forces of Satan are rampant and victorious (for the time being) across the whole world.

.