.
Here in old Blighty the Queen's ' Diamond Jubilee' celebrations are just beginning.
Four days of media drivel.
The presumption being that we all want to participate in the glorious pageant.
Well, here's a contribution.
It's a fair question.
Why do the British Royals have their male offspring circumcised by Jewish Mohels?
Why?
A few ideas suggesting possible answers occur, but maybe there are more:
1) The British Royals are Jewish.
2) The British Royals merely perceive themselves as being Jewish (Merovingians, the 'line of David' and all that).
3) The entire European aristocracy including the 'Windsors' have, over the last couple of centuries, intermarried with the banking elite and are therefore 'sort of' Jewish.
4) Acting 'Jewish' is a kind of insurance policy. The Royals will be well aware what happened to their Russian cousins in 1917 after New York banker Jacob Schiff's project (he funded Lenin and Trotsky) was successful. (see film below. The astonishing story of the takeover of Russia by western-financed Bolsheviks is worth two hours for anybody who wants to understand modern history)
Maybe someone out there has some better ideas.
I'm off to Spain for 3 days. This trip couldn't have come along at a better time.
Up the Republic!
.
BBC AND CHILD ABUSE
1 hour ago
Kevin.
ReplyDeleteI've heard and talked to Juri Lina on several occaisions. He walks the talk. His dad was rounded up and taken to Siberia from Estonia when Juri was 4½.
I think the intermarrying of zionist bankers and the British royals is the correct answer, i.e. they fear being 'Bolsheviked'. Going along to get along like the majority of folks.
Who do you nominate for president? You will be allowed to choose from the following official shortlist: Peter Mandelson, Tony Blair, Lord Sugar, Stephen Fry and with Kenneth Clarke as a makeweight.
ReplyDeleteAs to your question, as there is no consensus on the web or indeed any reliable source quoted; without a rummage at Windsor Castle, you probably will not find out when it commenced or, of the reason, ever.
In the Shadow of Hermes by Juri Lina is essential viewing for all those sheeple who vote for the LibLabCon party and are therfore lining up to be shorn of their country, life and liberty.
Sort of Jewish indeed. Sir David Manning (linked to 9 11) is Prince William's mentor.
ReplyDelete- Aangirfan
On Deadly Ground
ReplyDeletehttp://melgibstein.wordpress.com/2012/05/31/on-deadly-ground/
See the American scholar Revilo P Oliver's interesting conjecture on this subject at http://www.revilo-oliver.com/rpo/Kosher_Kings.html
ReplyDelete"Albert was officially the son of Ernest, Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and Duchess Louise, but Ernest was noted for his antipathy to women etc"
DeleteAccording to wiki, Ernest was a Prussian General who fought against Napoleon. In addition to two legitimate children, he had three illegitimate children by two different women.
As Saxe-Coburg is in Bavaria, A Bavarian accent might well have been used by British royals.
Revilo P Oliver scholarship is unsubstantiated.
Interesting question.
ReplyDeleteHave a great time in Spain Kev. Wonder what the Spanish think about the International Bankers?
Your second 'idea' is the correct idea. Not so sure about the Merovingian's stuff but suffice it to say the Royal Family are definitely Jewish, but Royal Judahite would be a more accurate description being descendants of Judah and Taymar (Genesis 38). The Jewish Banksters are Canaanite Jews (non Jews of the synagogue of Satan) descended from Judah and the Adullamite's daughter. Adullamites were Canaanites - again the account of this is in Genesis 38.
ReplyDeleteYour second 'idea' is the correct idea. Not so sure about the Merovingian's stuff but suffice it to say the Royal Family are definitely Jewish, but Royal Judahite would be a more accurate description being descendants of Judah and Taymar (Genesis 38). The Jewish Banksters are Canaanite Jews (non Jews of the synagogue of Satan) descended from Judah and the Adullamite's daughter. Adullamites were Canaanites - again the account of this is in Genesis 38.
ReplyDelete1) The British Royals are Jewish.
ReplyDeleteAre Judah which can be traced back through England, Scotland and Ireland for 2600 years. Who are Shemetic people and the fake Jews mostly Askanazi (Japhethites; not Shemetic.)
2) The British Royals merely perceive themselves as being Jewish (Merovingians, the 'line of David' and all that).
Before 2600 years right the way back to David about 4000 years ago can all be traced back; was even in Windsor castle at one time proudly on display.
3) The entire European aristocracy including the 'Windsors' have, over the last couple of centuries, intermarried with the banking elite and are therefore 'sort of' Jewish.
The British Royals married in to the Ashkanazi bankers (8th century converts to Talmudic Judaism and who married into other none Jews Edomites who were thrown out by the Romans 72AD) Ashkanazi bankers gaining more and more influence with a few setbacks from about the 10th century and mentioned much in the work of William Shakespeare and others; a little coded but there never the less.
4) Acting 'Jewish' is a kind of insurance policy. The Royals will be well aware what happened to their Russian cousins in 1917 after New York banker Jacob Schiff's project (he funded Lenin and Trotsky) was successful. (see film below. The astonishing story of the takeover of Russia by western-financed Bolsheviks is worth two hours for anybody who wants to understand modern history)
Oh what a tangled web they have weaved and their own fault and DOing too. Since some Judah wanted it all for themselves alone the Nazi even worse and more evil.
The most disgusting and perverted part of the traditional Jewish method of circumcision is "mezizah" (the spelling varies) where the mohel sucks the child's penis immediately after circumcising it.
ReplyDeleteKev, you may wish to know that Norton Internet Security are effectively blocking your website with a sinister NWO like warning. You must be doing something right.
ReplyDeleteThat's interesting. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteKB
I notice they've done the same to Griffin Watch and probably many other inconvenient truth sites. Even when one (obviously) disregards the NWO's infantile fake warning nonsense and chooses to enter the website anyway, the same warning is repeated EVERY time a new page is loaded. Bloody annoying. They don't like it (truth) up 'em do they? You must be over the right target to get such flak.
DeleteThe problem with the warning pop-up does seem to have gone away for now. I think we can expect more of this sort of thing as the world descends into dictatorship and global conflict.
ReplyDeleteIt is interresting to sometimes ponder about how things really were back in the old times.
ReplyDeleteAbout things happening in Europe after Spain 1492, with the possibility of printing, the war between protestants and catholics, and also the steppings up to the French revolution in 1789 et cetera. It´s interesting to look at how all the royal courts and aristocratic families, their intermarrying, and how much of them all was a kind of political activity for gaining political power.
In 1762 is the Duke of Kent was born, supposedly as a son to George III, who had about 15 children. The Duke of Kent looks very different from his sisters and brothers, and one can wonder why. In 1819 he is considered fathering the future queen Victoria, after which he dies around 1820. There is something strange about this Duke of Kent, since he is said to have been with numerous of women, and had not produced one single child with any of all these women….
The mother of the future queen Victoria is a woman who has been married to a man, who before marrying her had been married to her mothers sister, that is her aunt. With this man she, (queen Victorias mother to be), gives birth to two children.
The first husband dies, and queen Victorias mother marries Prince Edward, the Duke of Kent, and gives birth to Victoria, the future queen, and the Duke of Kent dies.
Now is really the Duke of Kent the real father of Victoria, or is he not? Who else could it be?
The father of prince Albert was a brother of Victorias mother. He had two children, and one of them was prince Albert.
The other son looked amazingly much like Victoria, so one could think that he was her halfbrother….
The other son, Prince Albert, is said to have been queen Victorias cousin….
Prince Albert father, that is queen Victorias mothers brother, later married one of his other sisters daughters.
Could this Ernst actually have been the real father of future queen Victoria? That is, could Victorias parents have been brother and sister?
There was in Egypt a tradition among the Farao familes. They married sister and brother with eachother. After Alexander the Greats death, Egypt was ruled for some time by Ptolomeios, who adopted the tradition and who is said to have married his sister.
Many strange things in the history of mankind……(although with queen Victoria and prince Albert, and their perhaps being half-brother and sister, and Victoria the product of sister and brother, it is of course only fantasy and speculation, which is not to be taken as any thruth whatsoever…)…..