Some of the biggest men in the United States are afraid of something. They know there is a power somewhere, so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it. – President Woodrow Wilson
The "Occupy" protests and other demonstrations across the US and Europe are reported as being "anti-capitalist", "anti-banker", "anti-EU" or simply "anti-government".
But these labels will just not do.
The oligarchs who bring us our successive financial crises and wars will be getting rid of capitalism pretty soon.
Unfortunately they have no intention of disappearing with it.
We know that the entire financial system is going to collapse in fairly short order.
It must.
The 'more-debt' solution to irresolvable debt problems is a stalling strategy and everybody knows it.
A real solution to the nightmare that the financial oligarchs have created for us would end their system, so that ain't going to happen.......just yet.
First we are going to endure crises like we have never seen before.
Currencies will collapse.
There will be a major and very terrible war, a primary purpose of which will be to make survivors so desperate that they will be glad to accept anything on offer that delivers peace.
When it is over capitalism will go.......but the same people will remain in charge.
Therefore there is little point in branding oneself an 'anti-capitalist' (because Messrs. Rothschild and Rockefeller will soon be making common cause with you)
When the time comes we will be expected not to notice that the new, much better, much fairer system on offer will continue to be run by the same banking oligarchy that caused all the problems and nearly destroyed planet earth in the first place.
This trajectory is well laid out by Richard North in a recent article here.
We can expect a new Godless tyranny. A 'humanitarian' tyranny.
So let us be clear:
The system we call 'democracy' is really government by agents representing the interests of a financial oligarchy.
'Capitalism' is government by oligarchy.
(Wall-Street funded) Soviet 'Communism' was government by a tyrannical oligarchy.
All these disastrous systems were disasters because they were structurally designed to represented the interests of a ruling elite rather than the genuine interests of ordinary people.
So,
WHEN THE NEXT OLIGARCHICAL SYSTEM IS OFFERED TO US, ALL HUMANITY MUST RECOGNISE IT FOR WHAT IT IS AND REJECT IT.
TOTALLY.
What protesters need to set their minds and hearts against is the continuing dominating influence of a financial juggernaut that is, at its core, led by a small elite of extraordinarily powerful, corrupt and self-serving oligarchs.
Think it through, be clear about this and explain to everybody you meet.
Our system is not democratic, it is oligarchical and.....
Yesterday Alex Jones interviewed Demos operative Jamie Bartlett on his nightly show. Bartlett's job description on the Demos website goes as follows:
Jamie is Head of the Violence and Extremism Programme. His primary research interests lie in terrorism, radicalisation and extremism, conspiracy theories and integration policy.
He is a familiar figure to UK 9/11 activists. He came, along with Demos buddy Carl Miller, to speak to us at Goldsmith College last year. The same pair addressed the Conway Hall 'Conspiracy Theory Conference' a couple of months ago.
At the Goldsmith's event, during a heated exchange, Miller asked the assembled 'conspiracy theorists' this question:
"If the US government wanted a war wouldn't it have been enough to fly two aeroplanes into the buildings? Why would they choose to demolish them as well? It is completely unneccesary........
...........Why?......(pleading look)......Why?"
As I was present in the room and about 4 feet in front of them I tried to offer an explanation but was ignored by Mr Bartlett who was acting as chair if the meeting.
At the Conway Hall conference (which did not go very well for the establishment side in my view) Carl M raised the same question.
Last night, for a third time, at 2:35 during the interview below Jamie Bartlett asked Jones their favourite question yet again.
"Why do you think the American government felt the need to enact a controlled demolition on the two towers to actually bring them down? Would it not have been more rational to just allow two planes to fly into the buildings? That is surely enough of a cause for war if that's what they were planning. Why multiply the chances that you are going to get caught exponentially by actually bringing them down in a controlled demolition in front of the entire world?"
Now, Alex Jones has done more than any living human being to expose the actions of the globalist financial elite, including the hidden truths of false flag terror. This is simply a fact. Much as one can respect him for that, his response to Jamie Bartlett's question was weak. It went:
"No guts, no glory."
"Fortune goes to the bold."
"Bottom line, those buildings already had asbestos and structural problems."
"Psychologically you do it on a weekday morning....etc.....etc"
Poor response Alex.
There is one primary reason for the controlled demolitions of WTC1&2 and all the other reasons are much less essential.
It was necessary to produce profound and lasting shock in the general population.
The scenes of hundreds of thousands of Americans running for their lives were necessary to induce this shock. A few dozen dead bodies on the upper floors was not enough dead bodies.
A B-25 bomber flew into the Empire State Building in July 1945. Hardly anyone remembers this now.
Planes into buildings is just not shocking enough.
When Bartlett says, "....that is surely enough of a cause for war if that's what they were planning"........he needs to be told that these people were not just planning a war.
They were planning multiple wars (as the PNAC document confirms) and multiple wars are what we have been given.......and there are more wars to come.
The demolitions were to create a collective post-traumatic stress disorder in the population at large. A mega-event from which to launch an assault aimed at gaining control of the major resources of planet earth.
The numbing, disabling shock was the necessary element of the operation. Everything else was secondary.
Building 7 was also obviously and provably demolished, so it can be sensibly deduced that the purpose of this demolition was the destruction of evidence connecting the perpetrators to the crime.
The Bartlett Method
Jamie Bartlett is a very charming fellow. He is impeccably polite. He is very intelligent. For this reason I find it impossible to accept that he is honest in his exchanges with 'conspiracy' activists. He is well aware of the detail of the hard questions but he never addresses that detail. If he could win the argument by addressing detail he would certainly do so.
He has watched '9/11 Mysteries' and the detailed analysis of the physics of the WTC7 collapse. The laws of physics prove beyond ANY doubt that these collapses were demolitions. However Bartlett chooses to accept the laughable science promoted by paid government 'debunkers'. It is probable that he genuinely believes he is with the 'good guys' in 'uniting' society and moving it towards participation in a global system of centralised control.....because this would be a good a sensible thing and would create a fairer world for everybody.
Everybody has their alibis.
However Mr Bartlett is a professional liar.
And a good one.
If you present good evidence he will concede any point in argument....
.....except when it really matters.
Yes, Tony Blair lied. Yes, governments sometimes do terrible things. Yes, they sometimes lie.
No, 9/11 and 7/7 were Al Qaeda attacks on the west by Islamic fundamentalists. No, Zionist-Occupied-Government is a lunatic fantasy.
When dealing with Building 7, say, activists will go deep into the issue, show detailed point-mapping of the building collapse, draw graphs, calculate acceleration compare with 'g'. Bartlett refers to 'the majority of engineers' who are not in A&E911Truth (well, of course they are not), refers to official government reports but never faces the detail himself.
Regarding 7/7 here is a question for Bartlett and his pals at Demos: Evidence presented at the 2010/11 Inquiry and the London Assembly Inquiry in 2006 makes it clear from multiple witnesses that there were a MINIMUM of 3 holes (2 separate ones by the first set of double doors and 1 in front of the first set of single doors) in the bombed Edgware Road carriage.
How is it conceivably possible for a suicide bomber holding a single rucksack containing hydrogen peroxide and black pepper to create 3 separate well-spaced holes in the floor of the train?
Indeed, how can a single rucksack containing ANYTHING YOU CARE TO THINK OF produce such damage?
However, we know that while we will go on producing detailed analyses that destroy government lies, paid think-takers will go on propagating and defending those lies.
Until the system falls.
IT'S ALL A BIT LIKE........
Jamie Bartlett reminds me of someone.......and I couldn't think who.....and then it struck me.
I went to school with Gus O'Donnell.
It's Gus.
We all held Gus in the highest regard. He broke school academic and sporting records. He captained football teams (and went on to captain Oxford University first XI). In spite of this he was universally popular. A very modest, well-mannered and respectful fellow. Nobody resented him for his gifts.
Yet.......as the country's most senior civil servant.....I've seen him on TV defending the Afghan war and resorting to quoting statistics about the increased number of young girls that are now being schooled there.........How must it feel to be in charge of a machine responsible for seeing that the illegal Iraq/Libyan wars were well managed......or that the funding was in place to adequately support the humanitarian carpet-bombing of Libya.
Gus.
What happened to you?
How on earth can you buy into these murderous games?
You read the gospels of Christ first period every single morning for years.
I just don't get it.
.......likewise Jamie, a very 'nice' man.......do you understand that you are making common cause with the very worst kind of criminals?
IT'S ALL A BIT LIKE (2)........
I know how Demos types would see what I'm about to say as an opportunity (or perhaps a reason) to trash everything else a 911 activist might say out of hand but I will say it nonetheless, for this situation will not persist.
The only mass mental trauma-inducing reality that can be compared to the 9/11 collapses is the 'human gas chambers' element of 'The Holocaust'.
Without this ultimate horror, this unspeakable evil, this terrible shock to the western mass mind, Jewish suffering during WW2 would have had, in historical terms, no special status.
More Ukrainians died in 'The Holdomor' (at the hands of Soviet Jews mostly). More Soviets were murdered by Stalin. Far more Chinese killed by Mao.
Two planes into skyscrapers, a few tens of thousands dead in concentration camps, from Typhus mostly.
Get over it.
But the 'human gas chambers'* have created a unique reality. 'The Jews' have displaced Christ.
They are, in mainstream thinking (as Christ once was), beyond criticism.
Such is the power of victim status (ask any shareholder in Manchester United FC).
There are people out there, think-tankers also, who understand (as Bertrand Russell put it) "the science of mass mind control....... the knowledge of which will be confined to the elite...."
Well, the mass mind has been well controlled for a very time but thankfully the public at large appear to be waking from their slumber.
The genie is out of the bottle and will never go back in, however hard Demos operatives work at containing it.
* It needs to be said that, based on the physical evidence, the 'human gas chambers' story like the official narrative of 9/11 is a wicked lie.
.....and like the 9/11 government apologists, the one manner in which no spokesman will respond to a denier of the existence of the 'human gas chambers' is by debating the detail of the contradictory physical evidence with him/her.
That is because it just can't be done.
Videos, confessions, blah, blah, blah....these things are easily falsified.
Chemistry and physics present a very much tougher challenge.... but, hey, why bother when you control the media anyway.
We are all part-victim and part-perpetrator of the evils that result from great lies.
The issue of 'Deicide', the killing of Christ by "the Jews", has (astonishingly in this Talmud-dominated* age) been recently raised in the mainstream media.
Bishop Williamson of the traditionalist Catholic SSPX order has accused Jews of killing Jesus in a (privately circulated) blog posting entitled "How can Pope Benedict let go of ancient truths?" (his article can be read on Michael Hoffman's website here)
BW is correct to state that his position was the mainstream Catholic view for nearly 2000 years until 1962 and the publishing of Nostra Aetate (“In Our Time”), a document contradicting the New Testament and agreeing with the Rabbis that the ancient Jews were not responsible for the execution of Christ.
Williamson states the case thus...."Originally raised by God to cradle the Messiah, alas, when he came they refused, collectively to recognize him. Collectively also, meaning there are always noble exceptions, they have remained faithful to that rejection, so that they changed their religion from that of Abraham and Moses and the Old Testament to that of Anas, Caiphas and the Talmud. Tragically, their very messianic training by God drives them to go on rejecting the one whom they hold to be a false messiah. Until they convert at the end of the world, as the Church has always taught they will do (cf. Rom. XI, 26-27), they seem bound to choose to go on acting, collectively, as enemies of the true Messiah."
Jewish convert to Christianity, Roy Tov, presents some detail about how the Pharisees altered 'the religion of Abraham and Moses' to serve their purposes.
Michael Hoffman surely nails the essence of this issue here and here when he says that those modern Jews who accept The Talmud can rightly be accused of 'Deicide' by Christians because the 'holy book' they follow openly celebrates Christ's murder. It says, amongst other horrible things, that Christ is in hell drowning in boiling excrement and that his mother is a whore.
The Talmud promotes a moral code that is to be practiced amongst Jews only. It promotes hatred (indeed murder and sexual exploitation) of gentiles (we're only 'cattle' you know) and the idea of Jewish supremacism over all other races. A Jew can say a prayer once a year (the Kol Nidre) that undoes all promises and contracts with gentiles for that year.
Let Christians be clear.
And be unafraid to say it.
THE TALMUD IS AN UTTERLY SATANIC DOCUMENT.
As a child attending Mass before 1962 I remember that we always used to says prayers at the end of the service 'for the conversion of Russia' (i.e. the Jews)
This was surely a work of spiritual mercy that the prodigal sons and daughters of 'Israel' return to God.
Catholicism's (and Christianity's at large) abandonment of this aspect of our spiritual and religious focus has proved a greater disaster than we could have imagined.
International banking interests have taken over our governments. Western societies allow their owned leadership to exercise an ideology that is, in practice, Talmudic supremacism on a global stage. The Christian churches have no effective or even mildly useful criticism to make of this diabolical situation.
Our children in Europe are flown (aided by government subsidy) to Auschwitz to witness the scene of ultimate human sacrifice. Auschwitz has displaced Golgotha. Work-shy predators and parasites have thus been protected by a victim-status while they have soared above and gained control of society at large.
It needs to be emphasised that there are legions of gentiles happy to collaborate in the supremacist mission......and that many, many Jews reject the Talmudic ideology. It is unfortunate that some of these buy into that ideology second-hand by accepting precepts of Zionism.
And yet in spite of current Jewish hegemony (this is not too strong a word) over western countries, Rabbis respond to Williamson's statements with something approaching panic.
Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt of the European Council of Rabbis said: "Comments like these take us back decades to the dark days before there was a meaningful and mutually respectful dialogue between Jews and Roman Catholics. There must be no rapprochement within the Catholic church for those of its flock who seek to preach words of hate."
Meaningful?
Mutually respectful?
There has been no sincerity whatsoever in this dialogue on the part of the Talmudists.
None.
Their 'Holy Book' still curses Christ and His mother.
The Christian churches (and the Catholic Church in particular) are in ruins as a result of their abandonment of tradional principle and their willingness to submit to the secular-humanistic Frankfurt-School-created agenda, so heavily funded and promoted by financier-funded think-tanks and Foundations.
Money rules. Global supremacism is our governments' policy of choice. We have abandoned God and are helpless because of it.
For the moment we have no power to stop the Leviathan.
Our choice today is the same as it was for Jews 2000 years ago.
Christ warned us against the Pharisees, those supremacist Jews who abandoned the traditions of Abraham and Moses and put themselves on an equal (or superior when it suited their purpose) footing with God.
He did not even argue with the money-changers. Christ's first act in Holy Week was to drive them from the temple.
We have collectively stopped listening to Christ, upon whom our civilisation was once founded.
We have embraced the enemies of God and the results are there for all to see.
We are all Jews now.
* Our parliamentary system in England began as a talking shop between the king and land-owning barons to create mechanisms that would keep the peace between these thugs and settle disputes with a minimum of risk to life. It has developed in the modern world on the Talmudic model. An almost infinitely flexible and continually developing system of law created for lesser brethren by an elite that (primarily) serve the interests of that elite. The financiers' control over the global political system is now almost complete. Red-team-blue-team-one-party-state-democracies are the primary instruments via which they imprint their lies and Godlessness upon us all.
This evening I caught the following on the BBC News Channel. A Conservative supporter (missed his name) of Liam Fox was holding forth strongly in defense of his beleaguered minister.
".......Mr. Fox has been an excellent Secretary of Defense. We have nearly completed a highly successful operation in Libya without the loss of a single British life....."
Successful?
Highly unlikely in the long run.
But yes.
.....tens of thousands of Libyan dead with
NOT THE LOSS OF A SINGLE BRITISH LIFE.
Are we supposed to feel proud of the fact that our leaders now order the military to yet again embark on a campaign of action that can, this time, only be described as
the risk-free slaughter of brown-skinned people.
Surely most British people recoil in horror at this obscenity....
....the fact it is carried out in the name of 'humanitarianism' is truly beyond words.
Must we not now admit that, however much we oppose this illegal war, that the RAF's bombing of Libyan cities is a horror for which WE must admit some reponsibility?
To be honest, realising what is taking place in our name, I feel very guilty that I do so little to oppose this war.
I've seen my MP about it. He knows large numbers loathe the Libyan campaign. He didn't defend it but his demeanor was one of helplessness.
What kind of a monstrous world are Cameron and the rest of these internationalists building for us?
....but there's always worse......
......from an article: Remote control murder: Afghan drones operated from Nevada and Virginia, recognising drones as the weapon of choice of US military and the RAF in Afghanistan, we read the following:
"Regarding the use of drones against civilians in Pakistan and Yemen US author and journalist James Bamford said,
“Death warrants for targets are signed by mid-level bureaucrats, and soccer moms and dads double as joystick killers. They operate in comfort and safety, half the Earth away from their targets and close enough for many to run home for lunch between kills."
The time is coming when will be forced to confront the elite that creates these monstrosities.
Here is a template for enforcement up with which we must not put.
