.
.
US Envoy Writes of Israeli Threats
33 minutes ago
Tuesday, 31 May 2011
Thursday, 26 May 2011
IT IS ALL ABOUT THE JEWS
.
I have nothing original to say on the subject of our seemingly hopeless oppression.......but how dire the situation sometimes appears?
There is no lie so great that the mainstream media will not propagate it as truth.
Entrapped within this matrix of simply enormous lies, it is difficult to imagine a way out for ourselves.
But there is more at work in heaven and earth than the mere minds of men.
One can understand why the powers-that-be allow revolutionary background noise on the internet. They have been fighting their war for a long time and they obviously believe that they have already won it.
Either that or they are afraid that if they stop people writing their articles, large numbers will take to the streets and become much more dangerous to their project.
JOHN KAMINSKY
There is a writer called John Kaminsky who has been focusing his attention on organised Jewry or, as he is more inclined to call them, 'The Jews' for many years. A person (a friend) I know in the 'alternative' media has called him a Zionist agent because his verbal accusations and attacks against Jews have been so intense and because Kaminsky often fails to distinguish between 'Zionists' and 'ordinary Jews'.
It is well-known that 'anti-Semitism' is the Rabbis' greatest ally. They teach their people that this 'anti-semitism' is an irrational hatred that goyim have for all Jews. By such lies, and by the corrupting power exercised by their moneyed Zionist allies, they control their flock and induct them deeper into their unholy project.
I believe that Kaminsky is not only genuine but that he is right (the friend is genuine too, but we all make mistakes....here's hoping I'm right this time....I do think so).
'ORGANISED JEWRY' AT WAR WITH THE WORLD
The Jews (or, as one should perhaps put it) 'organised Jewry' are the primary entity at war with the mass of decent humanity.
Jews are at they very core of the FINANCIAL OLIGARCHY. There are Jewish names on all the banks.
The BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT has interbred with Jewish bankers over the generations. The Royal family is Jewish. Maybe the British Empire was, at its heart, a Jewish project?
Though there are all races involved, near to and supporting the top of the power pyramid, the dominant group within this power matrix is surely Jewish. Jews similarly dominated SOVIET COMMUNISM. Although only 50% of the leadership, their greater coherence and co-operation made them the dominant Soviet faction for most of the life of the Soviet state.
LOOK AROUND YOU
Jews dominate every observable area of public life.
They dominate POLITICS to the point where one might say that they OWN our governments. 80% of Conservative MP's are Friends of Israel. British Prime Ministers' seem to move around shadowed by some Jewish money-bags or other. The current Prime Minister's personal fortune is founded on the drug-running activities of his Jewish great grandfather, who was such a nice man he founded his own bank.
In the USA the situation appears to be, if anything, worse.
'Nuff said.
Jews dominate BUSINESS. The big banks are Jewish. The big food stores, Tesco, Sainsbury's, Marks and Spencer's are Jewish. Billionaire Philip Green dominates the clothing industry and more.
In SPORT there's Formula One motor racing (Bernie Ecclestone), Premier League football (Roman Abramovich, the Glazers etc., etc..)
The MEDIA and PUBLISHING are dominated by Jews.
The MUSIC INDUSTRY is run by Jews.
HOLLYWOOD is entirely dominated by Jews.
The EDUCATION SYSTEM is controlled by government policies generated within think-tanks funded by banking/corporate finance. So who controls that?
Kaminsky is right. There is a 'destabilisation template' at work. It's principles have been written down by various groups over the centuries from the so-called Illuminati (and before), The Protocols of Zion to the subtle developments now being implement along the lines recommended in the writings of the 'Frankfurt School' psychologists.
The influence of the Jews is UNIVERSAL and OVERWHELMINGLY DOMINEERING.
Even the CATHOLIC CHURCH is now a department of Jewry.
I was raised a Catholic and although I might now reject its authority, the Church did spend a great deal of time educating me in the sayings, teachings and about the example of Jesus Christ. Today, it seems to me, the Catholic Church has ditched Jesus in favour of Orthodox Rabbis. (i.e. the inheritors and current practitioners of the religion of Pharisees).
The Pharisees, in case you didn't know, convinced the Romans that they had to crucify Christ.
The Pharisees have been absolved of guilt for this crime by the current Pope. So Orthodox Jews continue in their foul faith while so-called Christians abandon theirs.
Enough is enough.
We must call a spade a spade.
IT IS ALL ABOUT THE JEWS.
The Frankfurt School psychologists promoted the ideas of anti-racist offenses and mass immigration in order to destroy racial cohesion in our societies. How successful these Jewish social engineers have been. And while we were abandoning and making an unforgivable crime of racism, the Jews have been been practicing it intensively, relentlessly, most determinedly.....as no other race ever has...to the point where they either own or control almost everything.
They have destroyed our ability to defend ourselves in order to achieve their own racist ends.
For us anti-racism has become a moral imperative.
For them it is a way of destroying the opposition.
A quote from the Koran comes to mind here: " God judges a man not by his actions but by his intention."
The wickedness and nerve of these people takes ones breath away.
We must go to the Jews in a spirit of love, as Christ did, and tell them that they are being misled.
WE TOO, OF COURSE, ARE BEING MISLED....BUT JEWS AT THE TOP ARE THE VANGUARD OF THE DECEIVERS.
We must tell them that their leadership (who they have made ours) are, as Christ said, "of Satan".
We must do no violence against them, though I believe their leaders would happily murder us all( Well, that's what they say anyway).
WE MUST EXPOSE THE GREAT LIES THAT EMPOWER THEM.
LIE/FRAUD NUMBER ONE:
The root of their power over us is the guilt we have been conditioned to feel over 'The Holocaust'.
This story is a huge over-inflated LIE.
There were no homicidal gas-chambers. NONE. There were hygenic gas chambers for delousing clothes of the workers (i.e. to keep them healthy). Anyone who spends the time to research this issue will discover for themselves that there is no end to the lies behind this great hoax (that was not launched in earnest until about 1970)
LIE/FRAUD NUMBER TWO:
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB .
Completely provably.
It is also clear that 9/11 was primarily as Israeli project.
LIE/FRAUD NUMBER THREE:
7/7 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.
Less obviously than 9/11, but an inside job nonetheless.
LIE/FRAUD NUMBER FOUR:
The MONEY-CREATION SCAM.
This is the engine that underpins all their power. It has got to be swept away.
BY US.
NOT BY THEM, AS THEY INSTALL SOME NEW SEEMINGLY ATTRACTIVE SYSTEM THAT WILL BIND US EVER-MORE-TIGHTLY UNDER THEIR HEARTLESS YOKE.
There are many more big lie/scams but that will do for a start.
ALSO PRAY
Christ IS the spirit of God in man.
Christ loves all men and women. HE loves those that reject HIM as truly as those that love HIM. HIS spirit is the Father's and God can only love.
Christ came to save the Jews and all men through them. Those Jews that accepted him founded Christianity and gave us the basis of western culture.
Those that rejected him remain lost and damage not only themselves but all who fall under their influence.
GOD made us free. It is we who must choose to change as God cannot make us.
Those who reject HIM would do well to remember that in the eternal world and in this (for Christ is alive today), Lucifer is crushed.
and GOD WINS.
So we must take care and be very slow to think ourselves wise.
However, we have heard the word of the prophets.
The Jews WILL accept Christ.
(.....and better sooner than later)
.
I have nothing original to say on the subject of our seemingly hopeless oppression.......but how dire the situation sometimes appears?
There is no lie so great that the mainstream media will not propagate it as truth.
Entrapped within this matrix of simply enormous lies, it is difficult to imagine a way out for ourselves.
But there is more at work in heaven and earth than the mere minds of men.
One can understand why the powers-that-be allow revolutionary background noise on the internet. They have been fighting their war for a long time and they obviously believe that they have already won it.
Either that or they are afraid that if they stop people writing their articles, large numbers will take to the streets and become much more dangerous to their project.
JOHN KAMINSKY
There is a writer called John Kaminsky who has been focusing his attention on organised Jewry or, as he is more inclined to call them, 'The Jews' for many years. A person (a friend) I know in the 'alternative' media has called him a Zionist agent because his verbal accusations and attacks against Jews have been so intense and because Kaminsky often fails to distinguish between 'Zionists' and 'ordinary Jews'.
It is well-known that 'anti-Semitism' is the Rabbis' greatest ally. They teach their people that this 'anti-semitism' is an irrational hatred that goyim have for all Jews. By such lies, and by the corrupting power exercised by their moneyed Zionist allies, they control their flock and induct them deeper into their unholy project.
I believe that Kaminsky is not only genuine but that he is right (the friend is genuine too, but we all make mistakes....here's hoping I'm right this time....I do think so).
'ORGANISED JEWRY' AT WAR WITH THE WORLD
The Jews (or, as one should perhaps put it) 'organised Jewry' are the primary entity at war with the mass of decent humanity.
Jews are at they very core of the FINANCIAL OLIGARCHY. There are Jewish names on all the banks.
The BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT has interbred with Jewish bankers over the generations. The Royal family is Jewish. Maybe the British Empire was, at its heart, a Jewish project?
Though there are all races involved, near to and supporting the top of the power pyramid, the dominant group within this power matrix is surely Jewish. Jews similarly dominated SOVIET COMMUNISM. Although only 50% of the leadership, their greater coherence and co-operation made them the dominant Soviet faction for most of the life of the Soviet state.
LOOK AROUND YOU
Jews dominate every observable area of public life.
They dominate POLITICS to the point where one might say that they OWN our governments. 80% of Conservative MP's are Friends of Israel. British Prime Ministers' seem to move around shadowed by some Jewish money-bags or other. The current Prime Minister's personal fortune is founded on the drug-running activities of his Jewish great grandfather, who was such a nice man he founded his own bank.
In the USA the situation appears to be, if anything, worse.
'Nuff said.
Jews dominate BUSINESS. The big banks are Jewish. The big food stores, Tesco, Sainsbury's, Marks and Spencer's are Jewish. Billionaire Philip Green dominates the clothing industry and more.
In SPORT there's Formula One motor racing (Bernie Ecclestone), Premier League football (Roman Abramovich, the Glazers etc., etc..)
The MEDIA and PUBLISHING are dominated by Jews.
The MUSIC INDUSTRY is run by Jews.
HOLLYWOOD is entirely dominated by Jews.
The EDUCATION SYSTEM is controlled by government policies generated within think-tanks funded by banking/corporate finance. So who controls that?
Kaminsky is right. There is a 'destabilisation template' at work. It's principles have been written down by various groups over the centuries from the so-called Illuminati (and before), The Protocols of Zion to the subtle developments now being implement along the lines recommended in the writings of the 'Frankfurt School' psychologists.
The influence of the Jews is UNIVERSAL and OVERWHELMINGLY DOMINEERING.
Even the CATHOLIC CHURCH is now a department of Jewry.
I was raised a Catholic and although I might now reject its authority, the Church did spend a great deal of time educating me in the sayings, teachings and about the example of Jesus Christ. Today, it seems to me, the Catholic Church has ditched Jesus in favour of Orthodox Rabbis. (i.e. the inheritors and current practitioners of the religion of Pharisees).
The Pharisees, in case you didn't know, convinced the Romans that they had to crucify Christ.
The Pharisees have been absolved of guilt for this crime by the current Pope. So Orthodox Jews continue in their foul faith while so-called Christians abandon theirs.
Enough is enough.
We must call a spade a spade.
IT IS ALL ABOUT THE JEWS.
The Frankfurt School psychologists promoted the ideas of anti-racist offenses and mass immigration in order to destroy racial cohesion in our societies. How successful these Jewish social engineers have been. And while we were abandoning and making an unforgivable crime of racism, the Jews have been been practicing it intensively, relentlessly, most determinedly.....as no other race ever has...to the point where they either own or control almost everything.
They have destroyed our ability to defend ourselves in order to achieve their own racist ends.
For us anti-racism has become a moral imperative.
For them it is a way of destroying the opposition.
A quote from the Koran comes to mind here: " God judges a man not by his actions but by his intention."
The wickedness and nerve of these people takes ones breath away.
We must go to the Jews in a spirit of love, as Christ did, and tell them that they are being misled.
WE TOO, OF COURSE, ARE BEING MISLED....BUT JEWS AT THE TOP ARE THE VANGUARD OF THE DECEIVERS.
We must tell them that their leadership (who they have made ours) are, as Christ said, "of Satan".
We must do no violence against them, though I believe their leaders would happily murder us all( Well, that's what they say anyway).
WE MUST EXPOSE THE GREAT LIES THAT EMPOWER THEM.
LIE/FRAUD NUMBER ONE:
The root of their power over us is the guilt we have been conditioned to feel over 'The Holocaust'.
This story is a huge over-inflated LIE.
There were no homicidal gas-chambers. NONE. There were hygenic gas chambers for delousing clothes of the workers (i.e. to keep them healthy). Anyone who spends the time to research this issue will discover for themselves that there is no end to the lies behind this great hoax (that was not launched in earnest until about 1970)
LIE/FRAUD NUMBER TWO:
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB .
Completely provably.
It is also clear that 9/11 was primarily as Israeli project.
LIE/FRAUD NUMBER THREE:
7/7 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.
Less obviously than 9/11, but an inside job nonetheless.
LIE/FRAUD NUMBER FOUR:
The MONEY-CREATION SCAM.
This is the engine that underpins all their power. It has got to be swept away.
BY US.
NOT BY THEM, AS THEY INSTALL SOME NEW SEEMINGLY ATTRACTIVE SYSTEM THAT WILL BIND US EVER-MORE-TIGHTLY UNDER THEIR HEARTLESS YOKE.
There are many more big lie/scams but that will do for a start.
ALSO PRAY
Christ IS the spirit of God in man.
Christ loves all men and women. HE loves those that reject HIM as truly as those that love HIM. HIS spirit is the Father's and God can only love.
Christ came to save the Jews and all men through them. Those Jews that accepted him founded Christianity and gave us the basis of western culture.
Those that rejected him remain lost and damage not only themselves but all who fall under their influence.
GOD made us free. It is we who must choose to change as God cannot make us.
Those who reject HIM would do well to remember that in the eternal world and in this (for Christ is alive today), Lucifer is crushed.
and GOD WINS.
So we must take care and be very slow to think ourselves wise.
However, we have heard the word of the prophets.
The Jews WILL accept Christ.
(.....and better sooner than later)
.
Tuesday, 24 May 2011
Forensic Evidence About the "Holocaust"
.
Title of film: The Forensic Evidence About the "Holocaust" That Almost Every Jew is Too Afraid to Look At
Why do Jews need us all to believe the very worst about Hitler and the Germans?
Is this great lie the rock upon which Jewish economic and political global hegemony is founded?
If the truth of this matter is neither here nor there to our political representatives, then whose interests do Members of Parliament really represent?
Our 'democratic' system can ONLY be a total farce.
.
Title of film: The Forensic Evidence About the "Holocaust" That Almost Every Jew is Too Afraid to Look At
Why do Jews need us all to believe the very worst about Hitler and the Germans?
Is this great lie the rock upon which Jewish economic and political global hegemony is founded?
If the truth of this matter is neither here nor there to our political representatives, then whose interests do Members of Parliament really represent?
Our 'democratic' system can ONLY be a total farce.
.
Jose Arguelles -The Mayan Calendar and The Thelepatic Field in 2013
.
This is interesting. I've never seen anything like it:
.
This is interesting. I've never seen anything like it:
.
Tuesday, 17 May 2011
Ireland Royal Visit: Peace or Reoccupation?
.
Superficially the visit of Queen Elizabeth to Ireland is a cause for celebration an all sides. It seems that irreversible peace has broken out between Ireland and its ancient enemy across the water.
This can only be good.
We can all celebrate the fact that IRA bombs no longer blow up English city centres.
However, if this is marking the breakout of peace why has this visit taken so long. The Good Friday Agreement was signed in 1998, after all.
The last Royal visit, by George V, was in 1911 when Ireland was just another possession of 'The Crown'. Owners do, after all, like to take a look at their goods every now and again and, in the case of colonies, remind them who's in charge.
We should, perhaps, remember that Her Majesty is a figurehead for a rather nebulous organisation that is called 'The Crown'.
But who are 'The Crown'?
Some say that 'The Crown' is the allegorical symbol and name for the familiar international financial oligarchy whose base is in the City of London. If this is the case, then the IMF is a mere instrument of this 'Crown'.
The same IMF that now have taken control of the Irish economy.
Is Elizabeth's visit a marking of a new occupation of Ireland by 'The Crown'? This time not by force of arms but by the instrument of debt?
The old slavery was enforced at the point of a gun.
Techniques have become more sophisticated. The very same entity can now extract the same servitude and more, without using a single bullet.
But make no mistake.
DEBT IS SLAVERY.
The parasite is back in full control.
There is another interesting aspect to this that is worth a mention.
Henry Makow, a Jewish writer, says that "The Jewish Conspiracy" is British Imperialism.
We might wonder why all the Royal Males get circumcised, as openly acknowledged by this Rabbi (and Mohel) and does this not support the claim we do not read about in the papers, that The Royals regard themselves as Merovingian Jews?.
.
Superficially the visit of Queen Elizabeth to Ireland is a cause for celebration an all sides. It seems that irreversible peace has broken out between Ireland and its ancient enemy across the water.
This can only be good.
We can all celebrate the fact that IRA bombs no longer blow up English city centres.
However, if this is marking the breakout of peace why has this visit taken so long. The Good Friday Agreement was signed in 1998, after all.
The last Royal visit, by George V, was in 1911 when Ireland was just another possession of 'The Crown'. Owners do, after all, like to take a look at their goods every now and again and, in the case of colonies, remind them who's in charge.
We should, perhaps, remember that Her Majesty is a figurehead for a rather nebulous organisation that is called 'The Crown'.
But who are 'The Crown'?
Some say that 'The Crown' is the allegorical symbol and name for the familiar international financial oligarchy whose base is in the City of London. If this is the case, then the IMF is a mere instrument of this 'Crown'.
The same IMF that now have taken control of the Irish economy.
Is Elizabeth's visit a marking of a new occupation of Ireland by 'The Crown'? This time not by force of arms but by the instrument of debt?
The old slavery was enforced at the point of a gun.
Techniques have become more sophisticated. The very same entity can now extract the same servitude and more, without using a single bullet.
But make no mistake.
DEBT IS SLAVERY.
The parasite is back in full control.
There is another interesting aspect to this that is worth a mention.
Henry Makow, a Jewish writer, says that "The Jewish Conspiracy" is British Imperialism.
We might wonder why all the Royal Males get circumcised, as openly acknowledged by this Rabbi (and Mohel) and does this not support the claim we do not read about in the papers, that The Royals regard themselves as Merovingian Jews?.
.
Veterans Today False Flag Warning
.
BREAKING! Netanyahu Now in USA for False Flag ASAP!
We expect another False Flag incident sometime soon.
After Bin Laden's execution what else can we expect.
Here's hoping as many as possible are paying close attention. A visit from the 9/11/7/7 angel of death is something to take seriously.
READ HERE.
Towards the end of the article there is a discussion about the possibility of a f-flag attack being an eco-attack such as an earthquake. It is easy to imagine that such a possibility is fictional but listen to this Russian politician threaten Georgia:
"We have new weapons that nobody knows anything about yet....with these weapons we will destroy any part of the planet within 15 minutes...no explosions, no rays, no laser, not lightening, it's a calm and quiet weapon with which whole continents will be put to sleep forever...."....and the threats get heavier....
Just the kind of guy we want running the planet. We know the Americans have HAARP. Does Russia have something similar or is this fellow just trying to pretend so?
BREAKING! Netanyahu Now in USA for False Flag ASAP!
We expect another False Flag incident sometime soon.
After Bin Laden's execution what else can we expect.
Here's hoping as many as possible are paying close attention. A visit from the 9/11/7/7 angel of death is something to take seriously.
READ HERE.
Towards the end of the article there is a discussion about the possibility of a f-flag attack being an eco-attack such as an earthquake. It is easy to imagine that such a possibility is fictional but listen to this Russian politician threaten Georgia:
"We have new weapons that nobody knows anything about yet....with these weapons we will destroy any part of the planet within 15 minutes...no explosions, no rays, no laser, not lightening, it's a calm and quiet weapon with which whole continents will be put to sleep forever...."....and the threats get heavier....
Just the kind of guy we want running the planet. We know the Americans have HAARP. Does Russia have something similar or is this fellow just trying to pretend so?
Sunday, 15 May 2011
THE BBC's WAR ON TRUTH
.
This morning 'The Big Questions' went out on BBC1, as usual, but addressed a single question (rather than the usual three). This was:
'Does Britain Have A Problem With Muslims?'
The studio was filled with perhaps two-thirds Muslims.
A survey, The Pew Global Attitudes Report, carried out in 2006, found that more than half of the British Muslims, 56%, believed Arabs were not responsible for the 9/11 terror strikes. In some parts of the UK that majority is much higher. Try home of 'the 7/7 bombers' Beeston, in Leeds, for example.
Anyone who mixes with ordinary Muslims knows that a majority of them believe that the 'War on Terror' is a hoax, that 9/11 was an 'inside job' and that 7/7 was not carried out by four suicide bombers but by forces acting on behalf of the secret state in order to provide yet a further pretext for foreign aggression and domestic suppression.
However, in this debate not a single Muslim voice represented the opinions of this VERY LARGE part of their community.
On the contrary, the only mention of 9/11 and 7/7 was made by a Jewish contributor, one Davis Lewin of 'The Henry Jackson Society' (his special subject seems to be 'Homeland Security').
Lewin (at about 50 minutes) accused a Muslim panelist of 'working with' someone "who said (shock, horror) that 7/7 and 9/11 might not have been done by Muslims." The absence of any challenge to this man's short speech communicated to the BBC audience that such an idea really is beyond the pale......utterly outrageous. (Lewin went on, at the end of the show, to condemn a panel member "during Israel's war with Hamas" for suggesting it might inflame Muslims....."war with Hamas?!!")
Job done.
The woman accused busied herself in a mode of defensive apology. The next Muslim speaker, Saleem Chagtai, another funded-by-God-knows-who think-tanker, was asked directly and forcefully by Nicky Campbell, regarding 7/7.... ."Why did they do it?"
Chagtai did not raise the possibility that these men might be innocent. Their guilt was accepted as a statement of fact. He wittered on about Iraq and Al Queda. He might as well have been Lady Justice Hallett.
In fact 9/11, absolutely provably by simple physics, and 7/7 were both false flag events.
Last week a London jury almost unanimously delivered a verdict in favour of a man who asserts exactly this version of events in the excellent film that got him arrested and charged.
So here, in the most civilised and well-mannered arena imaginable, we witness two great betrayals.
Firstly, hand-picked Muslims failing to defend the lives of their own people by failing to present any of the copious evidence that would prove Muslim innocence regarding these foul crimes.
Secondly by the perfidious BBC, executing exactly the same betrayal against the British people.
In the decade to come these people will stand condemned not by the fact that they propagated the lies that were fed to them by their superiors, but by the fact that THEY FAILED TO EVEN RAISE (NEVER MIND DEMAND ANSWERS TO) QUESTIONS ABOUT EVIDENCE, FREELY AVAILABLE TO ALL, THAT BLOWS BOTH OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORIES RIGHT OUT OF THE WATER
So, another Sunday, another job well done by our satanic engineers of consciousness.
There are now millions across the world that know the truth. In the USA, and the UK too, millions have seen the evidence.
The real architects of terror might imagine they can manage some kind of coming dollar collapse/terrorist crisis in a way that will ensure a final victory for the financial oligarchy that presently pulls our strings.
If I worked for the BBC I wouldn't count on it, I'd start thinking about how my participation in the BBC's War on Truth is going to play out for me personally and for everyone I love.
Keeping my job (and my fingers crossed), while failing in my primary duty, just would not do.
"Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don’t mean to do harm – but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves."
T.S. Eliot
.
This morning 'The Big Questions' went out on BBC1, as usual, but addressed a single question (rather than the usual three). This was:
'Does Britain Have A Problem With Muslims?'
The studio was filled with perhaps two-thirds Muslims.
A survey, The Pew Global Attitudes Report, carried out in 2006, found that more than half of the British Muslims, 56%, believed Arabs were not responsible for the 9/11 terror strikes. In some parts of the UK that majority is much higher. Try home of 'the 7/7 bombers' Beeston, in Leeds, for example.
Anyone who mixes with ordinary Muslims knows that a majority of them believe that the 'War on Terror' is a hoax, that 9/11 was an 'inside job' and that 7/7 was not carried out by four suicide bombers but by forces acting on behalf of the secret state in order to provide yet a further pretext for foreign aggression and domestic suppression.
However, in this debate not a single Muslim voice represented the opinions of this VERY LARGE part of their community.
On the contrary, the only mention of 9/11 and 7/7 was made by a Jewish contributor, one Davis Lewin of 'The Henry Jackson Society' (his special subject seems to be 'Homeland Security').
Lewin (at about 50 minutes) accused a Muslim panelist of 'working with' someone "who said (shock, horror) that 7/7 and 9/11 might not have been done by Muslims." The absence of any challenge to this man's short speech communicated to the BBC audience that such an idea really is beyond the pale......utterly outrageous. (Lewin went on, at the end of the show, to condemn a panel member "during Israel's war with Hamas" for suggesting it might inflame Muslims....."war with Hamas?!!")
Job done.
The woman accused busied herself in a mode of defensive apology. The next Muslim speaker, Saleem Chagtai, another funded-by-God-knows-who think-tanker, was asked directly and forcefully by Nicky Campbell, regarding 7/7.... ."Why did they do it?"
Chagtai did not raise the possibility that these men might be innocent. Their guilt was accepted as a statement of fact. He wittered on about Iraq and Al Queda. He might as well have been Lady Justice Hallett.
In fact 9/11, absolutely provably by simple physics, and 7/7 were both false flag events.
Last week a London jury almost unanimously delivered a verdict in favour of a man who asserts exactly this version of events in the excellent film that got him arrested and charged.
So here, in the most civilised and well-mannered arena imaginable, we witness two great betrayals.
Firstly, hand-picked Muslims failing to defend the lives of their own people by failing to present any of the copious evidence that would prove Muslim innocence regarding these foul crimes.
Secondly by the perfidious BBC, executing exactly the same betrayal against the British people.
In the decade to come these people will stand condemned not by the fact that they propagated the lies that were fed to them by their superiors, but by the fact that THEY FAILED TO EVEN RAISE (NEVER MIND DEMAND ANSWERS TO) QUESTIONS ABOUT EVIDENCE, FREELY AVAILABLE TO ALL, THAT BLOWS BOTH OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORIES RIGHT OUT OF THE WATER
So, another Sunday, another job well done by our satanic engineers of consciousness.
There are now millions across the world that know the truth. In the USA, and the UK too, millions have seen the evidence.
The real architects of terror might imagine they can manage some kind of coming dollar collapse/terrorist crisis in a way that will ensure a final victory for the financial oligarchy that presently pulls our strings.
If I worked for the BBC I wouldn't count on it, I'd start thinking about how my participation in the BBC's War on Truth is going to play out for me personally and for everyone I love.
Keeping my job (and my fingers crossed), while failing in my primary duty, just would not do.
"Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don’t mean to do harm – but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves."
T.S. Eliot
.
Tuesday, 10 May 2011
Friday, 6 May 2011
(Mistaken...See comments) Apology to Bridget Dunne of J7
I put put up a post some months ago calling 'J7' "controlled opposition".
I apologise to Bridget (whom I have never met) for this comment, my own angry judgement mostly based on J7's extreme hostility to 7/7 activists Nick Kollerstrom and Muad'Dib, both individuals I still respect and admire..
J7's commentary on Justice Hallet's Inquest Report is spot on.
Let me also acknowledge that Bridget Dunne has done more than anybody in collecting, archiving and analysing evidence, other records and anomalies emerging from the massive volume of material generated by the events of 7/7.
Sorry again.
KB
I apologise to Bridget (whom I have never met) for this comment, my own angry judgement mostly based on J7's extreme hostility to 7/7 activists Nick Kollerstrom and Muad'Dib, both individuals I still respect and admire..
J7's commentary on Justice Hallet's Inquest Report is spot on.
Let me also acknowledge that Bridget Dunne has done more than anybody in collecting, archiving and analysing evidence, other records and anomalies emerging from the massive volume of material generated by the events of 7/7.
Sorry again.
KB
Britain's 9-11 Cover Up: WHAT WILL BECOME OF US?
.
What will become of a people too mentally lazy and stupidly trusting to take an interest in their own survival?
Yesterday Mike Adams published an excellent article titled 'The Gullible Mind Explained'. It could have been describing the wall of uncritical and lazy reporting now hitting the airwaves regarding Lady Justice Hallett's report on the recent 7/7 Inquest.
The content of this report was easily predictable. Simply inevitable.
There are two competing narratives to explain this crime:
1) The official story of four suicide bombers murdering 52 people and injuring hundreds by exploding four bombs on three tube trains and one bus on the morning of 7/7.
2) Forces embedded within the establishment carried out a false-flag attack against the British people. As with nearly all false-flag events, patsies were set up to take the blame for the crime. The four Muslims were completely innocent actors paid to participate in a concurrent anti-terror 'drill'.
As you will have guessed, I am one of the many who subscribe to conspiracy theory number two.
HERE'S WHY
After 9/11 the murderous confabulation that is modern history soared and raged all around us under guise of a ‘War on Terror’, providing the necessary pretext for just about anything the western military-industrial complex felt like doing. However, in the UK we (or should I say the Labour government) had a serious problem. Although Blair and his army of stooges signed up to every invasion and participated loyally in every occupation, the one thing our ‘War on Terror’ was short on was…..the terror. It appeared that British Muslims, peeved though they undoubtedly were at watching their co-religionists being slaughtered by the million in Iraq, just wouldn’t turn their energies toward blowing up their fellow Englishmen. The ‘War on Terror’ was happening somewhere else.
The fact that on 7/7/05 four (or more) explosions killed fifty-two innocent people making their way to work on a Thursday morning changed all that.
Nonetheless the story, universally accepted by the British media (if not across the country), that four Islamic-terrorist suicide-bombers murdered them remains an unproven and (as I will attempt to explain) highly unlikely conspiracy theory.
Firstly it needs to be noted that the refusal of both the Labour and the new Tory/Liberal alliance to hold a public Inquiry into the events of 7/7 should ring a very loud alarm bell for every British citizen. This was the largest mass-murder ever on British soil. One might have expected the promoters of the 'War on Terror' to use a Public Inquiry to cash in on an incident that would make and massively boost their case.
In a court of law physical evidence always trumps excuses, allegations, observations or any other kind of verbal contribution to a case, so one should perhaps begin here.
Three Holes in the Floor of the Edgeware Road Carriage
Evidence was given by different witnesses, including the train driver (a Mr Whitehead), that clearly describe three separate holes in the Edgeware Road carriage. People fell into all three holes. Two emerged from the holes . One died in the third hole. The original report on the Edgeware Road explosion (from mark Honigsbaum of the Guardian who was on the train) had the train lifting off the tracks and being derailed (i.e. bomb(s) underneath the train). The driver described all the access panels in the floor of the first coach (the bomb(s) killed people in the second carriage) being 'flipped open' from underneath.
In what way is any of this compatible with a single suicide 'suicide bomber' with a rucksack full of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide?
The Explosives
Here is a timeline for the 7/7 explosives narrative as it developed:
The first analysis came from a genuine expert. This is surely the most reliable commentary on the nature of the bombs that went off that morning. The problem is that it would have been all-but-impossible for four young men from Leeds to get their hands on such materials.
On 12 July 2005, Superintendent Christophe Chaboud, chief of French anti-terrorism Coordination Unit who was in London assisting Scotland Yard with its investigation, confirmed to The Times that,‘The nature of the explosives appears to be military, which is very worrying….the material used were not homemade but sophisticated military explosives …’ (Nafeez Ahmed The London Bombs, p.24)
On 13th July it was stated that these were of ‘C4’ explosive....London explosives have military origin – [Science Daily. LONDON, July 13 (UPI)]: Forensic scientists told the newspaper the construction of the four devices detonated in London was very technically advanced, and unlike any instructions that can be found on the Internet.’
From The Independent on July 14th: ‘A bath filled with explosives has been found at a house in Leeds that was the “operational base” for the London suicide bombers
17th July 2005 The Observer: ‘22 lbs TATP in the bath.’
The TATP story survived but faded away in 2007 then, when the 7/7 Kingston trial came along in the summer of 2008 all trace of the TATP story had gone.
Now the explosives were made of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide. The idea of the four heating up Hydrogen Peroxide in their kitchen to the point where it would make an explosive mix with black pepper is simply laughable. How could they test that their ‘bombs’ were going to go off. Were they going to go lurching across the country with this kind of bomb sloshing about in their rucksacks. Has anybody ever made a bomb out of this mixture? If such a bomb did explode could it possibly have caused the devastation created on 7/7?
There is much written online that mocks these materials as potential tools of mass destruction. Do we not require a Public Inquiry on this issue alone. The changing storyline above surely makes no sense at all.
Why Suicide?
Moving on to another very obvious question: why would terrorists who wished to wreak havoc and punish British people for the UK’s involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan choose to blow themselves up along with their victims? These were very crowded trains. They could have set a timed detonator and quietly slipped off the trains a stop or two early, leaving their bags on the floor amongst the feet of dozens of incurious passengers. Where would have been the risk in that? Surely such activists would better serve their cause by continuing and not terminating their mission?
Drills
There were four uncannily accurate drills carried out before the 7/7 bombings:
1) The BBC Panorama ‘management exercise’ programme of May 2004 during which a panel of ‘managers’, including Peter Power (see below) and Michael Portillo, discussed how they would deal with a terror attack on London that revealed itself to them through mock news reports as the show progressed. The scenario they had to deal with turned out to be one overground and 3 underground explosions taking place over a short space of time during the morning rush hour.
2) The contemporaneous 7/7 drill: on 7/7 itself Peter Power conducted a terror drill that shadowed the cataclysm as it happened – over the same three tube stations at more or less the same time. On the afternoon of 7/7 he was interviewed on Radio 5’s ‘Drivetime’ programme:
POWER: …at half-past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for, er, over, a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing upright!
3) Atlantic Blue: held over 5-8 April, 2005. All echelons of government participated in this large terror-drill. The Independent reported after July 7th that “By an extraordinary coincidence, all the experts who formulate such plans are together in a meeting at the headquarters of the London Ambulance Service – and they are discussing an exercise they ran three months ago that involved simulating four terrorist bombs going off at once across London.”
4) Operation Hanover: London’s police hold a little-known yearly terror-drill. On 2005 it just happened to be held on 1-2 July. Its game-plan was threefold: three ‘simultaneous’ bomb attacks on three underground stations. The police have been reticent about discussing this astounding precursor event, mere days before 7/7. They only revealed it in 2009.
Why No Post-Mortems?
Another astonishing fact that emerged during the 2010-11 7/7 Inquest was that no post mortems were carried out on the bodies of the victims. A very great deal about the nature of and distance from the explosions could have been discovered from such examinations. The effects of different explosives on flesh are well-known. Such post-mortems would have provided some definitive information that would have at least ruled out some possible explosives from consideration as the source material of the blasts. What could possibly explain such an oversight other than the desire to avoid creating conflicts with a fabricated narrative.
Body Count reveals no Bombers
The First Official Body Count on Two of the Trains was One Body Short
At the 7/7/ Inquest in November 2010 Dr. Morgan Costello gave evidence that he was asked to attend two scenes, Edgware Road and Aldgate, for the 'purposes of certifying the extinction of life'. He counted six bodies at Edgware Road and seven bodies at Aldgate and declared these as 'life extinct'. The enormous anomaly, that passed completely unreported in the press, was that the numbers should have been seven and eight if we count the bodies of the bombers. Here is surely the clearest possible evidence that the alleged bombers were never on the trains. No similar count seems to have been carried out on the other (Russell Square ) train but we do know a little about the behaviour of the Russell Square bomber, Germaine Lindsay, before his demise.
Germaine Lindsay, cool and then confused
Germaine Lindsay drove from Aylesbury to meet the other (let’s call them) bombers in Luton railway station. He arrived an hour before them and decided to take a little nap. He received a parking ticket while asleep in his car. Were he a terrorist he obviously would have known that he would have had only four hours left to live.
Germaine Lindsay was one extraordinarily relaxed suicide-bomber.
A station attendant called Mr. Patel gave testimony to the Inquest that a man he identified as Germaine Lindsay arrived on the concourse of King’s Cross station and asked to talk to “The Duty Manager”. He said it was, “Very important.” Mr Patel remarked that it was very unusual for a member of the public to know the exact name for the person in charge of the station. Normally people asked for ‘the supervisor’ or ‘the manager’. At this time there was chaos on the concourse. The metal grills had been pulled down and shut at the front of the station. Passengers were not being allowed through the barriers. A crowd had built up and people were starting to abuse staff. Numbers of ‘Community Support Officers’ who looked like police were milling around the area trying to manage the situation. No wonder Lindsay was confused. He must have decided to try to speak to someone who ‘was in on the game’ to explain to him what was going on. The most obvious explanation of his behaviour is that it would have puzzled and alarmed him that the drill had started before he, ‘the bomber’, had caught their trains. Perhaps a chilling possibility occurred to him. When Mr. Patel returned with the duty manager Lindsay had gone.
And More
There are many, many other serious anomalies in the official narrative.
The train times presented huge problems for the official narrative causing the Home Secretary to change the story after it was realised that the 7.40 they were said to have caught had been cancelled. Then the next train arrived 23 minutes late at King’s Cross giving the bombers only three minutes to buy four RETURN tickets (think about that one), cross the track by bridge and board the last possible train that makes it just feasible they could have reached the bombed trains in time.
On the 5th July 2005, Mohammed Siddique Khan took his pregnant wife to Dewsbury Hospital in West Yorkshire. She was bleeding and there was obviously something wrong. Doctors examined Hasina Patel and said that there was a ‘threatened miscarriage’. They sent her home and booked her in for a scan on the 7th. Mrs Patel has never told the time they got home but afterwards Mohammed Khan said that he was ‘going to see his friends’. Hasina Patel never saw or heard from her husband ever again. She miscarried on July 6th . At the 7/7 Inquest there was ‘evidence’ (peculiar and surely untrustworthy) presented of a mobile phone text-message exchange between Khan and Germaine Lindsay at 4.35am on the morning of the 6th July. Would Khan really have abandoned his desperate wife for a whole day while she was in that condition? Khan was a highly respected in his community and by the headmistress of the special school in which he worked as a classroom assistant. The police had used him to mediate between rival gangs in local disputes. He was trusted by all sides. Hilary Benn had taken Khan on a tour of the House of Commons. He was not known to be politically radical. Quite the opposite. He was protective of the good name of his community and was eager to maintain good relations with the local white community. Bearing this in mind it is likely that the reason the police have film of Khan is that he was helping them ‘keep an eye on’ any worrisome Muslim elements in his locality. He was not a troublemaker, he was a healer and a fixer.
The most likely explanation for Khan’s disappearance on the 6th is that he told his minder for the 7/7 exercise that he was not going to be able to make it. . He would have been told to see that the others could make it without him. The bombings were not going to be called off but……now he had presented his minders with a problem that had only one possible solution. His goose was cooked.
This would also explain why the attendant at the filling station where Tanweer filled his car (and argued about the change he was given) said he only saw one other person in Tanweer’s car. Hasib Hussain alone (the bus-bomber) was in the car and, unknown to the pair of them, Khan was by now already dead. This would also explain why the now-suppressed BBC radio 5 news reports from the late morning of the seventh said that two men had been shot in Canary Wharf (rather than three, the supposed train bombers. Hussain had been separated from the others).
Those who have travelled to Beeston and spoken to locals report that, like Khan, Hussain and Tanweer had shown no inclination in their communities towards political or religious radicalism.
The Evidence against ‘The Four’
Looking at the detail of latest narrative laid out before the 7/7 Inquest, it must be admitted that it is now just physically possible that the four caught the last possible train at Luton and rushed from King’s Cross Thameslink to the various subway platforms before detonating their deadly cargos. However, their relaxed demeanour in the very few still photos presented as evidence militates against the probability that they were rushing about madly that morning (especially with all that liquid explosive slopping about on their backs).
Why too in the most CCTV-rich environment on earth are there only a couple of very poor pictures of the four, one at Luton, one at Thameslink, the date and time stamps on which could have easily been photoshopped. Could the photos of Khan have been used from the ‘practice run’ the four carried out on 29th June 2005, just eight days earlier?
The mobile phone evidence places them all on the correct train at the right time. Three things about this though. Firstly, this is new evidence that was not released in the previous 2006 hearing. Why? Second, is it likely that these men would have been texting each other on train they had all boarded together. Finally, this is the kind of evidence easily faked. It is letters and numbers on a piece of paper.
Khan and Tanweer could easily have been talked into making the Jihadi videos that have played such a large part in aiding the public to accept their guilt. They were employees, well-paid for two days work, the practice on June 29th and for the day itself. They were told that the exercise has to be made as realistic as possible. The film would be in the hands of the station staff and other authorities giving them a possible means of intercepting the four. The on-camera ‘threats’ from Khan and Tanweer are vague and unspecific. When Hasina Patel first saw these videos it was reported that she said, “That’s not my husband.” Her brother thought it was Khan. It is most likely that she meant, “ I know him. He would never say such things.”
The ‘bombers’ all had four or more mobile phones each; one of their own private phones and at least three other (so-called) ‘operational’ phones that they are supposed to have used to confound anyone who might attempt to track their communications and obstruct their diabolical plan. It is most likely that these phones were supplied by their minder and that their holding them allowed their ‘handlers’ to track Tanweer and Lindsay down in Canary Wharf after they had panicked and gone on the run, presumably (and naively) hoping to tell their story to the British press who are mostly based there.
P.S. Muad’Dib
The first person to present an alternative and more credible narrative for 7/7 was Yorkshireman Anthony John Hill, in his documentary ‘7/7 The Ripple Effect’ (this is a must-see. Please watch if you don't know the film). Hill, a very unusual character in many ways, has renamed himself Muad’Dib, after a character in Frank Herbert’s sci-fi epic ‘Dune’. It is his basically his interpretation of events that have been presented above, excepting that ‘Dib did not know of the pregnancy problems of Khan’s wife, nor about the 4.35 text-messages, nor Khan’s failure to contact his wife after leaving her on the evening of the 5th of July at the time of making his film.
When a group of ‘Islamic terrorists’, allegedly associates of Khan, went on trial for offences in 2008 at Kingston Crown Court, Hill posted two copies of his DVD to the court. One envelope was addressed to the judge, the other to the foreman of the jury. Neither DVD reached its target but shortly afterwards a request for Hill to be extradited from Ireland (he lived in Kells, County Meath at the time) was sent to the Irish Ministry of Justice. The request was successful and Hill was collected by a British policeman, accompanied across the water and incarcerated in Wandsworth prison shortly before the start of the 7/7 Inquest.
Hill relates, amusingly, that he asked the policeman in whose charge he was placed, “Have you watched my film.” The constable replied, “Yes.” “What did you think of it?” asked Hill. The PC offered a look that was wide-eyed and grim. Hill asked him, “Shouldn’t you be arresting Tony Blair and not me?” and the policeman sheepishly went back to reading his newspaper.
Hill made immediate applications for bail but was only released once the Inquest was finished.
His documentary has been copied and handed out at mosques to thousands of Muslims in the UK. Most Muslims now believe ‘The Four’ to be innocent, largely because of ‘Dib’s work. The authorities were obviously determined he would not upset the 7/7 Inquest operation by getting his film into the hands of family members, press and God knows who else. This man scares them and has suffered accordingly. His case is being heard in Southwark Crown Court on next Monday Morning 9th May 2011.
WHAT WILL BECOME OF US?
For me, there is only one sensible explanation to explain the facts of 7/7/05. Unfortunately this is a very unpleasant explanation.
Let us ask the hard questions of all our leaders, MP's, journalists, teachers, police, military and the rest.....
.......What will become of us if we continue to allow ourselves to be led by such criminals, people who are prepared to commit acts of false flag terrorism against their own people?
Think about it Constable, Sargeant, Brigadier, Headmaster, News editor, everyone.......
There is no such thing as an innocent bystander. To stand and watch is to be complicit. Standing and watching is passive approval.
.
What will become of a people too mentally lazy and stupidly trusting to take an interest in their own survival?
Yesterday Mike Adams published an excellent article titled 'The Gullible Mind Explained'. It could have been describing the wall of uncritical and lazy reporting now hitting the airwaves regarding Lady Justice Hallett's report on the recent 7/7 Inquest.
The content of this report was easily predictable. Simply inevitable.
There are two competing narratives to explain this crime:
1) The official story of four suicide bombers murdering 52 people and injuring hundreds by exploding four bombs on three tube trains and one bus on the morning of 7/7.
2) Forces embedded within the establishment carried out a false-flag attack against the British people. As with nearly all false-flag events, patsies were set up to take the blame for the crime. The four Muslims were completely innocent actors paid to participate in a concurrent anti-terror 'drill'.
As you will have guessed, I am one of the many who subscribe to conspiracy theory number two.
HERE'S WHY
After 9/11 the murderous confabulation that is modern history soared and raged all around us under guise of a ‘War on Terror’, providing the necessary pretext for just about anything the western military-industrial complex felt like doing. However, in the UK we (or should I say the Labour government) had a serious problem. Although Blair and his army of stooges signed up to every invasion and participated loyally in every occupation, the one thing our ‘War on Terror’ was short on was…..the terror. It appeared that British Muslims, peeved though they undoubtedly were at watching their co-religionists being slaughtered by the million in Iraq, just wouldn’t turn their energies toward blowing up their fellow Englishmen. The ‘War on Terror’ was happening somewhere else.
The fact that on 7/7/05 four (or more) explosions killed fifty-two innocent people making their way to work on a Thursday morning changed all that.
Nonetheless the story, universally accepted by the British media (if not across the country), that four Islamic-terrorist suicide-bombers murdered them remains an unproven and (as I will attempt to explain) highly unlikely conspiracy theory.
Firstly it needs to be noted that the refusal of both the Labour and the new Tory/Liberal alliance to hold a public Inquiry into the events of 7/7 should ring a very loud alarm bell for every British citizen. This was the largest mass-murder ever on British soil. One might have expected the promoters of the 'War on Terror' to use a Public Inquiry to cash in on an incident that would make and massively boost their case.
In a court of law physical evidence always trumps excuses, allegations, observations or any other kind of verbal contribution to a case, so one should perhaps begin here.
Three Holes in the Floor of the Edgeware Road Carriage
Evidence was given by different witnesses, including the train driver (a Mr Whitehead), that clearly describe three separate holes in the Edgeware Road carriage. People fell into all three holes. Two emerged from the holes . One died in the third hole. The original report on the Edgeware Road explosion (from mark Honigsbaum of the Guardian who was on the train) had the train lifting off the tracks and being derailed (i.e. bomb(s) underneath the train). The driver described all the access panels in the floor of the first coach (the bomb(s) killed people in the second carriage) being 'flipped open' from underneath.
In what way is any of this compatible with a single suicide 'suicide bomber' with a rucksack full of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide?
The Explosives
Here is a timeline for the 7/7 explosives narrative as it developed:
The first analysis came from a genuine expert. This is surely the most reliable commentary on the nature of the bombs that went off that morning. The problem is that it would have been all-but-impossible for four young men from Leeds to get their hands on such materials.
On 12 July 2005, Superintendent Christophe Chaboud, chief of French anti-terrorism Coordination Unit who was in London assisting Scotland Yard with its investigation, confirmed to The Times that,‘The nature of the explosives appears to be military, which is very worrying….the material used were not homemade but sophisticated military explosives …’ (Nafeez Ahmed The London Bombs, p.24)
On 13th July it was stated that these were of ‘C4’ explosive....London explosives have military origin – [Science Daily. LONDON, July 13 (UPI)]: Forensic scientists told the newspaper the construction of the four devices detonated in London was very technically advanced, and unlike any instructions that can be found on the Internet.’
From The Independent on July 14th: ‘A bath filled with explosives has been found at a house in Leeds that was the “operational base” for the London suicide bombers
17th July 2005 The Observer: ‘22 lbs TATP in the bath.’
The TATP story survived but faded away in 2007 then, when the 7/7 Kingston trial came along in the summer of 2008 all trace of the TATP story had gone.
Now the explosives were made of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide. The idea of the four heating up Hydrogen Peroxide in their kitchen to the point where it would make an explosive mix with black pepper is simply laughable. How could they test that their ‘bombs’ were going to go off. Were they going to go lurching across the country with this kind of bomb sloshing about in their rucksacks. Has anybody ever made a bomb out of this mixture? If such a bomb did explode could it possibly have caused the devastation created on 7/7?
There is much written online that mocks these materials as potential tools of mass destruction. Do we not require a Public Inquiry on this issue alone. The changing storyline above surely makes no sense at all.
Why Suicide?
Moving on to another very obvious question: why would terrorists who wished to wreak havoc and punish British people for the UK’s involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan choose to blow themselves up along with their victims? These were very crowded trains. They could have set a timed detonator and quietly slipped off the trains a stop or two early, leaving their bags on the floor amongst the feet of dozens of incurious passengers. Where would have been the risk in that? Surely such activists would better serve their cause by continuing and not terminating their mission?
Drills
There were four uncannily accurate drills carried out before the 7/7 bombings:
1) The BBC Panorama ‘management exercise’ programme of May 2004 during which a panel of ‘managers’, including Peter Power (see below) and Michael Portillo, discussed how they would deal with a terror attack on London that revealed itself to them through mock news reports as the show progressed. The scenario they had to deal with turned out to be one overground and 3 underground explosions taking place over a short space of time during the morning rush hour.
2) The contemporaneous 7/7 drill: on 7/7 itself Peter Power conducted a terror drill that shadowed the cataclysm as it happened – over the same three tube stations at more or less the same time. On the afternoon of 7/7 he was interviewed on Radio 5’s ‘Drivetime’ programme:
POWER: …at half-past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for, er, over, a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing upright!
3) Atlantic Blue: held over 5-8 April, 2005. All echelons of government participated in this large terror-drill. The Independent reported after July 7th that “By an extraordinary coincidence, all the experts who formulate such plans are together in a meeting at the headquarters of the London Ambulance Service – and they are discussing an exercise they ran three months ago that involved simulating four terrorist bombs going off at once across London.”
4) Operation Hanover: London’s police hold a little-known yearly terror-drill. On 2005 it just happened to be held on 1-2 July. Its game-plan was threefold: three ‘simultaneous’ bomb attacks on three underground stations. The police have been reticent about discussing this astounding precursor event, mere days before 7/7. They only revealed it in 2009.
Why No Post-Mortems?
Another astonishing fact that emerged during the 2010-11 7/7 Inquest was that no post mortems were carried out on the bodies of the victims. A very great deal about the nature of and distance from the explosions could have been discovered from such examinations. The effects of different explosives on flesh are well-known. Such post-mortems would have provided some definitive information that would have at least ruled out some possible explosives from consideration as the source material of the blasts. What could possibly explain such an oversight other than the desire to avoid creating conflicts with a fabricated narrative.
Body Count reveals no Bombers
The First Official Body Count on Two of the Trains was One Body Short
At the 7/7/ Inquest in November 2010 Dr. Morgan Costello gave evidence that he was asked to attend two scenes, Edgware Road and Aldgate, for the 'purposes of certifying the extinction of life'. He counted six bodies at Edgware Road and seven bodies at Aldgate and declared these as 'life extinct'. The enormous anomaly, that passed completely unreported in the press, was that the numbers should have been seven and eight if we count the bodies of the bombers. Here is surely the clearest possible evidence that the alleged bombers were never on the trains. No similar count seems to have been carried out on the other (Russell Square ) train but we do know a little about the behaviour of the Russell Square bomber, Germaine Lindsay, before his demise.
Germaine Lindsay, cool and then confused
Germaine Lindsay drove from Aylesbury to meet the other (let’s call them) bombers in Luton railway station. He arrived an hour before them and decided to take a little nap. He received a parking ticket while asleep in his car. Were he a terrorist he obviously would have known that he would have had only four hours left to live.
Germaine Lindsay was one extraordinarily relaxed suicide-bomber.
A station attendant called Mr. Patel gave testimony to the Inquest that a man he identified as Germaine Lindsay arrived on the concourse of King’s Cross station and asked to talk to “The Duty Manager”. He said it was, “Very important.” Mr Patel remarked that it was very unusual for a member of the public to know the exact name for the person in charge of the station. Normally people asked for ‘the supervisor’ or ‘the manager’. At this time there was chaos on the concourse. The metal grills had been pulled down and shut at the front of the station. Passengers were not being allowed through the barriers. A crowd had built up and people were starting to abuse staff. Numbers of ‘Community Support Officers’ who looked like police were milling around the area trying to manage the situation. No wonder Lindsay was confused. He must have decided to try to speak to someone who ‘was in on the game’ to explain to him what was going on. The most obvious explanation of his behaviour is that it would have puzzled and alarmed him that the drill had started before he, ‘the bomber’, had caught their trains. Perhaps a chilling possibility occurred to him. When Mr. Patel returned with the duty manager Lindsay had gone.
And More
There are many, many other serious anomalies in the official narrative.
The train times presented huge problems for the official narrative causing the Home Secretary to change the story after it was realised that the 7.40 they were said to have caught had been cancelled. Then the next train arrived 23 minutes late at King’s Cross giving the bombers only three minutes to buy four RETURN tickets (think about that one), cross the track by bridge and board the last possible train that makes it just feasible they could have reached the bombed trains in time.
On the 5th July 2005, Mohammed Siddique Khan took his pregnant wife to Dewsbury Hospital in West Yorkshire. She was bleeding and there was obviously something wrong. Doctors examined Hasina Patel and said that there was a ‘threatened miscarriage’. They sent her home and booked her in for a scan on the 7th. Mrs Patel has never told the time they got home but afterwards Mohammed Khan said that he was ‘going to see his friends’. Hasina Patel never saw or heard from her husband ever again. She miscarried on July 6th . At the 7/7 Inquest there was ‘evidence’ (peculiar and surely untrustworthy) presented of a mobile phone text-message exchange between Khan and Germaine Lindsay at 4.35am on the morning of the 6th July. Would Khan really have abandoned his desperate wife for a whole day while she was in that condition? Khan was a highly respected in his community and by the headmistress of the special school in which he worked as a classroom assistant. The police had used him to mediate between rival gangs in local disputes. He was trusted by all sides. Hilary Benn had taken Khan on a tour of the House of Commons. He was not known to be politically radical. Quite the opposite. He was protective of the good name of his community and was eager to maintain good relations with the local white community. Bearing this in mind it is likely that the reason the police have film of Khan is that he was helping them ‘keep an eye on’ any worrisome Muslim elements in his locality. He was not a troublemaker, he was a healer and a fixer.
The most likely explanation for Khan’s disappearance on the 6th is that he told his minder for the 7/7 exercise that he was not going to be able to make it. . He would have been told to see that the others could make it without him. The bombings were not going to be called off but……now he had presented his minders with a problem that had only one possible solution. His goose was cooked.
This would also explain why the attendant at the filling station where Tanweer filled his car (and argued about the change he was given) said he only saw one other person in Tanweer’s car. Hasib Hussain alone (the bus-bomber) was in the car and, unknown to the pair of them, Khan was by now already dead. This would also explain why the now-suppressed BBC radio 5 news reports from the late morning of the seventh said that two men had been shot in Canary Wharf (rather than three, the supposed train bombers. Hussain had been separated from the others).
Those who have travelled to Beeston and spoken to locals report that, like Khan, Hussain and Tanweer had shown no inclination in their communities towards political or religious radicalism.
The Evidence against ‘The Four’
Looking at the detail of latest narrative laid out before the 7/7 Inquest, it must be admitted that it is now just physically possible that the four caught the last possible train at Luton and rushed from King’s Cross Thameslink to the various subway platforms before detonating their deadly cargos. However, their relaxed demeanour in the very few still photos presented as evidence militates against the probability that they were rushing about madly that morning (especially with all that liquid explosive slopping about on their backs).
Why too in the most CCTV-rich environment on earth are there only a couple of very poor pictures of the four, one at Luton, one at Thameslink, the date and time stamps on which could have easily been photoshopped. Could the photos of Khan have been used from the ‘practice run’ the four carried out on 29th June 2005, just eight days earlier?
The mobile phone evidence places them all on the correct train at the right time. Three things about this though. Firstly, this is new evidence that was not released in the previous 2006 hearing. Why? Second, is it likely that these men would have been texting each other on train they had all boarded together. Finally, this is the kind of evidence easily faked. It is letters and numbers on a piece of paper.
Khan and Tanweer could easily have been talked into making the Jihadi videos that have played such a large part in aiding the public to accept their guilt. They were employees, well-paid for two days work, the practice on June 29th and for the day itself. They were told that the exercise has to be made as realistic as possible. The film would be in the hands of the station staff and other authorities giving them a possible means of intercepting the four. The on-camera ‘threats’ from Khan and Tanweer are vague and unspecific. When Hasina Patel first saw these videos it was reported that she said, “That’s not my husband.” Her brother thought it was Khan. It is most likely that she meant, “ I know him. He would never say such things.”
The ‘bombers’ all had four or more mobile phones each; one of their own private phones and at least three other (so-called) ‘operational’ phones that they are supposed to have used to confound anyone who might attempt to track their communications and obstruct their diabolical plan. It is most likely that these phones were supplied by their minder and that their holding them allowed their ‘handlers’ to track Tanweer and Lindsay down in Canary Wharf after they had panicked and gone on the run, presumably (and naively) hoping to tell their story to the British press who are mostly based there.
P.S. Muad’Dib
The first person to present an alternative and more credible narrative for 7/7 was Yorkshireman Anthony John Hill, in his documentary ‘7/7 The Ripple Effect’ (this is a must-see. Please watch if you don't know the film). Hill, a very unusual character in many ways, has renamed himself Muad’Dib, after a character in Frank Herbert’s sci-fi epic ‘Dune’. It is his basically his interpretation of events that have been presented above, excepting that ‘Dib did not know of the pregnancy problems of Khan’s wife, nor about the 4.35 text-messages, nor Khan’s failure to contact his wife after leaving her on the evening of the 5th of July at the time of making his film.
When a group of ‘Islamic terrorists’, allegedly associates of Khan, went on trial for offences in 2008 at Kingston Crown Court, Hill posted two copies of his DVD to the court. One envelope was addressed to the judge, the other to the foreman of the jury. Neither DVD reached its target but shortly afterwards a request for Hill to be extradited from Ireland (he lived in Kells, County Meath at the time) was sent to the Irish Ministry of Justice. The request was successful and Hill was collected by a British policeman, accompanied across the water and incarcerated in Wandsworth prison shortly before the start of the 7/7 Inquest.
Hill relates, amusingly, that he asked the policeman in whose charge he was placed, “Have you watched my film.” The constable replied, “Yes.” “What did you think of it?” asked Hill. The PC offered a look that was wide-eyed and grim. Hill asked him, “Shouldn’t you be arresting Tony Blair and not me?” and the policeman sheepishly went back to reading his newspaper.
Hill made immediate applications for bail but was only released once the Inquest was finished.
His documentary has been copied and handed out at mosques to thousands of Muslims in the UK. Most Muslims now believe ‘The Four’ to be innocent, largely because of ‘Dib’s work. The authorities were obviously determined he would not upset the 7/7 Inquest operation by getting his film into the hands of family members, press and God knows who else. This man scares them and has suffered accordingly. His case is being heard in Southwark Crown Court on next Monday Morning 9th May 2011.
WHAT WILL BECOME OF US?
For me, there is only one sensible explanation to explain the facts of 7/7/05. Unfortunately this is a very unpleasant explanation.
Let us ask the hard questions of all our leaders, MP's, journalists, teachers, police, military and the rest.....
.......What will become of us if we continue to allow ourselves to be led by such criminals, people who are prepared to commit acts of false flag terrorism against their own people?
Think about it Constable, Sargeant, Brigadier, Headmaster, News editor, everyone.......
There is no such thing as an innocent bystander. To stand and watch is to be complicit. Standing and watching is passive approval.
.
Nick Clegg is an Idiot (repost)
.
Politicians are often baffling but few more so than Liberal leader Nick Clegg. Before last year's General Election he went on TV and made some astonishing statements (see below). He also, now famously, promised not to raise University fees. This gained him lots and lots of votes. To the young he came across as one of the 'good guys' in politics.
How he did not realise that reneging on this promise, in the spectacular way he did by legislating for the tripling of fees, would not destroy his party, is nothing short of amazing.
Last night's losses were predictable (and pleasing).
When trust is broken, it is gone. There is a whole generation of young people who will never dream of voting Liberal again.
Unfortunately for them there is no one else in the field worth voting for either.
People are looking for a real alternative to the banker-owned, phony (left/right) divided, phony democratic, one-party state we now endure.
Many are working on creating a real alternative. Something will emerge. Let's hope it will arrive sooner rather than later.
Previous post on Clegg is below:
On the Andrew Marr Show this morning Nick Clegg says that Britain should make itself a safe haven for persecuted homosexuals around the world.
Marr said, "That's a lot of people. What about those who say that we are already an overcrowded island and we don't have the room?"
"This is true in London and the South East but not elsewhere. There is a shortage of fruit pickers in Lincolnshire, for example...."
Is it Liberal policy to flood Lincolnshire with African homosexuals, one might fairly ask.
This great idea would surely work wonders for Liberals standing for parliament in Spalding and Grantham, say.
Good luck with that one Nick! Sounds like a winner.
He then said that "We need policies like this to make Britain the integrated diverse society I want it to be."
If Clegg thinks that the politics of 'Diversity' produces 'integrity he is either a fool or a fiend.
'Diversity' (as is obvious to anyone with their eyes and mind wide open) is about 'divide and rule', artificially created alienation and conditioned helplessness for society at large. Its purpose is to make us compliant to the diktats of an increasingly tyrannical (and globalist)government.
.
Politicians are often baffling but few more so than Liberal leader Nick Clegg. Before last year's General Election he went on TV and made some astonishing statements (see below). He also, now famously, promised not to raise University fees. This gained him lots and lots of votes. To the young he came across as one of the 'good guys' in politics.
How he did not realise that reneging on this promise, in the spectacular way he did by legislating for the tripling of fees, would not destroy his party, is nothing short of amazing.
Last night's losses were predictable (and pleasing).
When trust is broken, it is gone. There is a whole generation of young people who will never dream of voting Liberal again.
Unfortunately for them there is no one else in the field worth voting for either.
People are looking for a real alternative to the banker-owned, phony (left/right) divided, phony democratic, one-party state we now endure.
Many are working on creating a real alternative. Something will emerge. Let's hope it will arrive sooner rather than later.
Previous post on Clegg is below:
On the Andrew Marr Show this morning Nick Clegg says that Britain should make itself a safe haven for persecuted homosexuals around the world.
Marr said, "That's a lot of people. What about those who say that we are already an overcrowded island and we don't have the room?"
"This is true in London and the South East but not elsewhere. There is a shortage of fruit pickers in Lincolnshire, for example...."
Is it Liberal policy to flood Lincolnshire with African homosexuals, one might fairly ask.
This great idea would surely work wonders for Liberals standing for parliament in Spalding and Grantham, say.
Good luck with that one Nick! Sounds like a winner.
He then said that "We need policies like this to make Britain the integrated diverse society I want it to be."
If Clegg thinks that the politics of 'Diversity' produces 'integrity he is either a fool or a fiend.
'Diversity' (as is obvious to anyone with their eyes and mind wide open) is about 'divide and rule', artificially created alienation and conditioned helplessness for society at large. Its purpose is to make us compliant to the diktats of an increasingly tyrannical (and globalist)government.
.
Wednesday, 4 May 2011
Bin Laden's 9/11 Confession (not)
.
Below we see an interview given by Osama Bin Laden to the Ummat newspaper of Pakistan, published on 28th September 2001. This piece, somehow, never made its way into the pages of western newspapers nor was it ever mentioned on major TV news channels. Bin Laden blames Israel for the attacks much like Christopher Bollyn and former director of studies at the US Army War College,Dr. Alan Sabrosky (see YouTube interview below).
OSAMA BIN LADEN SAYS ISRAELI REGIME BEHIND THE 9/11 ATTACKS
KABUL, Afghanistan (Ummat): Prominent Arab mojahed (freedom fighter) Usama bin Laden or the Al-Qaida group has nothing to do with the 11 September attacks on the Bush Administration, according to an Osama bin Laden interview with Ummat, the Karachi-based Pakistani daily newspaper. In his interview, Osama bin Laden pointed out that the Israeli regime is behind the 9-11 attacks. He expressed gratitude and support for Pakistan, urging the Pakistani people to continue their Jihad against dictators, tyrants, traitors, crooks, criminals, dictatorships and tyrannies. Following is the text of Osama Bin Laden's interview conducted by a "special correspondent" and published in the daily Ummat on Friday, 28 September 2001. [The place and date of the interview was not given by Ummat.]
Daily UMMAT: You have been accused of involvement in the attacks in New York and Washington. What do you want to say about this? If you are not involved, who might be?
OSAMA BIN LADEN: In the name of Allah (God), the most beneficent, the most merciful. Praise be to Allah, Who is the creator of the whole universe and Who made the Earth as an abode for peace, for the whole humankind. Allah is the Sustainer, who sent Prophet Muhammad (saw) for our guidance. I am thankful to The Ummat Group of Publications, which gave me the opportunity to convey my viewpoint to the people, particularly the valiant and momin (true Muslim) people of Pakistan who refused to believe the lies of the demon (Pakistani military dictator General Pervez Musharraf).
I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. It is the United States, which is perpetrating every maltreatment on women, children and common people of other faiths, particularly the followers of Islam. All that is going on in Palestine for the last 11 months is sufficient to call the wrath of God upon the United States and Israel. There is also a warning for those Muslim countries, which witnessed all these as a silent spectator. What had earlier been done to the innocent people of Iraq, Chechnya and Bosnia? Only one conclusion could be derived from the indifference of the United States and the West to these acts of terror and the patronage of the tyrants by these powers that America is an anti Islamic power and it is patronizing the anti-Islamic forces. Its friendship with the Muslim countries is just a show, rather deceit. By enticing or intimidating these countries, the United States is forcing them to play a role of its choice. Put a glance all around and you will see that the slaves of the United States are either rulers or enemies of Muslims.
The U.S. has no friends, nor does it want to keep any because the prerequisite of friendship is to come to the level of the friend or consider him at par with you. America does not want to see anyone equal to it. It expects slavery from others. Therefore, other countries are either its slaves or subordinates. However, our case is different. We have pledged slavery to God Almighty alone and after this pledge there is no possibility to become the slave of someone else. If we do that it will be disregardful to both our Sustainer and his fellow beings. Most of the world nations upholding their freedom are the religious ones, which are the enemies of the United States, or the U.S. itself considers them as its enemies.
The countries which do not agree to become the U.S. slaves are China, Iran, Libya, Cuba, Syria [Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iraq, Sudan, Indonesia, Malaysia] and Russia. Whoever committed the act of 11 September are not the friends of the American people. I have already said that we are against the American system, not against its people, whereas in these attacks, the common American people have been killed. According to my information, the death toll is much higher than what the U.S. Government has stated. But the Bush Administration does not want the panic to spread. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the U.S. system, but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology could survive. They can be anyone, from Russia to Israel and from India to Serbia. In the U.S. itself, there are dozens of well-organized and well-equipped groups, which are capable of causing a large-scale destruction. Then you cannot forget the American Jews, who are annoyed with President Bush ever since the elections in Florida and want to avenge him.
Then there are intelligence agencies in the U.S., which require billions of dollars worth of funds from the Congress and the government every year. This [funding issue] was not a big problem till the existence of the former Soviet Union but after that the budget of these agencies has been in danger. They needed an enemy. So, they first started propaganda against Osama and Taleban and then this incident happened. You see, the Bush Administration approved a budget of 40 billion dollars. Where will this huge amount go? It will be provided to the same agencies, which need huge funds and want to exert their importance. Now they will spend the money for their expansion and for increasing their importance. I will give you an example. Drug smugglers from all over the world are in contact with the U.S. secret agencies. These agencies do not want to eradicate narcotics cultivation and trafficking because their importance will be diminished. The people in the U.S. Drug Enforcement Department are encouraging drug trade so that they could show performance and get millions of dollars worth of budget. General Noriega was made a drug baron by the CIA and, in need, he was made a scapegoat. In the same way, whether it is President Bush or any other U.S. President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks.
Daily UMMAT: A number of world countries have joined the call of the United States for launching attacks on Afghanistan. These also include a number of Muslim countries. Will Al-Qaida declare a Jihad against these Islamic countries as well?
OSAMA BIN LADEN: I must say that my duty is just to awaken the Muslims; to tell them as to what is good for them and what is not. What does Islam says and what the enemies of Islam want? Al-Qaida was set up to wage a Jihad against infidelity, particularly to counter the onslaught of the infidel countries against the Islamic states. Jihad is the sixth undeclared pillar of Islam. [The first five being the basic holy words of Islam (There is only one God in the entire universe and Muhammad is the last Prophet of God), prayers, fast, pilgrimage to Mecca and giving alms (zakat).] Every anti-Islamic person is afraid of Jihad. Al-Qaida wants to keep Jihad alive and active and make it a part of the daily life of the Muslims. It wants to give it the status of worship. We are not against any Islamic country. We do not consider a war against an Islamic country as Jihad. We are in favour of armed Jihad only against those infidel governments, which are killing innocent Muslim men, women and children just because they are Muslims. Supporting the U.S. act is the need of some Muslim countries and the compulsion of others. However, they should think as to what will remain of their religious and moral position if they support the attack of the Christians and the Jews on a Muslim country like Afghanistan. The orders of Islamic Shariah [jurisprudence] for such individuals, organizations and countries are clear and all the scholars of the Muslim brotherhood are unanimous on them. We will do the same, which is being ordered by the Ameer-ul-Momeneen [the commander of the faithful Afghans] Muhammad Omar and the Islamic scholars. The hearts of the people of Muslim countries are beating with the call of Jihad. We are grateful to them.
Daily UMMAT: The losses caused in the attacks in New York and Washington have proved that giving an economic blow to the U.S.is not too difficult. U.S. experts admit that a few more such attacks can bring down the American economy. Why is Al-Qaida not targeting their economic pillars?
OSAMA BIN LADEN: I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We are against the [U.S. Government] system, which makes other nations slaves of the United States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic freedom. This system is totally in control of the American-Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is clear that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the U.S. is not uttering a single word.
Daily UMMAT: Why is harm not caused to the enemies of Islam through other means, apart from the armed struggle? For instance, urging the Muslims to boycott Western products, banks, shipping lines and TV channels.
OSAMA BIN LADEN: The first thing is that Western products could only be boycotted when the Muslim fraternity is fully awakened and organized. Secondly, the Muslim companies should become self-sufficient in producing goods equal to the products of Western companies. Economic boycott of the West is not possible unless economic self-sufficiency is attained and substitute products are brought out. You see that wealth is scattered all across the Muslim World but not a single TV channel has been acquired which can preach Islamic injunctions according to modern requirements and attain an international influence. Muslim traders and philanthropists should make it a point that if the weapon of public opinion is to be used, it is to be kept in the hand. Today's world is of public opinion and the fates of nations are determined through its pressure. Once the tools for building public opinion are obtained, everything that you asked for can be done.
Daily UMMAT: The entire propaganda about your struggle has so far been made by the Western media. But no information is being received from your sources about the network of Al-Qaida and its Jihadi successes. Would you comment?
OSAMA BIN LADEN: In fact, the Western media is left with nothing else. It has no other theme to survive for a long time. Then we have many other things to do. The struggle for Jihad and the successes are for the sake of Allah and not to annoy His bondsmen. Our silence is our real propaganda. Rejections, explanations, or corrigendum only waste your time and through them, the enemy wants you to engage in things which are not of use to you. These things are pulling you away from your cause. The Western media is unleashing such a baseless propaganda, which makes us surprise but it reflects on what is in their hearts and gradually they themselves become captive of this propaganda. They become afraid of it and begin to cause harm to themselves. Terror is the most dreaded weapon in modern age and the Western media is mercilessly using it against its own people. It can add fear and helplessness in the psyche of the people of Europe and the United States. It means that what the enemies of the United States cannot do, its media is doing that. You can understand as to what will be the performance of the nation in a war, which suffers from fear and helplessness.
Daily UMMAT: What will be the impact of the freeze of Al-Qaida accounts by the U.S.?
OSAMA BIN LADEN: God opens up ways for those who work for Him. Freezing of accounts will not make any difference for Al-Qaida or other Jihad groups. With the grace of Allah, Al-Qaida has more than three alternative financial systems, which are all separate and totally independent from each other. This system is operating under the patronage of those who love Jihad. What to say of the United States, even the combined world cannot budge these people from their path. These people are not in hundreds but in thousands and millions. Al-Qaida comprises of such modern educated youths who are aware of the cracks inside the Western financial system as they are aware of the lines in their hands. These are the very flaws of the Western fiscal system, which are becoming a noose for it and this system could not recuperate in spite of the passage of so many days.
Daily UMMAT: Are there other safe areas other than Afghanistan, where you can continue Jihad?
OSAMA BIN LADEN: There are areas in all parts of the world where strong Jihadi forces are present, from Indonesia to Algeria, from Kabul to Chechnya, from Bosnia to Sudan, and from Burma to Kashmir. Then it is not the problem of my person. I am a helpless fellowman of God, constantly in the fear of my accountability before God. It is not the question of Usama but of Islam and, in Islam too, of Jihad. Thanks to God, those waging a Jihad can walk today with their heads raised. Jihad was still present when there was no Osama and it will remain as such even when Osama is no longer there. Allah opens up ways and creates loves in the hearts of people for those who walk on the path of Allah with their lives, property and children. Believe it, through Jihad, a man gets everything he desires. And the biggest desire of a Muslim is the life after death. Martyrdom is the shortest way of attaining an eternal life.
Daily UMMAT: What do you say about the Pakistan Government policy on Afghanistan attack?
OSAMA BIN LADEN: We are thankful to the valiant people of Pakistan who erected a blockade in front of the evil forces and stood in the first file of battle. Pakistan is a great hope for the Islamic brotherhood. Its people are awakened, organized and rich in the spirit of faith. They backed Afghanistan in its war against the Soviet Union and extended every help to the Mojahedeen (freedom fighters) and the Afghan people. Then these are very Pakistanis who are standing shoulder by shoulder with the Taleban. If such people emerge in just two countries, the domination of the West will diminish in a matter of days. Our hearts beat with Pakistan and, God forbid, if a difficult time comes we will protect it with our blood. Pakistan is sacred for us like a place of worship. We are the people of Jihad and fighting for the defense of Pakistan is the best of all Jihads to us. It does not matter for us as to who reforms Pakistan. The important thing is that the spirit of Jihad is alive and stronger in the hearts of the Pakistani people.
- Source: Ummat, Urdu-language daily newspaper based in Karachi, Pakistan - Friday, 28 September 2001 - pages 1, 7. - Source: BBC Monitoring Service. - Source: http://www.khilafah.comhttp://www.khilafah.com/1421/category.php?DocumentID=2392&TagID=2
Carol A. Valentine President, Public Action, Inc. Copyright, October, 2001. May be reproduced for non-commercial purposes.
Quote from interview below:
......"I have had long conversations over the last two weeks with contacts at the Army War College and the headquarters, Marine Corps and I've made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation." Period.
......"There are some really, really unhappy people up there.......astonishment was the first thing.....they didn't know, they truly didn't know......and the next statement is rage...real rage"
......" The Zionists are playing this as an all-or-nothing exercise. If they lose this one, they're done....."
.
Below we see an interview given by Osama Bin Laden to the Ummat newspaper of Pakistan, published on 28th September 2001. This piece, somehow, never made its way into the pages of western newspapers nor was it ever mentioned on major TV news channels. Bin Laden blames Israel for the attacks much like Christopher Bollyn and former director of studies at the US Army War College,Dr. Alan Sabrosky (see YouTube interview below).
OSAMA BIN LADEN SAYS ISRAELI REGIME BEHIND THE 9/11 ATTACKS
KABUL, Afghanistan (Ummat): Prominent Arab mojahed (freedom fighter) Usama bin Laden or the Al-Qaida group has nothing to do with the 11 September attacks on the Bush Administration, according to an Osama bin Laden interview with Ummat, the Karachi-based Pakistani daily newspaper. In his interview, Osama bin Laden pointed out that the Israeli regime is behind the 9-11 attacks. He expressed gratitude and support for Pakistan, urging the Pakistani people to continue their Jihad against dictators, tyrants, traitors, crooks, criminals, dictatorships and tyrannies. Following is the text of Osama Bin Laden's interview conducted by a "special correspondent" and published in the daily Ummat on Friday, 28 September 2001. [The place and date of the interview was not given by Ummat.]
Daily UMMAT: You have been accused of involvement in the attacks in New York and Washington. What do you want to say about this? If you are not involved, who might be?
OSAMA BIN LADEN: In the name of Allah (God), the most beneficent, the most merciful. Praise be to Allah, Who is the creator of the whole universe and Who made the Earth as an abode for peace, for the whole humankind. Allah is the Sustainer, who sent Prophet Muhammad (saw) for our guidance. I am thankful to The Ummat Group of Publications, which gave me the opportunity to convey my viewpoint to the people, particularly the valiant and momin (true Muslim) people of Pakistan who refused to believe the lies of the demon (Pakistani military dictator General Pervez Musharraf).
I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. It is the United States, which is perpetrating every maltreatment on women, children and common people of other faiths, particularly the followers of Islam. All that is going on in Palestine for the last 11 months is sufficient to call the wrath of God upon the United States and Israel. There is also a warning for those Muslim countries, which witnessed all these as a silent spectator. What had earlier been done to the innocent people of Iraq, Chechnya and Bosnia? Only one conclusion could be derived from the indifference of the United States and the West to these acts of terror and the patronage of the tyrants by these powers that America is an anti Islamic power and it is patronizing the anti-Islamic forces. Its friendship with the Muslim countries is just a show, rather deceit. By enticing or intimidating these countries, the United States is forcing them to play a role of its choice. Put a glance all around and you will see that the slaves of the United States are either rulers or enemies of Muslims.
The U.S. has no friends, nor does it want to keep any because the prerequisite of friendship is to come to the level of the friend or consider him at par with you. America does not want to see anyone equal to it. It expects slavery from others. Therefore, other countries are either its slaves or subordinates. However, our case is different. We have pledged slavery to God Almighty alone and after this pledge there is no possibility to become the slave of someone else. If we do that it will be disregardful to both our Sustainer and his fellow beings. Most of the world nations upholding their freedom are the religious ones, which are the enemies of the United States, or the U.S. itself considers them as its enemies.
The countries which do not agree to become the U.S. slaves are China, Iran, Libya, Cuba, Syria [Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iraq, Sudan, Indonesia, Malaysia] and Russia. Whoever committed the act of 11 September are not the friends of the American people. I have already said that we are against the American system, not against its people, whereas in these attacks, the common American people have been killed. According to my information, the death toll is much higher than what the U.S. Government has stated. But the Bush Administration does not want the panic to spread. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the U.S. system, but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology could survive. They can be anyone, from Russia to Israel and from India to Serbia. In the U.S. itself, there are dozens of well-organized and well-equipped groups, which are capable of causing a large-scale destruction. Then you cannot forget the American Jews, who are annoyed with President Bush ever since the elections in Florida and want to avenge him.
Then there are intelligence agencies in the U.S., which require billions of dollars worth of funds from the Congress and the government every year. This [funding issue] was not a big problem till the existence of the former Soviet Union but after that the budget of these agencies has been in danger. They needed an enemy. So, they first started propaganda against Osama and Taleban and then this incident happened. You see, the Bush Administration approved a budget of 40 billion dollars. Where will this huge amount go? It will be provided to the same agencies, which need huge funds and want to exert their importance. Now they will spend the money for their expansion and for increasing their importance. I will give you an example. Drug smugglers from all over the world are in contact with the U.S. secret agencies. These agencies do not want to eradicate narcotics cultivation and trafficking because their importance will be diminished. The people in the U.S. Drug Enforcement Department are encouraging drug trade so that they could show performance and get millions of dollars worth of budget. General Noriega was made a drug baron by the CIA and, in need, he was made a scapegoat. In the same way, whether it is President Bush or any other U.S. President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks.
Daily UMMAT: A number of world countries have joined the call of the United States for launching attacks on Afghanistan. These also include a number of Muslim countries. Will Al-Qaida declare a Jihad against these Islamic countries as well?
OSAMA BIN LADEN: I must say that my duty is just to awaken the Muslims; to tell them as to what is good for them and what is not. What does Islam says and what the enemies of Islam want? Al-Qaida was set up to wage a Jihad against infidelity, particularly to counter the onslaught of the infidel countries against the Islamic states. Jihad is the sixth undeclared pillar of Islam. [The first five being the basic holy words of Islam (There is only one God in the entire universe and Muhammad is the last Prophet of God), prayers, fast, pilgrimage to Mecca and giving alms (zakat).] Every anti-Islamic person is afraid of Jihad. Al-Qaida wants to keep Jihad alive and active and make it a part of the daily life of the Muslims. It wants to give it the status of worship. We are not against any Islamic country. We do not consider a war against an Islamic country as Jihad. We are in favour of armed Jihad only against those infidel governments, which are killing innocent Muslim men, women and children just because they are Muslims. Supporting the U.S. act is the need of some Muslim countries and the compulsion of others. However, they should think as to what will remain of their religious and moral position if they support the attack of the Christians and the Jews on a Muslim country like Afghanistan. The orders of Islamic Shariah [jurisprudence] for such individuals, organizations and countries are clear and all the scholars of the Muslim brotherhood are unanimous on them. We will do the same, which is being ordered by the Ameer-ul-Momeneen [the commander of the faithful Afghans] Muhammad Omar and the Islamic scholars. The hearts of the people of Muslim countries are beating with the call of Jihad. We are grateful to them.
Daily UMMAT: The losses caused in the attacks in New York and Washington have proved that giving an economic blow to the U.S.is not too difficult. U.S. experts admit that a few more such attacks can bring down the American economy. Why is Al-Qaida not targeting their economic pillars?
OSAMA BIN LADEN: I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We are against the [U.S. Government] system, which makes other nations slaves of the United States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic freedom. This system is totally in control of the American-Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is clear that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the U.S. is not uttering a single word.
Daily UMMAT: Why is harm not caused to the enemies of Islam through other means, apart from the armed struggle? For instance, urging the Muslims to boycott Western products, banks, shipping lines and TV channels.
OSAMA BIN LADEN: The first thing is that Western products could only be boycotted when the Muslim fraternity is fully awakened and organized. Secondly, the Muslim companies should become self-sufficient in producing goods equal to the products of Western companies. Economic boycott of the West is not possible unless economic self-sufficiency is attained and substitute products are brought out. You see that wealth is scattered all across the Muslim World but not a single TV channel has been acquired which can preach Islamic injunctions according to modern requirements and attain an international influence. Muslim traders and philanthropists should make it a point that if the weapon of public opinion is to be used, it is to be kept in the hand. Today's world is of public opinion and the fates of nations are determined through its pressure. Once the tools for building public opinion are obtained, everything that you asked for can be done.
Daily UMMAT: The entire propaganda about your struggle has so far been made by the Western media. But no information is being received from your sources about the network of Al-Qaida and its Jihadi successes. Would you comment?
OSAMA BIN LADEN: In fact, the Western media is left with nothing else. It has no other theme to survive for a long time. Then we have many other things to do. The struggle for Jihad and the successes are for the sake of Allah and not to annoy His bondsmen. Our silence is our real propaganda. Rejections, explanations, or corrigendum only waste your time and through them, the enemy wants you to engage in things which are not of use to you. These things are pulling you away from your cause. The Western media is unleashing such a baseless propaganda, which makes us surprise but it reflects on what is in their hearts and gradually they themselves become captive of this propaganda. They become afraid of it and begin to cause harm to themselves. Terror is the most dreaded weapon in modern age and the Western media is mercilessly using it against its own people. It can add fear and helplessness in the psyche of the people of Europe and the United States. It means that what the enemies of the United States cannot do, its media is doing that. You can understand as to what will be the performance of the nation in a war, which suffers from fear and helplessness.
Daily UMMAT: What will be the impact of the freeze of Al-Qaida accounts by the U.S.?
OSAMA BIN LADEN: God opens up ways for those who work for Him. Freezing of accounts will not make any difference for Al-Qaida or other Jihad groups. With the grace of Allah, Al-Qaida has more than three alternative financial systems, which are all separate and totally independent from each other. This system is operating under the patronage of those who love Jihad. What to say of the United States, even the combined world cannot budge these people from their path. These people are not in hundreds but in thousands and millions. Al-Qaida comprises of such modern educated youths who are aware of the cracks inside the Western financial system as they are aware of the lines in their hands. These are the very flaws of the Western fiscal system, which are becoming a noose for it and this system could not recuperate in spite of the passage of so many days.
Daily UMMAT: Are there other safe areas other than Afghanistan, where you can continue Jihad?
OSAMA BIN LADEN: There are areas in all parts of the world where strong Jihadi forces are present, from Indonesia to Algeria, from Kabul to Chechnya, from Bosnia to Sudan, and from Burma to Kashmir. Then it is not the problem of my person. I am a helpless fellowman of God, constantly in the fear of my accountability before God. It is not the question of Usama but of Islam and, in Islam too, of Jihad. Thanks to God, those waging a Jihad can walk today with their heads raised. Jihad was still present when there was no Osama and it will remain as such even when Osama is no longer there. Allah opens up ways and creates loves in the hearts of people for those who walk on the path of Allah with their lives, property and children. Believe it, through Jihad, a man gets everything he desires. And the biggest desire of a Muslim is the life after death. Martyrdom is the shortest way of attaining an eternal life.
Daily UMMAT: What do you say about the Pakistan Government policy on Afghanistan attack?
OSAMA BIN LADEN: We are thankful to the valiant people of Pakistan who erected a blockade in front of the evil forces and stood in the first file of battle. Pakistan is a great hope for the Islamic brotherhood. Its people are awakened, organized and rich in the spirit of faith. They backed Afghanistan in its war against the Soviet Union and extended every help to the Mojahedeen (freedom fighters) and the Afghan people. Then these are very Pakistanis who are standing shoulder by shoulder with the Taleban. If such people emerge in just two countries, the domination of the West will diminish in a matter of days. Our hearts beat with Pakistan and, God forbid, if a difficult time comes we will protect it with our blood. Pakistan is sacred for us like a place of worship. We are the people of Jihad and fighting for the defense of Pakistan is the best of all Jihads to us. It does not matter for us as to who reforms Pakistan. The important thing is that the spirit of Jihad is alive and stronger in the hearts of the Pakistani people.
- Source: Ummat, Urdu-language daily newspaper based in Karachi, Pakistan - Friday, 28 September 2001 - pages 1, 7. - Source: BBC Monitoring Service. - Source: http://www.khilafah.comhttp://www.khilafah.com/1421/category.php?DocumentID=2392&TagID=2
Carol A. Valentine President, Public Action, Inc. Copyright, October, 2001. May be reproduced for non-commercial purposes.
Quote from interview below:
......"I have had long conversations over the last two weeks with contacts at the Army War College and the headquarters, Marine Corps and I've made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation." Period.
......"There are some really, really unhappy people up there.......astonishment was the first thing.....they didn't know, they truly didn't know......and the next statement is rage...real rage"
......" The Zionists are playing this as an all-or-nothing exercise. If they lose this one, they're done....."
.
Monday, 2 May 2011
The Death of Bin Laden Means Terrorism Will Go Nuclear
.
People, as our 'protectors' in the CIA know, will believe just about anything.
Osama Bin Laden was introduced to us all as a central player in the narrative that brought us 'The War On Terror'. It is important to understand that history is carefully scripted in advance by the agencies of international finance capital. It doesn't matter if the narrative is true or false (actually 'The War On Terror' is, in all important aspects, false). What is important is that we, the dumb masses, are given a good story in which to believe.
It's all about the narrative.
Well, now that the central baddie no longer has a role to play in our narrative, we can surely expect that the globalist story-tellers are ready with a new script.
What seasoned CIA watchers will sensibly ask and what everyone else would be wise to start asking is this:
"Does the 'death' of Bin Laden today signal a summer of nuclear terrorism in the United States?"
The chaos is mounting. International Law is now a joke, a dead duck. The Middle East has been turned, more than ever before, into a seething cauldron.
China is sitting back for now, while it watches its investments in Eastern Libya turn to dust. It understands that the west is determined to drive it out of Africa.
Russia watches while Syria, and its deal with the Syrians to establish a naval base in the Mediterranean, falls apart.
China is beginning to refuse to buy American debt so the dollar will shortly collapse.
What better event to coincide with financial collapse than an act of nuclear terrorism at home.
An immediate war footing would guarantee immediate recovery of the currency albeit, possibly, a new one.
This 'Bin Laden Is Dead' bullsh*t should scare the pants of every intelligent human being who has been paying serious attention over the last few years. Nearly every news bulletin and current affairs programme will be endlessly asking the question:
"Will Al Queda take revenge for the killing of Bin Laden?"
When they (the CIA/Mossad/MI6 as usual) strike, the familiar traitors will be wheeled on to our screens to say, "We told you so."
Pray to God this is wrong, but it is hard to see any other consequence of today's news, nor any other reason for the CIA to go to all the trouble to carry out this operation and concoct this lying story to go with it when everybody knows (outside of the idiot-zone) that Bin Laden is already a long time dead.
The extent to which the theatre of the coming conflict is co-ordinated between western powers, China and Russia is unknown. However, it is looking increasingly like we are watching a full-on world war in the making. The fact that nobody wants this yet it seems to be coming tells us, yet again (if we still need telling), that our elected governments act in the interests of parties other than ourselves. Therefore 'our' government is the primary enemy of 'we the people'.
It seems unbelievable but there you are.
Henry Makow appears to deliver the only commentary that makes any sense of such a breathtaking reality.
Humanity has been hijacked.
Henry......
.....you're right.
....by a Luciferian cult, as you assert?
More than likely. See here, here, here, here.
Let men gather before their God. We know that the media will continue to lie, even though those lies spell the same disaster for the journalists who tell them as for the rest of us.
Prayers are recommended. We are soon to endure a great trauma. The sooner we find faith and recognise that we are all one, a single powerful (rather than passive) consciousness created by God, the sooner we will overcome the manipulative fiends that have blinded the eyes and misled the minds of humanity and bought the souls of so many of our (tragically weak) leaders.
Oh, By the way...
.....and see here (article from India's Daily Bahskar.com "WikiLeaks: Nuke hellstorm if Osama is caught or killed, says al-Qaeda", first posted April 27th. Is Wikileaks a branch of the CIA, one might fairly wonder.)
3rd May.......and here's Wayne Madsen (speaking to Alex Jones) saying the same as above:
Part One:
Part Two:(Hear about new Al Queda number 2, one Adam Perlman, a "Jewish kid from Los Angeles" who "used to attack Muslims outside Mosques and whose grandfather ran the ADL".......you'd think somebody was just making this stuff up, but it's all been out there for a couple of years at least(with no one denying it).)
.
People, as our 'protectors' in the CIA know, will believe just about anything.
Osama Bin Laden was introduced to us all as a central player in the narrative that brought us 'The War On Terror'. It is important to understand that history is carefully scripted in advance by the agencies of international finance capital. It doesn't matter if the narrative is true or false (actually 'The War On Terror' is, in all important aspects, false). What is important is that we, the dumb masses, are given a good story in which to believe.
It's all about the narrative.
Well, now that the central baddie no longer has a role to play in our narrative, we can surely expect that the globalist story-tellers are ready with a new script.
What seasoned CIA watchers will sensibly ask and what everyone else would be wise to start asking is this:
"Does the 'death' of Bin Laden today signal a summer of nuclear terrorism in the United States?"
The chaos is mounting. International Law is now a joke, a dead duck. The Middle East has been turned, more than ever before, into a seething cauldron.
China is sitting back for now, while it watches its investments in Eastern Libya turn to dust. It understands that the west is determined to drive it out of Africa.
Russia watches while Syria, and its deal with the Syrians to establish a naval base in the Mediterranean, falls apart.
China is beginning to refuse to buy American debt so the dollar will shortly collapse.
What better event to coincide with financial collapse than an act of nuclear terrorism at home.
An immediate war footing would guarantee immediate recovery of the currency albeit, possibly, a new one.
This 'Bin Laden Is Dead' bullsh*t should scare the pants of every intelligent human being who has been paying serious attention over the last few years. Nearly every news bulletin and current affairs programme will be endlessly asking the question:
"Will Al Queda take revenge for the killing of Bin Laden?"
When they (the CIA/Mossad/MI6 as usual) strike, the familiar traitors will be wheeled on to our screens to say, "We told you so."
Pray to God this is wrong, but it is hard to see any other consequence of today's news, nor any other reason for the CIA to go to all the trouble to carry out this operation and concoct this lying story to go with it when everybody knows (outside of the idiot-zone) that Bin Laden is already a long time dead.
The extent to which the theatre of the coming conflict is co-ordinated between western powers, China and Russia is unknown. However, it is looking increasingly like we are watching a full-on world war in the making. The fact that nobody wants this yet it seems to be coming tells us, yet again (if we still need telling), that our elected governments act in the interests of parties other than ourselves. Therefore 'our' government is the primary enemy of 'we the people'.
It seems unbelievable but there you are.
Henry Makow appears to deliver the only commentary that makes any sense of such a breathtaking reality.
Humanity has been hijacked.
Henry......
.....you're right.
....by a Luciferian cult, as you assert?
More than likely. See here, here, here, here.
Let men gather before their God. We know that the media will continue to lie, even though those lies spell the same disaster for the journalists who tell them as for the rest of us.
Prayers are recommended. We are soon to endure a great trauma. The sooner we find faith and recognise that we are all one, a single powerful (rather than passive) consciousness created by God, the sooner we will overcome the manipulative fiends that have blinded the eyes and misled the minds of humanity and bought the souls of so many of our (tragically weak) leaders.
Oh, By the way...
.....and see here (article from India's Daily Bahskar.com "WikiLeaks: Nuke hellstorm if Osama is caught or killed, says al-Qaeda", first posted April 27th. Is Wikileaks a branch of the CIA, one might fairly wonder.)
3rd May.......and here's Wayne Madsen (speaking to Alex Jones) saying the same as above:
Part One:
Part Two:(Hear about new Al Queda number 2, one Adam Perlman, a "Jewish kid from Los Angeles" who "used to attack Muslims outside Mosques and whose grandfather ran the ADL".......you'd think somebody was just making this stuff up, but it's all been out there for a couple of years at least(with no one denying it).)
.
Sunday, 1 May 2011
Jewish Influence. Racism In Action.
.
How proud one must feel to be a NATO pilot this morning.
One Gaddafi son and three grandchildren murdered in their 'villa'. Here was an attempted targeted assassination if ever there was one.
How comforting to hear David Cameron speaking to Andrew Marr this morning repeating that
" 'Command and Control Centres' are 'legitimate targets' under UN Resolution 1973. Ours is a humanitarian action in order to prevent any further suffering of the Libyan people."
There's that magic word again...'humanitarian'.... doesn't it just sit so well alongside everything and anything.
Private residence, dead children.....'humanitarian'.
Slips out like a glossy turd.
As well as discussing the Libyan issue with Mr. Cameron, a man whose great personal fortune derives from the banking and drug-running activities of his Jewish great-grandfather, Mr Marr also discussed it with his 'newspaper reviewers', one Simon Schama (the BBC's historian in residence) and comedienne, Maureen Lipman, both also Jewish.
Lipman, to her credit, said she found the Gaddafi story 'horrifying'.
Given the fact that every poll taken in the UK so far has clearly demonstrated the unpopularity of the Libyan adventure, is it fair to remark on the fact that 0.5% of the British population can (often) contribute 100% of the news commentary on such a serious political event?
Schama's take on the killing of Gaddafi's son and grandchildren was "Should anyone complain that there was a plot in 1944 to kill Hitler?"
......another fair comment from the great 'history' guru, no doubt in between filming episodes of his next smooth reality-defining history series that will be shoved into our stupid trusting faces.
The Andrew Marr Show went out on BBC1 from 9 to 10 am.
From 10 to 11 am 'The Big Questions' discussed three issues in front of a studio audience with comments on each issue from three 'special guests', one of whom was the Jewish Chaplain at the University of Surrey. One of the three debates centred on a film opposing 'anti-semitism' at football grounds. Only one third of the main speakers and the focus of one third of the debate....yet Jewish interests are still here over-represented by a factor 66 times greater than what might be considered fair.
From 10 to 11am BBC1 showed 'Country Tracks' which is probably, or perhaps relatively, a non-political programme.
From 12 noon to 1 pm there was the weekly 'Politics Show' on which Jon Sopel (Jewish) interviewed leader of the Labour Party, Ed Milliband (Jewish). Bloody Hell! Back to 100% again.
This was followed by two solid hours of the soap 'Eastenders' during which we can watch wall-to-wall anti-racist and anti-homophobia propaganda. After decades of this stuff there surely cannot be a grain of racism still running through the veins of the British public.....and yet.....and yet.....
Is 'racial discrimination' not discriminating in favour of one's own race and against others? Surely the ridiculous predominance of Jews in the media (not to mention every other centre of power, wealth and influence) is evidence that the engineers of anti-racism are racism's greatest practitioners?
It is interesting (and surely no accident) that the category 'racial discrimination' has disappeared from Wikipedia pages.
Why do I expect to be accused of 'racism' for pointing out these obvious facts of life.
Am I being racist for pointing these things out?
Is anyone who says such things a 'racist'.......or are they fighting a very real and dangerous racism?....a practiced racism that has, in truth, defined every important and regrettable aspect of our reality.
Our slavery to bankers.
The fact that corporate finance owns our very government.
The onward march of imperialism and all the horrors that entails.
Our manufactured insecurity.
The poverty of the masses.....and so on?
If it was the Frankfurt School Psychologists (also nearly all Jewish) intention to "make society stink" in preparation for a 'New World Order', they are clearly making excellent progress.
Ordinary Jewish people really do need to wake up to the perils that 'organised Jewry' present to us all and to their own selves (traditionally, its greatest victims) in particular.
.
How proud one must feel to be a NATO pilot this morning.
One Gaddafi son and three grandchildren murdered in their 'villa'. Here was an attempted targeted assassination if ever there was one.
How comforting to hear David Cameron speaking to Andrew Marr this morning repeating that
" 'Command and Control Centres' are 'legitimate targets' under UN Resolution 1973. Ours is a humanitarian action in order to prevent any further suffering of the Libyan people."
There's that magic word again...'humanitarian'.... doesn't it just sit so well alongside everything and anything.
Private residence, dead children.....'humanitarian'.
Slips out like a glossy turd.
As well as discussing the Libyan issue with Mr. Cameron, a man whose great personal fortune derives from the banking and drug-running activities of his Jewish great-grandfather, Mr Marr also discussed it with his 'newspaper reviewers', one Simon Schama (the BBC's historian in residence) and comedienne, Maureen Lipman, both also Jewish.
Lipman, to her credit, said she found the Gaddafi story 'horrifying'.
Given the fact that every poll taken in the UK so far has clearly demonstrated the unpopularity of the Libyan adventure, is it fair to remark on the fact that 0.5% of the British population can (often) contribute 100% of the news commentary on such a serious political event?
Schama's take on the killing of Gaddafi's son and grandchildren was "Should anyone complain that there was a plot in 1944 to kill Hitler?"
......another fair comment from the great 'history' guru, no doubt in between filming episodes of his next smooth reality-defining history series that will be shoved into our stupid trusting faces.
The Andrew Marr Show went out on BBC1 from 9 to 10 am.
From 10 to 11 am 'The Big Questions' discussed three issues in front of a studio audience with comments on each issue from three 'special guests', one of whom was the Jewish Chaplain at the University of Surrey. One of the three debates centred on a film opposing 'anti-semitism' at football grounds. Only one third of the main speakers and the focus of one third of the debate....yet Jewish interests are still here over-represented by a factor 66 times greater than what might be considered fair.
From 10 to 11am BBC1 showed 'Country Tracks' which is probably, or perhaps relatively, a non-political programme.
From 12 noon to 1 pm there was the weekly 'Politics Show' on which Jon Sopel (Jewish) interviewed leader of the Labour Party, Ed Milliband (Jewish). Bloody Hell! Back to 100% again.
This was followed by two solid hours of the soap 'Eastenders' during which we can watch wall-to-wall anti-racist and anti-homophobia propaganda. After decades of this stuff there surely cannot be a grain of racism still running through the veins of the British public.....and yet.....and yet.....
Is 'racial discrimination' not discriminating in favour of one's own race and against others? Surely the ridiculous predominance of Jews in the media (not to mention every other centre of power, wealth and influence) is evidence that the engineers of anti-racism are racism's greatest practitioners?
It is interesting (and surely no accident) that the category 'racial discrimination' has disappeared from Wikipedia pages.
Why do I expect to be accused of 'racism' for pointing out these obvious facts of life.
Am I being racist for pointing these things out?
Is anyone who says such things a 'racist'.......or are they fighting a very real and dangerous racism?....a practiced racism that has, in truth, defined every important and regrettable aspect of our reality.
Our slavery to bankers.
The fact that corporate finance owns our very government.
The onward march of imperialism and all the horrors that entails.
Our manufactured insecurity.
The poverty of the masses.....and so on?
If it was the Frankfurt School Psychologists (also nearly all Jewish) intention to "make society stink" in preparation for a 'New World Order', they are clearly making excellent progress.
Ordinary Jewish people really do need to wake up to the perils that 'organised Jewry' present to us all and to their own selves (traditionally, its greatest victims) in particular.
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
