.
The TUC-led protest march in London yesterday was the biggest I've seen. The attendance was significantly larger than the massive pre-Iraq war London protest (that was duplicated in cities across the UK leading to an estimated 2 million participants).
As the newspapers report, the march was good-humored and almost entirely peaceful.
This morning however, as usual, front pages are filled with images of young men slamming poles through shop windows and fires blazing on the streets. This is the image of 'protest' that is intended to settle into the minds of the complacent, the merely curious and those that might be considering doing something to challenge power in society.
The violence is blamed, again as usual, on 'Anarchists'.
The presence of this group is easily identifiable at any large protest. They dress mostly in black and often carry red-and-black pennants on poles. Most cover their faces below (and normally but not always above) the eyes with black scarves. They move as one and stick together.
Yesterday I was in Trafalgar Square when this group (of maybe 150) skewed away, as one, from the main body of the march and strode as a troupe round the other side of the square past St Martin-In The Fields and up Charing Cross Road towards Cambridge Circus. I heard one old fellow say, "Where are they off to?" The reply, "Oxford Street to smash a few windows".
Of course they were. The game is well and broadly understood.
But why were they not stopped? Nor even followed. The police showed no interest in these people whatsoever.
They could easily have been stopped. If a few of us had put some thought into this predictable event we could have stopped them ourselves. They were small in number and mostly kids. I would guess that there was hardly a person over 25 among them. The young men leading the group were lean and fit. Many of those behind were slight. No fat, middle-aged or grizzled faces at all.
Who are these people? For a political movement they seem strangely reluctant to reveal themselves in public and state their case.
In fact Anarchism as a political philosophy seems to be a 19th century idea that more or less disappeared during the first three decades of the 20th century. In the mid-to-late 1800's this movement was led by people like Emma Goldman. The Goldman-directed agent Leon Czolgosz assassinated US president William McKinley in 1901. McKinley had been supported by the financiers against William Jennings Bryant and had won the 1896 election. However, it appears that he outlived his usefulness and was killed. At that time Anarchists were major political change-agents. Their actions allowed them to be presented to the public as enemies of the state but their 'orgy of destabilisation' (to use Webster Tarpley's words) created a chaos that those who really wield power find extremely useful. Violence, division and chaos makes for a political situation where the only people who are NOT confused, disorientated and misdirecting their energies are those who directed the chaos in the first place.
Is it possible that the ridiculous, silent and anonymous rump that is UK 'Anarchism' today is nothing more than an instrument of MI5 that is only triggered into action when there is an active political opposition to discredit?
Are 'Anarchists' a bunch of silly kids signed up to a website (on which there is not a single name, nor a forum nor an other evidence of serious political discourse)?
Has anyone ever heard of a UK anarchist being prosecuted for violence during a public protest?
Do we know the name of a single UK Anarchist?
What kind of political organisation does not have a visible leader, nor leadership group.
What kind of political group does absolutely nothing to promote its political philosophy in the public domain (please don't say that smashing windows [remember to wait until the cameras arrive] is any kind of meaningful statement)?
Are the 'Anarchists' such a group? Almost-adults led by a very small group of police agent-provocateurs?
Highly likely in my opinion.
Actually, here is film of some of the worst scenes from yesterdays protest. If you watch carefully (it will take a few viewings) from about 5:45 you will see one of the 'Anarchists' move towards police lines while some fighting is still taking place. He must say something or show a card (it was suggested to me that he looks like he is removing a wire at one point) because he is ushered gently to the other side of the line by the same police (he has presumably just been attacking) while the chaos continues. I suppose this explains why juvenile Anarchists are never arrested and charged.....because it would inevitably lead to the naming of more senior individuals within the group who are police or MI5.....and the whole charabang of deceptive (but useful) bullsh*t would fall over a cliff and disappear under the waves.
I've convinced myself.
UK ANARCHISTS ARE PART OF MI5
And there is evidence that this type of police action goes on everywhere (watch the boots).
It also seems that internationally 'anarchists' serve a similar purpose.
Here they are back in November 2010 at the 'student' protest.
No long-haired scruffy jumper-and-trainers-clad student he.
Note the strong and sturdy copper's boots. Notice the banks of cameramen awaiting their money shot that will (and did) adorn our front pages the following morning. Notice PC plod behind the cameramen, looking on with mere curiosity.
Neither the BBC, nor ITV, nor the corporate press will EVER ask simple and obvious questions, nor raise obvious concerns nor make obvious allegations about these people.
It is about time the rest of us did. If you are beginning to understand the game, inform your friends and associates. Speak it out loud and clear.
PS
For those who are new to realising the obvious but 'unthinkable', MI5 are the internal UK Intelligence service. They are senior to the police while working independently but often in co-ordination with them. They can turn up at a crime scene, flash an identity card and tell police to clear off. Even our most senior elected politicians are only told of their activities on a need-to-know basis. They are subject to an authority that is entirely separate from our visible political system. They are governed by individuals representing the interests of a ruling oligarchy, an elite who have access to almost unlimited funds owing to their ownership and control of the various vehicles of international finance.
One imagines that MI5 agents think they carry out their dirty work in service of UK PLC but international financiers are only interested in the UK as a safe haven from which to project, with their allies, imperialist control over the earth's resources i.e. globalism. They are engaged in a 'project', sometimes called 'the great game'. Though 'a game' to them, it has nothing in common with a game for the rest of us.
This is a game in which the rest of us all lose.
It is no accident that inside the UK (as elsewhere) the rich are getting massively richer , the poor get increasingly desperate while we submit (complaining-in-an-ever-so-civilised-manner) to the coming debt-enslavement of our children. This IS what yesterday's march was about, wasn't it?
Neither our real government(the oligarchy), nor MI5 care a damn for us. Their sole project is to condition us for submission and eventual total enslavement.
The pretend-government of venal careerists that we elect will strain at any number of gnats having swallowed every camel as dictated by their political bosses.
MP's DO NOT ASK THE IMPORTANT, NECESSARY AND OBVIOUS QUESTIONS. NOT ABOUT THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM, NOT ABOUT 9/11, NOR 7/7, NOR ANYTHING ELSE THAT REALLY MATTERS.
To be fair, most involved in imposing this nightmare agenda are quite unaware of the bigger picture.
MI5 employees!
WAKE UP!
You have got children too.
Schoolteachers, police, Council employees, military personnel!
WAKE UP!
Notice that the edicts you (and your bosses) obey come from you-know-not-where. Start challenging them. Do nothing (or as little as possible) that invokes the slightest qualm or reservation in your God-given conscience.
.
Reaction...
1 hour ago
Astonishing post Kev, and yet again I am stunned by the tactics that most would consider fantastic and incredible, yet are PROVEN to be utterly genuine and real.
ReplyDeleteI find this truly unsettling and begin to wonder at what point does the illusion end and reality emerge?
"WAKE UP!
ReplyDeleteYou have got children too."
Well said. I hope that all people of good will can be won over with better information.
By the way, the bit about the protesters having the same boots as the police has been noticed in North America too.
Hi Kevin
ReplyDeleteHmm: "What kind of political organisation does not have a visible leader, nor leadership group."
Er, Anarchists? Surely that's the definition you wrote right there? ;-)
Anarchism also implies 'individual action' rather than group action.
Methinks you are just presenting another case of that mind-bending dictum "We will lead every revolution against us" attributed to Zionism - and we all know how rough they play...
Anarchy can never be corrupted entirely as it is founded on _individuality_, peaceful in 99% of cases - just look first to the foot ware of your MI5archists before giving all the rest of 'us' an even worse name than corporatism has already thoroughly smeared the concept with, please... ;-)
Th...
Sorry to offend you Anonymous.
ReplyDeleteI have never before come across anyone who calls themselves an anarchist, nor heard anyone defend this position.
Well, there's a first time for everything.
However, even if there is no visible leader, nor leadership group I must ask you....why the universal anonymity for UK anarchists?
We can read all about 19th century ones. Names, full life stories, the lot.
"why the universal anonymity for UK anarchists?"
ReplyDeletePerhaps because the concept of individuality has been so thoroughly discredited, not to mention 'hounded' by those who are always so very desirous of control?
Besides, I suspect the majority of UK 'anarchists', anonymous or otherwise, haven't got much beyond 'Deff to der system!' and 'Orl property is feft!' as yet. There is also such a thing as anarcho-syndicalism - a means for individuals to at least work vaguely in concert for whom equating anarchy with violence would only occur when up against malignance of the fascist variety.
Talking of 'anonymity', how many MIx wallahs, or police officers for that matter, do you know by name? This might also put Anonymity in perspective, at least if you can tolerate modern approaches to music and computer voices-
http://soundcloud.com/bakshish/cloudcycle-ddos
I was most amused by that placard "Undercover police assembly point". Great to see Brits haven't lost their sense of humour despite the ongoing Orwellian ghastliness.
Th...
Respect for your response. Perhaps serious anarchists should get out more and spread their ideas about. We might all learn something.
ReplyDeleteThe music is well, even brilliantly, done and the voice content is interesting but I find it hard work listening to this kind of thing. Is it uplifting? Is art meant to be uplifting? It's an arguable point but I hold that it is so
(Tracy Emin, ugly 500 ton inside-out house of concrete, Piss Christ, that pottery bloke that dresses like a little girl....just can't stand it)
Old-fashioned or just too old....too addicted to tunes and traditional structures.
Thanks Kevin....keep up the good work....Well written...
ReplyDeleteThis article is spot on.
ReplyDeleteWhen the police kettle peaceful demostrators. The FIT follow known protestors http://www.fitwatch.org.uk/2011/03/25/top-ten-nasty-fit-cops-%E2%80%93-nos-12-discombe-and-cowlin/
ReplyDeleteYet they let the easy to spot "anarchists" run riot.
It's so obvious what happened.
Great article.
There are plenty of people who would define themselves as anarchists. True anarchy is not about smasjing stuff up though, it is about building communities outside of government control.
ReplyDeleteCheck out Gonzo Times for some good discussion.
http://www.gonzotimes.com/
Hey, if that's all it is I'm an anarchist too.
ReplyDeletethe guy/guys at around 5.45 on the youtube vid , they marked the protestor that was to be grabbed by the snatch squad then when the crowed surged pushed him toward the Police to be taken, they were planted in the crowd for that reason, they could also be used to provocate am sure .
ReplyDeleteDoesn't make much sense to me. Why would the MI5 incite a small group of people who are widely identified as separate in the media and also widely condemned in the media. Where is the motive? People throughout the country are pointing and saying "silly little boys" and that is it.
ReplyDeleteYour case loses pace when you realise that actually 149 people have been charged. Probably due to the man who you consider to be MI5 (or maybe he was an asthmatic showing an inhaler) being an insider and getting names.
Ultimately the only damage that has been done is to the shops, which are insured. Nobodies reputation is damaged except those of the hooligans since they were clearly identified as separate in the media.
I fail to follow the motive.
It is Brit-ain in action, supressing the English. As long as the Island remains Brit-ish, the slavery of the English will be without end. The so called anarchists are very likely invented and managed by Brit-Ish interests (the oligarchy, infiltrators into the otherwise blessed Island) which feels itself threatened.
ReplyDeleteJustice SHALL prevail, worldwide, the wave is moving, the minds are awakening, the powers that are, will not hold, the building is crumbling. "They" shall not be welcome anaywhere, not even in "Connaught".
I know all about Connaught, mate.
ReplyDeleteThere was a time when I was extremely nervous of showing up alone anywhere in Connaught with my English accent. I had to whip the tenor banjo out double quick and play a bunch of reels before I was confident I would be allowed to live.
Ah, the good old days.
Call me Mrs. Anonymous - and I am in Canada. The videos from the G20 Toronto demonstrations vividly proved four things. First, 'Black Bloc' anarchist-types were given completely free rein by Toronto law enforcement who indeed always 'look the other way'/'march off in the wrong direction'; Second, these 'Black Bloc' anarchist-types are visibly hustled behind police lines where they are safely hidden, and they are never arrested; Third, peaceful demonstrators, and even idle spectators, are brutally assaulted; Fourth, the government lies about it all afterwards or pleads ignorance, until confronted: i.e. Chief of Police Blair in Toronto. All this is as plain on the nose on your face. May I also add, slightly off topic, that the so-called 'revolutions' in the Middle East countries now are destabilizing operations fomented by covert operatives... M16... CIA... Mossad... Dig deep enough and you find the same dirty fingers everywhere. The moneyed interests and speculators manipulate all sides. They are winning now. Maybe only a nuclear disaster, which has now gone beyond their control, will save humanity, or what's left of it. I can think of no other solution, considering that people continue to be duped by the mass media, and true democracy has no hope of working any longer.
ReplyDeleteDon't know about the nuclear disaster, I can't bring myself to wish for that. I agree entirely with your analysis but perhaps one shouldn't be quite so gloomy. We can't see where victory will come from yet but come it surely will. You must believe the game is already won to make it happen.
ReplyDeleteLuciferians are losers. They want to be Gods but they are losers. Maybe we need to shine a bit of loving light on these people. Most of the people inflicting this stuff on the world are mere followers, not leaders. Maybe they will realise what's good for them all by themselves.
Here's hoping you never have to reach for the AK47.
That's why people were taught to protest in the 60's.
ReplyDeleteIt stopped the war in Viet Nam ! haha
We have generations believing protest works,holding signs The King Is Unfair,and the King gets off on the power he wields.
Look at the tenets of Willie Lynch how to make a (black)slave.
In a nutshell it was Separate the men from the women,and treat the women better so she teaches her young to trust the master.
(In the 60's this was women's liberation)
Divide by skin tone as light skinned blacks are averse to dark skinned ones...fine hair vs coarse hair.
(In the 60's it was racial liberation theology Martin Luther King)
Make some mulatto's to have a mixed up individual who cannot identify with either race.
(Diversity !)
Have the slave master beat the biggest man the slaves look up to so they know this can happen to you!
(Police Brutality)
Separate the Old from the young...to keep the wisdom of the elders from the young.
(60's it was the generation gap!)
And of course lynch a few !
That will keep them in line !
The idea was that distrust is stronger than distrust.
Willie Lynch said that the Romans would be envious of this system which would make slaves for thousands of years if applied correctly.
We can thank John Hawkins the British man for black slavery.The British always deny their bloody horror and say Willie Lynch isn't true.
They claim that Henry Hairbuyer Hamilton paying Indians for the scalps of American settlers wasn't true.
The British papers admitted recently that the empire was in fact built on the backs of black slaves.
They blame the US for John Hawkins fruit.
The US gets credit for having slaves,when in reality they ended black slavery.
Add to all this the British Invasion music which was written by Adamo suggesting things like the Beatles "I'm a loser" Help me if you can I'm feeling down,Ozzy Osbourne and his (British)Satanic Alister Crowley worship music.
The Power Of The British
Commonwealth Over The World
http://www.rense.com/general62/britt.htm
QUEEN GIVES MARCHING ORDERS TO THE UNITED NATIONS
http://www.newswithviews.com/Veon/joan170.htm
THE QUEEN'S DEATH STAR: Depleted Uranium Measured in British ...
Dec 28, 2009 ... There are no known uranium mines in Iraq indicating that it is not ... that the British Royal family privately owns investments in uranium ...
exopolitics.blogs.com/.../the-queens-death-star-depleted-uranium-measured-in-british-atmosphere-from-battlefields-in-the-middle-east.html
this is satire right? mi5 (chuckle)
ReplyDeleteThis is a classic example of reverse-psychology. The last thing that the 'authorities' want is a violent uprising...the people who wear suits and steal the pensions of hard working folks have very soft, nonathletic bodies that bruise very easily.
ReplyDeleteso, they send the MI5 out to stir up some trouble and make it appear as though they want a violent uprising so that they will have an excuse to use force against the people.
Trust me...the last thing those cowardly banker-types want is a violent (and passionate) uprising!
I saw that hoodie guy break away and flash something at the cops. He then ducked down behind a bus shelter and appeared to me to go on a radio or phone. I thought at the time, agent provocateur!!
ReplyDeleteBE LOVE... Be Vegan is a doorway, not a destination, nor else but a start...
ReplyDeleteTake the Queen from herself, the truth will set her free, and with her us all as one of us...
Take the Palace, not the streets... Next Time
Not a Million but Ten, Twenty even, our choice, not the choice made for us...
The term "anarchist" has become a loaded term and has been harshly demonized by the media over past few decades which is why many people prefer the term "voluntarist" or "voluntaryist" as it implies the same thing without the negative connotation that "anarchist" carries. A voluntaryist believes that all human interaction should be done on a voluntary basis which means that the government as it currently is -- an organization with a monopoly on force -- must disintegrate and be replaced completely with voluntary human interaction.
ReplyDeleteYou might find this interesting: http://infoasammo.net/voluntarist-2009
One of my freinds who got to the embankment early on Saturday, saw a group of these 'anarchists' arrive in a taxi, before the mass of ordinary marchers, and they spoke with 'plummy' accents! Funny sort of anarchists - more likely agents provacateurs!
ReplyDeleteYes indeed.....a bit like making a film about Che Guevara and casting Hugh Grant in the title role.
ReplyDeleteThe 'taxi' thing confirms that these enemies of the state/friends of the people are determined to make as little contact with ordinary folk as possible.
They're probably all trainee Freemasons at Eton or Dulwich College or somewhere......or just posh kids interested in an alternative wardrobe experience.
Great job ! I would say a division within MOD, as MI5 is now only use to manufacture fake 'islamists groups and fake terror attacks' they are working on a huge one ... planning arrest of 50 to 80 people in the Greater London which their agents binationals from Pakistan, Bengladesh, UAE background and local MOD agent srving the flase flag brit system as we saw with the yemeni operation last year and youngster framed up by british agents, all this people working as baits-receptor-providers are tricking the youth in the greater london, similar to what the FBI is doing in the US when the government is in huge despair.
ReplyDeleteIsraelis companies are in charge of the security of the olympic games and they want to clean it up from any muslim involvement ... is that because MI5 and israelis plan some operations during the games, this is clearly going this way according to british sources !
Is it fine to repost this article?
You're welcome.
ReplyDeleteKB
Not necessarily employed by MI5, though. Much of British intelligence is believed to be run through private organisations, such as security companies. A private company, The Association of Chief Police Officers, was running a secret police force until it was exposed, when the operation was taken over by the London Metropolitan Police. This gives some distance, so that if someone is caught, the security services can disown him.
ReplyDeleteThe objective of the protesters shouldn't be to stop them, but to try to identify them. If some of these people could be tracked, so that we know where they are coming from and going to, then we may have something to work on. If one of them leaves a footprint, a good photo of that could be useful.
See you chose not publish the comment from a self-identified anarchist.
ReplyDeleteSearch anarchist on twitter and you'll be able to find self-identified anarchists in the UK many who even use their real names.
That was no anarchist.
ReplyDeleteThat was a familiar and loathsome troll who lurks around the fringes of certain UK forums trying to undermine and smear anyone whose contribution is pointed and whose influence, therefore, is of potential effect.
Anarchy is about folks sitting down, being 100% honest with each other, accessing as much info as that group can, all feelings, insights, dreams, facts etc etc and deciding together a course of action, and being open to receiving new info and stopping long enough to assess the meaning of that new info, and of changing their actions if needs be.
ReplyDeleteAnarchy is non-linear self-organisation. It's inherent to Nature. It's inherent to empathic relationships. The word means no ruler, no leader, no hierarchy. It does not mean chaos. and it is not a political stance,it's a natural emergent philosophy.
Of course, in a hierarchical system, this is the most threatening thought possible, a complete and utter denial of all the hierarchy represents, and it's based on empathy, whereas hierarchy is based on fear.
The use of lables is an old trick.
http://www.violence.de/prescott/bulletin/article.html
Perhaps much of this discussion misses the point. I don’t doubt that the Security Services –MI5 or their contracted-out agents – employ their spies and provocateurs within the ranks of the ‘anarchists’ and protesters. That’s their job, to protect the elites who control this country, and to track anybody who in some way might threaten them. So, presumably the accusation that provocateurs are behind the violence is because this will then justify a crackdown on the right of assembly, etc. But this is all going to look like pretty small beer.
ReplyDeleteBritain is a country run entirely for the benefit of investment bankers. By allowing them to create electronic money way beyond the productive level of the economy they are effectively trashing the currency and doing more for the cause of anarchy then any hooded protester. The abject failure of the careerist-politicians to do anything meaningful about banking reform demonstrates where their loyalties lie.
Perhaps anarchy appeals to many because it would make a refreshing change to this situation. Unfortunately true anarchy is likely to lead to a rapid demise of the vulnerable (the elderly, disabled etc) and in any case could only last for a few months at most. The remnants of the State would quickly grab the commanding heights and resources of the economy (power-generation, key manufacturing plants etc, especially around London). The rest of us would be left to cope with the rise of the violent gangs, whose alpha male leaders would simply rob, rape and occupy anything they fancied. Nasty.
The UK is about to be faced with a level of austerity, and a frustration of expectations, totally beyond anything experienced in recent generations. The most likely outcome will not be rioting (beyond a few broken windows) but widespread family breakdown, alcohol and substance-abuse, and, unfortunately a rise in crime. Given such a scenario, it is vital that a new structure is found to maintain law and order by using and controlling the gangs etc so that ALL citizens can be protected. Social Continence is one such idea about how this could be brought about. More details at www.socialcontinence.co.uk
Very good, but what is the point of discrediting ordinary protestors by slinging paint at shops and smashing their windows. If anarchists want to do this (god knows why they would want too, why not have their own separate demos and try and help the public undrstand what their (or your?) agenda really is?
ReplyDeleteThe most common anarchist activity these days is running social centres, squatted or otherwise, to try and spread the ideas of mutual aid and cooperation independent of capitalism and coercion. Check radicalroutes.org or the contacts directory on schnews.org.uk to see if there's one near you.
ReplyDeleteAs for the black bloc on demos, I'm not denying some choose stupid targets, and lord knows police and MI5 infiltrators are all to common, but sometimes they are more targetted (leaving locally-owned businesses alone and smashing bank windows etc., or blockading a specific road or area so the police can't get through).
LMFAO
ReplyDeleteWhat a hilarious load of conspiracy theory nonsense!!!!
Do your research mate!!!!!!!!!!
You are truly a massive lunatic.
They march around smashing things up for the mass media's cameras with no interruption from anyone. This means they are doing work (discrediting other protesters) that pleases the state (i.e. the security services). Someone leading these teenage idiots knows this.
ReplyDeleteI'm not saying anarchists individually BELONG to MI5, they are just directed by them from the top.....
....much like the BNP and 'Stop The War'.
This much is obvious to me, whatever you think you know.
this is all interesting ive seen these groups off anarchists at the student protests but i dont see any at the london riot or in manchester i would think they would like the destruction and the course most of it at other protests
ReplyDeleteI can't believe all this - there are at least two prominent social anarchist organisations in this country and many more Individualist Anarchists like myself. Furthermore, there is a veritable library of anarchist books - whether anarcho-communist or Free Market Anarchist ( not to mention a plethora of websites!). Just do two minutes of research for goodness sake!
ReplyDeleteWhat a load of bullshit. I know plenty of anarchists, I'm pretty sure they're not MI5 agents because they don't have enough money to be. Anarchists may for the most part be socialists but individualism is very important. How can you have a free society where individualism is suppressed? As Mikhail Bakunin said "Freedom without socialism is privilege, socialism without freedom is tyranny."
ReplyDelete"Yet they let the easy to spot "anarchists" run riot."
I think you're crediting the police with more competence than they possess here.
I didn't say (or mean to say) they are "MI5 agents". I'm saying their leadership and hence their collective activities are directed by MI5. These present the state with the image of protest that the state wants the public to see. Look at the police letting them smash windows. Look at the massed ranks of the press photographing one 'anarchist' showing his feelings. I'd lay money the anarchist in question is wearing coppers' boots.
ReplyDeleteThis is not a comment about anarchism as a philosophy......though I must admit to knowing little about this other than that it was used as convenient instrument of terrorism against anti-banker forces in the 1800's (Emma Goldstein's anarchist dupe assassinated President McKinley who was threatening to take money-creation back to the US Congress from the then equivalent of the privately-owned Federal Reserve)
Id like to know apparently Im all stitched up in Cheddar an its very quietly announced in a crossword in a Cheddar Valley Gazette. Id love to know David Kelly whose real name was Richard Griffiths was apparently Investigating me. As I have never been a member of any anarchy group anywhere in the UK. although based on the experience of the last 14 years. Im getting close to paying someone to torch something.
ReplyDeleteProbably a person.
David Flower, the man whose is actually famous as a bunch of flowers care of Eddie Izzarrd which ones assumes that Ed is Hard..or better still Head is hard.
You see Im a code breaker, it comes naturally which apparently makes very dangerous, currently my mathematics is really bad but if i perfect Maths as well, then I'll become not just a good word & symbolism decoder much like the "silence" early reference to silence would be Silons! is represented in the painting by Edvard Munch, which I happen to know in 1992 the British museum had never heard of this Dutch Man. That actually the most important statement is actually on the reverse of this painting not the one we can see. And because Im a good code breaker, they have been hounding me since about June 2000 when I sadly identiofied myself as being the one who wrote an offensive remark about who was to blame for killing Diana in 1997. Ive since tried to write to the Royal family, namely charles and his mum, but although the letter was acknowledged im still apparently having my email hacked, my computer keystroked and every time I apply for a job I am getting turned down even when I am almost over qualified. Now you could say its paranoia but when a man called Simon Kelly is dating you and then asks you if you trust him because he works for Mi5 and the next thing you know a bunch of strnagers keeping asking you if you smoke in exactly the same way, you keep being followed by blokes which have since been described as "walkers"..you know like Walkers crisps where they make the man in the walkers look like the bad guy? I realise that although they are very much trying to make me look like Im losing the plot, there is no more insanity in my head then there is insanity in suspecting that Diana was murdered because she got pregnant with one of the most dangerous men in the world and that was quite deliberate, can you imagine Prince William having a terrorist as a step father...wouldnt do much for International relationships would it? So an accidental car crash? No...you should the very tall woman in Body Worlds..the pregnant one. Her body says so much just by looking at her eue lashes, the only thing that escaped becoming a barbie doll all covered in plastic...that was sung by Aqua, that was Simon Kelly's favourite colour...He used to live in London and his friend used to live Streatham High Road at No 566. A bunch of 3 storey buildings with the equivalent of a house on top of a computer shop run by underground Islamists whio were being watched by what seemed to be a newly wed couple and who were in fact working for Mi5 or Mi6 or another security company maybe Samss and becuse of this the girl was hung. or Perhaps Im wrong and she had a history of suicide attempts and overdoses...Either way she eventually turned up hanging from the very old plaster ceiling. although trithfully I suspect she was strangled first and then hung from the Chandalier. Bunch Of flowers found her first quickly followed by griffiths and kelly....Roberts was the late arriver although it was she he was having a relationship with of course. Peanuts cause allergies. Especially for those working for security services.
Oh and you can call me on home number if you need photographic proof because Ive got that too.
ReplyDelete