A Loophole For A New Kelly Inquest?

.


Yesterday a story was published in the Daily Mail reporting that one Dr Richard Spertzel, "a leading UN weapons inspector", is calling for a full inquest into the death of Dr David Kelly.

Dr. Spertzel asserts that Dr. Kelly had been "on an Iraqi hit-list". (along with himself and 'a couple of others')

As the pressure for a proper inquest grows (an inquest that is likely to conclude that the Hutton narrative regarding Kelly's death is almost certainly false) is a loophole being created to direct probable blame for Dr. Kelly's death towards Iraqi agents?

We must ask this question holding the certain knowledge that any government-initiated official inquest most certainly will not find that Dr. Kelly's assassins were agents of that same government (or agents of an allied government, which would amount to the same thing).

This simply cannot happen.

Can it?.....

......can it?

Let's get real here.

It might be an idea to look at the character of Dr Richard Spertzel. Even Wikipedia (not exactly an anti-establishment source) says that his evidence to Congress about the pre-war WMD capabilities of Iraq was "strongly misleading".

Below* is the summary to his 2002 testimonial to the Congressional Committee.

The point is.....it does not look as if this is an individual who can be trusted. He was prepared to misrepresent Iraq's WMD capacity. Being an intelligent man he surely understood the appalling consequences of invasion and occupation of a country that provided no serious threat to the USA or even Israel, with its massive nuclear capability.

So, this is an individual sharing the personality characteristics of the majority of our degenerate ruling class, high intelligence coupled with low character.

Is he, by speaking to 'The Daily Mail', acting on the advice of 'Intelligence Services' as he obviously did in 2002 during the Congressional Iraqi WMD hearings?

Almost certainly yes.

Even if such hit lists did exist (and how can such a thing be proved or disproved), the purpose of this story can only be to furnish an escape route for any new Kelly Inquest that is forced into existence by the weight of public opinion.

Addendum 1

The alternative death narratives are being put in place now. Here is another story from today's Independent, 'Kelly had heart attack, says pathologist'.

Retired Pathologist, Dr. Jennifer Dyson, about whom there is no information on the web that I can find, asserts confidently that "Dr. Kelly was not murdered". Making such a statement immediately indicates that hers is a political rather than a seriously considered scientifically informed intervention.
How on earth could she know that? What qualifies her to utter such a definitive sentence. Based on this bluster, any serious analysis would surely conclude that, in this case, a fool had opened her stupid mouth.

From the same Independent article:

Evidence: Ten reasons to query the suicide verdict

1. An elbow injury had left David Kelly's right arm too weak to cut his wrist.

2. He had "difficulty swallowing pills" so he couldn't have swallowed 29 tablets.

3. Medical records about the case have been classified for 70 years, implying there's something to hide.

4. There were no fingerprints on the pruning knife used to cut his wrist.

5. He anticipated his own death, predicting he would "probably be found dead in the woods" if Iraq was invaded.

6. Doctors doubt the severed artery would have caused enough blood loss for him to have died of a haemorrhage.

7. The detective who found his body, Constable Graham Coe, said there wasn't much blood, so how could he have died of blood loss after slitting his wrist?

8. Two paramedics at the scene were sceptical the "wrist wound we saw" could have caused his death.

9. There was no evidence he was depressed; he was looking forward to his daughter's wedding.

10. His death certificate was not signed by a doctor or coroner and does not state a place of death.

Addendum 2

Here is the headline from the front page of today's (16th August) Daily Mail:

Dr Kelly: Just one in five believes it was suicide as official cause of death is branded 'impossible'.

Read full article.

Addendum 3

From Daily Mail 18th August: "It was never suicide, says Dr Kelly's cousin as family finally breaks silence"






*
Iraq's BW program in 2002:

I intentionally left this discussion to the end because much of the above discussions affect this response. In 1990, as stated above, Iraq's BW program was still in expansion and development. It probably had three bacterial agents, one bacterial toxin, one mycotoxin and one anticrop agent in its arsenal. Although Iraq denies it, Iraq had the equipment and know-how to dry BW agents in a small particle that would be highly dispersable into an aerosol. (Iraq acknowledges testing aflatoxin and Smut spores mixed with silica gel.) It still retains the necessary personnel, equipment (including spray dryer), and supplies to have an equal or expanded capability in this regard. It has had 12 years to advance its viral capability and, as I have cited elsewhere, this almost certainly includes smallpox as an agent. Even more ominous is Iraq's successful efforts to acquire the necessary equipment and reagents for adding genetic engineering to its BW repertoire. This was particularly alarming because, at the same time, key personnel in Iraq's virus and bioengineering BW program were no longer functional at their stated work locations. There is no doubt in my mind that Iraq has a much stronger BW program today than it had in 1990. Perhaps of most concern would be anthrax and tularemia bacteria and smallpox virus as well as antianimal and anticrop agents.

THE GROUND ZERO MOSQUE

.


(Associated Press): "......After skirting the controversy for weeks, President Barack Obama is weighing in forcefully on the mosque near ground zero, saying a nation built on religious freedom must allow it."

What commitment to principle! In spite of the fact they murdered 3000 Americans on this very spot, Muslims will be well treated and enjoy equal rights in every last corner of this great country.

One can only suppose that the majority of Americans that bought into 9/11 lies will simultaneously accept Obama's statement as evidence of how truly great and moral a country the U.S.A. is while simmering with barely contained rage at the proposed presence of Muslims on this holy site.

It will not occur to such innocent minds that this act of generosity towards Muslims is part of the global attack on Islamic countries, a Third World War........which has already begun.

Is there a contradiction between this act (that is already generating lots of usefully distracting rage, hot air and media column inches) and what the US government has being doing to Muslims all across the middle east?

Are Muslims not the chosen ENEMY?

The only explicable purpose of this decision is to stir up even more anti-Muslim sentiment in America.

America is NOT committed to religious freedom. Children in America are not allowed to wish each other "Happy Christmas" at Christmas time any more. As in the UK Christianity and Islam are under severe attack (while, surprisingly to some, the symbols of Judaism are increasingly on public display).

We appear to be in a build-up towards a great and final conflict. Iran is the first target preceding a showdown with China (and, perhaps, Russia).

Is it difficult to see how Israel can possibly survive any middle eastern war.

Perhaps, as Clif High says, Israel is to be sacrificed in order to draw western societies whole-heartedly into full support of its own war machine.

Do you remember the Ground Zero Mosque and how fair we tried to be towards these Muslims, yet look at how they treat us?

People need to understand NOW that our real government, the financial oligarchs that pull all the strings of our society.......politicians, media, corporations, the education system......are (unbelievable though it might sound) Satanists who are striving to fulfil an age-old plan to dominate all the earth under a single government run by themselves.

AND THAT THEY GET WHAT THEY WANT BY PROMOTING THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT THEY WANT.

You want to attack and occupy far-flung oil-rich middle eastern countries?

Attack yourself and blame them.

You want a monoculture entirely under your control. Promote 'diversity' to disempower any core interests in society.

Are you an elite group seeking total power over society?

Promote that society's self-empowerment via:

1) 'equal rights for all', i.e. no special consideration for the wishes of any group particularly the core group in a society.
2) 'material justice, ownership of the means of production by the workers (i.e. Communism)',
3)multiculturalism (which will end....[or is it already here?]......in a single state-sponsored culture),
4) 'feminism' which creates wage-slaves of women, undermines the family, makes sluts of your daughters..

etc, etc (see here)

oh....and if you want to destroy Islam.......promote its well-being in a way that is as offensive as possible to your own citizens.

A great many Iranians might die because of that Mosque.

Were I a Muslim I'd tell Barack Obama to stick his Ground Zero Mosque up his well-exercised ass.


Addendum
NOTICE HOW THOSE AMONGST US WHO WOULD DISPLACE GOD PUT ALL THEIR ENERGY INTO IMITATING GOD.

IN A TRULY CHRISTIAN SOCIETY ALL GROUPS AND ALL INDIVIDUALS WOULD BE RESPECTED AND MATERIAL WEALTH WOULD BE FAIRLY DISTRIBUTED, BUT THE MOTIVE FOR IMPLEMENTING SUCH PRINCIPLES WOULD BE LOVE OF GOD AND ONE'S NEIGHBOUR.

THE OLIGARCHS IMPLEMENT AN IMITATION CHRISTIANITY BUT THEIR MOTIVE IS NOT LOVE, IT IS POWER FOR THEMSELVES.

HEREIN LIES THE WICKEDNESS THAT IS OFTEN SO HARD TO PERCEIVE.

THESE PEOPLE ARE WELL AWARE OF WHAT THEY ARE DOING AND WHY.

LUCIFER IS THE SPIRIT THAT WISHES TO DECLARE ITSELF AS GOD.

THIS IS WHY TO SUCCESSFULLY MANIFEST THEIR NEW WORLD ORDER, THEY MUST DESTROY CHRISTIANITY.

WE MUST NOT BUY INTO THEIR SHALLOW FAUX-CHRISTIAN (i.e. LUCIFERIAN) POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

WE MUST EXPOSE THESE PEOPLE FOR WHAT THEY ARE TO AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE.

NO EFFORT IS WASTED IN THIS REGARD.

As A Tired Man Looks At Flies

.


They have given us into the hands of the new unhappy lords,
Lords without anger and honour, who dare not carry their swords.
They fight by shuffling papers; they have bright dead alien eyes;
They look at our labour and laughter as a tired man looks at flies.
And the load of their loveless pity is worse than the ancient wrongs,
Their doors are shut in the evenings; and they never sing a song.

From "The Secret People" by G.K. Chesterton


The spirit in creative mankind is changing and creative mankind leads enslaved mankind.

This spirit is changing and must change before it is made manifest.

Our loveless Lords recognise a threat to their interests immediately. They can easily deal with material threats from fellow criminals because they themselves are bigger and stronger criminals.

They also understand that the most serious challenges to their hegemony will arise as a result of spiritual changes; an increased connection of their subjects to truth, love, justice.

This is why they put so much effort into brainwashing ourselves and our children.

This is why they realise they MUST destroy Christianity.

But it cannot be done.

A spirit is rising that can never be defeated even though many of those that carry it may die.

A spirit is rising and it WILL be made manifest.

Sooner, hopefully, rather than later.

Perhaps even some of our unhappy Lords will themselves take a look at all their financially valuable but spiritually worthless estate.....

..... and decide that they too would prefer to sing.