Cut To The Chase

Here's a story from 'The Borowitz Report', a 'comedy' blogger in today's (29/06/2010) Huffington Post:

NEW YORK - In what is looming as another public relations predicament for Goldman Sachs, the banking giant admitted today that it made "a substantial financial bet against the Gulf of Mexico" one day before the sinking of an oil rig in that body of water.

The new revelations came to light after government investigators turned up new emails from Goldman employee Fabrice "Fabulous Fab" Tourre in which he bragged to a girlfriend that the firm was taking a "big short" position on the Gulf.

"One oil rig goes down and we're going to be rolling in dough," Mr. Tourre wrote in one email. "Suck it, fishies and birdies!"

Yes, the coincidences are just too much. This cynical satire on reality highlights Wall Street's foreknowledge of this disaster. We saw such foreknowledge with the pre-9/11 'put-options'. We saw it when Netanyahu was warned to stay in his hotel in London on the morning of 7/7 (not to mention the BBC Panorama 'exercise' in May 2004 that had bombs going off on three underground trains in different locations plus one overground explosion on a vehicle. Does this sound familiar?). So we learn to recognise a 'false-flag' event when we come across one.

In this case, a question cries out from some unpolluted corner of one's soul....

"Why?"

Surely it is not possible that the financial elite that govern us would create such an event as the Deepwater Horizon disaster on purpose?

But, by now we do know better.....there is only one possible conclusion to be drawn from the information.....

....the fact that Goldman Sachs sold 44% of their BP shares 3 weeks before the disaster....

....the fact that BP CEO Tony Hayward sold £1.4 million of his personal shares in BP a week before the disaster....

....and Halliburton bought the clean-up company Boots & Coots, 8 days before the disaster.

People are beginning to realise that this catastrophe could eclipse all previous environmental disasters put together.

"Suck it, fishies and birdies!".....and they're not the only ones.

There are many experienced commentators speculating about the full intention and possible consequences of this potentially unfixable problem.


But let us cut to the chase.

The material is an expression of the spiritual and the forces of darkness are in the process of making a full-on power grab. Their strategy has been ratcheting forward since 9/11 and now we seem to be at the beginning of a phase of real chaos and forced traumatic change.

There will be financial meltdown.

There will be war.

We cannot physically challenge the elite in any meaningful way. They hold all the levers of power. Watching the news on the BBC tonight I was surprised to see how the government is promising drastic cuts in police numbers and a reduction in the prison population as part of 'austerity measures'. Police cuts? Now? Just before society starts to fall apart? I am moved to suspect that they are expecting the lack of police numbers to result in police being unable to cope with civil unrest later in the year when the pain of the financial cuts really begins to bite. This would then give them a pretext for arming police forces much more heavily and introducing new deadly weapons(that we have read about but that remain, as yet, unused) for crowd-control.
The point is that violence, unless applied on a massive scale, will only serve to further empower the parasite that is determined to dominate us.

The enemy, our own elite, want to displace God. Like all criminals they practice the Luciferian principle. They are always ready to sacrifice others in service of self. If we play the game their way they will win. If we play their game so well that we defeat them we will become them and the common good will be no farther advanced.

What these people dread is the light of Christ.

Love them and they experience their own wretchedness.

Tell the truth and watch them panic and flail about in an attempt to silence words that cut like a knife.

Say it again. Watch them bleed.

If we all prayed at once they would shrink to nothing.

Remember that it is we the sheep that carry them. They can do nothing without our compliance.

Tell the truth to your companions, to your colleagues, to your partners, to your bosses. Create a culture in which we question every detail of the social engineering that enslaves our minds. Challenge our collective ethic at every opportunity. Persecute your MP with facts.

Most people can sense that the banking elite have somehow robbed our children of much of their futures. An awakening is changing and will change everything. Remember that things are very different today to how they were only five years ago. Five years ago anybody who put up a website saying that 9/11 was an inside job was likely to get a visit in the middle of the night from guys in black leather jackets and jeans. Saying nothing. Staring. Today, in the USA the truth about 9/11 is common knowledge. Here in the UK the same truth is well understood by millions who care to know.

We the people are abandoning the mainstream media. We know they are liars giving cover to the world's worst criminals.

The Muslims have their narrative, Buddhists theirs......but let us try to remember our own western narrative.

WE ARE CHRISTIANS.

There is such a thing as absolute truth. We believe in absolute truth. Like the sciences that have developed, here within our culture, we should take it as a given that there is a truth to be pursued. And when we find it, we affirm it and embrace it and trust it until experience leads us even deeper towards our source that is this absolute knowable truth.

There is a God. An absolute reality that can be approached and known ever more deeply.

We are all connected to and somehow part of each other and this ineffable loving God that was revealed to us in Christ. We must love our neighbors as ourselves. We must love our enemies. For those who have experienced the ecstasy of the presence of God this is not only possible but easy. We must become perfect as our 'Father in heaven'. For us, as Christians, there is a perfect vision and the realisation that the highest expression of our love of neighbor and sense of connectedness is sacrifice of oneself for the common good.

Actually, every human being recognises this truth instinctively, including the Mafiosa and the Satanist.

We are made in God's image, not Satan's. A rejection of God is a rejection of self.

As Christ said, "Those who have ears to hear, let them hear."

In contrast the criminal, the Mafiosa, the high-level Freemason and (unfortunately) the Pharasaical Talmudist choose as their ideal the sacrifice of others in service of self.

We cannot avoid directing attention to this conflict of principle. To look away from such truth because it is painful and difficult is to betray ourselves and betray our children.

It is also to betray Christ.

There were four main threads to Christ's life:
1) The love of God
2) The practice of love in his life and teaching
3) The healing of the sick, and
4) His firm opposition to and condemnation of Satan and Satan's servants.

2000 years ago the 'chosen people' were given their Messiah. Some accepted him and continued to walk in the Mosaic tradition. These Jews were the first Christians. The new Israel.
Some rejected Him, stuck with their leaders, the Pharisees and, now without God, decided to make Gods of themselves.

As we Christians have lost the love and practice of our faith, this Luciferian ideology, this religion that imitates the one that tried (and failed) to replace God, has thrived.

.....to the point where they control nearly all the earth. The Pharisees, their moneychanging pals and their criminal gentile imitators (who outnumber them) now bestride this narrow world.

Surely not for long.

Surely not for long.

What doth it profit a man if he gain the whole world but lose his own soul.

Pray, pray and pray again. So will the world be remade. Pray particularly that the lost amongst the chosen people find again the true path in Christ. It would be wonderful if they were to lead us to a new 'promised land'.....


.....but we will find our way there anyway.


GOD WINS.


.

Sherlock Holmes......or Clouseau? If I Were A Bee I Wouldn't Be Buzzing About This.

A major news item on the Radio 4 'Today' show this morning was the announcement of a £10 million 'Insect Pollinators Initiative'. The money will be spent trying to discover why our bees and other pollinating insects seem to be dying out.
This effect has been obvious to anyone with their eyes open for some years now. The disappearance of pollinators is clearly a potentially very serious issue indeed because of the possible effects on food production.

The puzzling thing about the interview with Professor Andrew Watkinson of the University of East Anglia (Uh-O, not those people who doctored their reports for the IPCC on 'climate change'), was that during the interview it became clear that the most obvious candidate for causing the disappearance was not going to be investigated.

That candidate is the electromagnetic (microwave) 'noise' associated with mobile phones. This has become an all-pervasive, if invisible, reality in our environment.

I live on a main road in Croydon. We have lavender bushes in our small front garden. Not very long ago there were always, but always, numbers of bees buzzing round these plants at this time of year. However, for the past five years or so one never sees a honey bee and only very occasionally a bumble bee in the same garden.

Just before this change occurred the roof of an old Post Office building across the road was selected as a site for mobile phone masts. There are now two or three dozen masts on this roof (the roof is high and not all masts are visible from the street or even loft rooms).

The connection between the disappearance of the bees and the mobile phone masts is a very obvious one to make.......

....so why is this not amongst the issues being directly investigated by Professor Watkinson's initiative?

WHY?

Here is a full list of projects funded:

Sustainable pollination services for UK crops
Dr Koos Biesmeijer, University of Leeds
Modelling systems for managing bee disease: the epidemiology of European Foulbrood
Dr Giles Budge, Food and Environment Research Agency
Investigating the impact of habitat structure on queen and worker bumblebees in the field
Dr Claire Carvell, NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
An investigation into the synergistic impact of sublethal exposure to industrial chemicals on the learning capacity and performance of beesDr Chris Connolly, University of Dundee
Linking agriculture and land use change to pollinator populations
Professor Bill Kunin, University of Leeds
Urban pollinators: their ecology and conservationProfessor Jane Memmott, University of Bristol
Impact and mitigation of emergent diseases on major UK insect pollinatorsDr Robert Paxton, Queen's University Belfast
Unravelling the impact of the mite Varroa destructor on the interaction between the honeybee and its virusesDr Eugene Ryabov, University of Warwick
Can bees meet their nutritional needs in the current UK landscape?Dr Geraldine Wright, Newcastle University

To my simple mind it simply beggars belief that this team of funded truthseekers are studiously avoiding carrying out an investigation into the prime suspect.

What can possibly be going on here? Professor watkinson says here that, ".......A lot of the problems in the past come from the fact that ecological research has been undertaken in a vacuum, divorced from political and governance issues of a country."

Oh, really? You mean like your 'climate change' investigations? How comical is that?

So, is this research being funded by 'Vodaphone' or what?

I'd like to help out the good Professor a little by directing him to the following fairly random collection of articles on the subject:

Electromagnetic radiation from cellphones appears to alter the behaviour of bees, her experiments suggest and add fresh evidence to observations reported by a team of German researchers seven years ago.

Changes in honeybee behaviour and biology under the influence of cellphone radiations

..and here is an archive of similar articles.

Is identifying what is killing off the bees a bit like identifying suspects in the 'War on Terror'?

Are our learned professors allowed to point the finger at absolutely anything provided it is not the guilty party?

......just asking

Bankers To Regulate Themselves. Another Step In The Right Direction

So the Bank Of England is to take over the regulatory powers of the Financial Services Authority? This might help the international banks manage their parasitism more effectively but it will not help us.

Our system is fundamentally skewed in favour of financial oligarchs in a manner that no 'regulation' can fix.

I have tried, quite hard, to find out who specifically controls the Bank Of England. One might as well try to paint the sky. We know that central banks and international bankers co-operate internationally. They say so. The BOE is controlled by these bankers, not by us nor our 'representatives', in spite of its 'nationalisation' in 1945. If the BOE really worked for us it would have created the £1 trillion or so given out during 'quantatitive easing' itself, at no interest, rather than borrowing it from the banking system.

.....and it could easily have done just that.

Now we must 'repay' this debt. In fact the bankers did not "pay" out anything at all. They created this debt out of thin air. The only people who do any paying are ourselves, the debtors.


The nature of the scam at the very heart of our culture is breathtaking. This cannot be emphasised often enough. Look at what 'quantitave easing' really is.

In 2008 the banks were skint. Not because of faulty loans but because of the thousand trillion dollars or so of (now valueless) toxic derivatives they created in their casino 'markets'. Individually, bankers created these derivatives primarily so that they could scam a commission every time a trade took place. Overall, this process was sanctioned to serve a larger strategic purpose.

The usual one.

Next we gave them trillions of pounds (globally) to put them back on their feet.

Where did we get this money?

Why, from the very same skint banking system that had lost everything, holding worthless 'assets' nominally valued at approximately ten times the value of everything on earth.

Now, having given them trillions (that they don't seem very interested in sharing with the rest of us, by the way), we owe THIS VERY SAME MONEY TO THE PEOPLE TO WHOM WE HAVE ALREADY GIVEN IT!!

PLUS EFFING INTEREST!!! (that could and will multiply this money by whatever number they choose.....as it is the banking system, here the Bank of England, that sets the interest rate)

These people are wolves devouring a flock of sheep (that's us).

Let us see what happens next (the cycle seems to work the same every time round). Our currencies are heading for collapse. The derivatives reality ensures this must happen. There are two possible outcomes in the short term:

1) These are the conditions that precipitate war, as the financial powers recharge their system and save their asses. In the aftermath, shattered countries are desperate for money for reconstruction and the debts created always inflate banking power to a new zenith.

2) We will experience a currency crisis. While this is occurring the banks will probably close for a few days. After this (if the capitalist system if allowed to persist) massive financial chaos will bankrupt millions and the possessions of the broken will fall into the hands of (who else) the banks. This is what happened in Germany between the Wars. At this time the bankers might be waiting with a big new idea. The replacement of the global capitalist system by a managed global economy....a kind of global Soviet Union.

Whatever they offer us through 'our' politicians, be sure that THEIR control will be hugely enhanced by whatever new mechanisms are put in place.

This will happen one way or the other.

WE NEED TO RESIST THIS DEVELOPMENT WITH EVERY FIBRE OF OUR BEING!

These people CANNOT FIX OUR SYSTEM. THEY are the problem. They ARE the enemy........not Muslims, not terrorists, not the BNP, nor any other demonised group. Just remember who is doing the demonising.....and why.

Our enemies are the oligarchs (and their international partners) at the top of our own ruling class !



Here is one simple argument demonstrating that we can know definitively that the banking interest controls every last corner of our society.

Surely we now know that debt, or usury, is the basis of our entire culture. It defines everything else about us.

But......the mechanism at the heart of this reality, the money creation at interest by privately owned corporations is NEVER discussed within our schools. We are not told how this system came about nor what came before it nor any of the alternative systems that have existed over the centuries. The same is true of universities. Business Schools educate their students within a sole invented (bullsh*t) economic paradigm that is the Keynsian model (i.e. THEIR model).

Likewise in the mainstream media and in the British Parliament (and Congress and the U.S. Senate). Never a suggestion that realistic alternatives and solutions to our current debt enslavement are perfectly possible. It is written into the EU Charter and Lisbon Treaty that European member states are FORBIDDEN from creating their own currency independent of the international banking system.......so whose interests are these treaties written to serve?

There is only one possible answer to that question and it is not 'we the people'.

The hyper-successful author, media darling, friend of the Rothschilds and Harvard Professor of Economic history, Niall Ferguson, wrote a best-selling history book recently called "The Ascent Of Money". I bought this book to see what he had to say about the struggle been successive US governments and the central bankers for control of America's money creation (and hence, control of the country and its politics). This is the real, vital history that has defined America at every stage of its development over the last two centuries.

Eight times the banks have been kicked out by the politicians. Eight times they have rallied, bought politicians and re-established financial hegemony until their final installation of The Federal Reserve in 1913 (JFK's Executive Order 11110 returned to the U.S. government the power to issue currency in June 1963, but this activity lasted as long as the remainder of his life, about 4 months).

The not-so-amazing discovery you can make for yourself on inspecting this 'top-notch' academic's highly-praised and 'definitive' history is that NOT A DETAIL OF THIS FUNDAMENTAL STRUGGLE APPEARS IN HIS NARRATIVE.

Everybody in any position of influence seems to know what is good for them.

This man is a fraud, a professional liar and a traitor to the interests of his own people.......and see how he prospers.

He is no exception, but rather represents the rule. Venal servitude and a lack of integrity are the passports to success. Politicians, businessmen, financiers, media persons, academics......it works the same everywhere.

The entire system is under the total control of the money power.

How can anybody deny this?

Raise these questions with your elected reprasentatives. Raise them with your work colleagues.

Educate for change.

Promote non-cooperation with authority and division among the ranks, particularly the higher ranks. How long would soldiers continue to fight in service of bankers, corporatists and drug-traffikers if they became aware they were fighting and dying, not to prevent terrorists from attacking their country but to further enrich and empower the super-rich and to more deeply enslave their families at home?
We, our brothers and our sisters are serving this beast by our participation in their systems. We may feel we have no choice but there is much we can do.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.




A brilliant article by Ellen Brown, "Deficit Terrorists Strike In The UK
Is The US Next?" on this same subject is well worth reading:
http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/deficit_terrorists.php



Also watch 'The Moneymasters' on Google Video (3 hour 35 minute documentary) to see the real history of money, its undermining of political systems, its financial collapses and wars. A brilliant exposition:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936#

Is Israel Acting Immorally?

Is Israel acting immorally?

This was the third of three 'Big Questions' to be debated on this Sunday morning's BBC flagship ethical debate show 'The Big Questions'.

A 'fault' developed early in the show and transmission was intermittent but the debate continued. What do you know, after 35 minutes (5 minutes before debate on Israel's morality was due) the show was taken off-air. Israel's 'immorality' was the first 'Big Question' ever not to be addressed by the programme's panel and studio audience.

I had been, frankly, amazed that such a question was being asked on the BBC.

Harbour doubts about the most ethical government in the world?....

....the most moral army?.....surely not!

This 'debate' was going to be a BBC 'first'.

The BBC normally gives Israeli spokespersons a ridiculously free hand to deliver their lies and deceptions. It also fails to broadcast the contrary voices that condemn Israel's actions and expose these lies.

(Only the Guardian (unusually) published this evidence contradicting the Israeli narrative. This is pretty basic information and gives ample justification for Turks attacking the commandos with sticks as they boarded. However, most people believe that the Israelis were responding to aggression. They don't know that some passengers were already dead from Israeli gunfire when the soldiers boarded.)

A minority of malcontents and dissidents are left to challenge Israeli 'morality' as they please.....

....BUT NOT ON THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA.......

After all, here are where the masses hang out!

This must be controlled!

Allow such thoughts to roam loose here and who knows what will happen next?

The people Israel Shamir calls "The Masters Of Discourse" have had it all their own way so far, but today....


......oops!

Here we go again.

The question will not be addressed after all.


Is anybody surprised out there???

.

If Faith Is Blind, Reason Is More So.

There is a debate today on a BBC comments page entitled "How Should Schools Teach Religion?" The majority of the posted responses are predictable and rather depressing.

A society's religion is the accepted collective narrative upon which that society's culture, spiritual, moral and political, is based. It is a mistake to imagine we are simply losing our religion. We are, mostly unknown to ourselves, by stealth, having one religion (Christianity) replaced by a different, politically correct, secular, humanistic, atheist religion that is being installed in its place.

The ‘comparative religion’ being taught in schools is a fraud against religion. Comparing different religions is not a worthless exercise but forensic comparison invites (and is intended to invite) a sense of 'grand illusion'. There is no ontological element in this approach. Everything is at a distance. There is nobody proclaiming the tremendous importance that one should adhere strictly to certain universal moral code. Thus real religion is destroyed and I believe that those who have made the decision to move religious curricula in this direction know it.


Bertrand Russell wrote a great deal about beliefs being generated in "The Impact of Science on Society". Here is a single quote:

The Intended Result of Education

“The completeness of the resulting control over opinion depends in various ways upon scientific technique. Where all children go to school, and all schools are controlled by the government, the authorities can close the minds of the young to everything contrary to official orthodoxy.

Here's another, an extract from Protocol IV of 'The Protocols of Zion'(written by a genius, 'The Protocols' describe in detail the crises that are being generated in the world today):

WE SHALL DESTROY GOD

3. But even freedom might be harmless and have its place in the State economy without injury to the well-being of the peoples if it rested upon the foundation of faith in God, upon the brotherhood of humanity, unconnected with the conception of equality, which is negatived by the very laws of creation, for they have established subordination. With such a faith as this a people might be governed by a wardship of parishes, and would walk contentedly and humbly under the guiding hand of its spiritual pastor submitting to the dispositions of God upon earth. This is the reason why IT IS INDISPENSABLE FOR US TO UNDERMINE ALL FAITH, TO TEAR OUT OF THE MIND OF THE "GOYIM" THE VERY PRINCIPLE OF GOD-HEAD AND THE SPIRIT, AND TO PUT IN ITS PLACE ARITHMETICAL CALCULATIONS AND MATERIAL NEEDS.

Real religious education says, loud and clear, not only "these are the standards by which we must live" but also that there is a greater reality than man and that we cannot trust the powerful to lead us to the truth of this reality (as we are now allowing their 'think-tanks' to do) when, as everybody knows and as Christ has taught, the powerful are almost invariably the enemies of truth.

The financial powers that own most of the world and rule us wish to secure their power. The surest way for them to do this is to destroy the very idea of God so that people will look to other people for guidance (and we know who the powerful have in mind to do the guiding). Like Lucifer, the dominant group have decided they can replace God.

To understand what is happening in our schools regarding religious education we must think, not about religion but about power and its objective. The truly powerful have got where they are by wiping out other competing centres of power. This is obvious and well known. It is this process to which people should relate the ideological paradigms that are put before us. Who has an agenda and what is that agenda?

The family, our sense of nation and racial coherence are all under attack. Religion too, for the same reasons......and most people who pick up arguments promoted in the media do not understand (no more, most often, than those who write them) whose work they are doing.

If faith is blind, reason is more so.


ADDENDUM (June 6th 8pm)
I have just received Bishop Williamson's weekly article by email and it covers very similar ground to the above. As many will know the good Bishop has recently been in a great deal of trouble with the press, the courts and even his own order, the SSPX, over statements he has made about 9/11 and the Auschwitz gas chambers in particular.

Bishop Williamson is nothing if not an honest man and his own rebellion (along with the rest of his order) within the catholic Church has been against the new (heretical) teachings of the Vatican II Council in the late 1960's. Here is the article (I have BW's permission to use it):


ELEISON COMMENTS CXLXI (6 June, 2010) : CONCILIAR "THEOLOGIAN" I.



The havoc wrought upon souls throughout the world by the 1960's collapse of the mass of Catholic bishops at the Second Vatican Council, is immeasurable. So one can hardly reflect too much on the essential problem, because it is still very much with us, in fact more so than ever. It threatens to send all of our souls down to Hell. Last year the Italian fortnightly periodical, Si Si No No, published an article summarising the main errors of a pioneer "theologian" of Vatican II, the French Dominican Fr. Marie-Dominique Chenu. Laid out still more briefly below, his six errors point to the heart of the problem: the putting of man in the place of God (I have changed their order - thereby hangs a tale for another "EC") :



1 Turning to man, as though it is God that needs to be adapted to modern man, and not modern man to God. But Catholicism strives always to fit man to God, and not the other way around.



2 Submitting divine Revelation to modern ways of thinking, e.g. Descartes, Kant, Hegel. No more is there any absolute, objective Truth. All religious statements become merely relative and subjective.



3 Submitting divine Revelation to the historical method, meaning that every truth arose merely in its historical context, so that just as every historical context was or is changing, so no truth is unchanging or unchangeable.



4 Believing in pantheistic evolution, meaning that God is no longer the Creator essentially distinct from creation. He becomes no different from creatures, which come into being by evolution, and by evolution are constantly changing.



5 Putting feelings first in matters of religion, i.e. putting religious sentimental experience above either supernatural Faith in the mind or supernatural Charity in the will.



6 Denying the difference between good and evil, by claiming that the mere existence of a human act makes it good. Now it is true that every human act that happens has the goodness of being, but it only has moral goodness if it is ordered to its end, which is ultimately God. Human acts not ordered to God are morally evil.



The six errors are obviously inter-connected. If (1) religion is to center on me, then (2&3) I must unhook my mind from reality, where religion centers on God. With the mind crippled, then (4) "nothing is but what is not", so everything evolves, and (5) feelings take over (whereupon religion is by the fault of men feminized, because emotion is women's prerogative). Finally, where feelings replace truth, (6) morality collapses.



In the Vatican II documents themselves, these errors are rather more implicit than explicit, because the errors had to be disguised for the documents to get the vote of the mass of Catholic bishops who were attending the Council but were not yet sufficiently up-dated. However, these errors represent the fully up-dated "spirit of Vatican II", which is where the Council was headed, and that is why the official Church has been on a path of self-destruction for the past 45 years : 1965 to 2010. For how many more years ?


Kyrie eleison.