Below are events that provoked or justified wars or power grabs, and may have had sinister or traitorous truths behind them. (source)
•1898 - The attack on the USS Maine that provoked the Spanish-American War is often theorized to be a False Flag perpetrated by the U.S.
•1931 - The Mukden Incident, where Japan blew up it's own railway, was used to justify the invasion of Manchuria
•1933 - The Reichstag Fire that the Nazis used to justify taking control of Germany
•1939 - The Gleiwitz Incident - a faked Polish attack on Germany, used by the Nazis to justify invading Poland
•1953 - Operation Ajax - The CIA's coup d'etat and overthrow of Mohammed Mossadeq, the elected Prime Minister of Iran
•1962 - Operation Northwoods - A plan by the U.S. Military to conduct several terrorist attacks on U.S. soil, and blame it on Cuba. JFK refused to approve the action, and so it was scrapped.
•1964 - The Gulf of Tonkin incident that justified the US entry into the Vietnam War. A report declassified in 2005 revealed the US fired first, and one of the two exchanges of the incident might not have even happened.
•1970s - The Piazza Fontana Bombing and later terrorism acts associated with Operation Gladio - False flag terrorism conducted by Italy (with CIA assistance) against it's own people as part of the political Strategy of Tension.
•1999 - the Russian Apartment Bombings that provoked the Second Chechen War, were actually conducted by the FSB (Russia)
September 11th 2001 - brought us our latest production, the "War On Terror" and the invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq and, most recently, the attacks on Pakistan, a covert war the main purpose of which is to break up Pakistan into statelets and deny the Chinese a pipeline delivering Iranian oil directly into China.
It has been clear for some time that the government of the USA/UK/EU/Israel, the international banking cartel, has been trying to whip up enthusiasm for a war with Iran. They have met with serious resistance to the idea from within. Many of their managing agents (our elected governments) and many military leaders will not co-operate, it seems.
Thank you, good people.
Today we read that ‘All out war’ is threatened over a North Korean attack on the South Korean warship Cheonan.
IF EVER AN ACT OF WAR HAD 'FALSE FLAG' WRITTEN ALL OVER IT, THIS IS IT.
The bankers system is collapsing around them. We are at the start of a 'second wave' of the banking crisis that began in the autumn of 2008. There is a major danger, perhaps even an inevitability, that major world currencies will collapse. The public are 'waking up' to the diabolical reality at an unprecedented rate. See Zbigniew Brzezinski discussing his fears of the global awakening here.
It appears that only a major war can create the conditions that will inject 'confidence' into the markets and save the global financial system in a way that serves the moneylenders interests. The system is going down anyway. This is obviously a desired reality. If political power had wanted to save the current system it would have banned Hedge Funds, reinstalled the Glass-Steigel Act and taken other serious measures to prevent future destruction by their own licenced criminals.
But no! In order to instal the desired world currency and one-world government humanity must be made desperate enough to accept the extreme solution these interests will have waiting to solve whatever crisis they engineer for us. Their problem now is that a mere financial crisis is not enough. Humanity is 'catching on'. Merkel, only yesterday, banned the most destructive activities of Hedge Funds in Germany (not that this in itself will change anything), but it shows that nations will stop taking orders and stand up for themselves if push comes to shove.
So that war with Iran (that would obviously lead to a world war) is needed NOW!.....
.......and if that can't be started, and for all Israel's efforts on the world stage it cannot, then perhaps North Korea will do.
It is interesting that Iran and North Korea are the only two countries (I think) whose monetary systems operate entirely independently of 'ours'. It seems it is financial independence that marks a country out as 'the enemy'.
Who, one wonders, are the team of 'international investigators' that have declared North Korea guilty of this criminal act of war?
.........So the torpedo that struck the Cheonan had Korean markings on it?.........well, of course it did! How would we have known that Mohammad Attah was the 'leader of the 9/11 terrorists' if we didn't find his almost undamaged passport in the dust of the World Trade Centres? We know how this stuff works now.
Here is the most obvious question relating to the sinking of the Cheonan:
How could it possibly benefit North Korea to have suddenly, out of the blue, made itself the possible target of a massive military attack by South Korea and its (American) allies?
ANSWERS BELOW PLEASE....... I have to tell you, I can't think of any.
......on the other hand, what does the internation banking system stand to gain from a World War that leaves a desperate and ruined world on its knees, crying out for assistance?
ANSWER.........the same as the last two times except even more so now because:
a) Their agenda is now so much further advanced (so near and yet so far? Please God, let it remain so) and
b) Their very survival might depend on it.
So here is the question again......what does the international banking globalist conspiracy have to gain from this incident?
ANSWER
EVERYTHING.
PS
On 23 rd July 2010 the following report appeared in the L.A. Times (it seems even the South Koreans now smell a rat). It is possible the sinking was a simple accident caused by the Cheonan hitting rocks in shallow water causing many deaths and that this sad event was used as a 'false flag' by manufacturing phony 'evidence' to pin responsibility on the North Korean regime:
Reporting from Seoul — By Barbara Demick and John M. Glionna, Los Angeles Times
DOUBTS SURFACE ON NORTH KOREA'S ROLE IN SHIP SINKING
Some in South Korea dispute the official version of events: that a North Korean torpedo ripped apart the Cheonan.
The way U.S. officials see it, there's little mystery behind the most notorious shipwreck in recent Korean history.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton calls the evidence "overwhelming" that the Cheonan, a South Korean warship that sank in March, was hit by a North Korean torpedo. Vice President Joe Biden has cited the South Korean-led panel investigating the sinking as a model of transparency.
But challenges to the official version of events are coming from an unlikely place: within South Korea.
Armed with dossiers of their own scientific studies and bolstered by conspiracy theories, critics dispute the findings announced May 20 by South Korean President Lee Myung-bak, which pointed a finger at Pyongyang.
They also question why Lee made the announcement nearly two months after the ship's sinking, on the very day campaigning opened for fiercely contested local elections. Many accuse the conservative leader of using the deaths of 46 sailors to stir up anti-communist sentiment and sway the vote.
The critics, mostly but not all from the opposition, say it is unlikely that the impoverished North Korean regime could have pulled off a perfectly executed hit against a superior military power, sneaking a submarine into the area and slipping away without detection. They also wonder whether the evidence of a torpedo attack was misinterpreted, or even fabricated.
"I couldn't find the slightest sign of an explosion," said Shin Sang-chul, a former shipbuilding executive-turned-investigative journalist. "The sailors drowned to death. Their bodies were clean. We didn't even find dead fish in the sea."
Shin, who was appointed to the joint investigative panel by the opposition Democratic Party, inspected the damaged ship with other experts April 30. He was removed from the panel shortly afterward, he says, because he had voiced a contrary opinion: that the Cheonan hit ground in the shallow water off the Korean peninsula and then damaged its hull trying to get off a reef.
"It was the equivalent of a simple traffic accident at sea," Shin said.
The Defense Ministry said in a statement that Shin was removed because of "limited expertise, a lack of objectivity and scientific logic," and that he was "intentionally creating public mistrust" in the investigation.
The doubts about the Cheonan have embarrassed the United States, which will s begin joint military exercises Sunday in a show of unity against North Korean aggression. On Friday, an angry North Korea warned that "there will be a physical response" to the maneuvers.
Two South Korean-born U.S. academics have joined the chorus of skepticism, holding a news conference this month in Tokyo to voice their suspicions about the "smoking gun:" a piece of torpedo propeller with a handwritten mark in blue ink reading "No. 1" in Korean.
"You could put that mark on an iPhone and claim it was manufactured in North Korea," scoffed one of the academics, Seunghun Lee, a professor of physics at the University of Virginia.
Lee called the discovery of the propeller fragment five days before the government's news conference suspicious. The salvaged part had more corrosion than would have been expected after just 50 days in the water, yet the blue writing was surprisingly clear, he said.
"The government is lying when they said this was found underwater. I think this is something that was pulled out of a warehouse of old materials to show to the press," Lee said.
South Korean politicians say they've been left in the dark about the investigation.
"We asked for very basic information: interviews with surviving sailors, communication records, the reason the ship was out there," said Choi Moon-soon, an assemblyman with the Democratic Party.
The legislature also has not been allowed to see the full report by the investigative committee, only a five-page synopsis.
"I don't know why they haven't released the report. They are trying to cover up small inconsistencies, and that has cost them credibility," said Kim Chul-woo, a former Defense Ministry official who is now an analyst with the Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, a government think tank.
A military oversight body, the Board of Inspection and Audit, has accused senior naval officers of lying and concealing information.
"Military officers deliberately left out or distorted key information in their report to senior officials and the public because they wanted to avoid being held to account for being unprepared," an official of the inspection board was quoted as telling the South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo.
The Cheonan, a 1,200-ton corvette, sank the night of March 26 about 12 miles off North Korea. The first report issued by Yonhap, the official South Korean news agency, said the ship had been struck by a torpedo, but soon afterward the story changed to say the ship sank after being grounded on a reef.
The military repeated that version for days. The audit board found that sailors on a nearby vessel, the Sokcho, who fired off 35 shots with a 76-millimeter cannon around the time of the sinking, were instructed to say they'd been shooting at a flock of birds, even though at first they had said they'd seen a suspected submarine on radar.
On April 2, as Defense Minister Kim Tae-young was testifying before the National Assembly, a cameraman shooting over his right shoulder managed to capture an image of a handwritten note from the president's office instructing him not to talk about North Korean submarines.
Such inconsistencies and reversals have fueled the suspicions of government critics. U.S. officials, however, say the panel's conclusion is irrefutable.
Rear Adm. Thomas J. Eccles, the senior U.S. representative on the panel, said investigators considered all possibilities: a grounding, an internal explosion, a collision with a mine. But they quickly concluded that the boat was sunk by a bubble-jet torpedo, which exploded underneath the vessel and didn't leave the usual signs of an explosion, he said.
"The pattern of damage was exactly aligned with that kind of weapon," Eccles said in a telephone interview. "Torpedoes these days are designed to drive underneath the target and explode. They use the energy of their explosion to make a bubble that expands and contracts. It is designed to break the back of the ship."
Pyongyang, meanwhile, denies involvement in the sinking and calls the accusation against it a fabrication.
South Koreans themselves appear to be confused: Polls show that more than 20% of the public doesn't believe North Korea sank the Cheonan.
Wi Sung-lac, South Korea's top envoy for North Korean affairs, says the criticism from within has made it difficult to get China and Russia on board to punish Pyongyang for the attack.
"They say, 'But even in your own country, many people don't believe the result,' " Wi said.
PPS Report July 28th 2010
Russia says sea mine sunk Cheonan
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2923819
JULY 28th-Russia Today: Cheonan sunk by mine, not North Korea?
US Envoy Writes of Israeli Threats
33 minutes ago
