No Gay Gene

.
This story is a year old but it's new to me.

From the article:
"Although there is no mention of the research that influenced this new position (from The American Psychological Association), it is clear that efforts to 'prove' that homosexuality is simply a biological fait accompli have failed. The activist researchers themselves have reluctantly reached that conclusion. There is no gay gene. There is no simple biological pathway to homosexuality."

Perhaps someone should tell Peter Thatchell.

For years the media have been whispering in our ears that homosexuality is a universal and massive reality in our midst. Wikipedia suggests that 20% of the population have "some homosexual feelings". It also states that, "Gay and lesbian people often live healthy, well adjusted, happy lives" and that "many gay and lesbian people are in a committed same-sex relationship".

While this may be true for some gay people, more usually, for all kinds of reasons, the lives of compulsively 'gay' people is anything but "happy and well adjusted". It is also well known that male homosexual behaviour is notoriously promiscuous with casual sex with complete strangers being not uncommon behaviour.

Without wishing any harm to self-indentified 'gays', should we not revert to thinking of homosexuality as a developmental disorder, like any other.

We should harbour no ill-will towards people trying to come to terms with such difficulties but we should not allow a 'gay agenda' (which has been adopted by our liberal secular humanist political classes) to dictate moral principle to society at large.

Homosexual relationships should not be equated with heterosexual relationships. The plumbing speaks for itself.

Marriage and the family, which have been so seriously damaged by modern sexual mores, need to be vigourously defended from the social engineers who have been working tirelessly to destroy everything that binds us.

Gay "marriage" is not marriage at all. It is an offense against marriage, a sacred commitment not only to relationship but also to children produced in that relationship. Traditional marriage between a man and a woman should, and must, be a rock in society.

Today we know it is anything but.

Henry Makow has written extensively about the determination of the powerful to gain increased control over societies by undermining all that unites us, including normal sexual and familial relations.

There is a very telling moment in Alex Jones' interview with Aaron Russo about his relationship with one of the Rockefellers when Russo tells of being let in on the secret that the Rockefeller Foundation was responsible for the global promotion of feminism in the media, precisely to undermine society and excercise increased control over it. (Watch the whole interview here. It's brave and brilliant).

Last month the Office For National Statistics in the U.K. released figures that revealed that only 1.5% of Britons say they are gay or bisexual.

Not 20%. Not the more commonly stated figure of 'about 10%' (which is roughly the figure for soap-opera gays). Not the 'more careful' estimate bandied about in 'serious' articles of 5%.......but only one and a half percent.

Our minds have been under assault for a long time on such issues of sexual norms and sexual rights and the price paid by society at large and children in particular has been huge.

Let us hope that the gay juggernaut will be driven into reverse and that we will (eventually) return to more natural and healthy societal norms.

It is not a matter of wanting to damage or even reject homosexual people. It is simply that we need to turn back the tide of evidence-free 'gay' propaganda in order to create a society that is good for the majority and their children.

Not good for the corrupt elite who want to control us, no matter what......

.....nor for a disordered small minority, some of whom cannot believe their luck.